The Perfect Europe Thread

i based it off the kingdom of navarre

OK, but what would be the point of an independent Kingdom of Navarra? Navarra no longer has a king, and the foru system is gone. The only real basis for Navarrese "independence" would be Basque language, culture, and blood, in which case the western Basque regions would necessarily need to be included.

Not trying to be a jerk. Maybe just giving you some suggestions to improve your map.

a buffer state between the french empire and the empire of all the spains.

>poland
>no sea accsess
do you want to see the extinction of germany?

One of many I've made

Attached: EuropeAlt2.png (2988x2187, 569K)

Seems kind of pointless, and I can tell you that no Basque would like it.

spain's been a puppet state of france for years. distancing themselves from france by removing their border will help guarantee their sovereignty, and if france tries to invade navarre like germany did belgium in wwi spain along with other powers like britain will step in to maintain the balance of power

Attached: Ausgleich.png (2988x2187, 544K)

better template

Attached: map1.png (2988x2187, 352K)

I'm not objecting to the logic of a Pyrenean "buffer state," I'm objecting to the logic of separating Basque populations in an arbitrary fashion.

>Greater Albania Not Existing

Feel free to call me a faggot.

Attached: erp.png (2988x2187, 916K)

faggot

that's a shit map

I just had to commit lebensraum.

navarre isn't even mostly basque dude

Attached: Basque44.jpg (736x731, 130K)

nazi germany never annexed northern france

minor change

Attached: Ausgleich.png (2988x2187, 544K)

Well it should have.

Attached: europe perfect.png (223x226, 5K)

You're arguing with an ethnic Basque, before you try to lecture me on the subject.

Navarra is the de jure homeland of Basques. Basquicists argue that the population we call Basques and which the Romans called the Vascones populated what is presently Navarra in antiquity and subsequently migrated westward in the historical period.

What your image demonstrates is the diffusion of the euskaldunak, meaning Basque-speakers. As with any ethnic group, not all members speak the language of their fathers but, by right of blood, belong to their ethnic group nonetheless. Hence the distinction between euskaldunak and what we call euskotarrak, i.e. ethnic Basques who don't speak Basque. All Navarrese fall into the euskotarrak and those who live along the foothills of the Pyrenees (like my family) are both eusotarrak and euskaldunak.

actually makes sense. Southern france is basically italian and northern france is german. It's been a long time and things have doubtless merged but going back to the days of the frankish tribes migrating there has been an ethnic difference between north and south gaul. Really europe should bring back local governments, part of the reason the west became susceptible to globalism was that we started tolerating a form of nationalism that ignored and suppressed regional differences. To a lesser extent it happened in the US with states rights being eroded and their cultures being homogenized federally

Because the language was lost but the people are the same.

Attached: Euskararen_atzerakada1.png (1024x886, 295K)

Attached: 1543953344239.png (5976x4374, 1.85M)

you posted it, i dont think anyone would be rightfully annoyed about this other than unionists, turks and other people whos opinions dont matter

shit

Dunno what to do with Switzerland.

Attached: 1544395010079.png (2988x2187, 542K)

minus italy and greece

>all the lebensraum
>no memel
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE