This guy ruthlessly dismantles the bullshit studies paraded around by vegans, in many of his videos. He explains exactly how the fake results are constructed. He tackles Vegan Gains, Dr. Greger, Mic the Vegan, and others.
Why is this related to politics? Well, because the vegan agenda is all part of the master plan to replace the native populations of white countries. Veganism kills fertility, turns healthy people into an empty shell, attacks their capacity for reason, alienates them from their families, kills testosterone levels (the cause of the onions voice), and a bunch of sock puppets like "Mic the Vegan" are being funded to put this garbage out there. I wonder (((who))) could be funding them...
Up until recently, there has been almost no pushback to their narrative that veganism is not only possible to maintain long-term, but actually healthy. It is neither.
This kiwi is doing us all a great service and he needs our energy. He has exactly the kind of resume required to dismantle the vegan narrative and he needs exposure. The work done by Sv3rige and others is good and should continue, but none of these people have the kind of background needed to effectively dismantle the vegan narrative.
If you're sick of smug vegans parading around their bullshit studies that no one else seems to have the time or skillset to debunk, I'm sure you'll find these entertaining. It's a breath of fresh of air.
Pic-related - it's what vegans think being "kind" and "ethical" to animals (leaving them to suffer and die in the wild) looks like.
This guy is legit. You know how I know? He's challenging all the faggot vegans to debates, which they will decline. Why will they decline? Because they're wrong, and they can't engage in a debate with anyone even remotely intelligent. This is basic art of war shit. You don't fight battles you know you're going to lose and (most) vegans KNOW they will lose against a competent debater, because their position is inconsistent with reality and a competent debater knows exactly how to point this out in a way that an audience will understand and accept. This is why vegans will almost always only debate utter retards who can barely string together a coherent sentence. It's nothing more than theatre.
Vid-related - it's another example of what vegans want for the animals they "care" about so much. Vegan ethics are so logical!
Another vid demonstrating the foolproof vegan ethical framework - farming is cruel, so we should let the animals have their unborn children ripped from the womb by hyenas in order to be more ethical. Makes total sense!
This debate is worth watching too. I don't think the basedboys knew what they were up against. It's quite surprising they've actually left this debate on their channels as well.
Bump becuz i like debate, but, no i have no time to watch/read through this shit.
Jack Anderson
did it died??/
Brandon Nguyen
>that's an african wild dog, not a hyena did not look any of the video but >farming is cruel, so we should let the animals have their unborn children ripped from the womb by hyenas in order to be more ethical. Makes total sense! are you advocating for the extermination of african wild dogs, hyena or other kind of predators ?
Joseph Reyes
>are you advocating for the extermination of african wild dogs, hyena or other kind of predators ? No, I'm pointing out the utter hypocrisy of claiming to care about animal well-being to justify the idea that farming is wrong, when the alternative is being ripped to shreds by predators, dying of starvation and being eaten alive by rats while being too weak to resist, etc... Nature is fucking cruel compared to farms.
Hudson Campbell
I believe that Zebra saliva actually has healing properties, so it was probably ok in the end.
Link the video where he addresses Dr. Greger if there is one. I don't have time for straw man debunking.
Andrew Davis
I only just found this guy so I'm not terribly familiar with all his videos, so there may be more on Greger, but he addresses some of Greger's nonsense in this video (copy the link to get to the correct time or skip to 20:36).
Ok, but does eveyrone have to worship the magic vrill dust?
David Hernandez
No one worships Vril. Simply acknowledging its presence in the world empowers you
Christopher Wood
See if you can get him to debunk PlantPositive.com video by video.
Nolan Fisher
thanks for linking
Josiah Cook
Sage and shillpilled. Stop advertising YouTube channels of people you use in place of critical thinking and forming your own conclusions.
Easton Garcia
I think everyone here would agree the shill is you. And for the record, you realize that even if you sage, it gives me an excuse to respond, thereby bumping the topic regardless? Pic-related, it's you.
But they would maintain their autonomy. Nature isn't cruel, nature is nature. I'd rather take my chances in the real world and get fucking obliterated for it than sit in a comfy cage waiting to die. Don't act like you're doing the animals a favor by sheltering them from the dangerous world that gives their lives purpose.
Julian Evans
why would we even care if we're on top of the food chain
William Ramirez
And what does their "autonomy" get them? lol... Tortured in the cruelest possible fashion imaginable.
It is trivial to create an environment on farms that is nearly identical to how these animals live in the wild. The difference is, death is quick and painless (when it comes), they get unlimited food, free healthcare, shelter, and the ability to reproduce.
Why do you think it's moral to DECIDE for the animals that they should suffer and die, as in, get eaten alive by rats when they're too weak to move, rather than exist peacefully on a farm? Humans MUST make a CHOICE on behalf of the animals, and the choice I want to make, is to farm them in exchange for protection against nature's cruelty. The choice you want to make is for them to be eaten alive and die a tortuous, gruesome, death. I want these animals to proliferate the planet by collaborating with humans, you just want them to suffer, die and go extinct.
Xavier Cook
youtube.com/watch?v=m5Kxn3PPQvM >Hey Dr. Berg, take a CT calcium scan so we can see how clogged your arteries are >ok >here you go, no calcification whatsoever >B-B-BUH THAT DOSENT MEAN ANYTHING!! LOL YOU SCORED THE MEDIAN FOR YOUR AGE >YOU'RE STILL GOING TO DIE OF A HEART ATTACK!!! The absolute state of v*ganoids
Brody Taylor
Gojiman is having a total meltdown after Sv3rige posted epitome 4. The fucking clown made a video about how he's taking "legal action" against Sv3rige and Primal Edge Health, and subsequently deleted it after his own base told him what a thin-skinned loser he was.
maybe ur biased, since humans dominate nature with autonomy due to the fact that we can think and reason. would u want "autonomy" if u lacked the ability to think ur way out of problems, and were just fodder for predators? it's like u have no empathy for the animals. poor zebra , hope its ok.
Jose Foster
his camera stabilization is triggering my autism really bad
Colton Scott
Not sure who cares about vegetarianism/veganism but I see a lot of people here get hyped on it. Seems like you are getting trolled. Most people onions is not that healthy for people or the environment. Most hippies and punk rockers now opt for locally sourced meats and love to tell you how bad onions is for you and how “China and Japan have always eaten onions sparingly”.
Bentley Torres
>And what does their "autonomy" get them? Can you not read? Purpose. You could argue just the same that mankind should be enslaved to protect them against the dangers of the real world, but in the same process you would eliminate our ability to choose and by extension our humanity. You're like the leftist that wants to coddle and shelter everything from competition because in competition someone loses. I could care less about your grusome depictions. I maintain that I'd rather die in ways much worse than the ones you've listed having lived a life as master of my own body, made my own decisions and accepted the responsibilities that follows. >Why do you think it's moral to DECIDE for the animals that they should suffer and die Suffering is life, big whoop. All the physical pain in the world does not compare to meaninglessness of slavery. And to think that mankind has some moral responsibility to save the poor, suffering animals from the fate they bestow upon themselves is extremely pretentious. Do I have a moral reponsibility to enslave, feed and coddle suffering people, or would you deem that immoral? We wouldn't. His argument is just retarded.
Why do you think the animals want your human notion of "purpose" and "autonomy", rather than protection from nature and the ability for their species to literally DOMINATE the entire fucking planet?
Almost all DNA based life demonstrates the following. 1. They want their species to exist and thrive. 2. They want to exist as an individual. 3. They want to be comfortable.
These are the three things almost all DNA life values the MOST, in order, demonstrated via behavior. Farming gives them all three. Nature gives them suffering and extinction. Your position is untenable if you claim to give a shit about animals. The animals clearly don't want your dumb notion of autonomy or "purpose" or whatever other buzzword you want to pull out of your ass. Animals want their species to exist and thrive, they want to exist themselves, and they want to be comfortable. They don't want fucking "autonomy" you literal retard.
> I'd rather take my chances in the real world and get fucking obliterated for it than sit in a comfy cage waiting to die. You are waiting in a comfy cage to die and you are part of nature. It's just that humans have risen so high in the foodchain that most of us are living in the comfy cages of our cultures and civilisations. You cant make an exception for an apex predator like a tiger not being cruel because 'its part of nature' and at the same time make that exception for the apex predators called homo sapiens. It's either Nature is cruel and so are humans, or nature is not cruel and neither are humans because they are part of it.
Nicholas Cooper
Government is pushing veganism and wants to tax meat.
Nathaniel Reed
Holy cow that's fucking metal
Isaiah Robinson
>it tries to pull its organs back in
Man that's brutal
Michael Ross
These threads don't get slid you idiot. Threads that out the Jews and pizza gate threads do.
Benjamin Baker
This guy is gud. Too bad most people don't have the attention span. The first vid explaining about the epidemiology shit is spot on.
That's how doctors and scientists manipulate data. Same strategy they use in climate change
Gabriel Sullivan
Ten minutes into the first video and this is all the bullshit I've noticed so far
>CORRELTION DOSNT IMPLY CAUSATION DURHHH >Epidemiology is not real because they adjust data to match other data >Cholesterol-lowering medications actually work by reducing inflammation
He manages to sound more condescending than Vegan Gaynes despite being less well-read. You can tell his degree from the diploma mill has given him an Einstein complex and it's just absolute cringe.
Hunter Harris
>Why do you think the animals want your human notion of "purpose" and "autonomy" Because if you open the cages they run back into the wild to enjoy the great suffering of nature yet again. >Almost all DNA based life demonstrates the following. This includes mankind, and through our actions we can clearly deduct that the moral superiority which most of us claim to have and some of us want to impose on the rest of the world is merely a facade. We are motivated by the same needs and impulses as practically every other animal, and only through rationalization of the vast complexity of human life do we think us different. We act different because we are more intelligent, but our motives are clearly the same. You're either going to have to prove a false equivalence or acknowledge that slavery would be preferebly for you and me aswell.
Landon Long
I completely agree. How is anything you're saying incompatable with my post? Nature is not cruel and neither are humans because they are part of it, that is exactly what I believe.
Anthony Morris
>Because if you open the cages they run back into the wild to enjoy the great suffering of nature yet again. This doesn't demonstrate they want "purpose" or "autonomy". You're being obtuse because you can see I'm right. Obviously the animals lack the capacity to understand the consequences of their actions. If a retard jumps into traffic, that doesn't mean he wants to die, it means he doesn't understand the implications of his actions because he lacks the capacity to reason. Likewise for the animals. I'd give this a 0/10, but since you're obviously giving it your best shot, I'll up it to 1/10 for the effort.
>You're either going to have to prove a false equivalence or acknowledge that slavery would be preferebly for you and me aswell. This simply doesn't follow. You've failed to counter my position, yet again.
So please, tell me, why are you so sure that animals want your human notion of "purpose" or "autonomy"?
Ethan Powell
>humans aren't cruel tell me more, o wise one
Grayson Reyes
>Obviously the animals lack the capacity to understand the consequences of their actions. Source? Animals can reason, understand causality, and make decisions based on past experiences. >This simply doesn't follow. DNA based life demonstrates the same desires. Humans are DNA based life. If it is morally good to enslave animals and fulfill these desires, then why is it morally bad to enslave humans and fulfill these desires? And stop wasting my time by having to read through your petty insults.
Ian Walker
This guy needs to work on his articulation and stop doing that fucking city-girl dialect.
Lucas Fisher
>Animals can reason, understand causality, and make decisions based on past experiences. I suppose I should hedge my statement a bit. I replied in haste, so I wasn't as careful with my language as I could've been. In general, animals lack the capacity to understand the consequences of their actions. Animals do have instincts, they understand, on some level, that if they mount a female, that's good, they understand if a predator swings by, that's bad, they understand that eating is good, etc... But to extend this to the point where you make the claim that walking through a fence suggests animals want "purpose" or "autonomy", concepts which animals obviously have no comprehension of, is patently absurd, and you know it.
Why do you think animals want your human notion of "purpose" or "autonomy"? You're going to have to do better than "well they might sometimes walk through a fence" when they obviously have no comprehension of what that entails, much like a retard has no comprehension of what walking into traffic entails.
>why is it morally bad to enslave humans We're talking apples and oranges here. Is the label of "slave" bad, if adopting it gives humans everything they value most? If I could have everything I wanted most, but could not achieve on my own, by being a "slave", well, sign me up! By definition, there's no downside here.
Farming gives animals the three things they value most, which they would not be afforded by nature. The typical conception of slavery does not do this for humans. Apples and oranges.
Now I'll ask again, why do you think animals want your human notion of "purpose"? I know that animals want their species to exist because animals will risk their lives to protect their offspring. I know that animals want to exist because they'll fight to the death to protect their existence. I know animals want to be comfortable, because their entire lives are spent struggling to achieve a degree of comfort.
