Why are whites not called European Americans whereas everyone is called X-American

Euro-American is often used in academia.

They used to be called Italian Americans, Irish Americans, etc. They assimilated into becoming plain Americans, and there are no pressure groups or political reasons to prop up an additional identity.

"African American" is a nonsensical concept at this point because those coming from a slave bloodline and those immigrating to the US out of their own free will are two completely different groups with very different histories as Americans, yet it seems in American domestic politics all peoples of any African background are treated as if they had a shared identity which they really don't.

>Euro-American is often used in academia.
In Japanese academia?

Attached: giphy (37).gif (365x365, 1.41M)

Because american was synonymous with european. They came up with the term white instead or referring to themselves as german american or english american or whatever else american. Because it was a new nation independent of europe.
here´s some of the ethnic distribution of the US. Notice how small some of them are. Idiots pretend that white/european means they are identical. This is actually a disaster for the respective european ethnicities in the US that they pretend this. Because they act like there are so many. When there really isn't. So when they become minority in their own country. Well you have to realize, many of them already are. It's only if you just smash everyone of european ancestry together that they are a a majority.

Attached: ethnic_distribution_US.png (979x668, 43K)

Because Obamization excluded whites aka (real) Americans.

Depends where in US. On parts of the East Coast, Irish and Italian Americans have never forgot. Our ancestors weren’t accepted then we are blamed for Anglo-Jewish problems that we bore the brunt of for centuries.

>when everyone was white people cared more about what type of white you were
yeah that was true when Europe didnt have any dark skin people

>Depends where in US. On parts of the East Coast, Irish and Italian Americans have never forgot. Our ancestors weren’t accepted then we are blamed for Anglo-Jewish problems that we bore the brunt of for centuries.
It seems multiculti somewhat didn't turn out totally perfect with europeans when it was too broad, because they were too different. What are the multiculti/multiethnic morons going to say now. What do they think happens if you bring in EVEN MORE DIFFERENT people than the relatively small difference between italian and british i the same countries. What do they think happens then.

Attached: 1543604399748.png (1260x2065, 259K)

Only whites can be Americans. Can a horse be American? No. Non whites are fauna.

>search image on Google
>daves car parts double din stereo in dash car mp5 player bluetooth autoradio with multi-touch screen 800*480 support bluetooth/usb/sd/fm radio/subwoofer/720p
Lmao

To divide us

That's what the ideological forebears of progressives told our great grandparents. They dropped their ethnic identities in order to become part of the broader American community. Now, progressives decided that that is lame, fake, and boring so they're encouraging new arrivals and non whites to refuse to assimilate and act like the whole "white culture" thing developed in a vacuum.

When you call yourself white you are using their language with all the baggage that entails. You arent gonna reclaim it, let it go and embrace being a European American.

>Can a horse be American? No.

Attached: giphy (38).gif (490x276, 854K)

because they are Americans

Attached: uh-duh.jpg (599x626, 119K)

because whites are called simply "Americans"
The other ones are guests

Because white Americans rejectes Europe and assimilated into a new “American” identity.

But those numbers squeeze all people of African ancestry under one label, even though there are first of all those whose ancestors were slaves taken by force to America and those who immigrated there by choice, and secondly no distinction is made between Africans from different parts of Africa even though the differences between different African peoples are pretty significant especially in comparison with European nations. It's not as if Muslim Somalis hang with Christian Nigerians.

Arguably, the refusal (or rather oversight / indifference) to distinguish between different groups of African ancestry is part of le "white supremacist" foundation of the American society. The irony is in that it's the blacks themselves who are seemingly the most eager and adamant to group themselves into being generic "African Americans", devoid of nuanced identity or even any aspiration to such, they're practically choosing to identify as slaves. Descendants of slaves trafficked to America are the only group it makes sense to distinguish as "African Americans" due to historical and societal reasons.

Attached: eddie.jpg (789x553, 42K)

Americans are default of European heritage. Nobody else should be in North America.

>Only europeans can be Americans.
FIFY
Well that's how it used to be, so that´s part of why they didn't call themselves for instance german american. Because it was synonymous with american. And it would imply that they were immigrants if they didn't just call themselves americans. So they further came up with the erroneous 'white' label. Because there were africans and idians in the USA aswell. But it only meant european. And is misleading since europeans do not have monopoly on fair complexion. And it is the inside that is different from a european with fair complexion, to a non european who also has fair complexion. If they have the precise same hue. They can still be completely different.
>That's what the ideological forebears of progressives told our great grandparents. They dropped their ethnic identities in order to become part of the broader American community. Now, progressives decided that that is lame, fake, and boring so they're encouraging new arrivals and non whites to refuse to assimilate and act like the whole "white culture" thing developed in a vacuum.
Right. Well ironically america since 1965 is a perfect example why multiethnic societies are a complete failure. And how it leds to ethnical and cultural strife the larger the other groups get, and the smaller the white/european ethnicities become in their own country the USA. And it is simply amazing that everyone pretends that this isn't exactly the case. See when the other groups were tiny. Then they respected american culture and values, and american who had made the country. Because they were too tiny to have a cultural impact in a negative fashion. Now these groups have gotten larger, look what has happened to the US.

FPBP

Why aren't Asians called yellows? Because it's fucking stupid. I have no idea why European Americans aren't called just that - because that's what they are. The rest are mutt terms.

"White" is purely an American thing, in Australia we call ourselves Anglo-Celts

>best identity

>But those numbers squeeze all people of African ancestry under one label, even though there are first of all those whose ancestors were slaves taken by force to America and those who immigrated there by choice, and secondly no distinction is made between Africans from different parts of Africa even though the differences between different African peoples are pretty significant especially in comparison with European nations. It's not as if Muslim Somalis hang with Christian Nigerians.
That's because those africans that were in the US were enslaved by other africans, and taken from all kinds of places in africa, and put in chains by other africans and sold out of the west coast of africa to the highest bidder.
Also africans were not supposed to have been citizens, they came over to the US as slaves. And they expected to deport them eventually . This was also part of why liberia was carved out for them, which very few of them utilized. Since it didn't make sense to send them arbitrarily back to west africa to the ones who enslaved them in the first place.
>Arguably, the refusal (or rather oversight / indifference) to distinguish between different groups of African ancestry is part of le "white supremacist" foundation of the American society.
No because africans were not immigrants and were not even supposed to be there. If it's white supremacy that the USA wasn't meant to be about black people/africans, or many other groups for that matter. Then sure. But that's like saying that china is chinese supremacy, because it's about chinese people, not about someone else. So that concept makes absolutely no sense. And i hate that word white supremacy. It means white majority (int their own country. In their own country, their own fucking country). So this is why they considered them african americans. And why it's incredibly hard to find out what specific places they were from in africa, because they didn't really know where the other africans took them from.

>"White" is purely an American thing, in Australia we call ourselves Anglo-Celts
That's because USA is a combination of several west european ethnicities. Predominately ofcourse the british who were the original colonialists. Who then invited similar west european ethnicities over.

because Euro-Americans are the OGs

this.
there are 3 "pure" admixtures:

> western hunter gatherer
> caucasus h-g (~~ iranian neolithic farmer)
> early eastern farmer

everything else , including the "anatolian farmer" or the "european farmer" or the "eastern h-g", is a crossbreeding of the 3 above.
WHG is what makes europeans essentially europeans.

Because america was founded by europeans, for europeans

Attached: Screenshot_20180704000919_Twitter.jpg (1080x881, 269K)

this
there is no white people, useless mutt construction
Europe is made by Greek shitskins, so it is bad word too

I use the term European American all the time. You should too. "African" Americans and "Latin" Americans have very little ethnic cohesion compared to Europeans. If those labels are a thing then Euro American is certainly a thing. Words are power. Use it.

wrong
Eastern hunter-gatherer is completely isolate population

>early eastern farmer
buzzword
Natufians were probably completly isolate population from the anatolian farmers

ehg is a mix between whg (90%), chg and a mongolian-like admixture.
(in the post above is meant there are 3 "pure" admixtures in eurasia, not in the entire world obviously).

Attached: ncomms9912-f1.jpg (946x597, 84K)

eef is similar to natufians. anatolian farmers were an interbreeding between whg and eef

America was founded by freemasons which are satanists. Freemasonry is judaism for goyim.
Imagine how stupid these people were. Fuck amerikikeland everybody hates how stupid and ignorant most of you are.
The entire world and the heavens wont give two fucks if you get nuked to oblivion.

(You)

Attached: 1541609503168.jpg (400x400, 28K)

That's not true, a lot of those visitors stayed permanently.

Always considered myself Porkchopanese

not true because some cherrypicked studies or admixtures say so
You have to first understand what the K means
If you put in K = 3, you get 3 populations
You could say that mediterraneans are 30% niggers/70% nordics otherwise, but the skin/hair color would not match up
admixtures are pretty useless unless you use them on global populations

I just call them snow-niggers and call it a day.

Masonry is Luciferian, not Satanist.

Anatolian farmers were of haplogroup G
Natufians were of haplogroups E
Same goes to haplogroup R who were isolated in Siberia

Fuck off Vargnigger barneven child fucker.

Its because its European clay. The rest came later. Whites are rightful citizens of the continent. They need not be specified.

coefficents are chosen on the basis of the actual dna differences, kid. so, yes, you can always choose k=1 (the humankind have one admixture) but it would be meaningless as well as choosing k= 7.000.000.000 (me, my brother and my sister have 3 different , yet similar, admixtures).
k = 17 is a good choice when it comes to europe's genetic history. if they had chosen k=37 maybe we would see both whg and ehg as crossbreeding admixtures but their components would resemble each other.

k17 can only include
but for the fact R was isolated in siberia, there were no western hunter-gatherers at in Siberia
the hunter-gatherers of paleolithic Europe were also different from the mesolithic ones

>k17 can only include
3 different proto-populations for Europeans

>Same goes to haplogroup R who were isolated in Siberia

wrong. r1b-v88 always existed among central african niggers.

not true
>always
that's the stupidest thing you can say, because human race has not always existed
all the major haplogroups after CF have developed out in Eurasia

because that's a result, retard. it's like saying 3 + 3 "can only" be 6

>that's the stupidest thing you can say, because human race has not always existed
how old are you, champ?

This should really be the standard answer to any such threads that are not strictly referring to the USA.

Attached: 1543172633879.png (900x1200, 1.32M)

how can you say that Mal'ta was partly WHG, when no WHG has been found before Mal'ta

Because "American" is an ethnic group of European origin. You don't call Englishmen "European-English" because it's an unnecessary qualifier.

Conversely, all the paperwork-"Americans" and x-"Americans" (yes, this includes you Italians and Irish) need the qualifier because they aren't American and everyone knows it.

this is creepy

Because african americans are africans, not americans.

>a boy and his boy lover

>Italian and Irish assimilated

No they didn't. They took over the North East and pushed the real Americans out with their Catholicism, socialism lite, and other bullshit.

who said that?
e.g. malta boy was has a mongolian-like admixture , which has nothing to do with whg, chg or eef. ehg is an interbreeding between whg and admixtures similar to that of mal'ta.

he had no mongolian like admixture
he had 10-20% amerindian like admixture (which at lower K-s is classified as the admixture found in the Russian far north Nganasan people about 98%), which was not found in all the later EHGs
consider how far-east he was in siberia, that's no suprise

>Accept the globalist frame that America is a free-for-all rather than claiming the right that the American founders passed down to their posterity.

No. I am an American because my parents are American just as their parents' parents' parents' were American all the way back to 1776. I will not play the stupid ass jewish game of accepting everyone into my nation because they filled out paperwork.

mal'ta boy shows up about 60-70% EHG admixture

This

Most non-Europeans in America know deep down that the United States is a European nation at heart and so they feel the need to distance themselves from the term "American" by adding on their country of origin to the label. Most Euro-Americans just call themselves American.

Oops, meant to reply to the OP, my bad.

White people of European descent wrote the constitution and created the United States if America on this land you drooling retard. (United States of) Americans. European descent is the default. Are you Jewish?

>60-70% EHG admixture
source. institutional , please. not eupedia shit.
>amerindian like
which is not very well distinguished from mongolian-like admixtures.

genetiker.wordpress.com/2018/03/03/k-14-admixture-analysis-of-ancient-southeastern-european-genomes/

not related with our discussion about mal'ta/whg vs ehg admixture, and not even peer reviewed, champ.

>not even peer reviewed, champ
imagine being this normie
is racism bad too because professor says it?

as you can't scroll the page, I will help you

Attached: savv.png (1269x616, 98K)

where is the verification for this comment?
I guess it is not verified, therefore we can't take any of your word seriously

these pools are like that old "yamanya admixture" meme of 5 years ago. moreover, that post hasn't even a dating or a name. was it written yesterday or 10 years ago?
a part from it, just look at any pca.if you mark a line from chg (or inf) to whg you see ehg takes its place in between, nearer to whg than to chg.

here, faggot. nature.com/articles/ncomms9912/figures/1

Im Italian American and im white. Actual european whites are usually boring types or hicks.

Don't insult Greeks you slavic subhuman.

Europe is very americanized, especially the west.
We should adopt it from the Americans, even though they aren't pure like Greeks.

because african americans don't exist people should call them black americans

>2015
Yeah, clustering between WHG and CHG does not mean they have ancestry from either on them
You could just as well as run them through African only calculator and see what happens then
To prove your claims, you have to prove me that WHG existed in Siberia, even through it did not exist in it's pure form in Europe at the time
and of course PCA will put a population geographically east to WHG right to it on the map
I could show you some other calculator which shows up 100% northern European for the EHG samples

>Italian
>White
Choose one

Haven you even been to Italy you shitskin?

"White" IS an American construction. But only because the Founders explicitly limited immigration and citizenship to Europeans ONLY. This was changed nearly a century later after the Civil War, but prior to that time "white" just meant European descendant. It made more sense to use that term to describe all European nations than to list every single frigging one of them on government documents. The term was also invented because of all the contact colonists had with non-whites. Europeans did not have such contact unless they lived in their colonies. So from the European point of view their national ethnic identity was maintained as the default, whereas here it really wasn't as second and third generation white settlers simply became "American" versus non-white non-Americans.

Also, the mutt meme is dead because genetic studies prove white settlers in America never interbred with the lesser races in any real number. Modern Britain has a higher mixed population than the USA.

Attached: dead meme.jpg (697x1175, 395K)

BASED AND DANISHPILLED. AMERIMUTTS.

USA sterilized their european citizens of their culture.

Most americans were german as of 1917 / 42, and yet by ww2 they would speak only english despite before ww1 german being the second-most spoken language.

2015 meant for your study
my study was from 2018

Anglos are the original Americans so everything else has to be clarified

I'm Italian, we aren't white. Only Polentones sometimes consider themselves white or Terrones with self-hatred.

> I could show you then show me. until now, i will just keep to the article published on nature.
> Yeah, clustering between WHG and CHG does not mean
CRINGE.
> my study
you have no studies whatsoever. you just read a blog.

Lol, you know nothing about America. Listen to this man .

>before ww1 german being the second-most spoken language.
Yeah I (((wonder who was responsible for stigmatizing Germans in America)))

This man gets it.