How do I talk with my therapist about r9k, chads, stacies, robots and evolutionary psychology?

Real specific user

Jordan Peterson is a deranged old man spewing cliched rightwing bullshit :(
The only reason he's had success is because the new SJW left is even worse than him, and far less intelligent, so he looks good bashing on them. But he seriously doesn't ever say anything new or worthwile, and he uses his mass of platitudes about self-development as scaffolding in which he sticks the same rightwing, individualist, anti-equalitarian, acritically pro-status-quo, sociopathic bullshit that old rich people have been repeating for ages.
(Wow that was a rant. Huh.)

get some better bait

What if he just pisses me off and I wanted to rant about it

He's not right wing at all, he's neutral. Where did you pick up that he's right wing? Did someone tell you he was right wing rather than listening and finding out for yourself? Or did CNN tell you?

I don't live in America so I never heard about him on the news. All I know about him I got from watching his youtube videos after a friend told me I should. I picked up that he's very strongly against all kinds of communism of socialism, which makes him right-wing in the economic sense. Plus from what I've gathered he has fairly conservative views about most aspects of society, for example gay marriage. That's what I picked up.
Or for a less obvious example, he always says he hates student protest movements, saying that basically collective political action is never the right way to deal with problems, and that they should instead study and work on the problems to try to solve them themselves. To me that kind of individualism, completely dismissing the idea that problems can be solved by state intervention, sounds pretty right wing.
It's not like the rightwing or leftwing label has any importance anyway. I'd still disagree with his stuff.

That sounds like a pretty healthy viewpoint then, you don't have to like him, I do and that's okay, I respect that you've done your research and formed your own opinions. Nothing wrong with disliking him and his viewpoints.

Fair enough. Thank you kind user for your time and understanding.

Depends on what you mean by this.
You want a therapist that'll be an echo chamber and asspat you and agree with everything you say?
A therapist that will heal you of those thoughts by simply shaming you and saying they're bad because it just how it is?

or do you want a therapist that will give you different points of view, questions for you to ponder on, tools that might make you question your beliefs and hurt but make you grow as a person thinking for yourself?

Find a therapist that helps you on how to think, not what to think.

A therapist should give you the tools, not a final product.

>some doctors are bad, therefore they all are
Stop thinking with your feefees.

If you aren't honest with your therapist, you will never feel better or happier. My own healing was set back for YEARS because I refused to just tell the truth. It doesn't have to be all at once! Therapists are used to handling patients that are reluctant and slow to open up. The fact that you're going to therapy at all is a huge step forward, and I really do hope that you're proud of yourself for it.

A million times this

>goes to therapy
>doesn't open up
wew

Attached: pink_pepe.jpg (960x886, 160K)

Go ahead and tell your therapist about it. If they're smart, they'll tell you that you've been indulging in pseudo-intellectual nonsense, that you should pursue a real education if you want to spew this shit, and that you should go outside and talk to people. And they'll be right.

fitting for a robot desu

Also, OP, you idiot! You're not there for her not to judge you. She may judge you all she wants. Her purpose is to help you help yourself. And do open up FFS.

Attached: 20160418001310_0.jpg (600x800, 60K)

>assuming OP's therapist's gender
W E W
E
W E W

Attached: 1441448733133.jpg (508x610, 161K)

I wouldn’t use any of those terms. They are a form of short hand or jargon that the therapist won’t understand.

Just describe what happens and how you think and react to it all.

>thinks JBP is right wing

>Thinks a Boomer who preaches judeo-christian morality isn't right wing

>Tried to explain to someone how the media spins a narrative when they had some gay guy complaining about abuse on tv
>Told them the media looks up causes they can exaggerated and paint one side as perfect victims and the other side as hitler
>Told them they are trying to create histeria so you keep watching and you tell your friends about it afterwards
>Told them that guy on tv is a professional victim and his job is to tell everyone how he has been hurt and it's either fake or unhealthy as fuck
>Told them about the organizations that get paid to look up crazy abuse cases and make some studyes and that if they cant find anything they make it up because if it doesn't exist they don't get paid
>Told them the media creates this demand for likes they can spin and then they deny being responsible
>Told them all this end up causing is people who get radicalized and insane laws based on crazy made up lies that help nobody and make life worse get passed

>Annon, this guy got a law against abuse passed that never existed before, it never existed before
Was abuse not ilegal before?
>No it has never existed before
What does the law say?
>It's against abuse, it has never existed befor

he is right wing get an education.

Tell him you’re a loser who browses an anime image board for advice

What problem exactly do you have with what he says, can you refute any of his points? Can you point out any mistakes? Or is your only reason for disliking him that he shows people what's wrong with the way they do things and the way you do things?

>Plus from what I've gathered he has fairly conservative views about most aspects of society, for example gay marriage.
The only time I've ever heard him talk about gay couples in general were when he was discussing adoption. He's a clinical psychologist, and he's in favor of traditional family dynamics, but only insofar as to how male-female relationships are conducive to healthy upbringings.

>you
asking loaded questions. not having an honest discussion or debate.

I have seen him having honest discussions and debates, he is careful during some interviews because he knows that they will try to edit two hours into three minutes and make him look like hitler and you don't own your enemy more honesty and kindness than your enemy shows you and trying to win by being more moral and righteous or agreeing to follow their rules they set up for you is pure stupidity
As for the loaded questions there is nothing wrong with that, the guy is a professional psychologist a d a college teacher who makes a fortune helping people, he is there to make a point and his time is really valuable so of course he won't beat around the bush and won't entretainment your bullshit

Now tell me who do you like who doesn't engage in any of these three practices

I’m not the same user. I pointed out that you were just asking a bunch of loaded questions.

peterson obvs has some good points. that’s why he gets $500,000 in donations alone to rail against out of control neoliberals who are out of touch with reality.

personally I do think he’s a devil sort of figure. he talks a lot about all of this beautiful stuff on his own time, but on the job he gets paid so say things like “white privlege doesn’t exist” and “ze ain’t a woman if ze don’t got a cunt”.

the ugly and destructive parts of what he says, he’s getting paid out the ass to say, both directly and by way of gaining more publicity.

Im sure you and I have each made good points in our lifetimes, but that doesn’t make us exempt for our actions. media figures representing the two world power houses, north american neoliberalism and north american neoconservatism, are a bunch of pure maniacs. it’s like how the news is intentionally morbid, stir up people’s negative emotions and you gain control of their attention.

that’s the pure answer as to why peterson is detestible to certain people regardless of their political affiliation. you don’t have to agree or believe it, as is the nature of debate between us plebs.

Whithe privilege isn't a thing and it's ugly and destructive corrective racism, white people are humans, white people never owned slaves because the ones who did are all dead. It's wrong to hate and persecute an entire race of people

And about the transgender thing you are entirely projecting, he never argued if transgenders exist or not and never gave an opinion on it, all he did was refuse to follow a law that forced him to use certain words because regulating speech is regulating thought and the idea of the state having control over what you think and what you can't think is tyrannical and horrible.

Honestly if you literally can't exist without the power to force people to think and believe certain things then I'm sorry but you shouldn't exist, Nazis no longer exist why should you?