Monarchism (part 2)

Can we get a thread going for the best form of government

First thread

Attached: 2ACDBE30-0D64-49A4-BA6D-3D0C180CC52D.jpg (1667x2500, 1.53M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=TXXdOqaI4mc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Meritocracy > Monarchism

Bump

https://
discord.
gg/hWjA6c

Attached: 396E6407-53FC-4372-98EE-EFCBDB304B21.jpg (1080x1317, 157K)

Bump

Attached: 0E29726B-AAF4-4D91-87AA-3B3AB55538BB.jpg (341x500, 61K)

>starting OP with one of the worst examples of Monarchy
Splendid.

Hereditary monarchism is shit. However, if you have an EDUCATED (politics, economy, ethics, philosophy, warfare, etc.) aristocracy that elects a monarch (Like the HRE) then you have the best form of government possible.

Also bump
youtube.com/watch?v=TXXdOqaI4mc

Attached: Tepes.jpg (459x456, 39K)

My favourite king

Attached: 2AC1C520-55EC-4C60-B921-F3330B754EC5.jpg (703x704, 80K)

I can’t believe I’m here but a few years back some autists on Jow Forums were into monarchism and I thought they were idiots but the last couple years have made it clear to me that democracy and freedom are actual a curse for the npc plebs that make up 80% of the population.

People have no reason and can’t be trusted to govern themselves ina good way.

Monarchy, even despotic monarchy is better

This

Bump
none of that constitutional shit

Attached: gooks.webm (400x400, 1.32M)

If monarchism is so great, why is Britain a first world shithole?

Cause its constitutional monarchism and the monarch has virtually no rights. A president without the elections. Everything still depends on the parliament

Because they have a parliament

uk. How that islamic shithole arresting people for their tweets works? Sweden too.

repeat: armed men punishing law being perverted. Corrupt judges. police. politicians. lawyers.

You're welcome

That's a false dilemma fallacy. Monarchism (which has many disadvantages) isn't the only option to democracy.

The greatest strength in Monarchism is the aesthetics and the LARP.
You know its true.

What?

I support monarchism I don’t think people have the ability nor inclination for self governence

then you're just a dumb peon. Monarchs are people, you know. You had king 0dumbo, I can take on him anytime, (white people rules in any category, mofo jews, brain, height or dick).

You had monarchy already (Bush) and almost had Clintons, soon nigger Michael again

chop chop

Attached: frenchrevolution2.jpg (540x303, 23K)

Bump

https://
discord.
gg/hWjA6c

Attached: 4ACC5E09-C1DF-4B24-8ADF-DF9BF68C605C.jpg (320x259, 37K)

Bump

Attached: 4271022B-4209-4605-8D8F-A92FEE35E10C.jpg (995x521, 77K)

As I said: tha's a false dilemma fallacy. I agree that people are incapable of self governence, but Monarchism isn't the only alternative to democracy.

Implying the monarchs here or in sweden have any power other than telling people about mental health or planting trees with King Ngubu Mwembe XII of Chad

Really what would you suggest?

Bump

https://
discord.
gg/hWjA6c

Attached: 8BDB3DF9-BF5A-474A-BD08-AB7E2CE34C1F.jpg (1073x521, 152K)

Fancy yourself being a dominion again?

Yes

Well honestly I don't how much would it be better. Britain is not much better than Canada