Get 1.1 million votes, 46%

The electoral process

Where has that been suggested that?
Maybe, and bear with me because this is pretty complicated, but maybe there shouldn't be any gerrymandering and it should be a matter of the best possible representation of how people have voted?

well I wouldn't have an electoral process run by emotionally stunted malcontents like yourself furious at being disagreed with

>can't answer how he would have a democracy
Kinda frightening. Are you sure you're not a tankie?

>How does that explain this?
The US is about freedom and liberty for all, not just for low-iq city niggers and jews.

It is only fair that the big cities with their large nigger populations and jewish overlords do not ruin the rest of the country for the little folk. I thought anarchist liked just that? But of course you're just a bootlicker fag, so kys.

yes when they wrong think involves mass theft and tends to destroy nations and starve their populations.

Lets set up a system where there is no information through price discovery on the relative value of peoples labor and the good that they want or need. I'm sure there wont be mass death, starvation, and it wont devolve into a dystopian hellhole this time.

I gave one answer to your petulant behaviour

as for over all, gee, I dunno, maybe, like, some kinda… independent electoral commission drawing boundaries and overseeing elections? Instead of elected officials running it? Like every other developed nation manages to do without any problems? What a crazy idea huh.
>if you dont vote for me you dont get freedom and liberty
hmm
>if you dont let a minority of corporate interests dictate policy to the rest of society you're not an anarchist
u wot m8

This is such a disingenuous photo. The Democrats put more votes into other fucking elections than the state-wide ones. They couldn't care less about state government.

>Maybe, and bear with me because this is pretty complicated, but maybe there shouldn't be any gerrymandering and it should be a matter of the best possible representation of how people have voted?
Then the US needs voter ID laws, to which you won't agree because we both know how the vote would look if illegals didn't vote. Besides, it is not fair that violent big cities ruin the lives of peaceful rural communities.

>mass theft
like bail outs?
>starve their populations
Do you know how many Americans are living in poverty?
>lets set up a system where untrammelled inherited wealth can dictate to the rest of society and buy elections
I'm sure it will work fine and wont devolve into the horror show America is becoming

>Import millions of 3rd worlders to vote for you, subverting the native population
>OMFG the right is literally destroying our democracy!
Right... nice cognitive dissonance.

How is it disingenuous?
Is it wrong?
Or do you not like the stark depiction of what is going on?
>The Democrats put more votes into other fucking elections than the state-wide ones.
What does this even mean?
Everyone else does it just fine without such complicated laws that disenfranchise voters
I go to vote and they cross my name off the electoral roll
>because we both know how the vote would look if illegals didn't vote
>I have no evidence this is occurring
>so that proves it must be
Did you feel your brain getting damaged while you were asleep?

>hmm
You are not an anarchist, you are a xenophile bootlicker.

Let me fix something for you:
>If you let a horde of low-iq parasites of selfish interests dictate policy to the rest of the society you're not an anarchist

Pretty easy fix.
Tie a rope around your neck, it'll ease the pain.

>the evidence we have assembled to prove this
meanwhile this demented paranoid theory is used to then rationalise widespread gerrymandering and voter disenfranchisement
its a beautfiul system of directed madness

Attached: evidence.jpg (1899x1936, 673K)

>like bail outs?
Jew scams aren't capitalism

>Do you know how many Americans are living in poverty?
I don't give a fuck. I'm not poor. Dont have niggerish traits like being lazy or low iq and you too can not be poor if you live in America.

>I'm sure it will work fine and wont devolve into the horror show America is becoming

This is why we need to kill commies. they ruin everything.

the self interested parasites are the power elite demanding their views be adopted as policy and society conform to their demands
commondreams.org/views/2018/12/02/billionaire-heiress-lashes-out-unions-because-her-fortune-didnt-buy-election
>“I have decided to stop taking offense at the suggestion that we are buying influence. Now I simply concede the point. They are right. We do expect something in return. We expect to foster a conservative governing philosophy consisting of limited government and respect for traditional American virtues. We expect a return on our investment.”

No true scotsman huh thats your come back?

We don't live in a democracy, but a republic. Is that so hard to understand?

>Everyone else does it just fine without such complicated laws that disenfranchise voters
No. Voter ID laws are pretty much the norm everywhere. Besides, you need an ID for welfare, so there goes your argument.

We know how stupid brown people vote. They vote according to their selfish interests. They vote communists and are bootlickers as long as they get their gibs.

>Did you feel your brain getting damaged while you were asleep?
I am talking with a person, (You), who is an equivalent to a sleeping person in terms of cognitive power.

Take a shar object and thrust it inside your neck, preferably puncturing the jugular vein.

Democrats put more votes into seats like governor or the US Senate than they did state-wide seats. Some people just don't vote for local officials, why do you think they get such little votes?

Does living in a Republic mean that one party gets to manipulate elections to give itself power with only a minority of the vote?
Where does it say that?

Oh my god, no one is manipulating the votes. How autistic do you have to be to believe something like that?

Oh boy, a dumb bootlicker """anarchist""" posted a single example in form of a quote from some propaganda outlet. How many levels of pilpul will you go?

A fix is coming:
The self interested parasites in addition to the low-iq brown people are the power elite, such as the jews and (You), demanding their views be adopted as policy and society conform to their demands.

Just stop, I btfo you so hard it is funny

>Voter ID laws are pretty much normal everywhere
I voted in the Victorian state election 2 weeks ago
They ask my name
They cross it off the electoral role
I fill out my preferential ballots
Do
Not
Fucking
Lie
To
Me
>we know better and must decide for you
But you were saying before there was voter fraud, now you say they're too stupid to vote properly so you have to take these measures
Which is it?
>They vote according to their selfish interests.
Like rich people insisting they shouldn't pay taxes on their unearned inherited wealth?
And insisting public healthcare and education and transit are wrong and shouldn't be publicly funded?
More people opted to vote on some issues than others, so that means what exactly?

>no one is manipulating a vote that sees a party with fewer votes getting more seats in the legislature
Nigga are you downs syndromed?

So to you winning with less votes = vote manipulation? You seriously need to grow up.

youtube.com/watch?v=yBweZMNIm2M&app=desktop
North Carolina Republicans admit to and then laugh about gerrymandering the Congressional districts

Attached: drill.jpg (500x363, 34K)

That means some people are either lazy or too stupid to realize only certain people can vote for a district candidate.

explain how it is adult

whites are more important

you do realise that state legislatures do not have an electoral college to give smaller less populous districts a more even footing with populous districts, right?
Tell me you haven't been operating under this false premise.

What makes you think I was? I never implied nor said it.

>t. New Zealand socialist bootlicker scum
Started chuckling right after I saw your flag.
Voter ID laws are pretty much the norm. Now you do not lie to me.

>we know better and must decide for you
You do not, and that's why the low-iq niggers and illegals in the cities shall not have the right to ruin the US for their own selfish interests. The US is a country for any free white man. They'd do well to remind themselves of that. They can send the scum to you, into a literal penal colony.

>Which is it?
It is the option that says:
You have a low-iq. And both. In addition to voter fraud there's the demographic change, you dolt. I want neither. Or are you too stupid to think without artificial binary constructs?

Fucking hell, you are a daft one.

>Like rich people insisting they shouldn't pay taxes on their unearned inherited wealth?
Like the low-iq people such as yourself.

>And insisting public healthcare and education and transit are wrong and shouldn't be publicly funded?
Fuck you are dumb.
When a small minority provides these for the large, selfish low-iq brown horde, yes, they are wrong.

So you're just rationalising gerrymandering out of some sort of arbitrary sense of balance with a group of electorates you don't like and demand to have political power over because of your hurt feelings
That's better than being an incompetent moron I guess

What? You're jumping to conclusions based off of nothing. If you're gonna be that petty then there's really no use in arguing with you.

If gerrymandering prevents low-iq brown people from electing their warbosses you should be all for it as preventative measure

Do not fall into the trap that """anarchist""" is trying to create. He's a xenophile commie bootlicker through and through. Maybe a jew, maybe a n*tive new zealander idc, but he is scum

>Victoria is in New Zealand
For bantz the mods have changed the flag, fuck your daft
>You do no
Greentexting your newest rationalism you bloody idiot
>people who disagree with me must have a low IQ and so cant vote
Please notice thats in greentext btw, fool, and you're wrong
>in addition to voter fraud
Which isn't happening
>Theres the demographic change
>people I dont like cant vote
greentext again
>are you too stupid
A man who cant understand greentext shouldn't be spending so much time criticising others alleged intelectual shortcomings
>artifically binary constructs?
Says the bloke who catagorises everyone who doesn't agree with him and vote his way as Low IQ and wrong demographic

>What? You're jumping to conclusions based off of nothing.
You mean like assuming there must be voter fraud because I dont like the result?
I am simply trying to interpret your statements and rationalisms.
If there is no gerrymandering giving a minority of voters a majority of power in the legislature then what is going on??
fuck off mouth breathing finland

So tell me, if you have a place like NYC, and they want to try your method of "fairness", which nearby rural areas are to have their representation obliterated by city dwelling people far away, and why?

Aaaaaaand /thread

Back to R eddit, kiddo.

Results like winning a democrat winning a blue district with more than 80% and a republican winning a red district by ~51% will lead to a result similar to what you initially posted.
You can't just assume voter fraud without looking at how the votes were spread out.

They're not obliterated, they have their representatives, they don't have MORE representatives.
This is where a bicameral State Legislature comes into play.
In Victoria we have a Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly.
The Legislative Council acts akin to the Senate, the state is divided into districts with the same equal number of representatives.

So tell me, why your idea of fairness is to give the conservative leaning party that you prefer greater undue representative and power over the legislature and disregard the will of the population?

Attached: 1280px-Regions_of_Legislative_Council,_Victoria.svg.png (1280x960, 138K)

>the thread ends of violent maniacs cant run elections
why

I should also preface that saying things like that are going to inevitably happen, regardless of whether or not the districts are gerrymandered.

Holy fuck you’re retarded.

States individually have districts which are meant to even out representation and give smaller populations more power. This isn’t the case with every government role, see governor, treasury, state , etc.

Some positions go to a popular vote to give the majority a share of governance and some positions work off more complex systems in order to give minority populations a chance at a share in government. All of this is designed essentially to promote harmony between two groups with vastly differing opinions but I wouldnt expect a retarded anarchist to understand that.

Gerrymandering is a byproduct of this system you fucking moron not the entire system itself. The state has tried NUMEROUS fucking times to (((Fix))) gerrymandering to no avail. The state has admitted at least twice that gerrymandering is the best possible system to deal with redistricting they just don’t like it lmao.

typical republican fraud

He’s already been blown the fuck out so many times. Btfo by a Finn This thread is over.

I am not saying there is voter fraud
That's the right that does that
I am saying there is gerrymandering.
Look at these results. Look at North Carolina.

And then there is the voter disenfranchisement:
Limiting or prohibiting early voting
Closing voting stations
Limiting voting stations hours of operation
Purging voter roles
Nonsensical signature mismatch requirements assessed by people who are not professionals
Unduely complicated Voter ID laws that have time and again been shown to target minorities and the poor
Limiting staff at voting stations ensuring that with the limited number of stations and the limited time frame it can operate there will be many uncounted ballots - which guess what also get a time frame imposed on them limiting how much time can be spent counting them

The end result and the purpose is obvious
And it has been taken to court numerous times, North Carolina are under a Supreme Court order to redraw their Congressional districts and only missed out on doing it before the midterms because they litigated and delayed for so long the Supreme Court had to declare there was not enough time to do it

>For bantz the mods have changed the flag, fuck your daft
Try forming coherent arguments and not resorting low-iq copes when you get btfo.
And, it's YOU'RE, you daft imbecile. I win again. Funny how low-iq you loses again.

>Greentexting your newest rationalism you bloody idiot
I have been using the greentext to illustrate and correct your grievous intellectual misgivings.

Point a. READ THIS YOU LOW-IQ DOLT:

You have a low iq
Please notice that it is not in greentext, btw, you fool, and you're wrong in everything

>I have a low IQ
Please notice that this is in greentext, perfectly summarizing your points into a one, consice point about your stances.

>Which isn't happening
Without voter identification it happens absolutely. Everytime. At the very best we don't know how much of it happens, Mr. Low-IQ Maori or whatever shitskin you are

>greentext again
There's the demographic change, a fact, and people I don't like should not vote in my country, an opinnion

>A man who cant understand greentext shouldn't be spending so much time criticising others alleged intelectual shortcomings
Please refer to point a. READ THIS YOU LOW-IQ DOLT, which is located upwards in this post

>Says the bloke who catagorises everyone who doesn't agree with him and vote his way as Low IQ and wrong demographic
In addition to being low-iq and probably the wrong demographic, you are not an anarchist for wanting a parasitic low-iq horde to suck the wealth from its makers, the US whites

I guess I'll win again

Attached: 1538588811035.jpg (2407x1937, 3.6M)

You stole the election from Scott Walker faggot

>I don't like it so I'll say its btfo
>we are promoting harmony by giving my side greater undue power
is this nigga serious?
>actually after all that and all my weasel words and insult I'll just turn around and admit it is a product of gerrymandering but you know what I'll just laugh it off and say its part of the system

Lefties are all concentrated and packed tight in small, urban areas. Everybody and everywhere else vote red.

>low iq low iq low iq

Attached: NPC2.jpg (971x546, 49K)

>if I lose an election its stolen
oh you

>I'm spread out so I deserve more representation
really? that's it?

>fuck off mouth breathing finland
Are you perhaps in a mental state that is not characterizised by coherent, serene thoughts and outward expressions?

Rephrasing for a low-iq commie bootlicker shitsking: YOU MAD, BRO

>They're not obliterated, they have their representatives, they don't have MORE representatives.

Bullshit.
Be small town of 10,000 people, have your vote rendered irrelevant by city with 5,000,000. The people who live in that town might as well not fucking vote.

Why do you think we even have a senate that gives each state 2 votes no matter what the size? Because geographic areas have their own special interests that far away people 1) have no reason to care about. 2) Have no first hand knowledge of.

In the same post you say that there is no voter fraud and then point to an example of voter fraud.
Looking at your other replies I also see you crying out about voter fraud. At least be consistent.
Concentration of population actually has an effect on district affiliation. It's the reason why a state like Virginia has more liberals but has a republican state legislature.

Low-IQ might as well be the new you for:
(You)

Do you know how counties and districts work? This is so simple a gifted 5 year old would be able to grasp this concept. It is of no surprise to me you attach yourself to such an infantile worldview

>Everyone else does it just fine without such complicated laws that disenfranchise voters
Are you retarded? Nowhere outside of Burgerland would anyone even consider having such a retarded voting system that doesn't require ID. I cannot even fathom how someone can type what you just did without secretely being against voter ID precisely for the reasons the other user stated(illegals voting), so I assume that's your true motive.

nigga stop huffing chrome lol
There is more than the town and city in the state
the town is part of a region being represented
And I also answered how you have equal representation - a bicameral legislature
Read beyond the first line please
>Why do you think we even have a senate that gives each state 2 votes no matter what the size? Because geographic areas have their own special interests that far away people 1) have no reason to care about. 2) Have no first hand knowledge of.
You did not read beyond the first line at all did you? And you lot then call other people stupid rofl

Yes, you cockgobbling moron, the whole idea behind this is so city slickers don’t have power over everyone else just because they have the densely packed, uninformed masses voting for gibs and political correctness

I have said there is disenfranchisement and gerrymandering
I have not said there is voter fraud
This is consistent
Maybe you understand these terms to be synonymous?
>It's the reason why a state like Virginia has more liberals but has a republican state legislature.
Its gerrymandering
Its gerrymandering
1) my country doesn't
2) if you need it fine but why does Americas make it difficult for certain demographics to obtain?
3) there is not one shred of evidence of illegal voting, this is then facetiously used to argue it must be occurring - the simple fact is they do not like the result and seek the rationalise it away

>nigga stop huffing chrome lol
So this is the power of anarchism. Inhaling solvents for their intoxicating effects. I assume this is what it means, because I don't neither speak nor act like a total degenerate low-iq parasite like (Low-IQ).

Okay, let's say I stopped it. Now...
Stop being a nigger. I won't hold my breath unless you do it for, say, like 30 minutes, starting about 29 minutes before me.

Basically I am saying that you should kys, you low-iq shitskin

No. But if an entire state is controlled by legislation and representatives with the interest of large cities, then you've effectively disenfranchised the majority of the landowners in your state. Same goes for the electoral college in national elections.

That would be in a bicameral legislature
Which they dont appear to have
Nor do they have a state level electoral college

So without any sort of legal precedent for what you want you're now just rationalising gerrymandering as if you have some sort arbitrary right to have unequal representation against people you dont like

Because in case you haven't noticed, its not equal
It is an overwhelming Republican majority
63 of the seats vs 36 in the Wisconsin legislature
10 of the 13 Congressional seats in North Carolina
Which they OPENLY ADMIT TO GERRYMANDERING AND LAUGH ABOUT AND THE SUPREME COURT HAS RULED IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND MUST REDRAW

Your idea of fairness seems to be you running the show

Durrrr I learned a new word today now I can explain away while ebil republicans control certain houses

Bro America is a democratic republic not a full blown democracy. Get it through your thick skull that the founding fathers put these safeguards by design so densely populated cities wouldn’t count top everything by default.

Fucking THINK

>the town is part of a region being represented

The bigger region (state) is represented by senators, the smaller regions (towns/groups of towns) by representatives.

>Read beyond the first line please
>let me gish gallop you to death

Ok fuckwit.

>The Legislative Council acts akin to the Senate, the state is divided into districts with the same equal number of representatives.

states aren't equal sizes for the senate, so why should towns be forced to be so?

>why your idea of fairness is to give the conservative leaning party...

That's not what's happening, we're "giving" people control of their geographic area. They already have it - naturally. If you don't like it, niggers can get jobs, buy houses and move out of the city to the suburbs. You know this won't happen because they're dumb and lazy, so you're trying to get the government to artificially redistribute their vote to a region that they know nothing about, so your party can win. Happy now?

>Its gerrymandering
Refer to: >1) my country doesn't
1) His country does

>2) if you need it fine but why does Americas make it difficult for certain demographics to obtain?
2) Nonsense. It is not difficult, since they know how to get their gibs.
>3) there is not one shred of evidence of illegal voting, this is then facetiously used to argue it must be occurring - the simple fact is they do not like the result and seek the rationalise it away
Please refer to Broward county, and to:
Quoting myself here, because I make the best points.
>Without voter identification it happens absolutely. Everytime. At the very best we don't know how much of it happens, Mr. Low-IQ Maori or whatever shitskin you are

>anarchist
>unable to read

Why am I not surprised.

I suppose we can just go back to giving all the power to our leige lords in NYC. See how that turns out when people start withholding food from metro areas

>rationalising gerrymandering as if you have some sort arbitrary right to have unequal representation against people you dont like
Stop trying to rationalise parasitism of the low-iq hordes of brown people

The state doesn't have an electoral college

So you're whining for gerrymandering because its not fair, for you
And you consider fairness to be you running it

>then you've effectively disenfranchised the majority of the landowners in your state

So to stop rural voters from being "disenfranchised" by having a proportional representation you will give urban and suburban voters less representation, which you insist is not disenfranchisement?
The mental gymnastics here are astounding.

And what are these terrible city folk interests anyway? Better healthcare, better education, protecting the environment, good god how horrible.

Bro, I live in fucking Virginia. This state is not gerrymandered at all. Maybe you should think before replying.

Well said. The low-iq penal colinist doesn't get it though.

Since we can do whataboutism here, and I stopped talking seriously with you a long while ago, still btfoing you, which is a bit embarrassing for you, but the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that people have the right to bear arms. That is, they validated the 2nd amendment as an individual right. Pretty neat huh, you can defend your home against the horde that way there.

How does this justify gerrymandering?
Where is the gish gallop? Explaining how bicameral works? Which you then proceeded to do in your own post telling me off? Bloody hell you are desperate
>states aren't equal sizes for the senate, so why should towns be forced to be so?
Its not specific towns being represented its regions which the town is in, as you yourself said:
>Why do you think we even have a senate that gives each state 2 votes no matter what the size?
God you are dumb.
>That's not what's happening
63 SEATS TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 36 SEATS TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
>we're "giving" people control of their geographic area
The Republican Party is drawing districts in such a way as to give itself more representation and seats in the legislature
For god sake stop being a retard for 5 fucking minutes and be honest and rational.
>buy houses and move out of the city to the suburbs.
>if you live in a city we wont let your vote count
And now you're finally letting the truth out
The real reason is not the city itself, as if it were some sort of abstract monster, but that urban living leads to liberalisation
>so you're trying to get the government to artificially redistribute their vote
Says the man endorsing gerrymandering to support his Bizarro Universe ideas
Why don't you just start saying Me Am Very Happy?

>BOO HOO HOO
I hope they did cheat to fuck you over, and if they did, I hope they keep it up.

>So you're whining for gerrymandering because its not fair, for you
>And you consider fairness to be you running it
When gerrymandering is done to disenfranchise the white populace of the United States, it is wrong. When gerrymandering is applied as a preventative measure against the selfish low-iq brown people, it is right. Pretty neat huh, things have like instrumental value, man

>So to stop rural voters from being "disenfranchised" by having a proportional representation you will give urban and suburban voters less representation, which you insist is not disenfranchisement?
They do not deserve more. They have had enough. Retard. What makes you understand that people don't share your xenophilia?

>The mental gymnastics here are astounding.
Your low-iq is not astounding, quite the opposite.

How does NYC vote in Wisconsin? Or North Carolina?
Do you mean money from outside the state?
Well gee you know the funny thing about that is its Republicans fighting to protect Dark Money
In Arizona they killed a public ballot that was trying to have it disclosed
And now in Michigan they have introduced a bill to make it ILLEGAL to disclose the sources of Dark Money financing
The fellas that have sponsored the bill are all very close to ALEC, Americans for Prosperty, The Cato Institute, etc
You know - the fronts of the Koch Brothers

>I don't care about what happens I just want liberal tears and if I get screwed that's okay cause liberal tears
Hows the e. coli?

See this. The Day of the Rope™ you go first. A non American has to explain shit to you.

Attached: 71Kc-TZtkzL._SY355_.jpg (350x355, 30K)

>How does this justify gerrymandering?
Please refer to my posts if you still are unsure due to your low-iq.

>Where is the gish gallop? Explaining how bicameral works? Which you then proceeded to do in your own post telling me off? Bloody hell you are desperate
>t. Mr. """Anarchist""" the low-iq guy

>63 SEATS TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 36 SEATS TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Nice. But it should be 100 seats for the whites, 0 for the xenophiles and their pets.

>>if you live in a city we wont let your vote count
It counts too much already.

>And now you're finally letting the truth out
The real reason is not the city itself, as if it were some sort of abstract monster, but that urban living leads to low-iq niggers ruining everything
Fixed this

>Why don't you just start saying Me Am Very Happy?
UUH! UUH! YOU ARE LOW-IQ, CAN I SAY IT?

You sound like you want everything done by popular vote, in which case the roaches in New York and San Fag control everything and we have another civil war as Indiana and Idaho farmers don't want to put up with tranny bullshit.

>How does NYC vote in Wisconsin? Or North Carolina?
Without voter ID

>Do you mean money from outside the state?
Benjamin Franklin could vote now wihtout voter ID.

>You know - the fronts of the Koch Brothers
Why do you shills out yourselves?

Wisconsin has voter ID now.

Lmfao he keeps using the word gerrymandering like it’s the end game boss of the debate.

You are beyond saving and you’ve done too much shitty coke tonight and need to go to sleep.

Think about how you have a guy from socialized Finland telling you that you’re a commie retard. Look at France now. This utopian gib society will never exist in America. It is simply unsustainable and a recipe for the destruction of our civilization. Now shut the fuck up and get a job.

>Hows the e. coli?
Not sure what you mean by that?
But anyway, yeah, if you got cheated out of your election, tough fucking shit. You faggots don't deserve to win anything but a 1-way ticket to the bottom of a mass grave. I hope they cheat you out of elections until it comes to that, then nobody will need to cheat.

>people who challenge me must die
I want equal representation
You know, no taxation without representation? Sound familiar?
If they have a bicameral legislature that's fine then they have an upper house and a lower house, one is popular representation and one breaks the state down into districts with all the same amount of representation

You lot are arguing for gerrymandering out of some warped sense of fairness, which funnily enough means representing your views
That is what is happening
There is also the multilayered voter disenfranchisement
The Finn is mentally ill and makes no sense, if thats your source you need help too.
>What we need is a society where the rich dictate to the rest of us and we have no rights or protections
Good luck with that

probably cus the districts within Milwaukee and Madison have the highest number of libshits and the rest of the state is red.

fuck you commie

>people who disagree with me deserve to tie because not sharing my views triggers me and I need safe space lest I melt like the snowflake I am