Women are being asked to record ‘consent videos’ before sex

>A WORRYING new trend is seeing women being asked to record "consent videos" before having sex with men who fear they will be accused of assault afterwards.

>This post #MeToo dating trend involves one partner filming the other giving them verbal consent before they engage in a sexual act.

>This then allows the person who recorded the video to use it as "evidence" that their partner gave consent before having sex.

thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7867376/women-consent-videos-before-sex-recorded-accused-rape-assault/

Attached: 1540417431304.jpg (537x594, 45K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/vYTbxpSLMUw
youtu.be/XLmxkaNMl2A
youtu.be/lIBJFAsYSWQ
youtu.be/-WUvDgJVd6A
youtu.be/El9RVIl47ZI
youtu.be/622nXHK_J9E
youtu.be/VNn3i1aakIs
youtu.be/sJM2HLYtW38
youtu.be/nTn6UMzAgZY
youtu.be/vWeoen7hPhY
youtu.be/wl8XMUo9vcQ
youtube.com/watch?v=GKBtMLOC2oU
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Attached: DtZJoZwV4AII90R.jpg (675x1200, 53K)

Attached: Dm9UdX1UUAEb9N7.jpg (500x253, 36K)

How is this a bad thing? Isn't this exactly what they'd wanft?

Doesnt matter. Women will just say they revoked consent during/after the sex, and therefore it is now rape. Women are sneaky and conniving, never trust them

>want men to get consent
>complain when they ask for proof of consent

Giving them rights was a mistake.

Daily reminder that if you haven't gone MGTOW yet and spend any time pursuing cunts, you are literally fucking retarded.

Attached: chadmgtow.jpg (2047x1208, 342K)

Look the best solution is to use a webcam and have 'group sex' with other couples over the webcam.

This way the consent will be recorded by the webcam in such a way as to keep it fun for females. Females definitively find sex a more social activity than males, who are mostly focused on personal pleasure because of the intense feelings they experience.

Women, in general, do not like having sex with one man alone in a dark room who video tapes them for consent...

>worrying
why because they cant make false claims?

>In other words, these worrying videos function as an insurance policy if someone is accused of assault or rape afterwards

Ain't nothing wrong with it. Can't trust thots.

Here is an opportunity to learn some unique redpills from The Based Man
>the nature of Chaotic-Good and Jow Forums
youtu.be/vYTbxpSLMUw

>100th monkey effect and shitposting
youtu.be/XLmxkaNMl2A

>NXIVM child cult in Columbia
youtu.be/lIBJFAsYSWQ

>eternal Memetics and symbolism
youtu.be/-WUvDgJVd6A

>article 13 is the great meme Iconoclasm of 2018
youtu.be/El9RVIl47ZI

>prophecy of a cyber future IF we DONT act
youtu.be/622nXHK_J9E

>your leading a revolution and dont even know it
youtu.be/VNn3i1aakIs

>planned parenthood expose , legal sacrifice
youtu.be/sJM2HLYtW38

>npc meme 3 part miniseries starts here
youtu.be/nTn6UMzAgZY

>john titor time travel trump doc
youtu.be/vWeoen7hPhY

>ingersoll lockwood and Baron trumps wonderful adventure
youtu.be/wl8XMUo9vcQ

Oh... and he names the Jew
And LOTS MORE, here is a small window into a world you might not know..,,,,.,.,.,,,

>function as an insurance policy

Evidence. The word is evidence.

right on bro, thats why i only fuck boipussy

destroy hollywood and social media and 95% of the west's problems will disappear

Attached: 1536949972907.png (569x442, 192K)

This isn't a female thing, it's a Jewish thing.

Why is this worrying?

>destroy hollywood and social media and 95% of the west's problems will disappear
DOTR no ones safe in hollywood

>Why is this worrying?

Because men are doing something.

Because thots won't be able to claim to have been raped 10 years down the line in order to get money and attention anymore

"Evidence of pre-recorded consent is clearly relevant and something a jury could consider. However, even if consent was freely given, such recordings could never provide a blanket defence."

Judging how a court of law would interpret a "consent video", she added: "A 'yes', pre-recorded or not, can be just as ambiguous as some men suggest a 'no' is."

And Katy Thorne QC added that a video was nothing more than evidence and could not always determine consent.

She added: "The use of video or audio recorded consent is a very unromantic way to ask and mat not be the cast iron protection the minor celebrity seeks, in fact texts and social media messages before and after the encounter might be as compelling."

Attached: Aaaaand-Its-Gone.jpg (500x281, 21K)

Cuz y'all are about to never get laid. Soon as dudes start using these videos to ridicule women womens legs everywhere are going to snap shut like a pitbull jaw.

>Soon as dudes start using these videos to ridicule women womens legs everywhere are going to snap shut like a pitbull jaw.
And how is THIS a problem?

>Snap shut
>Women's legs
>Ever

????

If they can retroactively retract consent even days later, what does it matter?

Attached: getting caught.jpg (1411x1080, 45K)

Giving them rights really was a mistake.

Women
Knowing what they want.

no, they want to accuse people of rape

And wo...sorry, feminist dont want this why?

>Record consent video
>have sex after
>woman still claims you raped her because at the moment of recording the video she was under pressure of your male chauvinist presence and as such she was afraid.
If you think the little videos are going to help you are wrong, they will turn it around and use it as extra ammunition against you.

Not how that works kike

Have you ever explained their own behavior to them? Either theirs or another woman's? It's like they've never thought "oh yeah, we do that don't we"

Jow Forums should create a consent contract app - a simple contract specifying that both parties agree to consent to sexual contact.

When you download the app, you create a passcode and it assigns you a unique identifier code. The contract contains a short legalese passage stating that all undersigned persons involved consent to the sexual activities indicated, check boxes for different activities (foreplay, oral, vaginal, anal, etc), and an 'add partner' button that detect other phones with the app within a certain radius. You select a partner, it connects you both to a copy of the contract, each of you checks which activities you and your partner consent to, and you press a button and enter your passcode to confirm consent, and once both parties confirm consent, a pdf of the contract is sent to the associated email accounts for each user.

Three possible outcomes:
A) It doesn't catch on
B) It catches on, everybody starts using it, and all the concerns about consent are ended.
C) It catches on, and everyone almost immediately realizes how fucking retarded it is and how it sucks all the spontaneity and fun out of sex and the consent debate implodes on itself and shit goes back to how it used to be.

best thing you can do really is just stay away from them altogether

It exists. Or someone tried to make one already.
Surprise! Feminists tore it down.

That's not a kike. It's worse. A Puerto Rican.

Attached: 1543772608658.gif (554x400, 135K)

I support this. I secretly video every time just to show consent and, for fap material later

mfw this isn't even real evidence since it'd be thrown out the moment the arby's sandwich cries "He made me film that"

this is what they wanted. i hope this catches on to make them realize how fucking gay the culture they made is.

that doesnt hold up in court. you get arrested, and you can show the cop the video on your phone. boom. out. girl gets 5 years.

Of course not. They "say" that's what they want, but it's not really what they want. They don't want to take responsibilities for their actions, so they say one thing while meaning or hoping for something else entirely.

Women are fucking hypocrites by nature because they are mental children.

It doesn't matter if you have it on tape, she can just say she changed her mind halfway through and claim you didn't stop.

no fucking way man. not in the USA. if you have hard evidence that she said the words "I consent to any and all sexual interactions with user. the date is X/XX/XX" and she accuses you of rape, you can put that bitch behind bars.

> implying women won't immediately accuse you of rape because they withdrew consent afterwards if you try this on them
The only defense would be to film the entire sexual encounter.

Thats exactly how it fucking works. Why do you think they would need to think of something as insane as this if they werent already desperate enough to try and get around the restrictive python that is the modern courts and womens rights.

Attached: 1543733395539m.jpg (1024x683, 52K)

Sounds like that "dave chappelle consent form skit"

Man, this slippery slope really just keeps going.

Women have no ammo.

May as well convert to Islam desu, it's now a less insane culture than the West

>film the entire sexual encounter.
She will say that she didn't have consented in record the sex, the whole vid will be discarted and you get +5 years behind the bars

what's the title of this sam hyde video?

Utopia

youtube.com/watch?v=GKBtMLOC2oU

maybe in cucknada. but if you have proof of consent, and she has fucking nothing but her word, your proof wins. you may lose in the media, or in the social circles, but you will win in courts. Cops, real fucking cops, DO NOT like being lied to and having their time wasted. And cops see this shit on the media every day. Blue collar motherfuckers are sick of seeing hoity toity bitches sit on their thumbs and ruin peoples lives for attention. most people except for the small enclave of mindfucked college liberals hates this shit and knows that its eating the fuck away at our court system and social systems. real sexual assault prosecutors have to look at victims of LEGIT sexual assault all the fucking time. they are bruised, beaten, fucked, and cry when you try and touch them.

The only solution is to record THE ENTIRE SEXUAL ENCOUNTER and make it extremely clear that the woman is free to stop at any point

This.

classic. thanks

>Some men are so confused on the topic of consent that they're filming their partners giving permission before engaging in a sexual act

CONFUSED? FUCKING CONFUSED? NO, YOU FUCKING COMMIE SUBVERSIVES, THESE MEN KNOW EXACTLY WHAT'S UP AND THEY'RE JUST TRYING TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM YOUR FUCKING HORDE OF DEGENERATE INQUISITORS!

Nothing pisses me off quite so much as the goddamn gaslighting...

It's a better idea to get some proof of consent after the fact, because the cunt could always just say, "well, I changed my mind during sex, teehee." This is why I always try to get them to text me after, so at least I can show that if she thinks she was raped why did she text me after.

Their gaslighting literally has no end.

objective truth is the enemy of women. they dont like what they cant manipulate, plane and simple.

reminder that the Jow Forums sticky literally cites "slippery slope" as a logical fallacy, what a fucking joke

>plane
plain*

Its just a way to remove people who would ask for consent from the gene pool so that future generations don't have them

>Judging how a court of law would interpret a "consent video", she added: "A 'yes', pre-recorded or not, can be just as ambiguous as some men suggest a 'no' is."

>No means no.
They spent decades trying to push this and arrested men over it.

Now suddenly shit we JOKED ABOUT on Jow Forums is real? Goddamn it.

that's some rough naivete

have you ever been accused of sexual assault?

Yes yes, don't reproduce goy.
Keep buying or vydia and our porn.
Also buy our sex dolls.
Also keep working and making those sweet sweet shekels for us goy and keep the system alive.
But don't forget. NO GIRLS, NO REPRODUCTION, NO FATHERHOOD.

- t. (((Turd 'Shilling' Monkey)))

>sex contract
>thot doesn't read the fine print
>extreme BDSM
what could go wrong?

if a bitch has scars and runs to the cops, youre fucked. if you have legit proof of consent and you didnt rough her up, youre fine.

An argument is a slippery slope fallacy when you no evidence. Moron.

>literally telling us to make our gfs porn stars
(((user)))

The only people this affects are roasties and other degenerates that participate in hook-up culture. No one that you're in a relationship with/in love with would try and frame you for rape.

>The Sun
Hearty kek

>Cuz y'all are about to never get laid
So I have nothing to lose

Like one weird thing from the abortion video is planned parenthood's stupid pyramid design (why the fuck did they do that?) and the hilarious racism of it's founder.

>No one that you're in a relationship with/in love with would try and frame you for rape.
My ex wife tried. Fuck off.

The thing about it is you never know when it will hit. Just like *snap* that beautiful sweetheart youve been dating for a year meets some jew lawyer and youre fucked. Never let your women near lawyers

Oh hi Muhammad what a surprise to find you here.

This is probably one of the dumbest posts I have ever read on here. Wives/girlfriends fuck over their husbands/boyfriends all the fucking time. Especially when there's money at stake.

i've yet to see a slippery slope not be true in any case with or without evidence chief

This. All women are a ticking time bomb. Even the "good ones" because they have a serious habit of turning bad quick.

Exactly fucking this. When a woman realizes she can squeeze more cash or reputation out of you by being against you rather than with you, she will do it. Keep your wallet fat, your bases covered, and every fucking moment of your day recorded.

You don't see Muslim women doing this to their men alhamdulillah.

you missed my point
wouldn't it be easy to say that she consented to whatever she was subjected to with video evidence?

Should post it online so other people can confirm.

You mean, your consent video doesn't hold up in court, underage retard.
>I changed my mind midway and told him to stop but he kept going
That's the story they would tell, and if it were true, it does constitute rape. And that's just one of many ways to nullify your consent video.

Yea thats becuase you fucking kill them when they get uppity. Thats not "putting women in line" thats putting women into the fucking ground. Women arent fucking property, and nobody with a fucking conscience is going to convert to your towel head jihadi murderous soulless faux christianity sandnigger religion. Get the fuck out of london before they start paying 500 GPB per muzzie scalp.

At that point they would need actual evidence.

No you fucking dumbass. Maybe the court of social circles or media, but the court of LAW is not about what happened. AT ALL. It is about what you can PROVE. And if you have a video of a girl saying she agrees to have sex with you, shes fucked. Becuase its not "he said she said" its "she said definitely, then she fucking lied, becuase whoop she has a motive becuase she has a long term BF." Women are not exempt from the law, whatever your uni teaches you to believe.

So what you are saying is that women belong in the kitchen or the bedroom, should be barefoot and pregnant, that we should lower the age of consent, and engage in a little domestic discipline when required?

That we should vote for far right christian fringe groups that have no chance of winning, so that the mainstream parties (conservative / republicans) politicians will start to represent the above values and people like you? (moving the needle)

stop bitching and do something about it

Feminism makes women unhappy. Muslim women are happier than Western atheist women. Women need to know their place in the household, under the man and looking after her children.

You know this is true. You know this is what Allah put you here to do. Come home white man, your true faith is calling to you.

What should I do if an ex tried to accuse me of rape? Is suicide my only option?

If she says on tape "fuck me beat me bruise me use me" and she comes out with a few bruises, youre fine. But not really, becuase shes fucking crazy. She can make your life hell for max 9 months, sure, but youre not getting any P-time.

He said she said scenarios require evidence.
While statements are taken into account. Physical evidence always trumps them.

For instance
>user raped me on tuesday at my house
>No, I was at applebees with my friends that entire night. I have witnesses and a receipt.

In the case of with drawling consent, she would need evidence that the consent was indeed taken back, especially when evidence that consent was provided is brought up.

If you're at a party and drinking, a drunk girl literally hangs on you and vocally states things like I want you to bang me in the bathroom and people hear it. That is evidence of consent.
Anyone that heard it could be used as a witness.

When in the bathroom she would have to prove consent was than taken away. If no witnesses exist, it would be hard to argue that.

Then you need a video recording the consent, and a video afterwards.

Why is the word Evidence in quotations?

wow i just converted. thanks dude, 100 virgins have been added to your account.

What's the difference?

If only Wienstien had thought of this.

are you retarded? one is a gender, one is a race/religion. but yes. false rape claims are verrrry jewish at their core. you probably can trace most sex assault claims back to a jewish boyfriend, a jewish lawyer, or a jewish bitch.