Should they be regulated or freely available for people? If freely available, is there any line that should be drawn as to calibre, rate of fire or explosive potential?
Also, why? Why do you want people to have free and unlimited access to certain firearms?
Yank delusion and superstition are the answer my friend. You will observe that the same idiots who talk about eternal hellfire for the unbelievers are unable to understand the meaning of the phrase "well-regulated militia" in their own Bill of Rights. If there ought to be no restrictions on firearms at all then everybody ought to be able to own nuclear weapons. Conversely as soon as you ban one weapon, you open the door to banning any number of them, and thus the Yank notion that every man should de jure be able to own an assault rifle and a machine gun is completely overthrown via a process of internal inconsistency.
>Should they be regulated or freely available for people? The people should have the right to buy whatever armaments they desire.
>If freely available, is there any line that should be drawn as to calibre, rate of fire or explosive potential? Nope.
>Also, why? Why do you want people to have free and unlimited access to certain firearms? Because it's our right.
Thomas Howard
the right to bear arms, defend yourself, and overthrow tyrannical governments are rights ordained by god
Julian Hall
>heh, if you want everyone to have an assault rifle, you should want everyone to have a nuke! INTERNAL INCONSISTENCY! FALLACY! FALLACY! MUM, I CALLED THEM OUT ON THEIR FALLACY! AM I SMART NOW MUM?
Fuck off, Muhammad. Keep being jealous that your government does not give you the right of self-defense, even and especially against the government itself.
Can you let me know who God is? I am interested. I believe in a creator, but you seem to believe this creator makes specific laws and provisions for people on Earth relating to projectile weapons and I am geniuenly interested how this is supposed to be true.
Luis Campbell
>Can you let me know who God is? God, nature, basic rights...take your pick. That's where our rights come from.
>I believe in a creator, So where does your belief in a creator state that the people don't have the right to defend themselves?
>but you seem to believe this creator makes specific laws and provisions for people on Earth relating to projectile weapons and I am geniuenly interested how this is supposed to be true. Our right to self-defense is God-given. Therefore we must have access to the best means available to defend ourselves. Which means armaments like firearms.
Joshua Lopez
>So where does your belief in a creator state that the people don't have the right to defend themselves?
It doesn’t say anything about firearms. It does say we, as God’s creators, have a right to preserve our lives.
Liam Cruz
>If there ought to be no restrictions on firearms at all then everybody ought to be able to own nuclear weapons.
Implying this is not the only way to ensure inviolability of individual rights by the ever-growing monstrosity of the government. The system, no matter how well and justly it was build will inevitably become corrupted and self-serving through corruptibility of people it's made up of or infiltration of certain (((someone))) into it. The mutually assured destruction between the citizen and the state is the only way to prevent the infringement on the rights of the citizen.
This works on international arena, the international law is being broken every day, America is invading sovereign nations all the time but it has never invaded a nuclear power. The same way smaller nations can defend themselves against giant warmongering superpower, the citizens can protect themselves against tyrannical governments.
Brandon Ramirez
They should be freely available for home defense and as a deterrent to tyrannical government. No restrictions at all need to be made.... the only regulated weapons should be nuclear arms.
Hunter Torres
>It does say we, as God’s creators, have a right to preserve our lives. And therefore we have the right to defend ourselves using the best means at our disposal. Which are firearms.
and when lazer guns are invented and widely available, we'll have the right to own those as well.
The real question is: Why are you trying to limit our rights?
Eli Ross
I think we also have a right to be free of maniacs, drug dealers and other criminals with firearms. I believe only non-criminals and non-mentally insane should have firearms.
Bentley Hughes
>reported for underage too bad you're not living in lala land
Henry Martinez
"Well-regulated" doesn't mean what you think it means in this context. The founding fathers wanted citizens to be able to stand up to the government.
Legalize recreational nukes.
Jaxson Wilson
>I think we also have a right to be free of maniacs, drug dealers and other criminals with firearms. I believe only non-criminals and non-mentally insane should have firearms. Then why don't you fix the rehabilitation and mental health systems and leave the rights of the people alone?
Nathaniel Wood
stupid opinons, should they be regulated or freely available?
Lucas Bailey
Only white people should be able to own firearms etc. No restrictions on the educated white man. This coencides with mandatory military service in the defense of the ethnostate. Darkies- being the second class citizens they are. Shall not have the god given rights, for they are not the children of God.
Easton Reyes
t. Shlomo Goldstein-Shekelburg
Adrian Bennett
>Only white people should be able to own firearms etc. That's easily solved. Only White people may reside in White countries.
Jonathan Rogers
I don't think there is any correlation. IDK what the birthrate is but Brazil has very strong gun regulations.
James Cook
the actual words are "ordained by your creator" so take your pick hans, it is your right to protect yourself, and die for a cause.
1 life only, peace should not be bought at the price of freedom
Levi Bell
Not a gun guy (but support them, I need a good guy with a gun to shoot the bad guy robbing me), what's the point of that huge gap between the stock and trigger? I've only seen that In recent guns.
David Flores
>but you seem to believe this creator makes specific laws and provisions for people on Earth relating to projectile weapons and I am geniuenly interested how this is supposed to be true.
read the constitution Hans. Human beings are born with unalienable rights, and any impingement on these rights is an unjust government
Mason Turner
Brazil has one of the lowest fertility rates at 1.7 which is falling further.
I believe every person on this Earth should have the same Right to bear arms as is written in the Constitution of the United States. Until we all have this I will never be happy.
Andrew Robinson
Why are these rights “unalienable”?
Ryder Nelson
>Why are these rights “unalienable”? Because if they aren't, anyone can justify doing anything to anyone at any time. You really want to live in a country where the government can do whatever it wants to you and you have no ability to resist?
Dominic Robinson
Now you're catching on. Gun violence is directly related to multiculturalism. >More multiculturalism equals >more gun violence
As a side note the mental health care in my country is ridiculously bad. Gun violence is caused by 3 things >Gang violence >Mental health issues >False flags (inb4 tinfoil hat) To solve this issue of gun violence only 3 steps need be made. >Ethnic cleansing >Rebuilding the mental healthcare system >Total destruction of the current political establishment
Sebastian Peterson
Wow interesting. Some good news
Carson Diaz
because you cannot lose them.
Adrian Wood
>Now you're catching on. Gun violence is directly related to multiculturalism. Exactly. you get rid of non-Whites and the USA's crime rate (or is it homicide rate?) drops to that of Belgium.
>To solve this issue of gun violence only 3 steps need be made. >>Ethnic cleansing >>Rebuilding the mental healthcare system >>Total destruction of the current political establishment northwestfront.org/
Josiah Scott
i just picked up an assault rifle 15 a couple of hours ago. in and out in 10 minutes
I say this knowing full well that my government is actively seeking to take all of Canada's hand guns and semi automatic rifles while forcing us to store what is left in containment facilities wherever they deem fit. I feel as this is a personal attack by Canada's government on every Canadian, whether they own a firearm or not. I feel my government is actively trying and even going out of it's way to undermine this country.
Julian Morgan
>The founding fathers wanted citizens to be able to stand up to the government.
This is actually a total falsehood. There was no government army at the time and the drafters of the Constitution were firmly against having one. In fact your so-called "Founding Fathers" (who were really nothing more than a race of petty pirates and murderers and tyrants) used the militias to oppress the Shays and Whiskey Rebellions shortly after the founding of the country.
Jackson Flores
no dude theyre tools it only seems wierd to people to own them becausr no one on earth hunts any more and also cause niggers&spics shoot people
Luke Foster
Armed population = citizens. Unarmed population = subjects.
Levi Gonzalez
Free for all citizens. Including personal nukes. Citizenship should be based of racial/ethnic background rather than some spook shit like language and history tests or years of employment.
Christian King
>Citizenship should be based of racial/ethnic background Entry into the nation should be based on your race. citizenship should be based on service to your race. You serve honorably in the military and serve the people for 4-8 years, you get the right to vote and hold office. For women, it's service to the people and having 3+ children.
Juan Phillips
This is great.
David Miller
Nice. I'm not going to sign up tho. They seem legit but I can't be too certain. They may not even accept me.
whites: yes everyone else: no, at least in white lands. they can own guns in their own countries.
Luke Howard
>Nice. I'm not going to sign up tho. They seem legit but I can't be too certain. They may not even accept me. You move to the PNW. that's all that's required to take part. Completely legal.
Perhaps. When I'm done with school. I'm studying welding and CAD so I won't be an anchor. I need to get away from California but my current school offers all the programs I need.
Noah Long
wow, stereotype murrican
Brayden Taylor
>Shells your neighbor for flicking a cigarette into your back yard
Isaac Morgan
Checked, will do!
Jacob Carter
BASED.
Benjamin Carter
>Perhaps. When I'm done with school. I'm studying welding and CAD so I won't be an anchor. I need to get away from California but my current school offers all the programs I need. That's a good plan. In the meantime you can read the novels northwestfront.org/northwest-novels/
No, unlimited. Reality is going to preclude most people from buying rocket launchers and the like.
Lucas Williams
Must be why most of you seem to be incapable of making a damned lick of sense.
Parker Adams
american is not a language u idiot. You spergs speak english with a different accent. That's all. But no, i forgot. Most of you nowadays speak spanish only. Sorry ramirez, how could i be this wrong
Sounds like you're just still pissed off that we whooped your ass.
Joshua Nelson
The overwhelming majority of gun violence is either suicide by handgun or gang violence by handgun. You’re focusing on the wrong factors. Long guns are absurdly uncommon in gun violence.
Nicholas Martinez
>Why do you want people to have free and unlimited access to certain firearms? why not you disgusting subhuman turkroach
Daniel Rivera
Both
Angel Hughes
>free and unlimited access to certain firearms the equalization of force, a woman against a man or a man against a wolf or a peoples against the state. You could take a look at it through the lens of geopolitics, what happened to gaddafi?, or saddam? compare that with how the west reacted with kim jong un? kim had nukes, so he got a seat at the negotiating table. the state has the police, the military, and if the people have only signs and slogans then they will be crushed if not killed.
Ian Bailey
Who decides what "mentally ill" entails - overly diagnosed add/ adhd? What about depression? Trannies? What about medicated schitzo? Emphasis on medicated. What about mental illness implies intent to injure or danger to others? Most are just dangers to themselves more than anything.
I'd say give guns to most of 'em except the agressives, a trained populace can defend itself from deranged neighbors. 'Sides, loons get guns whether or not they're allowed to; might as well know who has a license.
Aaron Martinez
Gun regulations are both pointless and a violation of human rights.
If you take any mind altering meds, you should not be handling firearms.
Asher Reyes
I disagree - one shouldn't surrender their life for an involuntary condition unless they feel they should.
Nolan King
I'm completely against regulation of any for (except maybe nuclear or biological...just because of long-lasting after effects).
Land mines are fair game - just give the fire dept. a "30 feet" rule. If a (((certain people))) and their offices can hire pmc's, bodyguards and the like, I should be equally capable in my personal defense.
I don't want you or your wife or kids "tolerantly" bent over. If you're into non-consensual racemixing, then to each their own; but don't force that on the rest of us.
Jordan Jenkins
What the actual fuck do you mean by "explosive potential"? Lmfao xD you do realize every single bullet that is fired is actually an "explosion"?....
Jose Baker
What about anyone who drinks alcohol? See how retarded it gets?
Blake Roberts
You don't know who God is? You probably never will. Fetch me the spirit. The son. And the father. Your pillar of faith has ascended.
they should be handed out free from our excess labor leftovers.
Brayden Bennett
>I think ownership of firearms is a right but right to carry is not. For rural areas, it is ok. For urban areas, not. fuck off kike.
Jonathan Nguyen
This is why the founding fathers kicked you the fuck out.
Chase Rogers
Bolt action ( long rifles, pump shotguns, manually loading sport guns ): no restrictions on purchase but illegal to own for past felons of violent crime
Semi-auto rifles: registration and background check
Full auto, heavy and Concealable weapons ( assault rifles, machine guns, pistols ): restricted to special training permit with background check and at least two people ( that passed a previous background check ) that will vouch
Destructive and mechanized weapons ( Explosive ordinance, anti-tank, mortars, infantry fighting vehicles, anti-tank cannons etc ): restricted to private militia that are under the observation of the state defense department after 51% of the locality pledge consent
This simply makes most sense, but it's not in the interest of a central government. Give them an inch and they even want to ban knives or pepper spray.
Nathaniel Bennett
Have you ever shot armor piercing incendiary rounds out of a .50bmg anti-materiel rifle? Shits cash.