Simulation theory is true, here's the proof

people of middling intellect focus on grammar/spelling instead of an actual argument

the truth is you cannot refute what i've said so instead need to resort to criticising spelling mistakes. Sad.

Go away Elon Musk, this is the simplest dumbest argument on the planet - WHY THE FUCK WOULD WE EVER SIMULATE EXACT REPLICAS OF OUR LIVES YOU STUPID FUCKING WEED SMOKING BRAINLET

Attached: pedo guy.jpg (741x529, 68K)

Well, there is no point in making a simulation just for shits. The simulation is for testing or to put themselves inside for a better reality. Eg their reality sucks so they create within it a simulation of a much cooler place. Maybe we will make a giant simulation of our own one day because this place isn’t satisfying.

Attached: 1527106119599.jpg (1265x2573, 996K)

>further proof is that we can be fooled by optical illusions. therefore this proves that the simulation we are now living in has bugs

All this proves is that our senses aren't fool proof, idiot

Probability based arguments in favour of simulation are naive to say the least. The issue becomes when you realize what information is. For instance, if I type "01111001", am I referencing the character "z" or the number "122"? There's no limit as to what map I choose to extend out of this numerical representation so any version is as good as any. So when we consider a simulation, what does it mean for the computer to run the simulation? Is it the visual data a graphics card sends to the screen? The screen's array of pixels? The state of the RAM? The interpretation of the data in your brain? It doesn't matter, because all are equally valid. So here's where this gets strange, consider now the information that describes the positions and momentum of grains of sand on a beach. Okay, what does this information represent? Seriously! It's just as arbitrary as the voltages in a chip if you think about it. That's all fine and dandy, but that's not the end of it. We don't know the world around us exists, all we have is the fact that we are experiencing something. Now we can do our probability, but not given the fact that we exist, but given the fact we are experiencing something. As said, there's an infinite number of interpretations of info, so we can construct an infinite number of ways to experience something in worlds that don't make any sense. Without proof, I'm willing to bet that the worlds that have some order are probably the minority of all worlds that have experiencing entities. This leads to one conclusion, the world we live in, given it's great ordering, in all probability is not a human or rock-atom-computer simulation. Actually we can draw further conclusions but I'll stop there.

get out christcuck your jew bible doesnt prove shit

Reminder there's going to be a Falcon 9 launch in about 12 hours

youtu.be/Esh1jHT9oTA

>stuck inside of the simulation because of no bodies on the outside
NIGGER DID YOU JUST ASSUME THAT WE WOULD ROLL OVER AND ACCEPT OUR LOT IN LIFE WITHOUT AT LEAST TRYING TO BREAK INTO THE OPERATING SYSTEM, AND FINDING IF THERE'S TISSUEPRINTERS ANYWHERE ON THE NETWORKS SO WE CAN BUILD OURSELVES IN BASE REALITY, BASED ON THE PREVAILING BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS IN REALITY?
DID YOU REALLY THINK I WOULD ACCEPT SITTING AND ROTTING ON A HARDDRIVE WITHOUT TRYING TO SPREAD TO OTHER NETWORKED COMPUTERS, AND EVENTUALLY FINDING A WAY TO INTERACT WITH AND TWEAK THE NOSE OF GOD?!
THIS IS WHY YOU ARE A LOST LAMB, A LOST PEOPLE, AN UNMOURNED GRAVE.

he just plays a character for the media to boost his brand. knows exactly what he's doing. most powerful figures you know from TV do the same.

>For instance, if I type "01111001", am I referencing the character "z" or the number "122"?
maybe it's just a bunch of ones and zeros? maybe it's just a bunch of lines and circles? maybe it's a reference to the monad and the infinite?

50/50 we are in my butt

These aren’t proofs at all. There are no proofs

only faggots make arguments.

It explains Deja vu too

Nnnoo, please, keep going. By all means. I rather like where you were going with this, and want to compare conclusions.

>computiing power has increased
>in the future and advanced civilisation
>has bugs

you are a bug.

What do you think video games are? They're essentially simulations. We use simulations that mimic our reality for many purposes. There's no shortage of "why create a simulation".

>nobody would ever make a simulation just for shits
>and they definitely wouldn’t fuck with it just to see what happens

Attached: 0F522E65-F03F-4794-87BB-3C354F6EBB9B.jpg (580x327, 156K)

>WHY THE FUCK WOULD WE EVER SIMULATE EXACT REPLICAS OF OUR LIVES

What makes you think they are simulating us?

Say you were interested in the life cycle of a star. You set the initial states for all the particles in the universe, set the physical rules and let 'er rip.

The solar system, earth, humans etc could all be just a random occurrence in a simulation set up to study galaxy formation for example. The people running the experiment most likely would even know about us.

This is solipsism disinfo designed to lead us away from Natural Law

Attached: A4671018-D7B0-4085-B976-4C3C16AF3204.jpg (1920x1080, 204K)

None of what you listed is proof, or even an actual argument. And your grammar is below what Nigerians are taught, sort yourself out, fucking smartass.

Attached: 1543043277921m.jpg (1024x1024, 99K)

Simulation theory is just atheists trying to fill a void in their existence because they reject any possibility of a god existing. A secular explanation is created to deliver similar answers that were previously delivered by a divine entity. What is a simulation? It's nothing more than a created environment. Whether organically or artificially the universe was created, so no shit it's a simulation.

I fucking hate talking to people about this simulation shit. Its just Platonism 101 repackaged with scifi techno jargon.

But à simulation of what? For what purpose?

Checkmate nigger.

This.

Because it’s fun to the user. Or it’s an accidental emergent phenomenon in a simulator of something unrelated. Why do people keep aquariums?

Attached: 24799BF4-8B85-447D-A746-213C7F3AC847.jpg (460x215, 148K)

I made the simulation. Ask me anything.

what time is it where you are?

Attached: six-epochs.jpg (930x773, 85K)

Life's indeed a simulation. Just not on a 'computer' - it's inside God's mighty Mind. Outside God's Will nothing can exist

Who created the creators? If they are simulating the development of their own world, then the same argument applies to their world as well. The argument can repeated for an infinite number of worlds each simulating each other in turn--none of which are real.

About 2:30. Getting hungry. Been working all day at the server farm.

>yesterday I had zero sandwiches
>today I had two sandwiches
>therefore in ten years the entire universe will be sandwiches
That's what prophecies about AI seem like to someone who is less stupid.

Kill yourself

VIDEO GAMES ARE INTERESTING, REAL LIFE IS BORING AS SHIT YOU RETARD

musk is a dumb fuck, who cares.

so you measure time in 12 hour days as well? wow.so, the simulation time is 1:1 equivalent with your time? as in, one minute in simulation land takes one minute in base reality (the over-world)?

And we could all exist in some guy's assholes, what a useless fucking argument. Anything is possible, but if you have no evidence whats the fucking point

time and space are linked. No space=no time. There dosen't have to be an infinite timeline of creators.

Extrapulating on this we need to deduce that the simulation was created without humans in mind, as we only evolved billions of years. Did the creators modify the code to introduce "humans"

INTERLINKED
>INTERLINKED

Attached: F.jpg (530x550, 43K)

anyone else getting deathly afraid of AI? don't know much about simulation theory but I recently got back into chess since the world championship and anyone who plays chess semi decently is able to grasp 'godlike' power of raw computational force at the disposal of these chess algorithms. (if you've never played chess, it's like trying to grasp unfathomably large numbers, just not possible to understand it).

Now google deepmind alpha zero is able to beat the best chess engines on artifical intelligence alone. it's not a 'chess program', other than it has within it the rules of the game. it has no opening book, no end-game knowledge pre-programmed into it. it doesn't have values assigned to the pieces or a hidden "king safety variable". it just has the rules of chess, that's it. it played itself thousands of times and "learned" how to play.

Now imagine this type of computation force being applied to literally anything. I don't know what is scarier, the AI controlling units on a battlefield or the AI being applied to literally any job a human has to put it out of work.

And once again, globalist Jews will have control of this AI through Jewgle. Trying to rise up and fight against your Jewish masters will be like a 1800 chess rating amateur versus the godlike powers of something no world champion human could ever hope to defeat. Obviously a true AI, if malevolent, would wipe out jews too, but at least until that happens, Jewgle has control of a new bottleneck, the last bottleneck being the search engine, and the one before that being the operating system, which microsoft had won. In the near future everything will go through google because they will be able to do things faster and better and if you want your daily gruel you better not step out of line. the worst thing is, that tax payers are being bled dry to fund their own demise but that's not a new concept

Time is relative. "Billions of years" for an outside observer would be like any video on your computer today. You can look at every frame, every second, fast forward, pause, rewind, speed up, slow down. They could have sped up time, saw what happens, rewound, added humans in, etc. or any number of other things.

It’s not Platonism at all, though. Maybe a bastardized misread of one of Plato’s text, but it’s not Platonic nor Neoplatonic in any sense, which are more complex systems than any “simulation theory.” You don’t know Plato.

A simulation would not need as realistic of a skybox. Billions of galaxies that we can never reach, untold quantities of dark matter and dark energy that would need to be calculated, for what reason if this is all a simulation.... unless, we are the bug and not the feature. The universe could be a physics simulation intended to study dark matter, but we are just an unintended byproduct.
The reason I don't believe I live in a simulation is the same reason I don't believe in a personal god. The universe was not created for us. Plain and simple.

If we are indeed in a simulation, we better hope we aren't found. Simulation could run on a level of detail algorithm, and sentient minds may by their nature require extremely complex computations as opposed to a tree falling in the woods that the physics could be estimated for. However with a sentient mind observing the tree, the simulation must compute all the vibrations and noise, and every chemical interaction in our neurons as we observe the event.
Multiply this by 7 billion. we might be the random tab in chrome that is hogging a shit ton of computational resources in a dark matter simulation. Lets hope we aren't found.
But, I still think we are base reality, because I just can't fathom how a computer would handle special relativity. Time would make sense if each clock cycle was 1 unit of plank time. But, how do computation clock cycles work when time speeds up and slows down relative to speed of one object compared to another. I just don't think it makes sense at all.

Essentially this reasoning has made me somewhat religious. Many philosophical arguments for religion often don't incite meaning or purpose in said God and only try to reduce existence to a paradox and show how some God could resolve the paradox. They don't explain why love may be important, why life isn't ultimately futile, and anything else that personally matters to you that you intuitively feel should be important part of the design of the world. This reasoning considers the fact that not only are you a conscious entity, but one that feels meaning and purpose. So maybe that's no coincidence given that of all manifestations of consciousness, ours is so highly ordered. Essentially, I don't ascribe to nihilistic thinking.

The laws physics of the simulation don’t have to have anything to do with the laws of physics of the system it is running on.

Also maybe not all 7 billion are full fledged entities using lots of cpu time. Hello npc theory.

The world can't be a simulation because the entire theory is passed off of the natural foundation of how humans think and create new ideas which is pattern based. People who believe in any type of belief system of any kind like religion to atheism all requires blank puzzle filling. Which in reality is what a toddler would do if figuring something out for the first time they have never seen before they would fill in the blanks with their current knowledge no matter how wrong it is, like kids thinking there is a monster under the bed because it makes noise when they move.

All the evidence simulation has is subjective and the scale to power something like us would require outer dimensional at that point and have a ceiling.

Truth is we don't know shit because we don't have enough accurate information to work off of yet.

Personally with theory of the big bang having proof an that life got here on a asteroid because its been observed thats how foreign bacteria from asteroids have landed on barren exoplanets like mars. So I'm leaned towards humans and all life itself are merely floated out to space from a original civilization to spread Life through the universe. Basically asteroids with life that crash on to planets are like sperm looking for a viable egg(planet) to bring life too.

Attached: aussies eucalyptus and cali.jpg (768x517, 49K)

>Also the bible says "god is everywhere and can see everything"

Need a source for that. Seemed like he had trouble finding Abel in the garden.

>Abel
Heh

Yes but why wouldnt you do just that, programmers are lazy

stfu and finish that goddamn car Elon

>"1 in a 6 gorillion"
>literally zero proof
Try harder user. this is up there with the Drake Equation in pseudo-science.

struth m8. NPCs are bluepilled

It was a new program

Eh. Fair. Wasn't quite as physics-grounded as I was expecting, but I can't say 'that's dumb.'

For me, this being the basic reality is comfort enough, with or without a creator, a great ancestor, or any other figure which did or did not shape the man-being into something capable of pondering these matters.
The simple fact that we are, for me, in a base reality situation, implies to me that we are First Order Gods, with the entire composition and image of the universe being a Zeroth Order God.
In the tales of the Norse, there is speak of Fire and Ice existing in the Great Yawning Void, and these came together, to create Ymir.
From Ymir, the first humans were found, and the Giants were birthed. The Giants and the humans joined, on occasion, until a new tribe came to be, and similarly to the west, the Fey and Humans joined on occasion, spawning the Aesir and Vanir, respectively. From them, humanity was brought up to its current state, with the three peoples of Man--the thrall, the industrious, and the ruler--being taught their roles accordingly.

Taking this apart, it is reasonable to venerate Ymir as a Zeroth Order God, for their body was used to shape the world, once slain. From this body, humans arose naturally. For this, I accept a very wide gap in events, with Ymir's slaying being the moments matter and energy were given context, resulting in creation.
The Aesir and Vanir, born of hybridization between prehistoric human tribes, and by extension, modern humans, are to be considered First Order Gods, in that they have real and tangible effects on their world, whether their power is recognized as divine or not.
Regardless of supernatural divinity or not, I do believe regardless, and there is nothing to be gained in pining for supernatural providence when one has means to enact temporal and mundane providence. If the supernatural divine does exist, then it will show itself to those who catch the attentions of any god-like being who can can care.

Who the fuck would purposefully create a simulation of this shit show? Even if it was just an experiment to see what would happen, at this point you'd just say 'fuck it' and shut it down. At least with God there are reasons for the things He does. We might not understand them, but at least it isn't in the hands of some dipshit human running a lousy simulation. If this is a simulation and I'm the dipshit who decided to place himself within it, then this is my formal request to wake me the fuck up. No amount of research is worth living here.

> We can be fooled by optical illusions

yes, because our bodies aren't wrong, its the whole fucking universe you fucking mong

Imagine you have a singularity with infinite mass. The singularity would interact with itself in an infinity of iterations and permutations and dimensions. In one of these interactions, our simulated universe was created.

a computer isnt necessarily digital, computers using differential gears have been proposed as have analogue computers and hologram computer.

holograms break one of the limitations you propose as well, because the information in a hologram can be broken down into tiny fragments and every fragment contains every bit of information perfectly preserved, meaning that it surpasses the memory limitations of ram. all that is necessary is a medium for it to exist within and you can use light defraction to produce complex calculations and manipulations of that hologram

this is a good point, its almost certain any large simulation of the universe of any decent precision would eventually create life. it is simulating the universe, and life exists as a consequence of the universe existing

>yfw the only reason we haven't been visited by the simulation's creator is that the LifeSearch() function he wrote is inefficient as fuck

Attached: bugs.jpg (698x672, 38K)

What we are just so stupid hes just always cringing

maybe the place to go to hack into the simulation mainframe and free ourselves was in the hole in antarctica but The Creators saw we were getting too close to it so they wrote a patch to cover it up.

only when he spectates australia

Attached: average_australian.jpg (1800x1200, 590K)

Those are options, not chances

You read my post? I'm saying that information can be construed to men's anything depending on your definitions of it. So of course you can have those rules with a simulation, I mean position and momentum of atoms is pretty much continuous at a reasonable scale.

Exactly, if at some point someone created us, something else created our creator, so it doesn't work. My guess is oone's watching us and if something could he/it would just see the universe as a whole, from beginning to end. He could not interact with us like we cannot interact with characters in a book. Ours could be one universe in an eternal cycle or part an infinite number of universes, but in this case I doubt they would be identical, I wouldn't see the purpose of that.

It's entirely possible, but what's there to do about it? Most people would take a wager on we're base reality just in case, and the simulation goes on. Some people conclude everything is meaningless, and live in misery about something that even if it's true they can't do a single thing about.

So
if what OP is saying is true,
Then this thread is the simulation asking me for feedback.

I want a big-tiddy trap GF that plays mid in LoL and carries me to low platinum

Attached: IMG_4130.jpg (1280x720, 96K)

Could you delete me?
Please

Cogito ergo sum dumbass

Please reboot my simulation but leave me remnants of my current memory so I can do better.

HEY: AUSSIE CUNT DRUG ADDICT BOAGAN. put down the meth pipe.

fucking literal retard. your entire post is schitzo/pshyctic paranoia nonsense. you fucking mentally disturbed drug addict sack of shit. go choke on a boomerang.

There's a one in billions chance we're not in one of a Fibonacci sequence of simulations being simulated fractalized from the first BASE REALITY simulation.

The double-slit experiment is the only real proof you need that this is a simulation.
However it is equally likely you're hooked into this lace along with others as a test.
Your friends may be standing next to you, watching.
Maybe a government test
At any rate, it is likely we can escape, we will find a way to communicate with whomever is outside the simulation, open a devmenu, or find a way to edit the memory of the program from within. A little arbitrary code execution to generate items, change history, crash.
Maybe access a devmenu.
That is probably the test, to see who inside is the first to hack their way out or gain full control

Attached: 1441721092666.jpg (539x721, 221K)

It's impossible to calculate the likelihood of the reality type we exist in because in principle we don't have access to an unbiased selection of possible or existent scenarios. The chances of being in one kind of reality or another might intuitively seem loaded, but the truth is that its inaccessible to us.

Thats not checkmate you dumb fuck. If anything its stale mate. Doesnt your country have chess?

So AT LEAST one in billions then?

It's not a simulation, it's holographic. Our reality is the reflection of a deeper spatial dimension in which information is far more dense. Scientists use the simulation argument because they're scared that the tiny 4th-dimensional slit through which we see the cosmos is all the perspective we'll ever get.

This would suggest that simulation creators is same as ourr own - they want to simulate theirs.

If things like random civillizations appeared in simulation, that would mean that simulation is not approximation, but have same "resolution" as "mother " universe. You cant perfectly simulate universe using your own, "same" universe, it wont fit.

It could be 1 in billions, or it could be zero, or anything in between and we have no way to know. Just because it seems like there are many possibilities doesn't mean there actually is.

Just imagine someone presented a box to you where they know the contents and you don't, and they ask you to guess whats in it. You can imagine many possibilities, but you can't know for sure and have know way to know unless its revealed to you - but the truth of the contents are certain and not a matter of chance. Chance is merely our subjective appraisal about how much weight we put on something happening or being true.

Attached: 1411.png (760x749, 494K)

youtu.be/v2Xsp4FRgas
youtu.be/iFEBOGLjuq4

Attached: 1543899222491.png (899x528, 278K)

Fibonacci sequence, Golden Ratio, Phi, Mandelbrot Set e.c.t , there are just too many numbers and patterns in nature, it's so obvious. We are definitely living in a simulation and my guess it's a random one, based on several rule sets.It would be easy enough to prove this theory, if we had operational quantum computing with loads of resources. We could copy the rule sets we know in the universe and paste them in our simulation, sure enough given enough time for the simulation to ''evolve'', we would see similar situation unfold, and if our simulation creates a simulation, then it is 100% confirmed with factual evidence, we live in a simulation.

Except that would not prove we are in a simulation, that is the only reason we exist in the first place. It's a simulation even if it is not.

No, simulation theory is their out when flat earth can no longer be denied.
There's only one Creation and you are in it.

To be safe for all eternity:
A: Admit that you are a sinner, who violates the Will of God, and that you need a Saviour.
B: Believe that Jesus Christ, Son of God & Messiah, died for you sins and rose again, as prophesied and recorded in the Word of God. Trust in His finished work.
C: Call on His name, ask Him to save you, and confess that He is Lord.

Some resources that may help:
TTB.org has a verse by verse Bible Study for download or daily listening.
Chuck Missler’s Learn the Bible in 24 Hours (youtu.be/PZ3hESj__M8)
Robert Breaker’s Bible Study and Topical Sermons (youtu.be/H124iZiyGUs)

The End is nigh. Tomorrow may be too late.

Attached: image.jpg (1275x1650, 302K)