Bbc playing detectives

The BBC are now wasting public money playing detectives, exposing people they disagree with politically.

Check this article, specifically the last sentence

> The BBC will be passing all its evidence to the police.

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46460442

REMEMBER THESE NAMES

Daniel Sandford
Daniel De Simone
STOP PAYING THE LICENSE FEE
DEFUND THE BBC

Attached: bbc_news_logo.png (1024x576, 21K)

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.com/news/uk-46465903
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46465903
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Big Black Cock?

Go burn their studio to the ground

>The messages show neo-Nazis from Europe and the US - hiding behind pseudonyms - engaging in racism and misogyny, glorifying violence and cruelty, and discussing the production of propaganda.
is any of that a crime?

Not as far as I understand the law. There are laws that are to do with offending people in the UK but I can't see how this can apply to private chat. The laws on this are so weirdly worded that both everything and nothing is a crime. If you lawyer up and don't incriminate yourself during a police interview you'll get away with it.

Looks like a bunch of glow in the darks snd Slavs. Daily reminder the government is trying desperately to construct a literal nazi far right (however small, literally 10 europe wide here) to also ban alongside the hundreds of thousands strong Islamist left in order to cow people into the deracianted, atomised, Goyim slave caste centre.

Attached: 1538589276588.png (1320x422, 100K)

there's all kinds of legal thresholds too before it becomes a criminal matter. Most of the hate speech stuff is "prohibited by law" and NOT a criminal act so it becomes this weird thing where you can only get a fine. As far as I understand it you have to either be actively plotting or trying to encourage other people to commit a criminal act but it has to be proven that it was realistic. So saying something like "Harry should be killed because he's a race traitor" doesn't work because it's unrealistic.

Attached: bbc-comic1.png (625x605, 55K)

>Be BBC
>Send details of police informants to the police
>Be happy they did their civic duty

Theyll stick you on trial and make a jury so offended by your online comments theyll send you down for 10 years on terrorism charges

This is unbelievably fucked

Theyll scare most who have no legal knowledge into just pleading guilty aswell

>violent image
>its a screenshot of text
BBC should all be lynched

Um, it's state run news........

The whole metoo thing was to usher in laws which can lead to a charge on hearsay, no evidence and let the media determine your guilt

Surley im not the only one seeing this?

What?

The BBC is controlled by the state. They are nothing more than a propaganda mouthpiece.
It’s funny watching plebs laugh at North Korea’s state run news and the shit it spews, then turn on the BBC for the “actual news”
Tbf, there isn’t really a major news source that’s not controlled.

You do realize that Neo-Nazi larper are potentially dangerous, just as Islamists are? They dont just hold political opinions but have a
'call to action' to kill people -hence why they are shut down.

Also, the BBC is a STATE owned and run institution.
GCHQ and the BBC are one and the same.
Stop worrying about the pathetic seej fags.

Attached: workingatGCHQ.jpg (1500x1100, 947K)

Everyone knows this, what are you getting at?

The point is you are paying for it to destroy yoyr own country

The power is entirely in the peoples hands to stop funding it. Just dont fucking pay

>The power is entirely in the peoples hands to stop funding it. Just dont fucking pay
That's illegal user.
Unless you're never going to own a computer, tablet or TV?

If enough people stop paying for the license it will just become a tax.

Oh please, you just have to say you dont watch bbc live

Not only that, bbc advertises itself as impartial, that is a falsley advertised product


If you want to go even deeper, look into top gear and how car manufacturers would pay and make donations for good reviews.

There are a ton of things you could destroy the bbc with if you put a little effort into it

Good, thats when everyone puts on their hi vis

Yeah, it stinks when a public source of news is parti- OOOOH forgotten mummies of egypt

Can someone archive , bbc is blocked here

>Oh please, you just have to say you dont watch bbc live
I thought if you have any device capable of playing BBC you need a licence?
Also I think it's ironic if you dont pay the TV licence you can go to jail and watch TV without a licence.

You dont really go to jail mate its a scare tactic

The courtrooms are even rented by the bbc to make it look official.

Of course youll go to jail for anything if you consent to it

And yeah the license is just for live broadcast watching

>Of course youll go to jail for anything if you consent to it
>consent
Dont tell me you fell for the Freeman on the land meme??

This is why you use a VPN kids

The freeman of the land stuff is disinfo, the common law "strawman" stuff is legit

You are only your paper counterpart if you assume it in court

MR FIRSTNAME LASTNAME is not Firstname, the man

Sadly, I don't think the UK has it in them. If they did they would be doing it over the dicking they are getting with Brexit.

They will be donning the yellow jackets sunday m8

that's bullshit.
My first year of my degree was doing an LLB before I switched out.
What you are talking about is 'Legal personality'.
There is no basis in common law or statute to separate Legal personality from the person.
Unless you can quote me case law.

Well i always get out of fines and debt with it so i think ill stick to actual results and not some approved curriculum thanks

>Well i always get out of fines and debt
Based on what legal principle do you get out of fines and debt?
Also what type of fine civil or private?

Private, i had a stamp made with "addressee not reckognised, no contract, return to sender" and i just pop it on the letter and stick it back in the mailbox

Never hear from them again

So basically they cant identify you -that's how you get away with it.

Because i dont assume the identity, which is what ive just been on about this whole time. Arnt you supposed to be clever?

Dont write 'no contract' this just make you sound like a 'freeman' nutter.
Just write no such person at this address.
If they can't identify you they can pursue you for the debt or fine. Although it potentially still remains in force for 6years.

bbc.com/news/uk-46465903

Looks like they got em, the ages and locations match up.

You really do need a license for memes in the UK.

No user. Trust me you're wrong on the not assuming the identity.
If British Gas wants to chase you for 500quid you owe, you saying you dont own the 'legal fiction' of Mr Smith, is not going to wash.
You're an idiot if you think it will.
I meant that in the nicest way.

Contracts are assumed until explicitly revoked or the letter has been "opened"

The whole idea behind it is to never identify as the paper counterpart. Its obviously trial and error but working for small things si far

But who the fuck is mr smith? Im just a man

Its the same as with an ip address. Thats not you until you say it is

Mr Smith is you. I’m more interested in this writing on the envelope business. Seems like a good way of getting them to fuck off

Google "meet your strawman pdf" its very very old now so looks a bit ridiculous to take seriously but its interesting

>Contracts are assumed until explicitly revoked or the letter has been "opened"
Im not sure what you mean by this?
A contract is could be anything you've and another party have agreed to.
It's binding from it's inception, not the moment you want to cherry pick things.

Of course you're just a man.
But there's also a legal Personality (LP) of you, which contracts with others and the state.
That doesnt exist anything in the current framework to disengage yourself from your own LP.
Just keep ignoring or saying you dont live there will work, until it doesnt, because they find another way of identiying you like the Electoral roll -which is illegal not to put yourself down on/

I know all about the kind of stuff spouted by people who wrote that.
It's mostly wrong or very misguided.
The law is already a massive ass, and you can shoot yourself in the foot with this nonsense.

Fuck the BBC, it's a state-funded kike propaganda tool

Attached: cancer.png (786x194, 27K)

No mr smith doesnt physically exist. Its like a limited company.

Ever had a business bank card and a personal one?

Your personal one will have MR JOHN SMITH on it, your business one will have

SMITH FINANCES LTD and JOHN SMITH

I envy you, it should be blocked everywhere.

Kek

>one post by OP
900 shekel on op is a faggot bbc intern trying to advertise this shit. mods, rangeban uk

>No mr smith doesnt physically exist
No it's a Legal Personality associated with someone who is a man, or a company etc.

>Obviously a not so private chat

What man is that? You cant possibly know until someone claims it is them. If you were right then i wouldnt be able to assume my neighbours paper identity and pay his bills, but i can if i wish to do so

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46465903
They've been arrested already

Anyone who works for the BBC deserves a bullet to the head.

Attached: 1543720870312.jpg (612x344, 28K)

Boadcasting By Communists
The BBC spends over 39 thousand pounds a year buying its staff copies of the Guardian newspaper, an sjw left wing rag

What a quick turnaround, and the bbc kept the muslim rape gangs quiet for how long?

They are a terrorist organisation

>Atomwaffen fags use Discord
The glowing!.... It's overwhelming!

Attached: happy school shooter.png (604x675, 587K)

>If you were right then i wouldnt be able to assume my neighbours paper identity and pay his bills
You're not assuming their identity paying their bills, unless you are actually are pretending to Mr Brown the next door neighbour?
The only way you can do actual assume Mr Brown's Legal Personality is via 'Power of Attorney', which gives you limited ability to act on their behalf.

Is the guardian still available in print, I thought it was only online now?

Youre stuck in legal land. I am assuming his paper counterpart by paying his bill and the company accepting payment is happy with who that is, transaction complete. Not everything is done so seriously

No I think its still going

>legal land
>Not everything is done so seriously
That's true.
And neither should it be.
You can strip away all Statues and a most case laws and be have a basic scaffold that upholds, just 'no stealing, murder, or rape'
, and you've got all the laws you need.
Some say you can condense this further to just 'no stealing' since murder is stealing a life, rape is stealing chastity etc.

Maybe it was the Independent then that's no longer in print.

>"See ya later race traitor"

Just imagine being all fucked up in a ditch and hearing in a cockney accent.
I'd die laughing.

You live in 1984 land. Maybe we should have a republic in Australia so we dont get your pozz.

Ah this must be why cuckolding is your number one searched porn result

Just get rid of your TV. You can watch movies on a computer.

Attached: BBC.jpg (620x413, 29K)

it's never gonna happen. same with canada, nz, etc.

The UK is fucked. You need to gas the jews or get the hell out of there.

Stop forming groups, it's not hard to follow. It's always the youngsters that get caught when they try forming some C18 wannabe. Listen to the old timers, they say it time and time again.

>Private messages between members show the leader stating that police officers should be raped and killed.
>Private messages
BBC either gained unlawful access for the purposes of subversion, in which case their evidence will be thrown back at them, or they think that an open Discord lobby is 'private'.

TAKE IT BACK
WITHHOLD THE TAX.
DON'T BE A DWEEB
FUCK THE BEEB

in third world shitholes like the UK yeah

>The messages show neo-Nazis from Europe and the US - hiding behind pseudonyms - engaging in racism and misogyny, glorifying violence and cruelty, and discussing the production of propaganda.
Sounds like an rap album to me

What is BBC business what people say in private anyway?

It says in an article the American division was involved in killing a Jewish teen.