Our education is fucked

Here is the redpilled version

Attached: 1486271102983.jpg (1856x887, 344K)

That's pretty damn accurate

Bet money you can’t elaborate coherently

This, true anarchy will appear naturally, as people become more libertarian and governments abandon the economy to itself. Power decentralization will continue to happen naturally as long as we don't go through a crisis of sorts, then progress will go back at least a decade

It's not wrong except donkey and an elephant in the middle.

How? Anarchism is neither left nor right wing. Nazism is not right or left or right wing either

There's only one thing you need to know, and you aren't going to learn it from college kikes

Attached: whydoyounotunderstandwhatisay.jpg (347x1023, 23K)

Do you mean Nazis were left wing yeh?
>hurrr durrr Nationalist SOCIALIST party
>literally has socialist in the name
>must be left wing

So, either way slaves and only being at the center will keep us free from both? Honestly, even 2D political spectrum with 4 squares makes more sense.
3D political spectrum when?

Nazism was in the middle authoritarian.

If you think this is true then you're retarded.
First off, "conservatism" and "liberalism" (in this picture at least) are just modern American variants of liberalism. Ones not right and ones not left, they're both left wing.
Second, there's no extremes. This doesn't exist. There's no such thing as an extreme, unless you mean consistency but it becomes quite clear that things classified as extremes are just things that are not liberal and/or accepted as the status quo. A conservative today would be classified as a left wing extremist in feudal Europe.

Nazis were economically socialist because when everyone is working socialism actually works

That is perfectly correct, just outdated. Democrats are socialist now and further to the left.

>Anarchism is left wing
>that is perfectly correct
Really fucking dumb my dude.

Attached: il_570xN.655683501_2vwq.jpg (570x456, 76K)

anarchy is the opposite of liberalism, its against any government doing anything
And you don't even know what nazism is if you're gonna put it on the right side, its national socialism, socialism is literally in the name. these labels are meant to keep people from think critically because fascism actually was founded by a Marxist. keep the herd divided and its easier to manage

Except Nazis were progressive you fucking dunce. The only truly right wing fascist movements of the 20th century were Francisco Franco's Spain, the Iron Guard, the Ustashe, and the Kuomintang in China. The Zaibatsu clique of Japan fits the bill but 1) they weren't ideological and 2) they predate fascism and its roots. Pinochet was a liberal, Juan Peron, Hitler and Mussolini were progressives. Mosley was a literal conservative. Rockwell was also a liberal. Fascism is rooted in leftist thought you bungling moron.

>nazism
>rightwing
kek

That makes zero sense.

>Except Nazis were progressive you fucking dunce.
Can you explain this to a history brainlet?

>trying to map out something as dynamic and complex as political parties on a graph

They had socialist in their name

How does anarchism lead to slavery? it's literally the opposite.

It's right enough for the kids.

You would think that they would teach more advanced concepts in college.

>Nazis were progressive
>hate jews
>hate gays
>hate freedom
>hate slavs
>hated commies
>established an authoritarian ultranationalist dictatorship
>suppressed the opposition
>killed millions of people to prove how progressive they are
>let me tell about all these other dictators and fascists that were actually liberal
>fascism is left wing btw
That's why they loved communists so much that they decided to invade and wipe out large portions of their populations to show them how left wing they are.

Hitler did nothing wrong amarite? Holocaust didn't happen? Strange that the only people who advocate for the "True Nazism" are right wingers who hate left wingers. Why aren't you faggots more progressive then? You all literally support conservatism.

>National Socialism has socialism in the name

Oy vey, the USSR has Republics in the name, are the Republicans the true communists?

Seriously this is honestly the dumbest meme the right has ever come up with. Jesus.

Burger education

I'm reading the bible right now. I don't think it's all that it's cracked up to be. The sermon on the mount was hard to read.

I know, right?

good goy.

>not visualizing it as a triangle

Attached: politicaltriangle.png (766x657, 63K)

>National Socialist
>Far Right
Hmmm

Attached: _20181210_220153.jpg (1079x1622, 146K)

Jesus was talking in code. But if you do what he says, it will work.

Attached: 62074-1532336916.jpg (640x357, 23K)

rigged 2 party system is free?

Hard to read in which way? Hard to swallow? Because it is supposed to be that way. There sermon on the mount cuts really deep for everyone because it cuts directly into the core of human behavior. Everyone is naturally prideful, vengeful, violent, bigoted, and hypocritical. It's an integral part to the human condition and explains why being a Christian is so hard and why being righteous without Christ's gift is impossible. Most people on Jow Forums who find it conflict with their beliefs recoil with the common "christcuck" insult, but you have to look at the bigger picture and know that in the end, God wins. God triumphs over the Satan worshipping homosexuals, blasphemers, islamists, false Jews and gives deliverance to the true sons of Abraham.

Progressive doesn't mean gay liberal. Hitler implemented many radical and new social reforms. He wasn't a traditionalist by any sense of the imagination. The Third Reich didn't ossify, it exploded.

Hi Zoomer. Let me let you in on a secret:

when you use a meme flag instead of choosing 'Geographic Location,' it looks like you're some foreign agent trying to shape a narrative. (And given where we are and all of the false narratives we've seen here, we'll all just assume the nation you're working for is Israel.)
So do have a happy hanukkah and good luck on your dreidel games. Hope you get lots of scheckles

Attached: 1472438081080.jpg (639x946, 172K)

we're gonna need a 4D political spectrum to honestly and rightfully represent politics
the jews have it because they use satanism to get those hax powers

They're entire model was based on progressive policy making and positivist social theory. Public infrastructure spending, the nature of their reforms in banking and finance, education, land management and social safety nets. They tried to create a new German culture, with new German filial norms, a new truly national German identity, a technocratic, bureaucratic political structure etc etc. Social engineering, eugenics, finance reform and nationalizing the schools, roads and so on. Literally textbook progressivism.
You're fucking braindead. I like how you jumped right on the 'Nazis were progressives' portion and just started listing shit off without having a single fucking clue what any the meaning of any the terms at play are. Because Nazis are the only group you have preloaded talking points for and you're too fucking ignorant to know anything else mentioned in my post.
>holocaust didn't happen right
Never said that, did I fuckwad?
>advocate for true Nazism
Where did I do that? Oops wrong again cocksucker
Id tell you to suck a tailpipe you monumental uneducated bottomfeeder, but to be honest I'm not even sure you're advanced enough to use an aerobic metabolism

Attached: 300px-Execution_of_Nguyễn_Văn_Lém.jpg (300x217, 25K)

Lol this
The Democratic Republic of Congo is one example I like.

How can anyone convince me that nazis are evil fascist monsters who will enslave me when all the pictures about german people back then look incredibly happy about the swastika and Hitler?

Attached: hitler1.jpg (400x267, 108K)

Eat shit retard
Also not much of a conservative anymore. Barely holding on these days. But the Nazis weren't remotely conservative. They annihilated any chance for a return to Germany's formerly princely nature and dismantled the Prussian state and dispossessed the Junkers. Literally the opposite of Conservative. But knowing that would require you having a triple digit IQ and basic historical literacy, wouldn't it you limp wristed subversive?

What the hell
How is Facism somehow worse to them than Nazism?

The truly sad part about this image is how quickly the Germans turned on Hitler and the Nazi movement when the Americans and Soviets showed up.

Left wing Anarchists help the Commies, and still get sent to Gulag.

Attached: 1375565018001.jpg (600x340, 54K)

The real spectrum is small government --> big government.

THIS
Communism being right next to anarchism is absolutely the stupidest thing I've read today

i thought the same thing, that's really dumb.

Left and right is bullshit and a control mechanism to keep you debating about which goldfish bowl you wish to be in, but a goldfish is never free unless it's in the sea.

The real spectrum is small government --> big government.

Big government = communism/fascism/nazism/etc.
Close to big government = socialism/crony-capitalism/etc
Closer to smaller government = libertarianism/minarchist/etc
No government = anarchism

The USA was founded on the principle of minarchist communities with very little interference, and a small government that would enforce the law in line with the Constitution, but for the most part people were free to pursue their own destiny, protect their castle, etc.

All big government is cancer. The government on most things should mind it's own fucking business or face the AR15.

Only a child believes in the left vs right system. It was invented in the 1800s by french political scientists to describe Western politics, and only works in the context of Western politics -- as training wheels at best

Here's an experiment: arrange US, Nazi Germany, modern France, Norway, USSR, North Korea, and the Holy See on a scale of "carburator to direct fuel injection"

Doesn't make any sense either, does it? Hence the numerous idiocies to try to make left vs right work, such as horseshoe theory, resulting in endless spats of "no *you're* the real socialist. And then think back thru history, how does left vs right explain the political landscape of the Congolese? The Ming dynasty? The ancient Sumerian? It doesn't.
You have to accept that after a certain point there is no easy cheat sheet and one must be intimate with each cultural and political system as it's own unique point in space and time.

Attached: 1543040589764m.jpg (1024x867, 97K)

anarchism - which literally means "without rulers" - is slavery
freedom is slavery
really makes me think

Making social progress does not mean Progressive. You lack an understanding of what progressive means in a political descriptive context

For most leftists/liberals anarchy is worse than slavery. In slavery they'd get the chains. In anarchy they would get the rope.

The biggest problem today is we keep the weak alive.

Even Hitler realised this which is why he hated low IQ populations, those with defects, the disabled, and people who were for the most part holding humanity back, yet loved the Japanese for their high IQ homogenous population.

The world will collapse into chaos because these bloodsuckers feed off the good and it's unsustainable because their parasitic mentality corrupts others and drags them down.

All of our problems like overpopulation, a strain on resources, growing welfare states, and mass migration would all be solved by giving them the rope.

How is one-man rule more freedom?

>holocaust didn't happen right
>Never said that, did I fuckwad?
>>advocate for true Nazism
>Where did I do that? Oops wrong again cocksucker
>Id tell you to suck a tailpipe you monumental uneducated bottomfeeder, but to be honest I'm not even sure you're advanced enough to use an aerobic metabolism

It's not schizo to jump to this in his argument because Jow Forums does this every fucking day

one believing in moderate political change and especially social improvement by governmental action
Literally pulled off merriam and webster

>Let social Darwinism

You first :)

Towards agoal of -- and say it with me here -- creating a more socially equitable society.

This is important as "conservative" in the official political science sense, has almost nothing to do with the way it is used in every day context.

By the Merriam Webster definition, literally any government that does something is Progressive. This us true in a colloquial sense but not in the much more specific political science context

So its entirely subjective meaning you can claim you're doing it right or wrong based on whether or not you personally agree with his results.

It's the fairest system where we all live in the wild and no people are trying to play God. The fairest system is to live by the sword and die by it. It's cruel, it's harsh, but who said life had to be kind? The fittest should survive and if I meet my match, and I'm killed, then so be it. It's nature's way.

However, the Jews just want to play God. Politicians want to play God as their puppets. Corporates want to play God. Faggots with no lives on Reddit want to play God. And what do they all have in common? They are all beta loser faggots with no lives and most of them do not even lift, because they are weak and would be slaughtered immediately in a free society.

Everyone just wants to control, but these fucking weak losers cannot even control themselves or sort their own lives out.

>he's not wrong to put words in your mouth because other people on this website with more traffic in an hour than conversations you'll have in a year let similar things come out of their mouths.
Except that's fucking wrong, and even if you take a narrower and more policy minded view of the definition of progressive, the Nazis were still incredibly progressive. Hitler wanted the Nazi regime to solve everything from STDs to transportation. Let's look at some other things. Cosmopolitan mass democracy, moved by political machinery? Check. Bureaucracy as a solution to misappropriation? Check. Regulation of nationwide industries? Check. The establishment of National Parks? Fucking check well would you look at that?

So you agree then that the Nazi's were progressive
They viewed removing the undesirables from their society to be making it more socially equitable.
Just because it doesn't fit the current 21st century definition of "progressive" doesn't mean it wasn't a progressive government for it's time.

>How can these blatant lies be fought in our education programs across the country
Know what they did to the West

Attached: holohoax class.jpg (673x918, 140K)

anarchy is synonymous with mad max for most people
it's not like they actually sit around and engage in thought experiments about how people would get along without an omnipresent bureaucratic army of extortionists

Which was the Nazis goal. To create a more equitable society for 'all true Germans'. Name one fucking progressive movement that gained political traction and expanded their goal of an equitable society outside their in group.

So what was America when it had slavery? Nazis or Communists?

Is this college? I really hope you're not paying anything over 10k a year for that shit, looks so unprofessional.
I'm disgusted by how unprofessional American education is. Even private schools are lowering their standards now.

i wish i lived in an anime, where people are normal

Attached: GNjYo[1].jpg (1366x768, 75K)

>Monarchism leads to nazism and fascism
?????

this is a pretty widespread chart on brazil for comparison

Attached: ds.jpg (800x365, 49K)

I love holocaust class. Especially the holocauster part.

Attached: Holocaust intolerance museum.png (1262x1026, 2.11M)

Anarchism is dog eat dog, which ultimately results in the strong rule the weak aka slavery. Anarchism cannot feasibly last for any real amount of time because the strongest will enslave the weak, then force rules upon them and then it isn't anarchy anymore.

Do you know the context of this slide? They could be talking about how the spectrum is flawed

Congrats, youre a retarded npc

If someone were ruling over you it would not be an anarchic situation.
Whether it's Alexander or a small group of bandits, it's not anarchy if people are preying on you with violence and threats of violence.

Cant read Portuguese but that looks pretty accurate

Except those 21st century notions are how we definitely Progressive (capital P). You can't just call any right wing movement conservative. conservative and Conservative are too different things, and for example in the precise definition Conservative and Liberals are not opposite but go together hand in hand. So I will concede that the Nazis we're progressive in the dictionary definition of the word, but we must not let that confuse the Nazis with the 21s century Progressive movements

So basically you think traditional left wing politics meant being a latent homosexual? Kek

A goldfish dies in salt water you fucking retard

That's my point. Human nature makes it impossible to realize anarchy, because someone, somewhere will always rise to the top then try to rule over others. Anarchy is slavery in the sense that chasing after it will lead to nothing else in the end.

Looks accurate to me if they would remove Nazism and append Libertarianism.

Anarchism was what first thousand years of human civilization was. It will end in barter, then commodities and currency, like we have now. Socialism can only exist if someone is there to enforce it- no money guys, you got to share

Teaching children politics is one-dimensional. No wonder the US is fucked up.

>The Jews want to play god by inventing Society

Oh ffs

So I'm right by definition but wrong because you say so? lmao dude
Progressive by today's standards just means "less white people" which will eventually translate to "no white people"
Sounds kind of similar to something else doesnt it?

>centrism intensifies

did they teach about Holodomor in holocaust class? how about pic related?

Attached: 1470621016261.jpg (1425x1425, 462K)

Except that's fucking wrong as I have pointed out in like three other posts

based mutt

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholar-official

the university system is not an institution of higher learning, its a place to train the help to run the estate for the Owners