Im too much of a brainlet to discuss economic models but what is this called and how deep does the rabbithole go?

What this is called is "usury", and it is what happens when Jews have influence in a market.

innovation, companies getting successful because they cut corners the right way.

> thinks bitcoin is the world's biggest bank

Attached: 1494528658535.gif (540x304, 2.07M)

So it's kind of like a market within a market, which a small group of owners have complete control, that isn't held to the same standard as the legitimate market, guaranteeing profit. A market which you can never enter as anything other than on a stall owner basis, never getting a share in the actual market a position which is inherent in the legitimate market?

You know what, if anyone on this board dares to say it's a group of subversive Jews trying to subvert and undercut legitimate infrastructure for in-group benefits at the cost of overall greater prosperity in which they have convinced a small number of the weakest willed in the host population to back their plans for material wealth in return should know this . . .

I'm telling the mods

You can still use the "legitimate" market - for a price, in money and in convenience.

You can walk into a hotel and take a room at the listed price.
You can buy crappy stuff from China from your preferred corner store at a hefty markup.
You can hail a taxi at the curbside.

The fact that these companies exist, is a sign that they DO provide value to their customers.

The gig economy is the ultimate parasitic model. It’s why Jews, poos and boomers love them.

They have very little competition and if you become involved with them they dictate the terms to you more than some legitimate employer ever could.

It’s modern slavery camouflaging as freedom.
SAD!

These global online companies have got their growth limit.
As such investors are looking for new vehicles, these companies will start disappearing in the next 5-10 years as capital flow dries up.
Unlike traditional operators which have Assets like real estate to draw from and more realistic growth forecasts

Kek'd

>lists a bunch of support distribution interfaces
They’re literal middlemen

That's true.
They can be "disrupted" as fast as they "disrupted" the market if something better arrives on the scene. Customers that were willing to switch once, will do it even faster the second time.

Not an argument brainlet.

Bitcoin biggest bank? Wtf

Deustche Bank has €1.475 trillions in assets, Bitcoin has $66 billion market cap

t. doesn't actually understand what usury is.

>Worlds biggest bank with NO ACTUAL CASH
Biggest in its category. American education everyone.

Attached: wtfdidijustread.png (620x800, 649K)

yeah but DB, like most international banks, has gone full oma wa moe shinderu

see
Spanish education everyone.

The name of the game is be the middle man, you don't produce anything just merely a gate keeper.

>Rabbit hole

Just kill yourself already

>he lives with his mom
>doesn't own any real estate

someone never grasped the notion of a business contract

Bitcoin isn't even a bank you fuckin' brainlet, it's a protocol.

lol

>What do most of these have in common.
Giant injections of cash from (((venture capital)))
Most silicone vallery based companies aren't profitable.
They need constant new streams of investors to make the math work.

What it is actually is irrelevant coat hanger dodging extra chromosome laden half wit, youre missing the point.

>doesn't actually understand what the definition of "bank" is
>calls other people halfwits
lol

The general term is "platform".
More specifically, to various degrees those companies also thrive by "disrupting" existing markets and laws.
Uber legally is not a taxi company. Airbnb is legally not a hospitality company. Bitcoin is not legally a bank. If they were, they'd be subject to all kinds of regulation. Whether you think that regulation is necessary is beside the point: by skirting it they have a competitive advantage over traditional companies that do have to follow the rules.
In that sense, those firms are also simply "new". If there are long-term flaws in the business model or legal pitfalls, they haven't had time to fully emerge.

>"lol" he ignorantly posts smugly unaware of how far he is from the mark because the vacant void behind his eyes forbids any form of intelligent reasoning let alone two brain cells to rub together because if that was possible he would realize that someone is using the image op used as source.
lol

Do children provide value to pedophiles?

This is a slide thread, that is the point

You missed the comma, faggot.

Does everyone in that transaction have the freedom to chose?
An no, an 8 year old can consent to ice cream or a toy car but not to sex or tranny surgery.

Its called service-exclusive economy
It could work if there was easily set up fully automatic manufacturing of anything from houses to microprocessors
In reality its just taking foreign production and destributing it for a fee, very dependant state of business

get fkt fat fgt

Attached: 1480359800681.jpg (571x650, 100K)

you shouldnt say such mean things to yourself user

It's just decentralization, a positive thing. To maintain their positions as leaders they have to be the best at providing liquidity for the assets in distributed ownership. It's proof that Marx was an idiot.

Services.

It's not really a rabbit hole, it's just a bunch of digital classified ads where payment is taken after the fact instead of up front. Facebook is just a dumbed down blogging service bolted onto your contacts list with ads sprinkled on. That ignores the NSA data collection aspect, but you get my point.

Attached: 1543391553337.jpg (552x495, 22K)

Bigot Kickl fan detected

They are premised on flaws in the tax and regulatory codes.

Thats how they derive their "profits"

Looks like technology is the key to destroying Jewish centralization of finance, media, and property once and for all

It's all based on the Kike fiat model of stealing someone elses wealth ( a nation's money) and charging a fee for using it (interest).

Attached: newBusinessModel.jpg (597x578, 125K)

Yup, said that here
Least initial capital frequented mostly have to invest in regulatory stuff instead of physical. Only caveat it is that you can get legislated out of business, or to a much less sustainable model, much easier than any other market out there; the middleman success is only as successful as the market they operate in for that matter. Housing goes to shit again? You can bet Airbnb will get fucked

lmao @ your life

Or they’re middlemen that facilitate exchange of goods/services, which have existed for a very long time you dunce

It's really odd it's like I seen this business model elsewhere....hmmm cant think where now...
something...something host nations...
use by proxy....
subvert...
use by proxy....
subvert....
charge goys interest....

nope Im out anyone know of this strange business model of not owning anything but selling it?

Attached: businessModel2.jpg (597x578, 75K)

>which have existed for a very long time
Jews.
Yes Jews have existed for a very long time.

next to go - realtors, non-litigation attorneys, and car dealerships

How?

Realtors are already selling someone else house.
Car dearlership already sells through a major websites.
Lawyers have already sell their souls to the devil at the highest price

Attached: 1542390317343.png (510x332, 66K)

Its called 'the middle man' ,
By providing a platform they place themselves a practical and obvious means to get goods and services from other peers

Its a good system because you dont have to produce and stock, its weakness is 'concurents' as they provide nothing unique or trademarkeable there is no reason to not go to another brand with the same services.

Admittedly the jewish model of
>subvert
>use by proxy
>and charge for it

is the best business model.
SAAS is the current big climber at the moment.

OP------->the worlds biggest faggot, has no vagina

>muh Jew
Not that I disagree, this can literally be said about every market that exists. These aren’t ran exclusively by Jews, easy to start up without having to blow millions in initial capital, and can, heavily on “can”, be very successful. As said before, they’re also the most vulnerable for failing overnight since they have very little to fall back on in collateral. Don’t be a brainlet, this can be learned in a basic marketing class

i love it lol

Middlemaning the middleman basically; commercial truck drivers have been working this way for decades, almost a century. Basically, they can become more and more freelance; being an online realtor/car sales isn’t something that’s not feasible and is becoming more and more realistic as an option as interfacing platforms like these makes C2C (customer to customer) much easier

Winner!
Welcome to Jewing 101.
Complete the course and someday you may become a rabbi

middle men syphoning off the cash from the real workers

>as they provide nothing unique
they create monopolies when they get big enough, pretty much forcing everyone to use their 'services'

I'm sure most people on here have seen the propaganda from Sweden or Germany or whatever:
"Its 2030, I don't own anything, I have no privacy, and I've never been happier!"

Things are being shifted to a model where everything is a service. In order to keep getting the service you need to keep doing something that the gov't finds acceptable for income.

Whether people accept it or not, there are many things in play trying to bring us to the cashless society mentioned in the bible. A one world gov't where you have to accept the mark of the beast

>monopolies
These are probably the most “free market” friendly methods out there. Whatever gives the contractors the best bennies will win, they don’t produce anything to buy out, other than contracts from freelance contractors. They provide a platform for others to provide services from, that’s it, 100% up to the freelancer to use their services or partner with someone else. This makes them weak, face berg and social media in general is kind of a shitty example though

These won’t be the methods to that goal though, these people are more or less self-employed. Someone has a shit property they want to rent through Airbnb, nobody wants to rent out in the niggerhood for the weekend, they’re probably not going to get many customers. It’s shakey at best and more of a method for secondary income for many

Well if that doesn't deserve a (you) I don't know what does.

>Its a legal, fair business
I don't think you understand what he is getting at.

Imagine a car rental place with no cars.
A grocery store with no groceries.
A clothing store with no clothes
An auto parts store with no auto parts.

Normally, no such thing could exist for more than maybe a few weeks or months before getting shut down. Would you keep going to a grocery store that has no food?

The idea that the LARGEST "cab" company has no vehicles, shows there is fuckery afoot.
The idea that the LARGEST "hotel" has no rooms of its own, shows that fuckery is afoot.

I'm not able to understand just what is happening, but I'm at least able to admit that something is happening that is bizarre and different from anything we've ever experienced as a civilization before.

Imagine if 20 years from now our economies are dominated by companies that don't own anything .

It’s the future, man.

Decentralization of trust. Essentially crowd funding of a business logistics chain.

>companies that own nothing
What really makes that so scary though? These companies don’t anything, that’s the whole point, they’re 100% dependent on clients to generate services for them, as they are unable to do it themselves since they produce nothing. It sounds like a libtard’s wet dream, as it becomes private ownership of the common man that dominates the market rather than super corporations. What happened, that you claim you don’t know of, was the age of communication/internet. As things become more and more networked and less and less physical as platforms to operate, brick stores closing down for example, there is more freedom. There’s a reason why every big Corp is trying to find a way to own the internet because that’s going to be THE platform, a platform of platforms, golden goose, of where majority of all business will be practiced and operated from. The internet will become more than a web of people networking, it’ll become a web of business networking as well; B2B just as much as B2C and C2C

We spend a lot of time online. We have all these sites online.

Time is money and we spend much of it online.

Sites are thus profitable.

And the real workers are happy to do business with him and to pay him because he does the job for them to find clients.

lmao why would a bank hold cash

>passes off risk and expenses to voluntary sub contractors
That’s the genius of all these companies. People self employ themselves to these companies, and in turn, make more money on average than what most of the competitors offers. Both the company and the people make more money; it’s a win-win.

KEK

Attached: pooinloo.jpg (208x242, 6K)

Oppai here,... well ofc but then again I thought my thread was gone, now I found it with all these replies, much more interesting to read about this than most bait you see on the catalog, even if some of things are somewhat hard to understand if you don't have a background in it nor any real knowledge about global economics besides vague notions about some cabal running shit.

Attached: 512AG1WPC5L._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (247x346, 34K)

this

Suprisingly correct evaluation.
May your feet never step in poo on the street, wise one.

All of this represses local privat market places or the commercial local equivalent.
>Uber
Taxis, lifts, communal car sharing
>Alibaba
Flee markets, fairs, local retailers
>Airbnb
inns, hostels, hotels
All of these international services are robbing the profit and jobs of locals, avoid insurances and taxes, profit from slave wages and are centralizing it into mega corporations.

lost

How are they suppressing locals when locals are using that product? The only thing this is any kind of a threat to is franchise hotel groups (for Airbnb), and not to the degree they’re freaking out about. Big money is still going to get a king suite at the 4 seasons or Ritz, these male hospitality more accessible to those on a budget and comfortable with inconveniences associated with them (walking, driving, public transport passes, etc). Taxis Jew the fuck out of people by taking the most pig trails to a destination to rack up the fare, don’t care about them, they’re no different than American waiters as far as I’m concerned, local venues and pop up shops will exist at events for convenience, etc. It’s not surpressing shit, big corps and monopolies just don’t like the fact that people will pay the same price for nicer accomodations that they’d charge customers to put them in a shitty room

you mean

>glorified ad agencies

Attached: brainlet.jpg (550x543, 24K)

>>Uber
>>Baba
>>Airbnb
>Literally what's your problem with this model? They provide a market place where buyers and sellers find each other.

Alibaba and Airbnb might be similar in how they give the buyers and sellers a choice of who to do business with.

Uber, however, just automatically pairs driver and passenger and takes care of the rate for them. Both people are complete strangers and only have a couple minutes to cancel before the driver arrives for the pickup or the passenger has to start paying cancellation fees. It's not like the passenger has a list of drivers with their car, their race, gender, a cleanliness rating, feedback on how friendly they are, whether or not they load your bags for you, and so forth. Nor does Uber allow drivers to set their own pay rates or choose their passengers. For example if they are a highly rated, desirable driver, they are not allowed to charge more or screen minorities.

Attached: teratoma.webm (480x360, 2.22M)

Then remove the shitty insurance and tax burdens?

Uber single handedly broke up the cab monopoly in USA look it up.
Not to mention people got added value by using the uber app in terms of a pleasant UX and feedback mechanism (which punishes bad behaviour by drivers)
They solved a problem a lot of the people had and made money from it. Textbook example of capitalistic efficiency.

I see. I don't actually use any of them lel

>single handedly broke up the cab monopoly
I’m not against this at all. I support these platforms completely as it gives more options that are priced by the individual private owner and not a company, which naturally tries to make the most out of as little as possible

Its called being a middleman. Jews are very good at wedging their nose between things.

There is a potential problem of these marketplaces becoming monopolies. As is the case with AppStore and play store for apps.
Then the company can arbitrarily decide who gets to provide service and who don't. (Maybe because SJW shenanigans)
But since there's no competing market place the service vendor is kicked out of the economy entirely because it's impossible to find customers outside these apps.

I think governments can easily solve this by providing basic IT infrastructure. In the uber example, there could be a government hosted API or some sort of protocol which all these taxi services are built on top of. Now the users are no longer locked in uber app. Because the same number of providers appear in all the taxi apps which is built on top of this infrastructure.

Such infrastructure would barely cost anything compared to most government programs.

As rough example.
>All-in-One super malls
1x chef with >1.000.000$
10x manager with 50.000 - 100.000$
90x wageslaves with Local retailer
1x chef with >100.000$
1x manager with >50.000€
10x wageslaves with getting rid of tax
That's exactly the reason why India is a literal shithole. Taxes provide infrastructure and lift standards.
>Uber single handedly broke up the cab monopoly
With wage slavery and precarious conditions.

Others have posted the gist, but there is further reasoning behind the model...

Having assets requires substantial capital, and as the economy goes up and down, managing those assets creates enormous risk. By having an effectively crowd-sourced asset pool, the market manages itself. If UBER drivers saturate a market, earning potential goes down, so drivers drop out of the platform. If UBER owned all the vehicles and all drivers were employees, the market ebb and flow would break the company too easily.

For the others, just replace the UBER driver with whatever product/service they provide.

Literally arguing FOR taxes. Did you forget to put up your meme flag you fucking commie.

>The All-in-One is replacing 10 local retailers, it's centralizing it's profit from up to down
It's also providing the same service for a lower cost. Which benefit the consumers more.
In ubers case they managed to provide a better service than the one people had access to before.

>fair distribution of wealth
What about the wealth they stole from customers by having an inefficient structure?

Nigger we were the most heavily regulated economies before reforms were pushed. We have 30% tax on the higher bracket and all that does is push people to launder money into assets creating asset bubbles and inflation

Some employers give insurance. The public sector companies do as well. It's a huge burden on a company to do so

Is this late-stage socialism? The businesses are just platforms/organizers. The workers actually own all the goods.

If you have full control over all your established rackets, then there's enough free time to make up new rackets that fit in between them. Why this obvious scheme always works is that humans are so dumb that when you fuck them hard today, they forget how hard you fucked them yesterday. Therefore yesterdays crime can now be made into an accepted foothold, because humans are so dumb that they argue that at least it wasn't as bad as it is today, which let this trail of perverted torture continue until they finally succumb an die. At this point the next generation of cattle is ready to be harvested to death with a fresh new set of obnoxious rackets on top of unmentionable amounts of evil schemes.

Happy Hanukah!

>Literally arguing FOR taxes
To a degree yes. They are necessary for society and infrastructure. How else should everything maintained and modernized? Reality is not an AnCap meme.

>It's also providing the same service for a lower cost
Not true. Bis companies are evading more taxes with loopholes. This evaded tax needs to be compensated by the tax payer. Ergo tax raise. Consumer is paying more taxes for a cheaper product, there is just one more middle field, which also is raising cost.

>What about the wealth they stole from customers by having an inefficient structure?
They're paying a fair price for a fair service, with the guarantee that the wages are fair and the money stays in the land/region instead being shipped out to tax paradies. Cheaper is not always better.

>Some employers give insurance.
Papa Pajeet breaks his ankle - his family starves or needs to sell their children to drug lords.
Onkel Adolf breaks his ankle - he gets medical treatment thanks to the socialized healtcare system and will start his work as soon as he gets fit for work, while not losing his family to famines.

>all that does is push people to launder money into assets creating asset bubbles and inflation
illiterate people will do illiterate things, nothing new.

This cost of course way more, but provides the safety that is needed to maintain a high standard of living. Sure it could be more efficient and less corrupt. But we're working on it.