MONARCHISTS AND CHRISTCUCKS ARE REPUGNANTS

IS THERE SOMETHING MORE REPUGNANT THAN A CHRISTKEK?

Attached: pol2.png (800x485, 99K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_Soviet_Union
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Anti-Zionism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctors'_plot
youtube.com/watch?v=o1vhXlSkVHE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nazism_and_Stalinism
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>lolbertarians are Christian
lol

Gtfo larper

they are, their whole moral basis behind the NAP and responsive aggression is inspired in the Bible

>monarchism is kikery but communism isn't
Nice try schlomo.

Communism fights for the potential of man to get starved and murdered sadistically in his homeland by his government, yet again, because stupid triple niggers like OP are never going to stop trying and failing to do the impossible

if that's that kind of flimsy reasoning is legitimate than every western ideology is Christian, even neo-paganism

>commie sympathizer
Gross, and you claim to be a fascist? Commies fight for their own envy and inferiority complex. Monarchy and Libertarian are both vastly superior. As a fascist for you to side with commies over monarchists is retarded.

Remove communism, it can never be perfected in real life even if it's sounds good. It's unachievable. Also the bolsheviks were jewish so fuck them. But other than that pretty accurate

SO YOU THINK THAT STALIN WAS EVERYTHING THE JEWS DREAMED OF? I DISLIKE COMMIES BUT THEY OBVIOUSLY WERE AGAINST CAPITALISM AND USURY

>fighting for humanity's potential being communist.
Wew lad.

Attached: moonlanding.png (644x598, 106K)

Yes, hence the need to disrupt every western ideology and end Christianity forever, we will always be submitted to Kikes

You fucking bet we are

Attached: RH026.jpg (736x882, 161K)

Why would bolsheviks support the jews if they ended capitalism?

this, first remove that shit you OP. You're fucking retarded, add something else instead

No they were literally jewish

Isn't the Jewish Power capitalism? Why would they support communism?

Bolsheviks were the jews retard

Then explain to me, why would they support the end of capitalism?

hitler was a faggot and liked butt stuff.

What does the crosswalk fencepost represent?

They were ethnically jewish, I don't trust the fucks

To seize control over the worlds largest nation and install themselves as dictators? Look up the ethnicity of every soviet leader from Lenin to its collapse. Stalin was the only one red piled on the JQ

Is there something more repugnant than a Jow Forumsedditor?

Attached: 1508100401037.jpg (979x740, 125K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_Soviet_Union

>unspoiled African bush

All existing ideologies failed really hard, yet humanity is do retarded it keeps insisting on them instead of trying something new.

the actual origin of the bundle of sticks is roman soldiers entering the capital under a triumph, but the symbol is just a blanket for facism in general but not directly tied to one country.

Most anti antisemitism happened under Stalin and he doesn't count, he was basically a fascist in commie clothing.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Anti-Zionism

Pagan Monarchy FTW

Attached: 1533596340899.jpg (198x262, 11K)

Yes, and the only brand of Communism that is worth something is Stalinism

Stalin was the only non-jewish bolshevik and only he was anti semetic
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctors'_plot
All other Bolsheviks were jewish and mostly agaisnt anti semitism

Dumbest thing I've ever seen.

Attached: 1538181139038.png (127x204, 42K)

That proves why Stalinism is the only Communist branch worth something.

this

>Stormfag makes great strides to be even more unlikable

Attached: pagan evolution.jpg (1136x960, 55K)

>This level of slave morality

Attached: Pathetic.png (953x1282, 495K)

probably is, but he still failed and killed his own people

shit D&C bait
whites need a balance of liberty and rules
kys
sage

You
Are weak b8

They were funded by jews, 70-75% of the soviet govt were jews. the NKVD was 50% jewish.

This again

Jews Are Not Israel Or The Chosen People
youtube.com/watch?v=o1vhXlSkVHE

Attached: 1542133361999.jpg (878x599, 247K)

The enemies of humanity are Christcucks, I find it funny that Jow Forums still hasn't realized it
>failed
He won against Nazi Germany m8, he was the best leader this world has seen along with Hitler.

I don't think you understand libertarians. In fact, you completely missed the point.

Fuck off faggot

>Jow Forumsedditor
>calls others nu/pol/
nu/pol/ pls go
also, christcuck has been around forever

Yeah, all Stalin did was kill millions upon millions of innocent whites for being called Nazis, but at least his Semitic murder sprees were not technically enacted by a Semite!

Why would they appoint Stalin then?

he killed retarded centrists like Sargon and that homosexual Paul Joseph Watson

>He won against Nazi Germany m8
>implying that's a good thing
Soviet russia only attacked germany because they attacked them, they won against germany because the freemason fucks in america tipped the odds in their favour. But I'll give him he was very based and redpilled on the jews

Stalin blackmailed and threatened his way to the top with his comfy office job and goons. I'm not trying to take away from the chadness of Stalin here all i'm saying is that if the soviets had their way he wouldn't have gotten close to any real power.

Well Germany was at war with the USSR. I obviously think that Communism is a mistake but you can't recognize that Stalin's leadership was essential for his cause. For the first time in history great leaders like Hitler and Stalin rose beyond God themselves and did what it takes to achieve their causes

That just makes him even more Based. Hitler also had his own problem within his party

>But I'll give him he was very based
He was a literal commie.
>and redpilled on the jews
Was this before or after he helped put them into political power and watch them slaughter millions of his people for 15 years?

They didn't though

Hitler admired Stalin. He thought of him as a reincarnation of Genghis Khan.

Libertine ideologies like Libertarianism are incompatible with Christianity; oh and big surprise this guy is a Communist sympathizer.

I said based on the jews only he was a retard in everything else and didn't care about his own people he actively massacared them

Sauce?

hey, mr. rabbi memeflag. happy hanukkah btw

This. OP = hebe

libertarians are basically the most cucked of the three in the other list. As to achieve a society without a state you need every single individual to be moral and respect the NAP and that is directly correlated with the Christian Morality m8. it's basically a society that is so cuck that even tho nobody is forcing them to do so they keep on being "moral" to appease God
t. never read one book about Libertarianism

don't remember exactly

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nazism_and_Stalinism

>t. never read one book about Libertarianism

I'm literally an ex-Libertarian you fucking retard; any "freedom" that involves the use and abuse of drugs, immoral sexual behavior, obscenity/blasphemy, the propagation of anti-social cults like Communism or Nazism is of no use to the Christian.

>I'm literally an ex-Libertarian you fucking retard; any "freedom" that involves the use and abuse of drugs, immoral sexual behavior, obscenity/blasphemy, the propagation of anti-social cults like Communism
No you aren't you fucktard. You probably don't even know the concept of Virtue beyond the State laws that Libertarians use which is directly copied from Christianism

>Thinks libertarians give a shit about individuals in society acting moral.
If you're talking about like the American founding fathers and old school Federalism thought as libertarian than yes you are correct. The only way for libertarianism and freedom to work is for it to be based within a moral society. However, modern libertarianism has gone completely off that track, modern libertarianism is based solely on if something violates the NAP=bad, doesn't violate the NAP=good. They activity do not care about rampant degeneracy in the world so long as its done by someone's choice and not forced by violent or threat of violent means. Libertarianism is cucked but not in the way in which you propose.

Only the best

Attached: RH139.jpg (550x370, 69K)

>However, modern libertarianism has gone completely off that track, modern libertarianism is based solely on if something violates the NAP=bad, doesn't violate the NAP=good. They activity do not care about rampant degeneracy in the world so long as its done by someone's choice and not forced by violent or threat of violent means. Libertarianism is cucked but not in the way in which you propose.
Well these guys aren't libertarians but mostly just cucks, just like thinking that modern socialists are equal to Stalin and his views

The Libertarian belief in the rights of men to abuse drugs, to practice sexual immorality, to speak blasphemies and obscenities and falsehoods are all contrary to Christian teaching.

They believe they shouldn't be forbidden by the state, also the Bible itself nor any religious Christian doctrine speaks about using drugs as recreation as sin, but it deems as mortal sin to be enslaved by it and lose consciousness while using. It's the same stance Libertarianism takes about drugs. And the same about promiscuity and obscenities, they deem sex and obscenities before marriage wrong and sins but they don't say the state should banish it from existence

REPORT ALL TROLL THREADS

DO NOT REPLY TO RULEBREAKING SPAM!

Attached: Sage.jpg (1156x2031, 933K)

>They believe they shouldn't be forbidden by the state,

They believe that they have a right to do these things.

>but it deems as mortal sin to be enslaved by it and lose consciousness while using. It's the same stance Libertarianism takes about drugs

>And the same about promiscuity and obscenities, they deem sex and obscenities before marriage wrong and sins but they don't say the state should banish it from existence

Last time I checked Libertarianism doesn't deem anything a mortal sin, or use any kind of moralizing apart from muh individual rights to be an utter reprobate.

The state in the Christian conception, does not exist to protect the right to immorality, but rather to serve justice against immorality and to uphold righteousness.

Based

>They believe that they have a right to do these things.
Yes
>Last time I checked Libertarianism doesn't deem anything a mortal sin, or use any kind of moralizing apart from muh individual rights to be an utter reprobate.
What makes an individual more strong than other and therefore prone to richness is the fact they can achieve virtue and enrich themselves from it, Libertarians believe that this will lead to individuals competing with eachother to reach domination and thus ultimately leading towards a moral state in the Christian Conception, they believe sin should be let free by state so that people learn from their own mistakes and thus reach virtue.
>The state in the Christian conception, does not exist to protect the right to immorality, but rather to serve justice against immorality and to uphold righteousness.
Yes, what I am saying is that libertarians hink Justice will be served itself by morality and individuals alone hence justifying the NAP. It's ultimately a branch off Christianity, a really radical one

still posting from the ISS, user?

Our Father who art in heaven,
Hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come.
Thy will be done
on earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread,
and forgive us our trespasses,
as we forgive those who trespass against us,
and lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil.
For thine is the kingdom,
and the power, and the glory,
for ever and ever

Amen.