Should Loli porn be considered Child Pornagrahpy?

Should Loli porn be considered Child Pornagrahpy?

Attached: 1530826285133.jpg (415x415, 16K)

Yes, all who watch it should be hanged with the rest of them.

Why's that? They are only drawings.

No, but people should look down on those who make and or enjoy them.

Yes now fuck off, MODS

The excitement comes from the fact that they are children. Regardless of if they are drawings or not, the sexual pleasure is still derived from the same thought process.

Pornography in general should not be allowed.

cringe and bluepilled
based and redpilled

No, it’s weird like furries, but that doesn’t mean we should go around making drawings illegal.

on one hand I'm pretty sure most the people who like it are just weebs and not real pedophiles
but on the other hand pedos can get off to this which isn't what I want
I WANT pedophiles to be forced to commit a crime if they want sexual pleasure that badly
I WANT them to get fucking thrown behind bars
jacking off to loli porn only delays the inevitable

no, obviously not. how is this even a debate? some people really just can't tell the difference between drawings and real life I guess.

Isn’t there a common idea that guys who are porn addicted tend to not make the effort to ask girls out (they lose the will to do it after they finish jacking it)?

Based on this, wouldn’t loli basically do the same thing and stop creepers from doing real harm?

it depends on the person
some might lose the motivation but others might grow a need for the real thing

Yes. It is pornography of children. Child pornography. That should be punishable by castration at the very least.

Of course not, these retards even want to ban nude historical statues of children and old paintings.

This

Yes but could is illegal because I wasade by abusing children.

Loli is made by fat old men drawing on their tablets.

The 1st amendment must protect it, and it should not be outlawed on the basis of it being disagreeable.

>aussie advocates for punishment of thought crimes

Attached: 1542845868510.jpg (735x582, 135K)

should PAYDAY 2 be considered bank robbery?

well you know, if someone plays enough payday, it might not be enough for them at some point and they'll go out and rob a real bank

t. pedo.

So, drawing of pictures is illegal then?

Attached: JailFree.jpg (1000x2315, 928K)

They are the first to the chambers.

>MAN OF SHAD

Attached: 341f768ec7ca0fea17ec2e8cb94b3ea57aaefcdfd.gif (400x305, 2.14M)

yes, but is child pornography supposed to be illegal because produced harming children or because it portrays children being harmed?
protip, the second is wrong or to be coherent we shouldn't have a single depiction of any other crime in our media.

of course just like playing cod makes you good at handling a gun and playing enough god of war makes you a raging half deity that goes on a rampage

All art should be illegal

Ok, this is epic.

You're fucking retarded and intellectually dishonest (or stupid).
Loli is closer to a genre and the furthest thing from fetish shit.

The realword ideal being presented by loli (when it is) hentai isn't fucking children because the reality is literally impossible and incogruent with what's depicted in the fiction.
The idealism and optimal-outcomes of loli =/= the idealistic achievable in reality and doesn't even strive for any semblance of realisticness anyway.
Go attack diaperfags retard.

Find me porn of a loli that's trying to mimic an actual child which is the pornographied you fucking bootsucking faggot and then we could even come close to even having a equal discussion.

>Find me porn of a loli that's trying to mimic an actual child.
No thanks, unlike you i'm not a paedophile.

>has only called it a thought crime
>everyone who disagrees with me is a pedofag

Why are you even here??

Attached: 4867a1d5836d666871af1bcb500df339.jpg (500x225, 19K)

>it's not true lolicon

gas all pedos

loli IS child pornography you strayan retard

DON'T
FORGET
WHERE
YOU
ARE

If you oppose 2D you oppose Jow Forums, and you will never belong here. Kill yourselves.

Attached: 1543581528706.jpg (1024x566, 57K)

No because Loli are not citizens.
Also, child porn should be 100% legal if you can prove it's not a child of your nation or your nation's allies.
I don't understand why the law protects random filipinos.

This is the most important post in the thread

trips don't lie

It's the concept of it though

This would also be fine.
But you'd also need to ban porn for women: the dating websites, and social media linked to your IRL body.

Der jap

Checked for being based on the loli question

I'd be down for banning unambiguous loli porn if we can also ban furfaggotry, since that's the analogue to bestiality.

No, but it should be shunned as a vice that would exclude a person from respectable group

Attached: 1517266320296_0.jpg (225x225, 5K)

No if its stated that she is 18+

Attached: 1532366338_tumblr_pber4cgwzB1tx8o4yo1_500.gif (500x280, 2.68M)

From what I hear, loli fags are hated in Japan. Degenerates deserve the gas, no matter how honorary they are.

boys i was browsing Tor and the amount of fuck up porn I've seen is worrying me
some much father daughter pedo shit its actually making me become more of a doomer

Only if i get tax benefits for having a waifu

The concept doesn't matter. No one is harmed, it is a drawing. Arresting someone for wanting to diddle little anime girls is enforcement for a thought crime. I can understand not wanting your kids around said person, but they haven't done anything inherently wrong.

Attached: 152f8bf17ec4cf1e724354503195.jpg (847x719, 50K)

It isn't important whether loli encourages harm of children or not.
What's important is whether the benefits outweigh the harms.
And the benefit is that roasties get toasty when 2D girls get more attention than them.
Anything that takes attention away from the roastie takes power away from the roastie, and the less power the roastie has, the better.
Porn depicting mixed-race couples is still legal, despite this producing fatherless households.
Child sexual abuse may be harmful but it's uncommon. Single mothers are bloody everywhere. And yet, propaganda supporting single mothers is common.
If it reduces the # of people falling for the 3DPD meme, I support it.
Yes some kids will inevitably get diddled. But for every 1 kid getting diddled as a result of someone playing lolige and getting inspired, there are 1000 salty old hags that are mad that men aren't paying attention to them.
That's a trade worth making.

Attached: this will never be you.gif (464x381, 424K)

>one is made with pixels and incel sweat
>one is made by sexualy exploiting a child
Gee, I dunno.

It's just drawings. Art doesn't harm anyone and should not be regulated by anyone's particular sensibilities. Free speech is something that should be protected.

You can't argue with this truth.

Attached: retard.jpg (150x180, 7K)

it is victimless

drawn porn is arguably the ONLY form of porn that should be legal to begin with, to console the mentally wounded but otherwise keep real humans from being a part of the thing itself due to it's extremely detrimental effects on everyone involved

this
art attempts to imitate God which is heresy

stop enjoying things

Found the loli lover

Attached: F2C8AE84-7EEB-4FB0-B8E9-E76B87F1A70C.png (256x256, 33K)

Attached: SnooTakes4chan.png (1487x625, 42K)

>can own an AR-15
>can't own lewd pictures of 2d "children"
So much for the land of the "free".

Attached: 1543092008428.jpg (2000x1900, 569K)

kek

Attached: wtf.jpg (202x200, 10K)

Victim-less crime shouldn't be illegal or prosecuted. They should be hunting real child abusers instead, but sadly those are the people who write the law and are trying to get loli banned in the first place.

According to the lolifags and shotafags I've meet over the years. All of them hate 3d children and none of them want children too. They also don't look at the stuff because it is a child but that it cute.
I don't see the appeal but others do.

Attached: 1541598859695.png (534x534, 370K)

no

Attached: 1533193410725.png (800x734, 481K)

Heres a doozy for all you loli lovers out there:

Should (realistic) retracings of actual photos be legal?
What about fotorealistic CP drawings that are fictional?
What about CGI CP? What about fotorealistic CGI CP?

>moe fags
I get it though

Attached: 1543582530433.jpg (1024x588, 28K)

Attached: 1532841292700.jpg (400x400, 120K)

Yeah, I forget to mention that most of them are woman.

Bot a loli lover but how are drawings accurate depictions?

all porn is child porn all of it, you're in babylon
BABY LON = LEAGUE OF NATIONS.

yearly ball drop in new york makes fun of
all of us for it, first thing for a baby that
drops is its balls, ground hog day is real.
no ones growing up.

>should lines of ink on paper be considered actual real life child abuse

Do you even hear yourself talk? What is wrong with this world that so many people can't distinguish fiction over reality? Is it a mental defect?

Pic related:
You are the woman

Attached: 1540798310500.jpg (1024x900, 153K)

...

This isn't so much about loli, but about drawn pornography in general. Lot of people can draw photorealistically, so the question is if such images (drawn or computer generated) should be treated the same as "real" images, even tho they're victimless

Based nip trips

Attached: 1aa.jpg (640x360, 35K)

No it's a drawing. Did you know you can say all characters depicted are over 18 and you're hands are clean? Weird how you cant do that with real people

Attached: 1543362860047.png (442x445, 99K)

Haven't seen a teamup between these two countries this good since the 1940s!

Attached: tumblr_static_kotoura_san-01-haruka-psychic-laughing-comedy-entertainment-funny.jpg (1280x720, 97K)

Should guro be considered equivalent to actual snuff porn?

>britbongs actually advocating for thoughtcrime
What a surprise...

Attached: doublethink meme.jpg (500x627, 79K)

>Lot of people can draw photorealistically,
yet they do not alter reality.

>so the question is if such images (drawn or computer generated) should be treated the same as "real" images, even tho they're victimless
They are art, art should not be illegal. Besides, victimless crimes are a nebulous concept.

>you can say all characters depicted are over 18 and you're hands are clean?
Same could be said for amateur CP since the police probably can't pinpoint the *exact* age of the victim.
You can draw a toddler and say it's a 40year old. You can draw a lion and say it's a giraffe.
Doesn't make it so. (And won't hold up in any court)

Not really. Here in Sweden they ruled that people get excited by the cute aspect rather than being a child.

Attached: 1467450277752.png (332x512, 186K)

should fight scenes in cartoons be considered assault

wowo

>They are art, art should not be illegal.
For simplicity, let us assume the images in question are purely pornographic and have no artistic merit

Watching a 2D murder and not reporting the crime should be accessory to murder, you horrible faggots.

Actually it would, and actually you can tell if something is computer generated. So how can you not make a distinction between the two, because it's there? And yes with real porn it is hard to distinguish between the ages. But you have a harder burden of proof with that

>leftists:
>YOUR LOLIS ARE REAL NOT 2D DRAWINGS YOU SICKO
>also leftists:
>YOUR WAIFU IS NOT REAL SHE IS ONLY A 2D DRAWING YOU WEIRDO
Liberals. Not even once.

Attached: 1542305452051.jpg (851x768, 194K)

What is pornography?
>inb4 Scalia cop out

Yes. Not an inch should be given to degeneracy.

Look at how she can't comprehend the idea that fiction is not real. British people were a mistake.

Well.. shit.

If 2d children are real and need to be protected then what about all the alternate universe children? Did you know there are an infinite amount of alternate universes out there right now with an infinite amount of alternate universe children of which an infinite amount of them are being abused right now as we speak? In fact in as many as an infinite of those infinite alternate universes it could be a judge, policeman, doctor, or even you abusing said child! How dare this atrocity continue! Please think of the infinite alternate universe children!

based, this was the church's approach to degeneracy in general

based jap decimates the larpers

If they are only representations of possible alternate realities there will be no problem then.

If they are real, meaning that there has been an event that has really happened in our reality, they should be illegal.

I know, you fucking retard, you want to know where to draw the line; "What is white?" etc. It will be drawn intuitively, and in that case, if an image is indistinguishable from a representation of a real event, the burden of proof lies with the image creator to prove that the image is indeed not-real.

For simplicity: I advocate for the current laws. Child pornography should be legal, cartoons and art not. The line is not clear and will decided case by case basis, if needed.

both based posts

Attached: 1447392737049.jpg (267x242, 25K)

>actually you can tell if something is computer generated.
For now, maybe. But I'd say we're well on the way to being able to completely generate fake videos on the computer (which even experts won't be able to distinguish)
The technology is maturing rapidly. And the legal questions beg to be answered, both in terms of this topic, but also with regards to using photo / video evidence in courts in the future in general.
CCTV footage is often blurry. I wouldn't be surprised if it could already be faked without experts being able to tell if there was tampering. pic somewhat related

Attached: Yezhov-before_and_after.jpg (340x456, 41K)

drawing naked people is literally one of the most ancient human pastimes. there are countless cave paintings of nude figures representing sexuality.

finally someone with a common sense since its in a gray area

It always leaves a trail. We may not know what the trail is, but it will always be able to be known when there is tampering