OI BAGUETTES

God I love Australians

Best way cause shit storm in European union is by buying British made goods.

Everyone should buy a bottle whiskey gin for someone for Christmas from Britain for starters.

>You will NEVER be able to mute bitcoin, Ever. its only going to grow. Buy now. If not remember this post in 5 years when you wish you would have moved to unmuteable, uncensorable and uninfitable currency.
Being someone that purchased in late 2014, I'd wager I probably still own more BTC than you. As a programmer, I still develop for it. You are correct - (((they))) cannot shut it down. But, they can (and did) cripple it to the point that it's useless at any practical scale.
What I'm advocating for here is cryptos that are a) capped inflative, b) decentralized and c) willing to scale.
Therefore, I stand by my original post.
Idea is to "wean" people off (((fiat))). In SHTF, gold and silver. But, so long as international trade holds together, crypto. You cannot send silver and gold down a wire.

If SHTF everything will be a matter of pure practicality meaning the only precious metal is STEEL because you can make tools and weapons with it. Gold and silver can't be directly used for tools, weapons, or food.

If just one country shuts down like what might happen with France as long as you get your wealth out of that country before it bombs you're fine. You can do that with crypto, gold/silver, or another countries' fiat.

But SHTF means everyone is fucked. No current currency will mean anything.

The advantage of crypto is keeping your wealth outside of (((gynocentric systems))) but that only helps you as long as either those systems exist or have been replaced with true patriarchy.

Though what do you mean by the cripple part? It's obvious there are state sponsored attacks on its fiat value but Bitcoin always had a low transaction volume and it's not being spammed anymore with fake transactions is it?

I have no idea what altcoin could serve the same function, Ethereum is full SJW socialist retard and has zero business sense on top of that so it's going down faster than female CEOs. (((Ripple))) is a no go, Monero has massive transaction fees that make it useless for anything other than big ticket purchases... the smaller Cryptonight algo based coins might have potential but they're still bombed every time Bitcoin is.

fucking rare

>accept crypto
Sorry but I'm not retarded

>Though what do you mean by the cripple part? It's obvious there are state sponsored attacks on its fiat value but Bitcoin always had a low transaction volume and it's not being spammed anymore with fake transactions is it?
I could go on for a long time about what happened to BTC. But, in short, 2X was a VERY mild compromise that had no ill intent. The fact that fees at one point (Dec 2017) hit ~$50USD shows the problem with what happened with BTC. There were indeed spam attacks, but the organic demand for putting a transaction in a block was what created such a massive rise here. Couple that with the fact that 1MB blocks are cheap to spam-attack, the decision not to scale was undoubtedly malicious.
BCH is, technically, what Bitcoin was supposed to be but that is a) currently under attack and b) owned largely by the Chinese (every time a Chinaman enters the world of business, two jews quit). (As an aside, the notion that you cannot scale on chain is a lie. You can - a validating node only needs the UTXO set - but any progress in that regard was stunted for three years deliberately by Blockstream)
So you are correct in many of the problems you cite.
That said, any capped-inflative crypto still takes power away for the jews in that they cannot print at a whim. Eventually their money runs dry. And it prevents them from pocketing other's money. So I don't think it so much matters which crypto is first used - just that a crypto is used. Again, the idea is to "wean" away from (((fiats))), but tout the philosophy of what crypto was intended to be.
>meaning the only precious metal is STEEL because you can make tools and weapons with it.
Fair point, taken on-board.

BCH is just divisive as fuck. Case in point, they're chimping out and dividing again for (((some reason))). Every time they do all cryptos drop and BCH drops harder, it's bombed about as hard as Ethereum if not harder and a good number of blocks are flat out empty. If there was a demand for increased transaction volume then BCH would consistently show a volume that BTC could not have supported but BCH could. Between that and the autistic screeching I don't even consider BCH as a currency, who would trust something that can be cloned at will? You might as well deal in Diablo 2 Stones of Jordan.

PS: BTC is also mostly owned by China, that's where the ASICs are coming from and that's where the strongest miner subsidies are. Literally the same machines farm BTC or any of its forks including BCH. They can then sell the ASICs once the profitability is almost expended by their strip mining and either R&D better ASICs or just straight out buy more crypto on exchanges.

All that said I'd trust the ruthlessly pragmatic Chinese over the ruthlessly exploitative Jews.

>dividing again for (((some reason)))
This is, to a degree, my point. Looking at it technically, the split here made zero sense. I suspect CSW became a plant of some form after his home was raided in 2015. His and Calvin's retardation shot both of them in the foot - the only reason I could see Calvin going along with it is because he was comp'd too. Canonical Transaction Ordering (CTOR), although debatable as the best approach, does allow BCH to scale and the "civil war" there did seem similar to Segwit2X in that the choice should have been obvious. I think the primary difference was that the BSV sockpuppets had more trouble swaying the BCH demographic because there were less "get rich quick" types and quite a few more passionately technical people to counter.
That said, the former are still very much present in that scene and are the one's responsible for exaggerating adoption/use.
>If there was a demand for increased transaction volume then BCH would consistently show a volume that BTC could not have supported but BCH could
I think you're missing what was intended here. The intention of the boom last year was three fold:
a) Discourage miners from switching to BCH by making BTC more profitable to mine (post-November's "almost flippening")
b) Pump it and show its limitations by way saturating it with spam tx's -> leading to absurdly high transaction fees
c) After the pump, collapse it, destroying public confidence in crypto entirely
It does not have the same level of use as it did previously because companies no longer trust it. BCH, and the thousand other coins, should never have existed.
The whole crypto-industry was set back three years.
>Every time they do all cryptos drop and BCH drops harder,
I think this is done to prevent a flippening and the "death cycle trigger" from happening. Personally, I don't think this will happen (if it ever does happen) for quite some time.

You know we have Israelis who try to create cryptocurrency right now?
>>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initiative_Q

>Anarchist/Librarian who claim to believe in individualism
>REEEEE ALL JOOOS ARE HIVE MIND

Realistically speaking, get rich quick or not follow the money does still apply. A good number of the creators cashed out of their own coins already and developers won't be invested if they're paid in a low value currency. As long as fiat exists crypto will be measured off of it, so a 100 dollar item for example will never sell for less than its equivalent in whatever currency. If it were only crypto then items could have set costs in that currency and be relatively stable.

>I think you're missing what was intended here.

So what you're claiming is it wasn't BCH proving the need for a higher capacity by showing what happens with and without it, it was an outside attack?

Did anyone really think a system where the miners can impose transaction fees just as they please forever could become a universal currency? Seriously?

Yes of course they do. And there are also central bank coins, they're called (((Ripple))). They're competing with China for a (((State coin))).

Are you claiming Jews do not have a collectivist ideology? Do you understand that just because you follow an individualist ideology that that does not mean everyone else thinks like you? Do you realize the white nationalists are trying to also have a collectivist ideology as a means of combating the Jews?

In group preferences are a thing.

Taxation is Theft

If they dislike taxes, they should just move to another country, no one is holding them there.

Miners do not "impose" anything. Miners could end up mining transactions with no transaction fee whatsoever BUT will automatically prioritize the highest fees.

Imagine a toll booth where you're bidding against the other cars to get through. If there's no traffic your fees are low or nonexistent. If everyone else wants through at the same time you either outbid them or wait a while.

The lower your maximum transaction supported the more easily you get a "traffic jam" and the less viable it is as an actual currency. The reverse is also true.

>Do you understand that just because you follow an individualist ideology that that does not mean everyone else thinks like you?
You mean not all Jews thinks the same?! Wow!
t.brainlet

>Are you claiming Jews do not have a collectivist ideology?
Brainlet can't tell between self loathing leftie secular cucks and religous Jews which unlike Mudslimes and Christians don't enforce their religion..or all his "knowledge" on Judaism comes from Stromerfaggotry

>Do you realize the white nationalists are paranoid collectivist brainlets?
Yes

Attached: Disappointment.jpg (306x306, 20K)