Atheists think that dinosaurs died from a meteor

No one thinks this is a stupid story?

Attached: e083aaf308de637978f3660c2437ba03.jpg (720x540, 74K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=IcGfjP4l-5A
palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/communication/lee/page1.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mokele-mbembe
ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/do-ica-stones-prove-mankind-coexisted-dinosaurs-advanced-technology-098989
forbidden-history.com/marco-polo.html
livescience.com/37781-how-do-fossils-form-rocks.html
theguardian.com/science/2014/jun/13/earth-may-have-underground-ocean-three-times-that-on-surface
youtube.com/watch?v=0-K7_H27Wq4
nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/06/dinosaur-nodosaur-fossil-discovery/
cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79B00752A000300070001-8.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=VI1yRTC6kGE
ancienthistorylists.com/ancient-civilizations/10-oldest-ancient-civilizations-ever-existed/
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/04/100428-noahs-ark-found-in-turkey-science-religion-culture/
youtube.com/watch?v=BxyfiBGCwhQ
youtu.be/W7UOCw-FsIc?list=PL95ShunremB_I5G6wfAJtCVAbbKmoUBix
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Attached: 6dcac4f46c936d40e07c07ce341ef2a6.jpg (736x1309, 149K)

I'm not sure what you are trying to argue, very few people will challenge the fact there was a "great flood" within human history

>a flood happened at some point in time therefore a magic sky man exists who will send you to eternal pain after death if you pull on your dick too long
The absolute state of christcucks

How would a fish drown in a flood?

>Implying that the asteroid is a stupid story.

Bullshit. Where did the 65.8 million year old Iridium layer come from then?

>Rapid burial proves a global flood.

No it doesn't. It only proves that landslides have happened several times in earth's history. Why do you assume that every rapid burial occurred simultaneously?

>Implying that only a global flood could cause an underwater landslide.

LOL No.

>year long aquarium enthusiast here
Fish take everything in their mouthes that can possibly fit and then decide if its food and swallow or not food and spit it out again. It is not uncommon for things to get stuck in the mouth of a fish, especially if it's another living fish trying to not get swallowed. If the thing (or fish) gets stuck and is too big to swallow, the eating fish will suffocate/die from not beeing able to eat, as well as the fish that is stuck in the mouth.

Then they die, sink to the ground and become fossils

Since when was there ever a "great flood" in human history?

LOL Exactly.

A+

The Bible makes about as much sense as hollow earth or homeopathy.

but fish thrive in water , they don´t give jackshit about a flood.
heh , really made you think didn´t i?

look at the stripped off surface of the great pyramid, water did that not scavengers.

>Fish died trying to eat too big of another fish
Most of the pics an a search show the fish being eaten is obviously too large for the bigger fish to eat so it got caught in its mouth/throat and they both died.

youtube.com/watch?v=IcGfjP4l-5A
>youtube.com/watch?v=IcGfjP4l-5A

Hey, an atheist here, there were multiple great floods through history such as the ones that made the english channel, the bosphorus, and I am not quite sure if the Bering Strait counts.

However, the meteor is backed up by sedimentary evidence, such as the iridium layer, footprints of fire, and shocked quartz
>>pic related to iridium spike

palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/communication/lee/page1.html

Attached: irspike2.jpg (344x550, 31K)

Hmmmm…

Come to think of it … if there were a global flood then freshwater fish would likely die from all the salt.

Of course, this just raises further questions. For example, how did Noah and his sons survive after the flood on a salted earth?

The great pyramid just wore down over time.

At this point, you sound like you are dropping to your knees and begging us to believe you … even though there is no Hell and so you are making fools of yourselves for nothing.

Dinosaurs lived during the same time as humans did. And the bible does talk about them, just calls them behemoth.
And I think this is how it really was. here some not so old mentions of dinosaurlike creatures.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mokele-mbembe
This is described to look like a longneck dinosaur, and was allegedly seen africa

There are rocks showing humans and dinosaurs together
ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/do-ica-stones-prove-mankind-coexisted-dinosaurs-advanced-technology-098989
It is claimed they are faked, but the explenation is that ONE guy faked all of the over 16 thousand of those discovered stones while also new ones are discovered all the time

Marco Polos description of dragons
forbidden-history.com/marco-polo.html
>"Leaving the city of Yachi, and traveling ten days in a westerly direction, you reach the province of Karazan, which is also the name of the chief city....Here are seen huge serpents, ten paces in length (about 30 feet), and ten spans (about 8 feet) girt of the body. At the fore part, near the head, they have two short legs, having three claws like those of a tiger, with eyes larger than a forepenny loaf (pane da quattro denari) and very glaring."
>The jaws are wide enough to swallow a man, the teeth are large and sharp, and their whole appearance is so formidable, that neither man, nor any kind of animal can approach them without terror. Others are met with of a smaller size, being eight, six, or 5 paces long; and the following method is used for taking them. In the day-time, by reason of great heat, they lurk in caverns, from whence, at night, they issue to seek their food, and whatever beast they meet with and can lay hold of, whether tiger, wolf, or any other, they devour

All signs humans were living during the same time as dinosaurs. What do you think they did when it was said some heroes slayed a dragon?

Attached: Dinosaur cavepaint.jpg (500x375, 72K)

regarding fossils
livescience.com/37781-how-do-fossils-form-rocks.html
>The most common method of fossilization is called permineralization, or petrification. After an organism's soft tissues decay in sediment, the hard parts — particularly the bones — are left behind.
>Water seeps into the remains, and minerals dissolved in the water seep into the spaces within the remains, where they form crystals. These crystallized minerals cause the remains to harden along with the encasing sedimentary rock.
>In another fossilization process, called replacement, the minerals in groundwater replace the minerals that make up the bodily remains after the water completely dissolves the original hard parts of the organism.

So basically they get buried by some mud which is under water. Assuming a great flood hit them like the one in the bible or the countless other floodmyths across the world, wouldnt that meet the conditions?

>11In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on the same day all the fountains of the great deep burst open, and the floodgates of the sky were opened.
>fountains of the great deep
Thousands of years later there is a discovery making it possible those fountain of the great deep actually exist
theguardian.com/science/2014/jun/13/earth-may-have-underground-ocean-three-times-that-on-surface

soft dinosaur tissue discovered on dinosaur bones
youtube.com/watch?v=0-K7_H27Wq4

pic related was recently discovered
nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/06/dinosaur-nodosaur-fossil-discovery/
65 million years my ass

Attached: nodosaur.jpg (1900x1268, 324K)

Exactly.

Fish aren't known for their intelligence. I imagine that prehistoric fish were probably even dumber.

Atheist/agnostic here. Dinosaurs are made up and so is the meteor story. I don’t speak for bluepilled athiests though

On the flood

cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP79B00752A000300070001-8.pdf
the Adam and Eve story by Chan Thomas. Didnt read it myself yet, but appearently it speaks of a reoccuring catastrophy destroying civilizations. Supposedly it was classified by th CIA and then a bit cleaned up and declassified.
It puts the time interval between the events to 6-7k years which kind of fits what I came to believe.

The Cataclysm 12,5k years ago I believe was the rain of fire like the aztecs call it aka an astoroid or comet hitting the earth like Göbekli Tepe tells too. The last Cataclysm I trust the bible saying it was around 3k BC, well actually around 2,4k BC, but there is the issue that kikes deleted 600 years out of the life from Shems descendents to pilpull around and claim that Jesus cant possibly be high priest
youtube.com/watch?v=VI1yRTC6kGE
(ignore the part about the pyramids, on that point the video is actually lacking some stuff, but it explains how all translations come from a faulty scripture.) pushing back the flood 600 years which happens to be at the time couple of cultures around the world seemingly independently created civilizations +- a couple hundred years
ancienthistorylists.com/ancient-civilizations/10-oldest-ancient-civilizations-ever-existed/
I believe they are merely the remnants of what survived

They also found something they believe to be the arc which is dated at around the same time (4800 Years)
news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/04/100428-noahs-ark-found-in-turkey-science-religion-culture/

However if the time frames inbetween are always the same it would mean the gap between cataclysm would be around 7 thousand years like that book of Thomas says too taking the time inbetween the last 2 as reference (the comet hitting earth before that being 12,5-12,9k years ago)

Attached: 1540178706028s.jpg (250x123, 2K)

>60 gorillion year old layer
The information you’re told is from unreliable (((sources))), you can’t hold on to those figures and claims anymore for comfort

Creationtarda think all dinosaurs lived at once even though their habitats/niches couldnt possibly coexist.

The flood is batshit insane. Did all the animals and microorganisms teleport onto the ark, what about the multitude of human parasites that require a live host. Also there is no evidence of a massive genetic bottle neck

Of course fossils show rapid burial, thats the only way to make fossils.

You also never find dinosaur in upper layers with more modern animals

Whats the requisite IQ to believe in creationism?

Attached: Screenshot_20180809-214229.jpg (800x1280, 303K)

>That pic.

Sauropods didn't drag their tails. Also, they had longer legs than that. That pic clearly isn't a sauropod.

>Dinosaurs lived during the same time as humans did.

Only if you count birds.

>And the bible does talk about them, just calls them behemoth.

Behemoth was an elephant. The Bible even describes its huge "tail" (penis) and "stones" (testicles).

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mokele-mbembe

In my opinion, the Mokele was created by Africans who dug up sauropod bones and misunderstood them.

Case in Point: The Mokele is described as an aquatic creature with a sauropod-like appearance. In reality, sauropods were fully terrestrial. Mokele is also sometimes described as carnivorous, even though sauropods were herbivorous.

>It is claimed they are faked

They are faked.

>What do you think they did when it was said some heroes slayed a dragon?

Dragons myths arose when ancient people (with no scientific background) dig up dinosaur bones and misinterpreted them.

Attached: a288c1060bbda543c476f76d21aae6e4.jpg (640x960, 128K)

jesus christ protestans are supposed to be smarter than catholics yet you only see this shit from ameritards

Post more screenshots of your tracphone you fucking retarded boomer, it's really funny

Attached: Screenshot_20180809-135317.jpg (800x1280, 287K)

>So basically they get buried by some mud which is under water. Assuming a great flood hit them like the one in the bible or the countless other floodmyths across the world, wouldnt that meet the conditions?

A global flood would have salted the earth. Noah would have died of starvation.

>soft dinosaur tissue discovered on dinosaur bones

The "soft tissue" found in dino bones is like leather. Over time, the cell structure breaks down and the soft parts became a leather-like substance. This is consistent with science.

How do you explain all the fossils then?

Grasshoppers haven't evolved for 92 years because there is no need to.

Attached: Molymeme.jpg (960x733, 48K)

There's a lot of fucking frozen water in Antarctica. I wonder what would happen if that were to quickly melt??

>Sauropods didn't drag their tails. Also, they had longer legs than that. That pic clearly isn't a sauropod.
or the one who made it just wasnt a prehistoric picasso

>Behemoth was an elephant.
yeah no
>Its tail is as strong as a cedar. The sinews of its thighs are knit tightly together.
nothing about its penis or testicles.

>The Mokele is described as an aquatic creature with a sauropod-like appearance. In reality, sauropods were fully terrestrial
because we were able to see how they dont walk through deep water occasionally making them appear aquatic when seen just in that occasion. and it being carnivorous could just mean it attacked some people

>They are faked.
sure they are, one guy admitted to faking all 16k of the stones alone after being threatened with long jailtime for selling historical artifacts

>Dragons myths arose when ancient people (with no scientific background) dig up dinosaur bones and misinterpreted them.
thats why they continously went out to kill a dragon

Attached: nerluc dragon.jpg (737x612, 68K)

>The information you’re told is from unreliable (((sources))), you can’t hold on to those figures and claims anymore for comfort

This is fucking laughable, given that the Bible was written by kikes and the fact that most Christians simply cling to the Bible because they are too weak to handle reality.

No. The information we know is scientific and debatable. If you knew shit about chemistry, geology and ophysics, you would know how to attack false statements.
When it comes down to science it all goes down to numbers, and no matter how famous and influential you are, if you're wrong, and you're proven to be wrong, you're wrong.
That's why the whole scientific community agrees on all of this shit, and the people that """think""" otherwise are facebook keyboard warriors

Doggerland.

Creationists are so stupid that it is embarrasing. Maybe you should do a PHD in evolutionary biology if you know so much.

...

>The sole reason landed gentry postulated the earth having an iron core in the 17th century was because of the magical properties of compasses.
I'm not a hollow earth fag, but like flat earthers they make some compelling points here & there. Much like when commies come here to help you sharpen up your fangs, it's good to sincerely blow them the fuck out with your own understanding of a subject.
Now we are aware of the existence of Birkeland currents & the electrical connections between bodies in the solar system, it's right that any or all relevant former theories/assumptions are retested.

>At what size does the phenomenon shown in the below experiment cease to apply in the current standard model of planetary formation?
youtube.com/watch?v=BxyfiBGCwhQ

Also a large meteorite hit Greenland about 12000 years ago.

>Mythological dragons prove that dinosaurs are still alive!

LOL No.

Dragon stories exist in every single ancient culture from China to Italy to Sweden.

Implying lizards give birth to live babies

The word "dinosaur" is a 19th century creation.

IMPACTS CAUSE FLOODS DUMMY

Attached: FFUCKIN DUMBASS.jpg (860x460, 55K)

BEHEMOTH IS A DINOSAUR, A DINOSAUR IS HE.

The amount of energy and mental gymnastics put into justifying taking iron age semitic mythology as literal truth is astondishing. You could have been a medical doctor by now.

That prehistoric grasshopper actually looks different from the modern one.

Not an argument, leaf.

Attached: e5162403ca390321a93cd258d8d864c2.jpg (770x465, 103K)

Here's a revolutionary idea, people sometimes fucked up animal anatomy when trying to draw them or record them in some other way

Attached: totally_a_lion.gif (1x1, 43)

Not an argument.

This. There are a few species that have stopped evolving and have remained the same for millions of years because they were also perfect for their environment, with little external pressure that would make more unique adaptions beneficial.

Attached: livingfossil.jpg (1920x1080, 354K)

>because we were able to see how they dont walk through deep water occasionally making them appear aquatic when seen just in that occasion. and it being carnivorous could just mean it attacked some people
Or it could mean that the tribespeople speaking of such legends think it's funny to screw with whitey who believes in such a bizarre animal and get gibs for 'confirming' it.

That drawing looks more like a dog to me.

Also, nobody is saying that all dinosaurs died at the exact same time.

Also, if that woman is really a Christian, she should know that Jesus punishes women who have opinions or set foot outside the kitchen. Someone give that cunt a black eye.

Not an argument

Attached: 45d9812e02486d29f0576bd65a0a0576.jpg (456x838, 109K)

No, it is not an argument. The fact that you believe a book, that says god attacked Moses in a pub and the only way to stop a god attack is to chop off a foreskin and put it on god’s penis, is more reliable or could disprove modern science is so asinine that it is a wonder you haven’t stuck a fork in a toaster yet. You’re literally retarded and beneath intellectual debates.

Icthyosaurs could.

Some do, they're viviparous.

>What do you think they did when it was said some heroes slayed a dragon?
stories of saintly heroes slaying monsters are allegories of how christianity replaced earlier pagan religions

They probably have evolved to some degree … just not so much.

Animals are always evolving, but some evolve more dramatically than others.

I wish leafs wouldn't even respond. You're all NPCs.

Still not an argument

It still wouldn't be enough to flood the entire earth.

>sat there completely undisturbed by any bottomfeeders or other predators long enough to become nearly perfectly preserved

k

THATS your evidence of massive flood? Are you fucking retarded???

Just to catch you up - no one in science is denying the great flood. Everyone knows it happened already. (Protip: look at a topographical map of the earth / google erosion). The debate is over what caused it. I think a meteor hitting the ice caps is the most prevalent theory atm

Neither is yours, all you do is posting mythological imagery
Imagine that in 500 years 12% americans will believe Harry Potter was a history book

Attached: 2124545.jpg (1056x1080, 108K)

if i saw that fucking thing swimming towards me i would probably soil my diving suit

Friendly reminder that not one fossil has ever been carbon dated accurately.
Ever.

Not earth, "known world", which back then was not very big at all.

The only way the fish would die in the flood is mixing saltwater and freshwater but that would kill all fish. The world wide flood is the weakest story in the bible, i have no idea why creationsts refer to it so often.

The sea floor is quite an active place, earthquakes, currents and continental shifts can cause sand to surge like an avalance and bury anything it comes into contact with.

There are several similar Civil War Era photos like this. All verified.

Attached: 1133be340ad1ede4a2a1e8dce2116ea7.jpg (481x446, 50K)

>or the one who made it just wasnt a prehistoric picasso

I don't now what you are talking about, given that Picasso didn't even paint realistically.

>nothing about its penis or testicles.

The Bible mentions its "stones" after mentioning its tail, meaning that "tail" is a penis euphemism.

>thats why they continously went out to kill a dragon

Those were just myths.

>That pic.

Triceratops had cheeks covering its rear teeth. That fake Triceratops would have had difficulty chewing.

And how are you determining that accuracy?

>numerous cultures have the same exact 'myth'

Sorry you never got passed the 6th grade. No I’m not. But if you had, you would have studied the evidence that shows the Chicxulub event put the final nail in the coffin for the dinosaurs. The extinction event was already in progress because of dramatic climate change (imagine that) due to tremendous volcanic activity at the time. Many species of dinosaurs had already gone extinct when the comet (most likely) or asteroid hit. That event just hastened what was already in progress. It happened approx 66 million years ago (latest dating) and is very much accepted science now. I believe the theory was first put forth in the early 80’s. Hard empirical evidence has been turned (literally) up to support this one time theory. Frog people / DumpTARDS are so fucking stupid.

Looks like a canoe.

Behemoth literally means hippopotamus in russian.

youtu.be/W7UOCw-FsIc?list=PL95ShunremB_I5G6wfAJtCVAbbKmoUBix

Attached: 03.jpg (1024x768, 156K)

Attached: Belt Hill Montana, evidence of flood.jpg (300x200, 16K)

They're pretty chill fish and are super lazy, not at all dangerous to humans. They''ve basically been chilling at the bottom of the sea for millions of years, sleeping in caves and just bumping around looking for small fish and other creatures to suck up like a greenland shark.

Attached: 34654756.jpg (1280x720, 98K)

This just lends weight to the idea that people all over the world found dino bones.

During the time of the dinosaurs, the earth was warmer and so dinosaurs could survive in places like Alaska.

Even Eskimos have dragons myths … even though real dragons would have difficulty surviving cold climates. They probably just found dino bones.

So?

>Source, my ass

Dunno about dinosaurs but ancient ugly creatures roamed the earth

Attached: 1543342641722m (1).jpg (1024x963, 238K)

Attached: mega-pill.jpg (497x348, 54K)

yes, that one was appearently uploaded by some women not really looking at it. found it in some closet and uploaded thinking its some cannon or something. when it gained traction they started a campagne to discredit it, but always referred to this pic here. note the same posture, setting and even holes in similar places. this is made to discredit the other.

>The Bible mentions its "stones" after mentioning its tail, meaning that "tail" is a penis euphemism.
except it doesnt. only translation that does is the KJV which is kiked on multiple ends

>That fake Triceratops would have had difficulty chewing.
its almost like people dont paint 100% accurately at all times

Attached: fakecivilwarpteropicture.jpg (474x319, 23K)

Case in point.

you missed the point idiot. Flood water carries sediment and rocks. Thats why it says it was "buried rapidly." of course a fish cant drown, but it will die and have its body preserved as a fossil if it is buried alive by flood waters carrying huge amounts of rock and sediment. If it died of natural causes its body would decompose before it is buried and fossilized.

Attached: IMG_2985.jpg (1486x1125, 424K)

Attached: pterosaur.png (506x321, 288K)

?

Ahahahahaahahahaha

Attached: images (5).jpg (220x229, 11K)

Two things.

1. Female Jackson's chameleons give birth to live young.
2. Ichthyosaurs were not lizards. They belong in their own reptile category. They aren't lizards for the same reason crocodiles aren't lizards.

Humans and dinosaurs lived tens of millions of years apart. No human ever saw a living dinosaur to start a legend. Dinosaurs died off 66 million years ago...the earliest proto-humanoids are about 2 million years old.