Firearms

Should they be regulated or freely available for people? If freely available, is there any line that should be drawn as to calibre, rate of fire or explosive potential?

Also, why? Why do you want people to have free and unlimited access to certain firearms?

Attached: 570EAF18-5D0B-44CB-A489-0472DDA6B809.jpg (750x500, 21K)

Other urls found in this thread:

northwestfront.org/
northwestfront.org/northwest-novels/
downwithjugears.blogspot.com/2015/08/revised-rfn-recommended-listening-list.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

kill yourself mohammad

Thank you, José. Anything else?

Attached: 1543981871852.gif (480x270, 1.96M)

I want Swiss gun laws.

Yank delusion and superstition are the answer my friend. You will observe that the same idiots who talk about eternal hellfire for the unbelievers are unable to understand the meaning of the phrase "well-regulated militia" in their own Bill of Rights. If there ought to be no restrictions on firearms at all then everybody ought to be able to own nuclear weapons. Conversely as soon as you ban one weapon, you open the door to banning any number of them, and thus the Yank notion that every man should de jure be able to own an assault rifle and a machine gun is completely overthrown via a process of internal inconsistency.

Wonderful. Got some more insight, obese Hispanic?

Attached: 1B91B78E-8020-43A7-AAA1-B4DA9BA8F872.jpg (420x297, 119K)

swiss gun laws are well balanced and avoids turning your country into a third world shithole like JewSA

freely but only for whites and vetted asians.

It's actually VERY simple.
More guns = fewer living humans.
Fewer living humans = good.

Define """"""humans""""""

UK economic retard. Fears if allowed everyone would spend millions to own a Nuke.

why not ban Aircraft carriers and Space stations with lasers while you are at it? can you just imagine if everyone could own a death star?

so much Global warming

>linear bolt action with 1:2 transmission
nice, didn't know that was a thing.

Only Germany should have gun laws because they are subhuman scum.

... What?

Do creaturas even speak English?

I believe fertility is a lot higher in areas with lax gun control.

Homo sapiens.
Preferably "non-white" but ultimately numbers matter more.

Merkel actually makes excellent rifles.

Attached: 4E42ED6C-FF09-43F7-83DD-162F427D61E4.jpg (1200x800, 121K)

>Should they be regulated or freely available for people?
The people should have the right to buy whatever armaments they desire.

>If freely available, is there any line that should be drawn as to calibre, rate of fire or explosive potential?
Nope.

>Also, why? Why do you want people to have free and unlimited access to certain firearms?
Because it's our right.

the right to bear arms, defend yourself, and overthrow tyrannical governments are rights ordained by god

>heh, if you want everyone to have an assault rifle, you should want everyone to have a nuke! INTERNAL INCONSISTENCY! FALLACY! FALLACY! MUM, I CALLED THEM OUT ON THEIR FALLACY! AM I SMART NOW MUM?

Fuck off, Muhammad. Keep being jealous that your government does not give you the right of self-defense, even and especially against the government itself.

Attached: 1498851228608.jpg (340x314, 79K)

Can you let me know who God is? I am interested. I believe in a creator, but you seem to believe this creator makes specific laws and provisions for people on Earth relating to projectile weapons and I am geniuenly interested how this is supposed to be true.

>Can you let me know who God is?
God, nature, basic rights...take your pick. That's where our rights come from.

>I believe in a creator,
So where does your belief in a creator state that the people don't have the right to defend themselves?

>but you seem to believe this creator makes specific laws and provisions for people on Earth relating to projectile weapons and I am geniuenly interested how this is supposed to be true.
Our right to self-defense is God-given. Therefore we must have access to the best means available to defend ourselves. Which means armaments like firearms.

>So where does your belief in a creator state that the people don't have the right to defend themselves?

It doesn’t say anything about firearms. It does say we, as God’s creators, have a right to preserve our lives.

>If there ought to be no restrictions on firearms at all then everybody ought to be able to own nuclear weapons.

Implying this is not the only way to ensure inviolability of individual rights by the ever-growing monstrosity of the government. The system, no matter how well and justly it was build will inevitably become corrupted and self-serving through corruptibility of people it's made up of or infiltration of certain (((someone))) into it. The mutually assured destruction between the citizen and the state is the only way to prevent the infringement on the rights of the citizen.

This works on international arena, the international law is being broken every day, America is invading sovereign nations all the time but it has never invaded a nuclear power. The same way smaller nations can defend themselves against giant warmongering superpower, the citizens can protect themselves against tyrannical governments.

They should be freely available for home defense and as a deterrent to tyrannical government. No restrictions at all need to be made.... the only regulated weapons should be nuclear arms.

>It does say we, as God’s creators, have a right to preserve our lives.
And therefore we have the right to defend ourselves using the best means at our disposal. Which are firearms.

and when lazer guns are invented and widely available, we'll have the right to own those as well.

The real question is: Why are you trying to limit our rights?

I think we also have a right to be free of maniacs, drug dealers and other criminals with firearms. I believe only non-criminals and non-mentally insane should have firearms.

>reported for underage
too bad you're not living in lala land

"Well-regulated" doesn't mean what you think it means in this context. The founding fathers wanted citizens to be able to stand up to the government.

Legalize recreational nukes.

>I think we also have a right to be free of maniacs, drug dealers and other criminals with firearms. I believe only non-criminals and non-mentally insane should have firearms.
Then why don't you fix the rehabilitation and mental health systems and leave the rights of the people alone?

stupid opinons, should they be regulated or freely available?

Only white people should be able to own firearms etc. No restrictions on the educated white man. This coencides with mandatory military service in the defense of the ethnostate. Darkies- being the second class citizens they are. Shall not have the god given rights, for they are not the children of God.

t. Shlomo Goldstein-Shekelburg

>Only white people should be able to own firearms etc.
That's easily solved. Only White people may reside in White countries.

I don't think there is any correlation. IDK what the birthrate is but Brazil has very strong gun regulations.

the actual words are "ordained by your creator" so take your pick hans, it is your right to protect yourself, and die for a cause.

1 life only, peace should not be bought at the price of freedom

Not a gun guy (but support them, I need a good guy with a gun to shoot the bad guy robbing me), what's the point of that huge gap between the stock and trigger? I've only seen that In recent guns.

>but you seem to believe this creator makes specific laws and provisions for people on Earth relating to projectile weapons and I am geniuenly interested how this is supposed to be true.

read the constitution Hans. Human beings are born with unalienable rights, and any impingement on these rights is an unjust government

Brazil has one of the lowest fertility rates at 1.7 which is falling further.

Attached: EBFB50F0-C4C7-4141-9917-861808EB891A.png (600x500, 141K)

I believe every person on this Earth should have the same Right to bear arms as is written in the Constitution of the United States.
Until we all have this I will never be happy.

Why are these rights “unalienable”?

>Why are these rights “unalienable”?
Because if they aren't, anyone can justify doing anything to anyone at any time.
You really want to live in a country where the government can do whatever it wants to you and you have no ability to resist?

Now you're catching on. Gun violence is directly related to multiculturalism.
>More multiculturalism
equals
>more gun violence

As a side note the mental health care in my country is ridiculously bad.
Gun violence is caused by 3 things
>Gang violence
>Mental health issues
>False flags (inb4 tinfoil hat)
To solve this issue of gun violence only 3 steps need be made.
>Ethnic cleansing
>Rebuilding the mental healthcare system
>Total destruction of the current political establishment

Wow interesting. Some good news

because you cannot lose them.

>Now you're catching on. Gun violence is directly related to multiculturalism.
Exactly. you get rid of non-Whites and the USA's crime rate (or is it homicide rate?) drops to that of Belgium.

>To solve this issue of gun violence only 3 steps need be made.
>>Ethnic cleansing
>>Rebuilding the mental healthcare system
>>Total destruction of the current political establishment
northwestfront.org/

i just picked up an assault rifle 15 a couple of hours ago. in and out in 10 minutes

Attached: 792345634906834986234.jpg (431x459, 47K)

I say this knowing full well that my government is actively seeking to take all of Canada's hand guns and semi automatic rifles while forcing us to store what is left in containment facilities wherever they deem fit.
I feel as this is a personal attack by Canada's government on every Canadian, whether they own a firearm or not.
I feel my government is actively trying and even going out of it's way to undermine this country.

>The founding fathers wanted citizens to be able to stand up to the government.

This is actually a total falsehood. There was no government army at the time and the drafters of the Constitution were firmly against having one. In fact your so-called "Founding Fathers" (who were really nothing more than a race of petty pirates and murderers and tyrants) used the militias to oppress the Shays and Whiskey Rebellions shortly after the founding of the country.

no dude theyre tools
it only seems wierd to people to own them becausr no one on earth hunts any more and also cause niggers&spics shoot people

Armed population = citizens.
Unarmed population = subjects.

Free for all citizens. Including personal nukes. Citizenship should be based of racial/ethnic background rather than some spook shit like language and history tests or years of employment.

>Citizenship should be based of racial/ethnic background
Entry into the nation should be based on your race. citizenship should be based on service to your race. You serve honorably in the military and serve the people for 4-8 years, you get the right to vote and hold office. For women, it's service to the people and having 3+ children.

This is great.

Nice. I'm not going to sign up tho. They seem legit but I can't be too certain. They may not even accept me.

>This is great.
this is where that idea is from: northwestfront.org/

Ok Nigel like you have room to talk. Stay mad.

whites: yes
everyone else: no, at least in white lands. they can own guns in their own countries.

>Nice. I'm not going to sign up tho. They seem legit but I can't be too certain. They may not even accept me.
You move to the PNW. that's all that's required to take part. Completely legal.

>northwestfront.org/
Thanks, I heard about this before, will look into it.

No regulations for weaponry except for nukes. I should be able to buy a AA cannon

Free and unlimited access to all firearms, including artillery*

>Thanks, I heard about this before, will look into it.
Be sure to check out the novels page. northwestfront.org/northwest-novels/

Checking out the listening list to get an idea of what it's all about wouldn't hurt either. downwithjugears.blogspot.com/2015/08/revised-rfn-recommended-listening-list.html

Perhaps. When I'm done with school. I'm studying welding and CAD so I won't be an anchor. I need to get away from California but my current school offers all the programs I need.

wow, stereotype murrican

>Shells your neighbor for flicking a cigarette into your back yard

Checked, will do!

BASED.

>Perhaps. When I'm done with school. I'm studying welding and CAD so I won't be an anchor. I need to get away from California but my current school offers all the programs I need.
That's a good plan. In the meantime you can read the novels
northwestfront.org/northwest-novels/

and listen to recommended listening list
downwithjugears.blogspot.com/2015/08/revised-rfn-recommended-listening-list.html

to get yourself informed.

We speak American.

No, unlimited. Reality is going to preclude most people from buying rocket launchers and the like.

Must be why most of you seem to be incapable of making a damned lick of sense.

american is not a language u idiot.
You spergs speak english with a different accent. That's all.
But no, i forgot. Most of you nowadays speak spanish only.
Sorry ramirez, how could i be this wrong

yes

Attached: Indoeuropean[1].jpg (750x934, 220K)

Sounds like you're just still pissed off that we whooped your ass.

The overwhelming majority of gun violence is either suicide by handgun or gang violence by handgun. You’re focusing on the wrong factors. Long guns are absurdly uncommon in gun violence.

>Why do you want people to have free and unlimited access to certain firearms?
why not you disgusting subhuman turkroach

Both

>free and unlimited access to certain firearms
the equalization of force, a woman against a man or a man against a wolf or a peoples against the state. You could take a look at it through the lens of geopolitics, what happened to gaddafi?, or saddam? compare that with how the west reacted with kim jong un? kim had nukes, so he got a seat at the negotiating table. the state has the police, the military, and if the people have only signs and slogans then they will be crushed if not killed.

Who decides what "mentally ill" entails - overly diagnosed add/ adhd? What about depression? Trannies? What about medicated schitzo? Emphasis on medicated. What about mental illness implies intent to injure or danger to others? Most are just dangers to themselves more than anything.

I'd say give guns to most of 'em except the agressives, a trained populace can defend itself from deranged neighbors. 'Sides, loons get guns whether or not they're allowed to; might as well know who has a license.

Gun regulations are both pointless and a violation of human rights.

Have you read any Codreanu?

Attached: 1543564562479.png (640x640, 110K)

If you take any mind altering meds, you should not be handling firearms.

I disagree - one shouldn't surrender their life for an involuntary condition unless they feel they should.

I'm completely against regulation of any for (except maybe nuclear or biological...just because of long-lasting after effects).

Land mines are fair game - just give the fire dept. a "30 feet" rule. If a (((certain people))) and their offices can hire pmc's, bodyguards and the like, I should be equally capable in my personal defense.

I don't want you or your wife or kids "tolerantly" bent over. If you're into non-consensual racemixing, then to each their own; but don't force that on the rest of us.

What the actual fuck do you mean by "explosive potential"? Lmfao xD you do realize every single bullet that is fired is actually an "explosion"?....

What about anyone who drinks alcohol? See how retarded it gets?

You don't know who God is? You probably never will. Fetch me the spirit. The son. And the father. Your pillar of faith has ascended.

Attached: 1544122041154.jpg (1500x1500, 996K)

Says the bong who needs a loicense for a spork.

I think ownership of firearms is a right but right to carry is not. For rural areas, it is ok. For urban areas, not.

>Why do you want people to have free and unlimited access to certain firearms?

Pic related is why. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

Attached: 2nd amendment texas sign.png (291x392, 188K)

they should be handed out free from our excess labor leftovers.

>I think ownership of firearms is a right but right to carry is not. For rural areas, it is ok. For urban areas, not.
fuck off kike.

This is why the founding fathers kicked you the fuck out.

Bolt action ( long rifles, pump shotguns, manually loading sport guns ): no restrictions on purchase but illegal to own for past felons of violent crime

Semi-auto rifles: registration and background check

Full auto, heavy and Concealable weapons ( assault rifles, machine guns, pistols ): restricted to special training permit with background check and at least two people ( that passed a previous background check ) that will vouch

Destructive and mechanized weapons ( Explosive ordinance, anti-tank, mortars, infantry fighting vehicles, anti-tank cannons etc ): restricted to private militia that are under the observation of the state defense department after 51% of the locality pledge consent

This simply makes most sense, but it's not in the interest of a central government. Give them an inch and they even want to ban knives or pepper spray.

Have you ever shot armor piercing incendiary rounds out of a .50bmg anti-materiel rifle? Shits cash.

Attached: gqJCFW.gif (320x180, 441K)