We're transitioning into a global matriachy, here's why it's a good thing

-The reason why women today adopt viperous behavior and ideology is not entirely (((artificial))) it's also bottled up suppression from many years manifesting and expelling itself hence why they're easily drawn to them, meaning that when the transition happens women will actually start to police and enforce each other to be the best all in the name of competition.

-Prime Males will be treated many times better than now. Basically if you're a prime example of a male(fit, intelligent, creative, high IQ maybe even racial purity) you will be allowed to grow, mate(or just donate semen for IVF) and have a voice while undesirable men would either have to change their gender or be forcibly castrated. This will solve the sex distribution, population and relationship question.

Remember, 100 males x 1 Female is bad compared to 100 females x 1 Male, meaning that men in these times are excess and need to be more thoroughly filtered to insure the biological imperative of humanity is maintained. Those who are not Primes will still contribute to the maintaining and functioning of civilization just don't have the same voice in matters compared to biological women until they earn a place among them.

-The more women outnumber men the more they'll compete for reproduction capabilities thus giving them a purpose to strive for, if not, lesbianism, undesirable men and sex machines will fill the gap so they're not discouraged in case there's a physical lacking of Prime Men and nobody would have a reason to hoard them just to keep everyone else in line thus equality.


So everything is fine. There's no need to worry for the future that much. What does Jow Forums think? Am I insane or on to something?

Attached: 1542179989464.jpg (640x855, 443K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.fo/DFYTT
web.archive.org/web/20181203043509/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_modernity]
web.archive.org/web/20181126023046/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Revolution]
web.archive.org/web/20181022005509/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Matriarchal_Prehistory]
web.archive.org/web/20170516113856/http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/LegEdRev/1995/9.html]
web.archive.org/web/20181103001826/http://www.witch.plus.com/7day-extracts/aboriginal-women.html]
web.archive.org/web/20170928213621/https://www.sweetsharing.com/a-ritual-done-to-stimulate-menstruation-in-men/]
web.archive.org/web/20181206231043/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_and_menstruation]
web.archive.org/web/20181123144959/http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/unambal/circumcision_initiation.php]
socialmatter.net/2016/02/23/mannerbund-101/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

That only works if every male in the world gave into the matriarch system which we all know will never happen. If europe continues it's slide towards matriarchy it will get gobbled up by islam or another patriarchal order.

>That only works if every male in the world gave into the matriarch system which we all know will never happen
it's already subtly happening and I'm not just citing the Śoyboy phenomena but how much power women globally are able to secure and keep securing.
>If europe continues it's slide towards matriarchy it will get gobbled up by islam or another patriarchal order.
That's just it, if you think about it every existing Patriarchy is going through a transitory phase, some like in the Middle Eastern countries are slow with it but the end result is inevitable.

women are reactive by nature, the masculine energy, the driving force is what lies behind deception, warfare and general prowess cuts deeply into anything that is just "reacting" men always have biological advantage of "driving force" an "initiation"

Women are not really quality besides making babies. Just look at an all female culture here


archive.fo/DFYTT

it got completely rekked by one good shitposter more or less. In the realm of power, one really good man is worth a million average, to good women.

>Women get power in ancient Greece
>Greece collapses and women become property once again
>Women get power in middle east
>middle east collapses and women become property once again
>Women get power in the west
>??????????????????????????????????????????????????

GEE I WONDER WHAT THE RESULT WILL BE THIS TIME, IT SURE WILL BE DIFFERENT FROM ALL THE OTHER ATTEMPTS WE HAVE AT THIS FARCE EVERY 500 YEARS

But women don't want control. Time and time again they prove that not only do they not want authority, but are massively incapable of having responsibility over others.

Then you'll ask, "why do they seem to seek it, spending so much time in school and climbing the ladder of favors for authority and high-income?"

I think you already know the answer. They're told it's the only way. They're told if you have a husband who takes care of you, he will beat you and there isn't anything you can do about it. They suppress their motherly urges and desire to be dominated by an alpha male, because that's inherently what the goal of all lilith-worshipping betamales is. Emasculated men, 'empowered' women. You need only to look at the societies where women have lots of authority to find out who is behind all this. Here's a hint: the origins are the Mediterranean.

>That only works if every male in the world gave into the matriarch system which we all know will never happen
ayy lmao, it already happened decades ago, almost a century, women have been going for it since they got voting rights, look at all those female politicians everywhere, those gender quotas and other gender laws that benifit women only, look at the age of consent where consensual sex of an 18+ y.o. with a 13 y.o. is considered rape when it was totally fine before, look at what marriage was turned into, look at how promiscuous women became and how cucked men turned to be

If men did not have porn, vidya games, fast food and all other instant gratification and hobby shit that we have now, then they would surely rebel almost in an instant and overthrow the feminist government. Problem is, we do have a lot of that stuff, it keeps us docile and obidient, and if we want to change something, we have to sacrifice it in order to set things right and make everything be like it used to be. And noone is going to sacrifice all that.
So we are just going to wait for a major recession, when women in power finally ruin everything for us completely. The only way to make things better is to make everything worse, accelereationism is a thing, and driving people out of their comfort zone, making their lives miserable enough for them to finally rebel - thats the only actual way that we can resist.
Reformation path is absolutely retarded and no right-wing pro-male political party would ever be allowed to form, and it becoming an actual ruling party in any modern country is COMPLETELY unthinkable, they would be utterly destroyed by the dominating "progressive" agenda of all the feminists and cucks.
So, inspire more hate, while, behind the courtain, supporting all the feminist agendas out there, make things miserable for all the males until they can no longer tolerate it. Though I dont really know whether our fellow white males even have a tolerance limit nowdays.

Attached: 1542205274340.jpg (476x1199, 131K)

>If men did not have porn, vidya games, fast food and all other instant gratification and hobby shit that we have now, then they would surely rebel almost in an instant and overthrow the feminist government.
Absolute bullshit. There's plenty of men that indulge in that and can tackle a relationship or affirm their patriarchal position. Plus women fall for that as well so it's not like it was tailored specifically for men, well in porn's case they're not indulging it as much but are taking a part in it.


>So, inspire more hate, while, behind the courtain, supporting all the feminist agendas out there
Adding fuel to the fire. Modern SJW feminists are just useful idiots and you're justifying their behavior.

>make things miserable for all the males until they can no longer tolerate it
Impossible. Men have always had control over their destiny now but not lesser/undesirable men. That's why a the Patriarchy came to be, to lift ALL men at the expense of women's individuality but didn't think about the fact most men are actually genetic trash that keep the Prime Men who can affirm themselves down.

Bitches are retarded and nonsensical, they are not capable of managing and leading anything on their own.

>There's plenty of men that indulge in that and can tackle a relationship or affirm their patriarchal position
Not plenty, a small minority of alphas.
>Men have always had control over their destiny now but not lesser/undesirable men
And noone cares about how "prime men" Chads are living, I dont even associate them with men, that 17% Chad margin is almost non-existent.
I have no desire to make Chads life even more luxorious.
Still, Chad is rather inferior to a good looking female, as Chad works his ass to achieve something, when a female just exists. Also, under the matriarchy that we have today, all male rights are extremely limited, Chad included, so, legally, he is still just a man and eventually he will be something like a muscular fuckboy for a bunch of old, ugly women that want to have a good time. There are no men above the law, I dont really believe that, and the law is all in favor of a female.

Attached: 1497832024564.jpg (960x960, 75K)

and yet they do, while you cuck to them _by_law_ (and by culture, which is predominantly feminist), its a fact and there is nothing you can do about it

Attached: 1534260717721.jpg (1024x1024, 116K)

>so, legally, he is still just a man and eventually he will be something like a muscular fuckboy for a bunch of old, ugly women that want to have a good time.
Not really, first all this isn't just about Chads who are most of the time just retarded jocks but real men. There would undoubtedly be a breeding program in place to ensure better Primes are born but that doesn't mean they would be pampered to outright mental and emotional retardation, that would only spoil their seed. They would be a protected class but still pushed into breaking their own limitations to ensure the next generation of humans are better. Meanwhile what would be the point for "old ugly rich women" to hoard them? They need everyone to have access to them so to ensure society doesn't end up stagnant. Technology would make sure that even if those real men number less than the women all women would be able to earn their right to breed with those men either artificially/IVF or physically if they're worthy.

If you think about it the real Patriarchy exists within the protective shell of Matriarchy. If you're against this then you're against men, not just women.

>women in power
>good
>ever
fuck off cuck

beta simps just need to quit giving women attention. nothing wrong with being a beta male, just quit giving these whores attention. if you do, you are the problem.

chad can be an abusive loser who leeches off the woman for money, all he has to do is be hot.

Matriarchies do not exist outside of some small tribal civilizations.

Patriarchy = civilization

>doesn't mean they would be pampered to outright mental and emotional retardation
if he supports feminism, he already is a retard
>Meanwhile what would be the point for "old ugly rich women" to hoard them?
Its the way things are now, why would something change? I do not expect age of consent to be lowered under a total matriarchy, rather raised to 21 or something, or to when she gets her frist cellulities signs.
Matriarchy will always be a gerontocracy, with only old women in power, old women would hoard Chads and deny them any access to younger females.

i am kinda bored of your trolling, so that will be enough, fuck off

Attached: cuck.png (722x770, 136K)

THE JEWS ARE WAGING A

>CULTURAL
>RELIGIOUS
>DEMOGRAPHIC

W A R
A
R

ON US.

GET ARMED.

>here's why ______
KYS faggot
SAGE

based and redpilled

The next step is when the 80% of Beta males realize that all their white knighting and cucking won't get women to love them, much less touch them, those 80% stop making excuses for female inferiority.

Humans reached behavorial modernity about 50,000 years ago. "Behavioral modernity is a suite of behavioral and cognitive traits that distinguishes current Homo sapiens from other anatomically modern humans, hominins, and primates. Although often debated, most scholars agree that modern human behavior can be characterized by abstract thinking, planning depth, symbolic behavior (e.g., art, ornamentation, music), exploitation of large game, and blade technology, among others." [web.archive.org/web/20181203043509/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_modernity]

For roughly 40,000 years we were wandering the earth and living like animals - killing each other and always lost in the moment. The Agricultural Revolution begins around 8000 BCE and 5000 BCE. "The Agricultural Revolution was the wide-scale transition of many human cultures during the Neolithic period from a lifestyle of hunting and gathering to one of agriculture and settlement, making an increasingly larger population possible. These settled communities permitted humans to observe and experiment with plants to learn how they grew and developed. This new knowledge led to the domestication of plants." [web.archive.org/web/20181126023046/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Revolution]

Prehistoric matriarchy or matrifocal societies were most likely the norm in early human history. When men were out hunting, it was women who were the stable point of civilization. It was women who were raising the young. It was women who were telling their children stories and passing on cultural knowledge. It was women who were coming up with rituals and religions to steer society. The idea of prehistoric matriarchy has been challenged by works like "The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory," yet most of these works have a political agenda (e.g. progressing feminism). "The Myth of Matriarchal Prehistory is a book by Cynthia Eller that seeks to deconstruct the theory of a prehistoric matriarchy. This hypothesis, she says, developed in 19th century scholarship and was taken up by 1970s second-wave feminism following Marija Gimbutas. Eller, a professor of religious studies at Claremont Graduate University, argues in the book that this theory is mistaken and its continued defence is harmful to the feminist agenda." "Eller's book has been criticised by feminist historian Max Dashu for "mischaracterising" the theories of Gimbutas and other key anthropologists, and for labeling them as "matriarchalist" despite most of these scholars rejecting ideas of matriarchy (female rulership) in favour of matrifocal or matrilineal societies. Dashu wrote that Eller "makes no distinction between scholarly studies in a wide range of fields and expressions of the burgeoning Goddess movement, including novels, guided tours, market-driven enterprises. All are conflated all into one monolithic 'myth' devoid of any historical foundation." [web.archive.org/web/20181022005509/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Matriarchal_Prehistory]

As an empirical study, let us consider the Aborigines of Australia.

"In stark contrast to non-Aboriginal, specifically European culture, Aboriginal women were not in a subordinate position to men. As in non-Aboriginal society, women were responsible for around 80 per cent of the provision of food. They were also the primary caretakers of the young, elderly and sick. Aboriginal women had their own culture and customs that men were not privy to. Female elders could be as powerful as male elders in their community. Most societies, including my own group,1 were matrilineal." [web.archive.org/web/20170516113856/http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/LegEdRev/1995/9.html]

"As for the equal status of Aboriginal women, it was until recently denied by male anthropologists who thought Aborigines lived in a patriarchy. But Diana Bell, one of the first women anthropologists to learn what it was to be instructed by women elders for some years and then to be with the "mothers" in ritual, reported a very different Aboriginal society. When I met her in Alice Springs, she was taking a break from living with her sons among the Warrabri in central Australia. She observed that many male anthropologists, with no access to the senior women living in the jilimi, the single women's camp , had no understanding of the important place of women in rituals - and of the vital role they had even in the principal male celebration, that of the ritualised rebirth through circumcision of the young men - which could not be performed without the women participating. They could even bring a halt to such rituals if they felt the men were not performing them correctly." [web.archive.org/web/20181103001826/http://www.witch.plus.com/7day-extracts/aboriginal-women.html]

"Aboriginal women among the Warrabri and other nations always retained the power to leave the company of men and live independently in the women's camp or jilimi. Bell described the jilimi in the settlement where she lived in 1977 as consisting of a long snake like building that the women had erected themselves. On its northern side was the large clearing known in Aboriginal English as the "ring place" or "business ground". Such grounds are always located where they cannot be seen from other camps. Aboriginal men would never walk in sight of them. Here Aboriginal women conduct rituals, display their sacred boards telling the stories of their Dreaming and sometimes sleep especially when ill or in trouble. The ring place was also traditionally a place where offenders were brought to trial and disputes resolved by ritual means. Backing onto its eastern side was the storehouse for sacred things. On the far side of this, to the east, it opened out to a bough shelter where the women would work on making ritual objects or simply chat and rest while monitoring all activity around the jilimi. If any women approached the ritual ground, she had to stop and wait to be signed through." [web.archive.org/web/20181103001826/http://www.witch.plus.com/7day-extracts/aboriginal-women.html]

"Here the elder women taught the younger women the Dreaming and arranged many ritual events. From here and the other camps women still go out together with their children to gather and to hunt. As they moved through the country they still sing of the travels of the creating Ancestors and teach their children about the land and its Dreaming. All food gathered, Bell observed, was first distributed among the women and the children before any was given to the men.

Diana Bell described the care and reverence with which women approach all their rituals. The senior women would grease then painted the bodies of the girls and women with ochre in the patterns that showed the link with country while singing gently and harmoniously of the Dreamtime. During the rituals the women would hold up and dance with the sacred boards that were also marked by them with the sacred signs denoting their links to their country. Energy had been sung into the boards until the paint itself was said to shine Their bodies, their dances, their chants and their boards told of their totem links to creatures such as the dingo and to their much loved country. The red ochre used represented the power of life and blood. They were through the rite reaffirming their bond with their sacred land and their responsibility for it." [web.archive.org/web/20181103001826/http://www.witch.plus.com/7day-extracts/aboriginal-women.html]

The most powerful cultural ritual of the Aborigines that demonstrates the dominance women had in steering their culture is the "ritualised rebirth through circumcision of the young men - which could not be performed without the women participating. They could even bring a halt to such rituals if they felt the men were not performing them correctly."

"The ritual is performed in two parts circumcision & sub-incision. Circumcision is still performed in many parts of the world. The procedure is almost same with a creepy twist it. Once the foreskin from the male genital is chopped off, the boy is made to swallow the ‘good meat’ which is nothing but the same foreskin. The boy is told that he has eaten ‘his own boy’ & it’s going to make him strong from inside. The creepiness doesn’t end here. The procedure continues…

In the second procedure, sub-incision which is performed after few months of circumcision when the wounds are healed, an elder person then takes a knife and makes a split on the underside of the penis underneath the head of the penis to near the scrotum. The boy is made to stand above the fire to allow the blood drip into it. From now on the boy must squat when he urinates just like women do. According to some anthropologists, the ideology behind this ritual is to respect & sympathize with the females of the tribe" [web.archive.org/web/20170928213621/https://www.sweetsharing.com/a-ritual-done-to-stimulate-menstruation-in-men/]

> mfw prehistoric women controlled prehistoric media, and prehistoric feminism led to ritual genital manipulation to honor women's menstruation

"In some historic cultures, a menstruating woman was considered sacred and powerful, with increased psychic abilities, and strong enough to heal the sick. According to the Cherokee, menstrual blood was a source of feminine strength and had the power to destroy enemies. In Ancient Rome, Pliny the Elder wrote that a menstruating woman who uncovers her body can scare away hailstorms, whirlwinds and lightning. If she strips naked and walks around the field, caterpillars, worms and beetles fall off the ears of corn. Menstrual blood is viewed as especially dangerous to men's power. In Africa, menstrual blood is used in the most powerful magic charms in order to both purify and destroy. Mayan mythology explains the origin of menstruation as a punishment for violating the social rules governing marital alliance. The menstrual blood turns into snakes and insects used in black sorcery, before the Maya moon goddess is reborn from it." [web.archive.org/web/20181206231043/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_and_menstruation]

> mfw prehistoric women thought menstruation gave them supernatural powers

"A red blossom is placed in the wound because the penis is to be as red as possible on the inside. After the young man has been initiated in this way he is allowed to make stone spearheads. The Wandjina cast the first bolt of lightning by splitting open his penis and in this way was able to discharge fire and lightning from it. The Wandjina created fire by turning the red inside of his split penis outwards so that fire could come out. The Wandjina can direct lightning by taking his penis in his hand and with his club show the lightning the direction it is to take.

In this way he can strike his enemies with lightning or shatter trees to get firewood for himself. I have often observed the aboriginals in thunderstorms trying to follow the Wandjina's example of directing flashes of lightning, and no amount of failure was able to shake their belief. The aborigines decorate their spear-throwers with a yellow serpent to represent lightning." [web.archive.org/web/20181123144959/http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/unambal/circumcision_initiation.php]

> mfw prehistoric women told men that their mutilated penises can shoot lightning

> mfw 40,000 years of human history under behavorial modernity were wasted when women controlled main stream media

>implying I won't fucking chimp out if institutionally denied access to pussy, taking tens of chads with me to hades

patriarchies always conquer matriarchies.

all it takes is one society to develop patriarchy and they will conquer all the neighbouring matriarchies.
so even if you were able to eliminate every patriarchy on earth another one would evolve because it is the most adaptive form of social organisation.

Matriarchies are self-destructive. When left to their own devices women almost immediately invest significant amounts of social energy, in fact nearly all of it, into hypergamy, henpecking and literal fucking magic.

youre going to memetic hell for posting this awesome image while begging for tendies and workout points.
you need to be dissolved in acid

primitive societies standing on the verge of starvation use matriachy?
such a stupid BS
no. no matriachy, just neo middle ages with neofeudalism and neofundamentalism

what does this mean for incels, do I get gf now?

Attached: 26611e364b3c0f44c0e5f792e6ad75a7.jpg (662x712, 34K)

Do you write headlines for the Media?

> be me 2100
> women run every level of society
> men locked up in cages
> barbarism becomes entertainment and men fight to the death in colloseums
> women want to get fucked like animals by the winners
> breed to select chimp-out genes
> death of decency

I see what you're doing. Taking the paradigm for men, applying it to women and getting us to defend equality?
Won't work. The nature of men and women are vastly different. Deny it and deny nature.

Attached: 1544348030134.png (1469x1323, 2.68M)

deny nature - path to extinction
so it's just another method of social genicide

actually USA anfd Japan develop sex robots
Britain develop artificial womb
well...

It's about time you incels get your own fecking board like we had to do for the horse fuckers

Attached: 47203293_945971605597249_2031919882089529344_n.jpg (693x491, 50K)

...

but what about cloning? if women can be manufactured and sold it would eliminate competition. how do you do that?

no it wouldn't, it just pushes the competition aspect a level lower. what you're saying only holds true in a world with unlimited resources. there is always a bottom line. e.g. maximum sustainable population on earth

i suppose fall of modern society and neofeudalism will be first

how? if any beta male could buy a 11/10 woman that was manufactured and customized to his specifications for like $10k, it would completely devalue natural women who would have to prove their superiority to compete.
if civilization fell, 90% of us would starve to death or be hunted for food and supplies. most people cant change their own oil, let alone farm or hunt.

can't you read?
It means incels get casterated and feminizid.
you're not getting a gf
you are the gf.

They don’t really supress those urges, a true patriarchal society will see a rise is the general femininity of women. The stronk wahmen and roastie problem are a direct result of a lack of masculinity in the west.

when the earth is overburdened, the ability to reproduce will become part of the economy. you will be in direct competition with a woman who wants her 11/10 man.

even if the sexes went their own way, such that natural women formed their own society where they all bought their 11/10 men, and men formed their own society where they all bought their 11/10 women, there would still be competition for space.

how will i be competing with a woman by buying a clone? african niggers are doing most of the overpopulation anyways and they will die off naturally once we cut the aid. soon, the west wont be able to feed itself and africa. america produces way more than it needs, but if push comes to shove, well stop feeding them and be ok. europe will be swarmed by africans and flee to safe areas like america, new zealand, canada and australia

>Am I insane or on to something?
You're just about an average gypsy cunt worshipper.
You get the rope.

Attached: 152.jpg (922x715, 62K)

bro i'm talking end game. if everyone can buy their 11/10 man or woman, the population on earth will explode. is this hard to understand? imagine every fucking loser on earth suddenly being able to get their 11/10 man or 11/10 woman. proceeds to have a fuck load of children. all their children buy a 11/10 man or 11/10 woman for $10k.

when the sexes eventually go their own ways, i imagine there will be a war between them over space on earth because all the women want to have their 11/10 men, and all the men want to have their 11/10 women. it seems like it will become an all or nothing situation because their societies will not be compatible. also, each of their societies would probably kill natural children that aren't of their sex.

Nah. The worse women behave the worse men will treat them.
We are heading into a society where women will regularly get beaten and raped on a regular basis. Where a woman's only purpose is not to serve her family and be treated with respect for the role she filled, but to be a sex treated with contempt and thrown away after her looks begin to fade.
Ironically the opposite of what feminism set out to do.

what if there is a law that says only a certain amount of clones can be able to reproduce?

Also women fuck losers more in matriarchal systems to keep the social order. See the bonobo. Pissing males off will just crash social order as we are seeing now. You need the males for work and securing resources, it's doesn't work when you get rid of 80% of males.

i can't believe i have to explain this to you.
> they make a law that only a certain amount of clones can reproduce
who gets to reproduce with them? how is this any different than people fighting outside a bar?

>That only works if every male in the world gave into the matriarch system which we all know will never happen

Nailed it on the head.
Sorry OP, but hordes of young, single, horny men is nature's version of a nuclear bomb.
You have do diffuse it or it'll blow.

Attached: 1544408332294.jpg (800x533, 86K)

fuck off varg

they will just cost more

muhammad had the same thought, probably after going balls deep in some spoils of war.

seriously its the muslim end times.

exactly! you are in economic competition now! you finally understand what i meant that the competition would just be pushed down a level lower!

sounds a bit like Giedi Prime

the difference is, even they basedest beta male could do it if he saved his pennies

bro imagine how brutal the world would be when every loser out there is saving his pennies to get their 11/10. betas might become robbers or killers when they know they can get their 11/10 if they land that heist or kidnapping.

dude, the cheap clones would be just as hot as the fertile ones. they could still get an 11/10 stacy, she just wouldnt be able to have kids.

Why the fuck are you using Aboriginals as a study group? They're a completely different species to ours.

sorry but racemixing is evil and that's what women will do

then they already have their 11/10 that they can't have children with. and they would save to have children. the only way what you are saying would work is if the desire for sex trumps the desire to have children.

it usually does.

This so called matriarchal movement will fail once the underlying society inevitably collapses, which it will as men reject becoming enslaved by it. This is already taking place with men rejecting marriage, which is the functional equivalent of a matriarchal system in most western societies.

socialmatter.net/2016/02/23/mannerbund-101/