Pol

Pol
>"Jews are the reason for all your problems! Gas the likes!"
Feminists
>"White patriarchy are the reason for all your problems! End toxic masculinity!"

Attached: auntiemax.jpg (575x419, 41K)

Kikes*

No, gas the likes.

yeah but women are more likely to lie than men

Attached: women are more violent than men.jpg (953x1280, 229K)

>Pol
Who?

how can you say x if they say y
it really makes me ponder

Fuck off retard

Wow, those opinions sure are different.

>you have hair
>dog has hair
>you are dog

/pol

The line is blurred in politics between intentionally lying and just being mislead. Leaders lie to mislead the public. Pol is also susceptible by propoganda.

Attached: FB_IMG_1541470816074.jpg (232x253, 8K)

Feminists hate kikes they just don’t realize it because (((fellow white people)))

A + B = C
B = C
A =/= C

wrong

Attached: 47395199_2557796654260538_5305450711360733184_n.jpg (643x960, 29K)

A = 0
B = 0
C = 0
OUTPLAYED

Nope. Example:
>(A) you are late for work because your car broke down
>(B) you show up to work and your manager yells at you
>(C) you cry because you're a little bitch who doesn't know how to handle your manager

You did not cry because Event A took place. You cried because Event B took place. B = C this is called a philosophical proof, or logic equation.

muh radical centrism
back to /Reddit/ you go

This assumes that A, B and C are just numbers, and their numerical values is all they have. If that's the case, then, yes, if A=C and B=C then A=B. People are not represented as a single number. They have a gigantic set of traits that can be used to characterize them. You are implying that one particular trait is shared by two people, then those people are the same. This is incorrect.

I'm not a centrist
I'm far right wing
Just not a natsoc because that's left wing.
Go back to AIM

There's so much fucked up with your "proof" I don't even know where to start.

They are a reference to events or flow of logic, not people or numbers.

Or you're just a brainlet who can't follow logic. Fitting.

Off the top of my head I see the following...
>Circular logic.
>Ad hom.
>Ergo propter hoc.
Some of these you managed to fit into the same line.

>I'm far right wing

Attached: farrightwing.jpg (800x450, 26K)

see

Conservative libertarian
Box me where you want

Learn high school math you domme belg

That's not how it works buddy boi. To say they equal 0 would deny the existence of an event that took place.

Whoah, pol is just like the libtard SJW snowflakes with trigger warning safe spaces. I guess the answer really does lie in the middle.............

This is such insightful political commentary, thank you for sharing your intelligent thoughts!

Surprise! Sometimes events don't take place.

The answer does not lie within the middle. Left wingers are just as anti semetic and anti zionist as Pol is.

/polish

The whole argument is based on the premise that the event did in fact take place in a given circumstance.

And then I proved you were wrong.
>inb4 you're just pretending

What a brain dead loser you are

You didn't prove me wrong.
How? I'm just equating the logic. I'm not even making the argument of which one holds more truth. You not understanding that the similarity in logic is pretty dumb desu.

SAY THING MEAN THEY SAME
WHITE MAN BAD

It's hilarious when redditfags try to fit in.

>trying to have s philosophical argument on a website intended for discussing mongolian cartoons
Are you autistic user?