The actual truth of the matter is that dogs, alcohol, religion, pets in general, netflix, weed, etc...

The actual truth of the matter is that dogs, alcohol, religion, pets in general, netflix, weed, etc. is trash for normies.

If you like one of the above, you're a normie. There's nothing wrong with being a normie, and anyone saying that there is would be lying. However, to lie about this and to make it seem like you are outside of some ideological dogma because you like normie-type2 things is dishonest; it is not debatable that you are a normie for liking these things, only as to what type of normie you are. You don't belong here, and so you either attempt to change the people here, write them off, or pretend to be one of them. Eventually, you will leave as a result of your true nature and your inability to responsibly handle reality and truth, and return to your comforting lies.

Normies do not like truth, in fact, they despise it to the core. You can do no more damaging thing than to tell them the truth. When they like truth it is because parts of it agree with them -- they like that which helps them believe their lies, and despise those who cast off old beliefs and shadows on their journey.

By all means, have at me now. Try to deny the above, call me names, throw around tired insults. You're still a chained normie, looking at his shadow friends.

Attached: literally reddit.jpg (698x520, 38K)

Nice blog faggot.

Dogs is a "status" attempt. They used to be used for work around the homestead, these days they "represent" the idea of work but 95% of them are obese and that is a goddamn fact.

>not owning a sheep dog and using them The way they were breed to be
What a normie faggot you are.

Switch out Normie for
>Neurotypical
And this would be accurate.

I've tried to redpill Jow Forums about the memes related to "status", specifically about how women primarily are concerned with "resources" and "status" in some variable form rather than identity and ideology. For men, politics and ideology is an extension of the self, a sort of invisible sword or tool that is used for crafting the world. For women, politics and ideology is more like a dress or a painting, something by which to gain attention and recognition. Men seek to capture ideals, women seek to embody them. As their soul becomes more coarse, more normie-like, they merely seek to capture ideas of wealth and resources.

>not making the superior 'we evolved with dogs' normieshit argument.

Come on.

>religion
>for reddit normies

Have you ever been to reddit?

>doesn't like the doggos

...and into the gas chamber you go, faggo

Attached: laugh8.png (409x392, 119K)

All of civilization is a distraction.

>hurrdurr you can’t like things i don’t like or your a normie huurrrr
Fuck off, dogs are based.

Attached: AEE5B23E-3173-4E5D-BBF9-289720C9D7DA.png (1296x1458, 217K)

once people have a yard they feel the need to trap a miserable dog in it as an accessory to their house

Hitler LOVED doggos and he was a normie faggot. In fact, he was the most normie faggot of them all.

>Fuck off, dogs are based.
to reddit please normie, thank you

For me the two are interchangeable. Being "neurotypical" is similar to calling someone average or standard. It's not a descriptor of their ability to actually understand anything, and in fact, is only a descriptor of their advanced ability to ignore most everything.

Consider if you make a neighborhood in The Sims, or some other simulation game. Your neurotypical sims are the ones who follow your commands when prompted, do their actions as needed, and typically will continually perform the same actions. You then have another class of sims, who exist outside of your control, such as death, random events, etc. They appear as "sims" but are actually totally isolated events. Imagine then that there is a sim who is aware of you playing their game, and reacts accordingly to what you do to other sims. The other sims would be confused or upset at the actions of this sim and would insist that this sim was not a typical sim, even if they know more than the others, and wish to spread knowledge, due to the means by which the others interact, this knowledge becomes impossible or meaningless to them, and becomes an issue of character rather than of information. I mean in the most sincere way, if you would have a sim perfectly aware of a player and also able to make their own actions without player influence, the system of the game would eventually cause the other sims to form a great dislike of this sim, by mere nature of the game itself.

It's just an analogy, but you can see the mechanism by which similar knowledge cannot truly be accepted or integrate into the general pool of knowledge that others have, without causing great strife to the one dispensing it. And of course, you have problems on top of that.

People enjoy dogs. If you don't, fine, get a gerbil but don't tell others they can't enjoy their dog.

nice counter, faggot.

Attached: 0648FF1A-FD30-4274-B0CD-6E7367EE00B9.jpg (680x501, 62K)

The only people who don't like dogs are niggers.
Guess you're a nigger user.

i give this post a clear and concise upvote, you have proven that dogs are BASED, just as blacks and jews are the most BASED RACE!! take this reddit gold as a token and please don't come back

It is getting to the point where everyone is a cop, everything is an ad, and everyone wants you to be a slave. Ultimately, while the only possibility of escape is engaging within the system, by attempting to remove oneself from it, paradoxically this creates slavery as well, inability to exercise the knowledge that you hold or at least engage with others becomes another chain. You are chained for remaining under the influence of others, and chained for not exercising your influence. Atlas only shrugs in the mind of fools.

>my IQ is too high for the norman plebs

Attached: 20181202_234853.jpg (180x209, 27K)

shut the fuck up retard

>no argument script detected
>running reddit.jar...

Attached: 26876DAC-9F82-489D-9FF9-5BC8752EDE7D.jpg (552x615, 35K)

The reddit normie has overlay with the comicbook normie and the dogs! normie. As I mentioned, it's not just one singular normie but rather a series of typified normies.

>You don't belong here, and so you either attempt to change the people here, write them off, or pretend to be one of them.
Jow Forums is a Christian board
Jow Forums is dog owning board

Deal with it.

Attached: 1481133546000.jpg (326x322, 20K)

i will proudly be called a normie because i love my dog and shes very important to me!

where's your argument nigger?

I like cats more than dogs, but I still like dogs.
I don't really like alcohol, but it's fun to escape from time to time.
I don't do organized religion, I'm just a deist.
I don't do Kikeflix.
I smoke weed before bed to shut down my autist brain so I can actually sleep rather than lie awake for 6 hours trying to solve every problem I'm working on in the business I own, but I hate weed culture.
I'm a depressed Jow Forums 8/10 looks autist who has never fit in, never will, dreads the thought of being reborn on this fucking planet because of kike fuckbags like you who spend their time posting utter garbage either to slide this board, or, try and get more (you)s just because you're a complete failure with no ambition and getting people angry is your only outlet. Either way, I think you're a fag, and your post proves it.

Attached: 1498768118122.jpg (650x650, 74K)

I agree with you but if you don't do those things at least a little bit you'll never have friends

I’m not the one chimping out about reddit, you autist. Do you happen to have any point beyond your plebbit boogeyman or are you going to continue autistically screeching about it?

>I like cats
you are a normie
>it's fun to escape from time to time
normie
>im a deist
normie
>i smoke weed
the normiest of normies
>i don't do kikeflix
yeah you do hulu right? fuck off and don't come back you don't belong here.

I think it goes beyond that. They want something around them which offers positive reinforcement for rote actions. Dogs emulate quite a few human behaviors so they begin applying a humanizing façade to the animal in order to continue to justify this expenditure in resources on a feedback loop. Because if it is not a loop, it becomes a meaningful interaction.

I think this betrays the mindset behind it moreso than I could capture it with words. They aren't reacting in any reasonable way, just expressing some generic negative emotion loop in regards to being prodded like this. It's sort of like putting a cucumber next to a cat, they think it's a snake and jump. It's not a higher kind of response.

>doesn’t like dogs
Whatever Muhammad.

does something need to have utility to have worth?

Dogs are child replacers. All the credit with none of the responsibility. Go look at social media accounts of childless women in their 20s and 30s. It's all pet worship.

And lemme guess, you’re some special snowflake player character, yeah? Because all I’m getting from this spiel is a glorified “everyone else is an NPC” response.

Fuck off, Ahmed. You're right about netflix and weed but the rest of that is just your sandnigger "religion"

)you(

Attached: brainlet3.jpg (866x677, 113K)

my point is that pets are a frivolous pursuit only taken in by the neurotypical blind faggot, literally the NPC. see and for more details on why. you liking pets means that you like to take part in the system's games of social status, as such you are a normie. you don't belong here.

Damn what an intellectual you are

Attached: 20181120_121321.jpg (850x974, 245K)

>REEEE REDDIT REDDIT REDDIT
>AUTISTIC SCREECHING
You're the faggot here, shitskin dog hater. Perfect example of accusing your enemy of what you are doing.

>emphasis on the pet part
nice bait

I think this is a far more compelling argument than most of the other things presented. I'd like to say in response though, that I can't get a lot of satisfaction out of having normie friends. I've done it before, and kept it going for a while, but ultimately it's just a burden because of the means by which they expect you to react in certain ways. At this point in my life I've been well apart from people for years, aside from a few brief months where I entertained the concept of friends and such before being disappointed in how monotonous it all becomes. There is no exchange of new ideas and a depressingly large amount of influence-creep. At a certain point you're not learning and responding to your friends but rather the material that they inject into themselves. The influences that they find valuable and begin to take as sacred cows.

I'd like to hear your response to this though, I'm a fair and level-headed person, and I'm open to other arguments.

Yeah I don't care. Life isn't about categorizing everything and everyone

he's a dog lover. see? you fucking pet owners are trained into a blind rage response, seeking and attempting to destroy everything which may interfere with your retarded house juden.

>has religion listed
Daily reminder not only are atheists retarded but also people who call Christianity a kike religion.

Ah, yes. Because owning goddamn snails is enough to make someone an NPC. Never mind what their political beliefs are or what media they consume, right?

Attached: D6B8121F-C089-424E-B79B-FFC58EFA2489.jpg (4032x3024, 1.58M)

you're not tricking anyone ITT user, you're clearly trying to start a shit-storm by roasting pet owners.

>tfw no one intelligent enough to converse with

I like all of those things.

Normal people with girlfriends and social lives and jobs like these things.

OP has autism.

Get some busted up lips if you bring that cringe into meatspace fag.

You assigned me that status, I did not assign it to myself. Why is that?

I think that's very true, and part of why the animals become a sacred cow. I'm always amazed at the vitriol and mindlessness by which any criticism pointed towards the idea finds, though.

I think that's a little abstract for what I'm discussing here. Utility and Worth in regards to what, specifically? Could you define what you mean by both of them, if you don't find it a burden to the conversation?

your knee-jerk reaction to protect your precious little leech says it all you dumb nigger. you are vulnerable over a fucking snail dude lmao

Guess I'm a "normie," darn.

Remember to type "sage" into the options bar before posting itt

Attached: 1542652149866.jpg (1536x2048, 445K)

>I did not assign it to myself.
don't kid yourself user, knowing your the player character includes being aware of the fact that you are that. you must not only recognize it, but actively assign yourself that title lest you become consumed by the faceless gray masses.

Watch the edge there antifa.

I am what they say I am.

>liking animals, specifically dogs, makes you a normie
No, I'm just white Tyrone.

OP is ascended

Attached: 1541280089200.jpg (1023x682, 139K)

no, you're not. by allowing others to define what you are on their terms is inherently the rejection of identity, which is the root of politics.

Dog owners are retarded mentally fucked up retards.

Doesnt matter how many times you tell them to leash their fucking dogs, they always give you NPC response "Nooo heees a goood boooyyy" Leash your fucking dog or i'll start dropping sausages with glass in them.

Oh by the way, all retard dog owners believe "if my dog doesn't like this person, it means this person is bad!"

Good luck, your whore dogs come crawling to me like little faggot sluts, looks like they are not detecting my thoughts about strangling you bitch

>I'm just white Tyrone
never have known a tyrone who is also white

Its true you are a piece of shit

Attached: 5421C679-D120-4EBE-BC51-7F34B5E5C1EE.jpg (720x960, 251K)

>your whore dogs come crawling to me like little faggot sluts
do you fuck dogs, user? if not, you must at least hold an attraction to them, otherwise why would you be sexualizing these petty house rats?

Several people have said they dislike dogs because they are "frivolous" or a waste of resources. My dog doesn't do anything useful. She isn't a human being. Yet I do find value in her.
I enjoy having her with me when I go for walks. Petting her when I'm feeling sad cheers me up. It's fun to train her to do tricks. There's a dozen other things I could name.
None of it gets any work done. She doesn't have any monetary value. I don't have any friends, so it's not like shes gaining me social status (I'm not even sure how that would work). So, she has no utility. But for the above reasons I feel she is worth the investment of time and resources.
Another thing I have noticed in this thread is that some people are acting as though love is a precious or finite resource that should not be given to something that cannot return it. The truth is you can love as many things and people as you want and you will never run out, so it is never wasted.

I am for me what I am. For others, I am what they believe me to be.

I do reject identity.

Yeah those two are onerous behaviors.

Hello hipster newfag. All that to explain that you are a classic contrarian. Who think that's what it is about somehow. You are unintelligible from the far left pseudointellectuals.
Stupidly thinking this indicates that you are intelligent and know about things. So whatever someone else is doing. You think if you do the exact opposite. It's the best choice. No, it isn't. But it shows you are a hipster version of a Jow Forumsack because that's what you think it is about.
Dogs are domesticated companion animals for mankind for thousands of years, they are specifically loyal to you. And can also depending on breed do all kinds of advanced things. But you decide, lot of people have them, so you should not have them because that's normie.
Religion is important because it's a huge part of the history of mankind, and understanding each type, is part of understanding the mindset of ethnicities and also the reasons for how each region is in the situation it is now, and how it works.
Alcohol can be the only one you are partially correct about. Since especially excess is bad for your body and mind.
Weed. Depending on what it is, and in what amounts, very calming and no hangover whatsoever. Also when not puffed, has medicinal properties, see run from the cure by rick simpson.
In your analogy
>It's just an analogy, but you can see the mechanism by which similar knowledge cannot truly be accepted or integrate into the general pool of knowledge that others have, without causing great strife to the one dispensing it. And of course, you have problems on top of that.
The other 'sims' in your pseudointellectual delivery don't dislike you because you know something they don't, and that this upsets them. But because you re a stupid contrarian that only does the opposite of everything they do no matter what it is, so they have little in common with you. And because you are smug and stupid at the same time. yet percieve yourself to be wise. You missed the point.

Attached: coudenhove-kallergi plan.jpg (599x604, 106K)

Dogs are based.

Only psychopaths and niggers have this much hate for dogs

>I do reject identity
>women primarily are concerned with "resources" and "status" in some variable form rather than identity and ideology. For men, politics and ideology is an extension of the self
>Normies do not like truth, in fact, they despise it to the core. You can do no more damaging thing than to tell them the truth. When they like truth it is because parts of it agree with them -- they like that which helps them believe their lies
You need to have a conversation with yourself, user.

Oh yeah i forgot to address netflix/or movies in general.
The reason to watch some of the things, is aside from in moderation it can be good entertainment to watch things with friends family or girlfriend/boyfriend. Is that you can see, that some of the things are peddling things to actual normies/NPC's and trying to program them subliminally what to feel about a matter politically, pic related for example.
See you don't really seem to know anything. And if you did you wouldn't be a smartass about it either. You seem to falsely try to pretend that you know something, instead of just saying what it is, and thus everybody who don't do what you do. Is a normie. You are a smug little hipster douchebag, now you want to go ride Jow Forums since bill hicks and all that crap is not that popular anymore. This is what you think it is about. You are one of the biggest wannabes i've seen on Jow Forums in a long time. I think it will surprise you that knowing what is going on, who is doing what and what is good or bad for people. Has nothing to do with shitting on everybody else. But about understanding everybody else.

Attached: 1543595884860.png (773x941, 126K)

Attached: 1543113053354.jpg (514x514, 36K)

My thoughts are my identity, not my identifiers. I don't reject my thoughts, I reject being captured through symbols or codes which exist to act as a summation of my abilities. This is identity. Identity is not politics and not ideology.

If you disagree, please present an argument against it.

Why don't you tell me what it is about then? Could you also please tell me the difference between an intellectual and a pseudointellectual?

Another bump for the most autistic thread of the night.

Yeah hehe. A lot of people are never told the truth, nor seek it as much. They have a lot of respect for it when they realize it. They just never realized it. Or how someone is pulling them around by the nose politically and such things, aswell as in parts historically. Most people are in their own little local bubble in the society they live in and the nation they live in. And don't have that much interest to understand what's going on in the world, and how other people are different, and so on. So they live their life like that without being interested in the bigger answers. Because they can be tough answers that are not so comfortable. But ofcourse add up because it's what the truth is.
>Why don't you tell me what it is about then?
I already did, that the truth and understanding makes you into a better person. But aren't you supposed to know that? You are such a little hipster douchebag. Smug little pretender. Acting edgy trying too hard to fit in. Do you think it's some kind of special club where you need to do a little hipster dance move to gain access?

There is definitely a creator. Organized religion is complete bullshit that has nothing to do with God, just the human ego. I doubt many priests truly believe their own dogma, but they know that the NPCs that attend mass will eat up anything.

And people should be banned from having pets until they produce at least two kids.

This seems to be a mechanism by which you allow yourself to defend against criticism of these actions by classifying yourself as an observer who needs to "understand". Is there a limit to the behaviors that you will engage in to achieve such "understanding"? For instance, would you go to a club to "understand"? Or would you do hard drugs to "understand"?

There have to be limits to what you are willing to subject yourself to in order to be appealing to others. You can set those limits yourself, allow others around you to set them through preference and evaluation, or merely attempt to set them through what you divine as knowledge. However, what you believe has to be as the consequence of understand to what end it will cause. If you truly believe yourself to be in the right, why not expend this truth and understanding towards my perspective as well?

I think that there is a creator but not for every person, and certainly not that it is the same creator for everyone created either.

>And people should be banned from having pets until they produce at least two kids.

I think this is very valid. Pets are good for children, I think that could be fairly argued.

It's slightly more entertaining though, I would hope.

You are allowed to enjoy things in life we don't preach against that. We can live in a world with all those things without having to import third world immigrants, legalize pedophilia and promote transgenderism. Fuck you nigger.

Really didn't make me think.

Yeah but you talk like a fag and your shit's all retarded so what now spaz?

based. OP BTFO

>breathing is for normies
We get it, you have autism.

Attached: 1542164994831.jpg (736x1012, 57K)

>This seems to be a mechanism by which you allow yourself to defend against criticism of these actions by classifying yourself as an observer who needs to "understand". Is there a limit to the behaviors that you will engage in to achieve such "understanding"? For instance, would you go to a club to "understand"? Or would you do hard drugs to "understand"?
More pseudointellectualism. You are the one who would sit in a dark room all fucking day, instead of walking your dog, because that's too normal for your hipster like approach to this. If you don't care about understanding the world and what is in it. Then just live your life. That's infact what most people do. But then don't pretend you have something to share with others in that category. Other than you are just living your life and trying to be good person and nice to others. And that's fine. But that's what you critique.
>There have to be limits to what you are willing to subject yourself to in order to be appealing to others.
Doing regular things, doesn't mean you subject yourself to others. Do you think people have dogs to be appealing to others? But you hate dogs because lot of people have dogs. So therefore it must be bad. Idiotic thinking.
> If you truly believe yourself to be in the right, why not expend this truth and understanding towards my perspective as well?
Because your perspective is a bullshit hipster contrarian, that just does as default as much as possible, everything 180 opposite because that's what you think is good and healthy. And don't on a case by case basis decide if this is good or healthy for you, but instead don't have an oppinion or assessment yourself with what you personally prefer, or care to understand yourself. But have to literally mirror what everyone else is doing. And then call them shit for doing it to pretend you are something special for doing it. And trying to rationalize why a lot would find you odd doing that on purpose.

If you think people are just carbon copies of eachother you don't understand nature. People are similar to their ethnicity, and different from other ethnicities. In how they think, and behave and in many other ways. If you don't realize that, you don't understand nature and how it works. We don't live in a world of similarity, we live in a world of difference. Which is why we are so against mass immigration from totally different people. Therefore it's very important to know yourself. And what you are about. Why should you care so much what other people think? Other than what it is you prefer. Now ofcourse if you live in a society with people of similar ethnicities, odds are very likely that you prefer the same things independent of eachother, that's why it's so easy to get along with people similar as yourself, compared to people who are totally different group of people. And that's fine.
But you, what about you. You think the only thing you are is someone who is some kind of retard contrarian hipster. Who decides, he look at some people, and then he decides, the only thing i am is someone who does it opposite. Wear two different socks aswell. Two different pair of shoes, 1 shoe from 1 pair on one foot, 1 on another. Take your shirt on backwards. And your pants. You are really special now! This is what you think is about? Being contrarian just because, is not being smart. It only makes sense if the situation calls for it. Not as a default setting. This doesn't give you anything that's good for you to do. Just makes you look like an idiot. Why do you think people can't live a normal life whilst well knowing all these kinds of things. Makes you actually a better, more well rounded person to understand that people are different from eachother. So everything makes more sense to you why they are the way they are. And this informs your oppinions much better. That's what it means.

Attached: heredity.png (1172x660, 1.01M)

KYS normie

>Doing regular things, doesn't mean you subject yourself to others.

I say this more in regards to your tolerance for netflix. I think part or most of it is brainwashing, for me, to subject yourself to brainwashing to understand what is being pushed onto others runs a risk of having some of that affect you as well. At the very least, shifting your mind to think about those ideas, if not necessarily wanting to agree with them.

I think you are assigning this label of contrarian to me when it does not really apply. In many ways I strive to be exactly like others, and in other ways I strive to seek to be myself. I think questioning why people undertake certain behaviors and also questioning why they have certain beliefs is a good thing. We live in a world of difference, as you say, but it is not a world in which these different groups have fully unique people as their parts. There are stereotypes and certain kinds of people who act in certain ways. I think you are not trying to understand me but rather to be upset at a type of person you think I am.

Please.

The thing you call normie, is that in order to create a stable society, people have to agree on certain things, not all things that you have to do things in certain way. but certain things, and again if it's similar people to yourself, that would already make sense to you some of those things naturally by your own selection of your preferences. Otherwise it doesn't work out very well. This is benign and good. That people are partly collective to cooperate with eachother and help eachother when necessary, and otherwise have their own preferences. It can however be exploited by nefarious people who want to have a less neutral agenda, than just doing the best thing for the people. And they want to instead do the best thing for themselves, and screw the rest, and so they don't want anyone to get along at all, because then they can put a stop to it. And that's ofcourse important to identify. All kinds of things like that, makes sense to not only improve your own life but your whole society. Just acting like a douchebag thinking you have to do opposite of everybody else as a default setting. If they drink water, maybe you should drink your piss instead. Or something. Right. That´s not how it works. What people do, it's not as if it's all totally stupid. I don't know why you even care about any of this if you aren't interested in knowing more. I mean if you just have your own preferences then just do whatever you want. If you don't like dogs then don't fucking have one. For example. If you don't like alcohol don't fucking drink it. If you don't like religion, don´t practice it. If you don't like watching netflix, don't watch it. If you don't like weed, don't smoke it or try to use it medicinally. And finally, if you don't care about understanding how things are, to understand how things make sense. Then don't make these stupid threads, and just go do something else.

Attached: 1543518702144.jpg (1920x2590, 2.24M)

>Saying normie
>In 2018
Fuck off back to whatever shithole site you came from you colossal faggot

What if I like fucking your mom?

>I say this more in regards to your tolerance for netflix.
I just went through your little list, netflix was on it, and what did i say?
Pretty clear i was aware of that, and it can be useful for those who are essentially predictive programming or subtle programming movies or tv-series. What they are trying to get normies to think politically or whatever. Because that can be useful to see what the agenda is.
>I think you are assigning this label of contrarian to me when it does not really apply. In many ways I strive to be exactly like others, and in other ways I strive to seek to be myself.
Not really. You seem to not care about who you are, nor care about who other people are. Except that you want to pretend you are good by doing everything 180 of them. Not very true to yourself is it.
>I think you are not trying to understand me but rather to be upset at a type of person you think I am.
See, this is again the contrarian aspect. You've been ITT applauding yourself narcissistically for that when you do something opposite of everyone else. They dislike you you say. Or rather you do it BECAUSE you want them to dislike you. Because you see their dislike for you as validation. This is what you did with the sims analogy. Well, maybe when assholes dislike you, that makes sense. Or people who literally are just stupid. So that it makes no sense that they dislike you. But when it makes sense that they dislike you. Maybe it's because you are acting like a clown. Whilst shitting on them and acting smug. Some degrees of uniformity in society is desired. But it ofcourse has to match with what people normally desire aswell and what is good for them. Or it makes no sense to go about.
>What if I like fucking your mom?
Right, lot of people don't like it if someone fucked their mom. So this must mean fucking their mom is the right thing to do, because they are all idiots. Haha that will show those fucking normies. This is essentially the OP.

Drit og dra Fittetryne.

>Shitskin mudslime rat wants to rant about filthy dogs and alcohol on Jow Forums because muhallah
>Hates ham sandwiches too but doesn't want to push his luck
>Throws Netflix and weed in there to mask his muzz stank
KYS Abdullah

meatspace

>your whore dogs come crawling to me like little faggot sluts
Lol what

Normies can be summed up pretty simply

>"If it's socially acceptable(or on the fringe of being so), and I haven't been affected by it yet in a negative manner, I support it"

As as example, if there was low income housing being built in his neighborhood, but he didn't own the place, he wouldn't be personally negatively affected by it. If he asks his friends what they think about it, and they see no problems with it, the normies opinion is cemented: There's nothing wrong with it. If it doesn't affect him, but it affects his group of friends and none of them support it, then he won't support it either, despite him not perceiving it as negatively affecting him. This will only be the case in a big enough friend group however. Likewise, if it does affect him negatively, but his peer group all say that they think it's fine, or even good, he too will think it's fine.

The normie relies on those two factors for creating his opinion on things, and they must be congruent with eachother in order to get a firm "good" or "bad" on the subject matter. However when his peer group's opinion is mismatched with his own opinion on things, he will default to the peer groups opinion, as social validation mixed in with a weak sense confidence in himself will have him defer to others.

What about dogs that have a use beyond “pet” like hunting dogs training a dog to guard your property sled dogs etc?

Jesus Christ dude. It's bad enough I can't have a conversation (I enjoy) with another human, and I'm fucking pissed all the time cuz straight edge... now you expect me to be physically alone and not have a dog? I've got panic attacks and unbearable anxiety/uncontrollable rage from nigger violence. Which is more bearable if I have my dog with me 24/7. If your life was easy enough that you didn't have death, violence, and property crime in it... then what is the point in not being a normie? you have no reason to believe in these things.

>The truth is you can love as many things and people as you want
Half true. Part of loving something comes from committing time and/or resources to it, both of which are finite.

This post was obviously written by a femnist to bait incels into not getting a dog. Dogs bring happiness and joy, and the fact of the matter is, not all things that bring you joy are utilitarian-- like children for example. Dont fall for this meme. Get a dog. Care for it. Take it for walks. It may not rescue people from burning buildings, but it will definitely help socially.

Proper use of dogs. Treating dogs like children/friends is the improper use. You can do it, I can't stop you, but it's not great to do. Sure, it's tempting, but so is alcohol, which is literally bad for you and gives you cancer.