Hey Jow Forums what do you think about fascism(the italian one , not nazism)?

hey Jow Forums what do you think about fascism(the italian one , not nazism)?

Attached: downle4tgdhdhdhdhdhdhdhdhdhdhdhdhdhdhdhoad.jpg (652x914, 18K)

>italy
>white

Wondering how much of it was funded by the UK in response to Communism in the mid 20s.

Italian futurism is an interesting little quirk. Other than that I know little about the ideology other than the usual buzzwords of "lionization of the state" etc. Based on how little I know, I imagine anyone else who uses the word "fascism" (especially in the anglosphere) probably hasn't even the slightest clue about it. I wouldn't be surprised if a significant majority of leftists didn't know about its Italian origins AT ALL.

all of it

It laid the foundation for all ethno-nationalist groups to follow. It also made it’s goal to pursue and legislate into man’s law the objective truths of the Universe. 10/10

Attached: A0FA03B4-37F3-44FC-BED0-3720252CEBDE.jpg (940x627, 96K)

Fascism is based.
National-Socialism is cringe.

Hitler was inspired by Fascism. National Socialism is just a German derivative of it much like Integralism in your country

I see fascism in a similar light to communism. Both are collectivist, authoritarian ideologies. I would rather live under fascism than communism only because fascism preserves national identity whereas Marxist college cucks want to get rid of it in the name of "diversity."

They totally cloned Jerome Lebanner out of his DNA.

Attached: jerome.jpg (320x310, 22K)

Integralism didn't push some occultist pagan bullshit and, most importantly, didn't pretend give basedbeans to Brazilians

i doubt marx gave a shit about diversity

If you live in the modern centrist democracies the national identity is disposed because it doesn’t turn a profit. The only way to save your racial and national identity is through Fascism.

Attached: 78CB768E-A6CC-498D-96D1-450C902AC63C.jpg (1024x963, 266K)

Which is funny because the USSR was Russian nationalist. Tried to russify large parts of the world and never banned traditional Russian culture.

Now mao? He wanted to destroy history

The occultism and paganism was pretty much limited to the SS and Himmler. The communication about it was pretty schizophrenic because smarter people in the regime realized it's better to present a united Catholic image.

Trotsky did. Workers of THE WORLD, Comintern etc, etc.
He's often credited as the inventor of the word and concept of racism, and people usually find only one earlier usage of the world by some french army official.

>Which is funny because the USSR was Russian nationalist. Tried to russify large parts of the world and never banned traditional Russian culture.
Nigga, the communists hated Russia and the country Ortodhox roots.

Nazis weren't a big fan of the Catholic Church and even used that Positive Christianity weird protestant crap.

The British never did have much forethought in their foreign policy. Too bad Italy didn't do the smart thing and sit out WWII.

yeah but mussolini was ,kinda, forced to ally with germany cause the nazis were on all italian borders and italy still couldn't afford a war

Less of a bad rep than natsoc, still only tailored for Italy and nobody else.

>what do you think of fascism(the fascist one, not the not fascist one)

We have no identity, we are a nation of profits money. It just so happens brown people from south America are potential consumers.

It's medium-tier. You can't supress abolish market economy and try to act as a top-class power. Italy didn't even need top tech to be competitive, just some economic efficiency, but they couldn't even keep proper supply lines across north africa. Still far better than communism tho

agreed

Have a read.

Attached: Fascism explained.png (886x1322, 150K)

Austrofascism is better.

If it had kept on just caring about colonial conquest and colonist policies it might have lasted quite a lot
Interestingly it could have been accepted way more at a world level since until 1938 (and even then I think the alliance with Germany had a great impact on that decision) there were no laws dividing the subject of the state by race, everything was centered around the Italian culture, the country's independence, and, in the case of colonies, in bringing those people civilization on a model inspired by what ancient Rome did in northern/western Europe

to much privatization

They could have been harsher on jews and less focused on reestablishing the roman empire,but i prefer their economic model over the natsocs,though they should have had more respect over private property,kind of what Primo de Rivera or Codreanu wanted

too*

>Pasta pasta we going to invade the Greeks

>1 year later...

>MAMA MIA HITLER HELP US PLEZZ

Attached: metaxas2.jpg (700x900, 250K)

I’m getting the doctrine of fascism for Christmas. So I’ll read that and get back to you.

GOTTA GO FAST
i think the thread will be already archived then

but like fascist uniforms

Not built on the idea of racial purity and therefor totally gay

Mussolini wasn't even antisemitic. He said himself Jews can be Italians. He only pretended to change his tune to appease Hitler. I'm really not sure why that cuck is so heralded here.

There was no need for that...first of all "race" was already heavily implied in "Nation"*, also there were no mass migrations threatening our countries unlike today. Insisting on race like Hitler did at that time was autistic.

*"una d'arme, di lingua, d'altare, | di memorie, di sangue e di cor" -- Alessandro Manzoni

this, would vote fascist 100%

He eventually came to agree with Hitler,not to the same extent but enough to realize the importance of racial purity,i still respect him even though i am more inclined to agree with Hitler in his focus of race.