Redpill me on jews

It was real in his mind
Herman Rosenblat - Jewish Holocaust Lie Exposed
youtube.com/watch?v=U33K4ryt2lc

Barbara Spectre on Multiculturalism, Israel, and the Refugee Crisis

youtube.com/watch?v=85BKDj_1vVU

Can someone post that picture of that wwe guy reading a list and the caption is ‘when someone asks me why I don’t like jews’ or something like that.

Attached: 1544372444789.png (857x1200, 453K)

Attached: 1542522651306.jpg (877x703, 189K)

Lurk the fuck more you fucking newfaggot.

Satan At The Wailing Wall
youtube.com/watch?v=94rcOVJBMYQ&bpctr=1544391537

LET'S DO THIS!

>1
Sanhedrin 59a covers the differences of commandments between Jews (Israelites)
and non-Jews (Noachides). The only occurences of the word "animal" in this
page are about the universal (i.e. Israelite and Noachide) prohibition of blood
consumption (Genesis 9:4).

>2
The only mentions of gentiles on this page are on the question whether or not
gentiles should be allowed to circumcize Jews. The answer is that they are,
but only under the supervision of other Jews.

>3
Rabbi Yohanan is quoted saying this in Sanhedrin 59a just to be refuted in the
very next sentence. The prohibition of studying the Torah hasn't been given to
the Noachides. Not to mention this sentence from the exact same page: "Even a
gentile engaging in the Torah is like a High Priest."

>4
>5
Libbre David does not exist.
quora.com/Is-this-statement-believed-by-all-religious-Jews-Libbre-David-37-If-a-Jew-be-called-upon-to-explain-any-part-of-the-rabbinic-books-he-ought-to-give-only-a-false-explanation-Who-ever-will-violate-this-order-shall-be

>6
I could just say Yevamot 11b isn't about this at all. Fortunately, I both feel
generous and know where this out-of-context quote actually comes from. In
Ketuvot 11b, the question is asked how to determine which dot to give a woman
for her wedding, as virgins are entitled to twice the amount non-virgins
received. It is said at some point that if a girl got penetrated before 3, she
may still be considered a virgin as her hymen may grow back until the age of
3. Before you even think about it, no, this does not allow sex with girls
under 3.

>7
Schabouth Hag does not exist. The very way it's spelled smells like the guy
making it up knows nothing about Judaism too.
minuteswithmessiah.com/question/kkk.html#8

>8
>9
Not only are Hilchot (not Hilkkoth) not part of the Talmud, but none of them
is called Akum.
minuteswithmessiah.com/question/kkk.html#9

Attached: 1402475921739.jpg (824x768, 183K)

>10
>11
Choschen Hamm does not exist. Assuming it's an uneducated abbreviation for
Choshen Mishpat, it's not about that.
minuteswithmessiah.com/question/kkk.html#10

>12
Szaaloth-Utszabot doesn't exist.
freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/van_hyning.html

>13
Assuming it's Bava Metzia 114b, Rabbi Shimon ben Yochai is quoted saying
non-Jews are not subject to Jewish impurity rules.

>14
Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D doesn't exist and doesn't even look like a Talmud
reference.
answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090125101646AAO6lP6

>15
This looks like satire. Everybody who's ever spent one second sincerely
studying Judaism knows it's Midrash. Anyway, this Midrash was written long
after after the Talmud and has... only one page.

>16
Again this looks like satire. Sarah is a name meaning "ministress" while Avoda
Zarah means idolatry ("foreign worship"). It's Jewish studies 101. Anyway,
this passage (36b--37a) is about ritual impurity of non-Jewish children having
intercourse. It is stated boys from 9 years old (who can ejaculate) and girls
from 3 years old (whose hymen doesn't grow back) are sexually-developed enough
to be subject to this kind of impurity.

>17
Gad. Shash. doesn't exist. If it's yet another uneducated abbreviation, please
provide the full name. You should be able to do that if you "did the
research," right?

>18
What the fuck? B5? Let's assume 5b. See how generous I am in front of this
level of not-doing-any-research? Sadly, the only things this page talks about
killing is animals, in commentary of Leviticus 22:28.

>19
>20
Shulchan Arukh isn't part of the Talmud, but of the Halakhah. Pages this far
haven't been translated to my knowledge, which doesn't mean I have to trust
who ever wrote this, especially after all the bullshit we've gone through.

Antisemites will believe literally anything. Let this review of made-up
bullshit serve as an example.

Attached: 1539767374885.jpg (1560x1521, 561K)

>go to Jewish meeting
>host says Jesus taught mostly good things
Could it be not all Jews are Haredim? No, that would get Jow Forums wrong...

Attached: tumblr_p7q1elidmN1qm36c1o1_1280.png (800x800, 26K)

>I'm starting to see a pattern here.
Yes, because you ignored all non-Jewish leftists and all Jewish rightists.