Anyone else who had the misfortune of growing up and spending time around these animals knows how sadistic and cruel they can be when it comes to picking on weaker people, but what about love and relationships? From what I’ve seen, their women and any other woman stupid enough to fall in with them was fair game to be passed around and used as often as possible, usually by multiple people at a time. Monogamy? Forget it. One article I read puts it like this:
>”There is something else that is striking about blacks. They seem to have no sense of romance, of falling in love. What brings men and women together is sex, pure and simple, and there is a crude openness about this. There are many degenerate whites, of course, but some of my white students were capable of real devotion and tenderness, emotions that seemed absent from blacks — especially the boys.”
Their “culture” seems to centered on sex and debauchery, plain and simple. So my question is, is this an IQ thing or what? The way I see it, they are basically what happens when a pit bull becomes halfway sentient. For years, society has covered the food and housing bills, so all that’s left is to seek stimuli and the most arousing is sex besides fighting and beating people up. What do you guys think?
nigger culture has made its way to this country as well, especially their genre of "music" ties in with the "roadman" culture which i'm pretty sure is just the nigger version of chavs
Jason James
Negroes are the original Jews. Those Jews killed Jesus. Therefore, the darker the negro, the higher the probability of them being closer to the original bloodline. Similarly, the darker the negro, the higher the probability of being a soulless psychopath who would murder the son of God.
Joshua Thompson
Criminals can be any race. I find mutts to be more violent. Usually bad parenting, or no parents. Feral children without good mentors. Of course, some people are unstable regardless..
Chase Kelly
I don't think it's merely a function of IQ; there are plenty of examples of retards and even gorillas exhibiting tenderness and love. It's something else, though it undoubtedly has a genetic basis.
In Africa, it's possible that pair-bonding, for some reason, confers less of a benefit to the species overall. Maybe it's because it's not as necessary to separate into "families" because there are no harsh seasons to prepare for, maybe it's because their nomadic lifestyle made such bonds harder to maintain.
Maybe it's some kind of feedback loop with their other traits-- Negroids aren't as smart, so maybe they're just not smart enough to jealously mate-guard as other races i.e. they're too easy to dupe, meaning that anyone who DOES mate guard is an instant loser. The whole population becomes saturated with males who exhibit high mating-effort, and little else.
Daniel Taylor
The number one predictor of criminality is low iq and single motherhood. If you have both of those you can make a very safe bet the person will be criminal. Guess which group has the lowest iq and highest rates of single motherhood? Go on...guess.
Zachary Morris
Obviously there are outliers, but it’s intellectually dishonest to both you and I for you to sit here and try to somehow excuse the 90% of negroes that are feral animals because 20% of whites are. This thread is not for that and your civicuckery isn’t welcome here.
David Brown
negroes lack a soul, they can only mimic those with souls.
Wyatt Flores
Interesting. I’ve read theories that the reason they develop faster than other races is because they had such a low life expectancy in Africa for thousands of years. If you had any recommended reading I’d be interested in taking a look at it.
Liam Watson
No. They have no remorse, no understanding of any future ramifications, and no belief of anything beyond their own immediate urges. It is why Africa has not progressed beyond shit caked mud and stick huts.
Michael Harris
Bantus conquered the majority of the African continent through brute force and numbers. You think they evolved to understand emotions that leave them vulnerable? >No
>we are separated by 40,000 years of evolution and science expects us to believe that we are exactly the same
Daniel Reyes
me on the bottom right
Jackson Sullivan
I am 40 years old and been here for almost 15 years. This is the best description of niggers I have ever seen. I would upvote/hump leg/thumbs up you, but it is not a function on this site.
Christopher Green
congratulations, Josea. At least you're not a weeping bitch like Tywuan.
Ryder Hall
The only way they know how to express feelings of love and friendship is by mimicking what they see on tv or movies
Brandon Myers
3 have no souls 2 have evil souls and maybe 1 has some sort of soul, something comparable to a monkey I would imagine
Liam Bennett
They develop faster because their biology basically cuts corners with developing their brain. I know that sounds like Cleetus-tier racism to normal people, but it's literally true.
So much of our energy is used by our brains, and they take a LONG time to adapt. The main benefit that our huge (as compared to the blacks only moderately big) brains gave us, in ancient times, wasn't mastery over nature. That's a common misconception with Jow Forumsacks though I can understand why they believe it.
It doesn't actually take much brain power to learn how to take a stick to a termite mound, or how to dig up a tuber. It doesn't even take that much brain power to stockpile food for winter, as a lot of people think. The real reason our brains are so big is because our evolutionary pressures pitted our intellectual capacities against each other. Basically, we have evolved to outsmart EACH OTHER.
The evolutionary path africans took was r-selection. Rather than spend a lot of time raising up a tribe of geniuses who can march to military victory, they focused on just having LOTS of kids. Even if you only kill one of them for every two of your guys killed, if you have kids at three times his rate, in a few generations you'll own everything. This seems to me to be how the congoids (the "latest" model of African, maybe only 3000 years old) replaced all the other people in Africa starting ~1500 years ago.
Read about the Bantu Expansion. Avoid Wikipedia if possible, because its article on the subject is heavily censored. They spare no verbal gymnastics to avoid saying it was an expansive, violent, and bloody conquest. Lots of "traditional warriors in traditional garb" and "traditional weapons" dug up as artifacts, but not a single mention of any traditional wars. That article is seriously outrageous-- when you look at how many wars happened between and within every group of people who has ever existed, the absence of conflict in their account is incredible.
Asher Butler
Also it's possible they have less empathy because weaklings among them are expendable. There's far less reason to keep someone alive when there's nothing that they can do that you can't. So populations with a lot of unpunished murderers and sociopaths wouldn't have shrunk and died off like they would have among k-selected groups. If anything, it'd make the survivors more formidable in inter-group conflict.
Dylan Bennett
>I know that sounds like Cleetus-tier racism to normal people, but it's literally true it's not Cletus tier it is literally easily verifiable just go check out cranial capacity by race, wikipedia of all places still had an article on it last i checked unless they deleted it recently
Yes, but also the result of environmental determanism, if you have spent millions of years evolving in a hostile environment where you can be killed at any second what is the point of romance or careful mate selection? You simply take what you want. What is the point of planning for the future if at any second you could be killed and have no future? You simply take what you want.
Essentially before we arrived these people would have lived in small tribes and their environment would have stopped their population from getting out of control.
Hudson Lopez
Not culture. Time preference.
Whites have a long time-preference. They like the idea of a secure future, having things stockpiled away for hard times.
Blacks have a much shorter time-preference. Preparing for things beyond the here and now seems pointless to them. The point in getting things is to enjoy them, right? Why delay?
In their native habitat, it makes absolutely no sense to have a long time preference. This is because someone will just knock you out (or just kill you) and take your stuff. Rather than being an advantage, having lots of resources stored away is actually a LIABILITY. You haven't consumed the product of your effort yet, and it's more likely to get stolen by someone else. Instead, you should eat whatever you can whenever you can get it, and always be on the lookout for more, be ready to attack for it if you have to.
I remember someone on here told a story (might have been a screencap or a greentext) about how a black man he met on a mission trip in africa had baked a bunch of bread rolls to sell in town. Well, he hadn't sold all of them when his worthless moron brother or uncle (some relative) came along and was offended at him selling these rolls rather than giving them to him and his kids. For various reasons he couldn't refuse-- It's like the robber culture has become enshrined as an institution. Just go ahead and give it away, because if you don't he'll come back with a gang, beat you up, and take it.
James Bell
>Roadman
Oh god when I see white lads acting like Jamaicans it's fucking cringe as fuck. They fucking worship them too! If there is a black lad around they way they all kiss ass is fucking disgusting. Thankfully it's mainly low IQ whites who live on council estates though.
