Reddit sneakily finds loophole to prevent criticism of Islam

Jislims are not compatible with western nations

All the criticism is unfair though. Islam and Christianity have been purposely put on a war path. (((We))) organized and funded a return to Islamic fundamentalism

and once upon a time the muslim in pakistan and the christian in switzerland both wanted to kill blasphemers equally

Gotta protect the shareholders.
Oops.

Attached: [HorribleSubs] SSSS.Gridman - 02 [720p].mkv_snapshot_04.09_[2018.10.28_20.05.21].jpg (1280x720, 82K)

>1300 years of costant war
>thanks to colonialism Europe is so powerful that jihad is basically impossible
>colonialism ends, jihad returns
>"muh west fault"
Return to reddit faggot

... You called?

Attached: download (6).jpg (299x168, 5K)

They keep making up vague terms that they then apply broadly.
Take their usage of dicotomy, which every instance should use a word like
>Contradictory
>Opposing
>Hypocritical
>Separate
>Overlapping
to provide a greater sense a clarity.

From wikipedia on intersectionality
> "using paradigms of intersectionality in interpreting social phenomena"
It sounds smart but break it down.
>Thinking of a framework for interpreting unusual social events.
I assume that is what they meant, there are like 10 ways to re-write that ambiguous fucking sentence, which I think is their point.

Attached: 1542368404444.jpg (717x720, 56K)

it should mean:
>Intersectionality is an analytic framework which attempts to identify interlocking systems [within an entity]
the leftovers are propaganda

...

yes goy, the root cause is violence and Western imperialism (the only type), therefore xtanity and white people and totally not that islam was a self-worshiping variant of talmudic judaism created by an autistic pedo bandit lord

>can only be made in the context of all the abrahamic religions
Okay, Islam is the most garbage abrahamic religion. Out of all the abrahamic religions it is the most barbarous, violent and anti thought. There, that's in the allowed context.

you mean that they are all piece of shit (((religions)))

Intersectionality is a method of appropriating all grievance movements under one banner - all oppression is the same, all oppression is because of white men. This was useful for feminists becuase it allowed white women to suddenly speak on behalf of blacks/gays/muslims/disabled as some sort of standard bearer. Obviously it has morphed, and once where (((white))) women were the leaders, they now have to bow before queer muslim non-binaries.

>criticizes jews
>redpills normie masses
>(((oh shit what have we done)))
>reddit is kill

Attached: 1519722201449.png (400x225, 143K)

Taco

JUST COMMENTED MY NIGGAS GIMME DEM SWEET INNA NET POINTS

Attached: 1503225512991.png (749x821, 888K)

someone post this meme to the leddit thread

Agreed
And let's hear this more often

I WAS BANNED KEK HOLY SHIT

go here if you wanna see deleted comments
snew.notabug.io/r/AskFeminists/comments/a4k9w1/intersectional_approaches_and_rule_update_re/

>no, stop focusing on Islam! STOP ASKING QUESTIONS

Attached: download.jpg (300x168, 6K)

Attached: Capture.jpg (911x460, 81K)

>300 years ago, when everyone thought their crops were grown by god and the average person would starve every year and go through starvation induced histeria; SOME white cultures were just like that
>that's basically the same thing as some fat pakis executing christians on a monthly basis in 2018 :^)
What a shitty fucking argument.

Attached: Rich_evans.jpg (500x390, 116K)

Can't see shit. wtf am I supposed to see?

Attached: file.png (928x727, 19K)

wait for it load. takes about 30 seconds

So why do they defend Islam?

because of cultural marxism

because islam and communism are two sides of a same coin.
Both are oppressive political ideology, censorship happy, brutal to opposing views, no empathy, force people to pay tax on their hard earned money, lack moral, etc etc.
Just lurk moar, faggot!

From what I've seen, it comes down, ironically, to a hierarchy where each 'identity' is a group opressed by another group and ranked accordingly to opression. To illustrate, 'Female' is one of those identities which are opressed by 'Males'. 'Non-binaries' are also opressed, more so than 'Females', and are thus ranked higher. 'Muslim Non-binaries' are even more opressed than 'non-binaries', and thus rank even higher.
Do this with any thing youncan imagine, religion, sexual preference, race, ethnicity, body looks, gender, anything really. The more you can imagine, the greater the social hierarchy becomes. Also lowest are most definitely hetero white males.

Perfectly fine, all the Abrahamic religions are fucked.

so don't discuss islam, just point out that there are [islamic] communities out there that [insert islamic bullshit without explicitly naming islam].

Islamism however is a political stance and can be discussed and not a religion at all. Mohammad was also only one man, the least oppressed of all genders, and so should be doubly discussed as an individual and pedophile.

Oh, or even better, get people to speak highly positive of Islam, and then report them when they don't also sing the praises of Christ.

"in the context of other religions" so tell them "Christianity has always been a tolerant religion, unlike Judaism or Islam". You've now included all three with some context, so they can't slap you.

I'm pretty fucking good at loopholes, better than most jews. The end result when you beat them is often the same though, they either blatantly ignore evidence or make some up out of thin air. Rules are an illusion to them.

Islam is Communism with a God.

what a bunch of cock heads, I love how upside down reddit is. outright banning people they dont agree with even Jow Forumseuropean didn't do that or even Jow Forumsalt-right

Bunch of faggots its clearly a leftist safe space, yet if you say that then you get dog piled with the "um really sweeties?"

Lmao

These aren't even offensive comments in the least bit

Feminists are truly thought police

Its just another framework to box yourself into new and interesting oppressed identities. When everyone is a victim, you must find a way to make yours unique and different.

Holy shit, this could work. Gon b anudda shoah

>why do people focus on the shortcomings of a religion that is responsible for 99% of terrorist groups, 99% of countries where it's citizens and women are slaves, and 99% of people responsible for terror attacks in Europe?
Besides, who gives a shit? That's r/AskFeminists. These people weren't going to want an honest discussion with people they disagree with regardless.

Mental gymnastics to justify oppression, basically

>there are like 10 ways to re-write that ambiguous fucking sentence, which I think is their point
It is. That's also why they love the word 'toxic'. Toxic can mean just about fucking any kind of behavior you might not agree with. From spreading your legs too much on the subway, to firing up the ovens. Thus, you can invoke the word to conjure images of the worst possible 'toxic' behavior in someone's mind and also free yourself from criticism because nobody can even pin down exactly what you mean to criticize it in the first place.

once upon a time men used to shit in the open, now we are civilized, someone stayed behind tho

Their core thinking boggles my noggin.
>I want to define myself with rigid boundaries that exclusively limit who I am, then I want to define how others influence me.
Why not just be who you are?

the religions are the same, the people are different; here in europe we changed because of turning our backs on cuckstianity (see: renaissance). but you keep praying to yahweh all you want over in muttistan.

Attached: 15432756455.png (800x1106, 100K)

and that's my point retard, it's about the people not the religions, because the religions are the same

Attached: 154282640203.jpg (546x787, 63K)

Ah, now you're engaging in antisemitism! b&

pernicious
[per-nish-uhs]

Causing insidious harm or ruin; ruinous; injurious; hurtful:
pernicious teachings; a pernicious lie.
deadly; fatal:
a pernicious disease.
Obsolete . evil; wicked.

Thank you based reddit. I will now look for a way to shoehorn this word into one of my future internet endeavours.

It roughly goes something like this.
White men

Attached: sciencepepe.jpg (961x816, 239K)

not a sneaky loophole, that's a straight up new rule put in place by the mods of that sub. but it doesn't really matter because it's not global, also becasue it's fucking reddit of all places.
This thread is best left ignored.

I guess we should get ahead of the curve and start learning the Koran. It seems like conversion will let us crush feminists like a tranny crushes the females

Attached: 1544185423924m.jpg (777x1024, 117K)

"This is a good rule. Islam treats their women far better than Christianity or Judaism."

I'm all for this. Fuck them.

Macadamize, so to speak, theses 'macaroni' syzygy.

it's still a shit argument tho and this one too btw

muslim and islam are a medieval culture anno 2018, the other religions not so much or even at all. that's the big problem and there are no excuses for it.

Attached: 1502726628048.jpg (1000x1000, 233K)

Feminism is just a civilizational shit test.
These women want to be dominated.

Attached: women_and_empire.jpg (590x824, 238K)

> Wait until their airhead liberal members starts being red-pilled about trans pervs.
I unironically think feminists will be the first allies of the white nationalists.

> They don't like Islam
> They don't like auto-gynephile creeps
> They don't like degenerate porn pushed everywhere

I believe the medical term is TERFs

Attached: 1544183282973.png (935x767, 801K)

I never liked that account anyway, I hope they go through the effort of translating it.

>Feminists
Reminder that academic researchers were literally able to get a chapter of Mein Kampf published in a leading feminist """academic""" journal (with glowing peer reviews) just by changing the word jews to white males.

areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/

Attached: fuck white people.jpg (602x613, 100K)

It's a fancy word for oppression olympics.

Leftists are demons, prove me wrong

Attached: daemonica.jpg (980x490, 78K)

>the major Abrahamic religion causes all kind of trouble in the world, such as muslims routinely stoning women to death after they get raped, and christians, once in a blue moon, sending a gay person away to buy a wedding cake somewhere else.

No it's some faggot word they use to justify obfuscation and changing the subject. Basically if you bring up something, they can claim that something else is equally involved and thus they change the topic to their own political causes.

Originally, "intersectionality" referred to social theories in which the social condition of groups stacks (in a naive additive kind of way) for people belonging to more than one group.

e.g. if one assumes that
>Women are oppressed
>Muslims are oppreseed
or
>White people are privileged
>Straight people are privileged
an intersectionalist would take this to imply
>Muslim women are doubly oppressed
as they lie in the "intersection" (think Venn diagrams) of two oppressed groups, and
>Straight white people are doubly privileged
as they lie in the intersection of two privileged groups.

Ofc it is easy to find examples where this line of thinking is obviously wrong, and intersectionality actually used to be rejected in the mainstream left not that long ago, since it leads to scenarios were even they could see the stupidity, such as
>Women are oppressed
>Gays are oppressed
>Lesbians are doubly oppressed
Despite male homosexuality being persecuted to a far greater degree than female homosexuality in basically every civilization in history.

Much like Marxism, the fact that these theories get debunked time after time never seems to stop them from re-emerging.

>overexposing Jews
Based and shoah pilled

Had a dream like that 2 nights ago. Frustrating af

>mandatory antisemitism
Not bad

>Naming the Eternal Jew for all three of his worst crimes whenever one is mentioned
Literally the best possible timeline

Attached: 1540774814235.jpg (683x1024, 169K)

lol

Attached: lolk.png (816x465, 28K)

Going for the perfect punch in a dream, hit the guy, my arm instantly feels sloppy and cant understand why.

Throwing a punch requires a high amount of motoric functions which is nearly non exsistent in dreams. It also requires you to have never faught before or it wont render properly.

That is why flying feels free in dreaming and fighting a "realistic" fight will not.

>The end result when you beat them is often the same though, they either blatantly ignore evidence or make some up out of thin air. Rules are an illusion to them.
isn't pilpul amazing?

Intersectionalism is the process by which you call your opponent racist and sexist and ableist and otherist and so on

Welcome to Cuckreddit! Become Cuckredditor. Be those who can leaves cuckments here.

>forced criticism of kikery
Shieeettt this could be good.

>criticizing the Jew
Roasties are about to get very very toasty.

>reddit
>feminism
Who the fuck cares?

Attached: bq-5bf4e22511acc.jpg (477x469, 71K)

So a jacked man can get tit implants and dominate female sports? When will this start affecting the Olympic Games?

It's basically a system to calculate how many oppression points you get.
>muslim bisexual trans nigger
>straight white woman
Both are 'muh suppressed' but the first one ranks higher. Anything ranking lower is ALWAYS suppressing you with their privilege. It's brain rot.

When you hear a leftist say "intersectional", it means they're maintaining an alliance between groups that otherwise despise each other, and have nothing in common but hatred of straight white men and healthy families headed by them. For instance: feminists, sodomites, and Muslims.

Never mind what the word "intersection" actually means, or what bullshit they'll try and tell you about it, finding an excuse to team up on straight white men is the real meaning.