Is it just because you don’t know the difference between evidence-based and anecdotal?
Why don’t Republicans use credible sources?
Nolan Rogers
Anthony White
All the big tech companies are gonna be anti trusted and you brought this upon yourselves. The tech executives are going to be executed for participating in a treasonous conspiracy to overthrow a duly elected president as well as crimes against humanity, genocide, espionage and a ton of other shit.
Matthew Wilson
The entire donor class and leadership of the Democrat Party will be either shot or hanged for treason.
Christopher Sanchez
Do you have a huff post article to back up that claim?
Easton Perez
>Wake me up inside
>I can’t wake up
The post
Ryan Reyes
>no leftist sources study political bias in the media
It doesnt exist.
Jason Sullivan
>Wake me up inside
>I can’t wake up
The post, pt.2
Parker Wright
>studies whose claims have been disputed
Every study will have a claim that’s disputed. You give me a study and I will either find a PhD to dispute it or do it myself.
Andrew Gomez
Climate change isn’t disputed
Benjamin Thompson
All boned-up over here!
Christopher Mitchell
A bunch of mainstream media outlets spread the same lies. Then they complain that we cannot find any mainstream media sources that would point out that those are lies. The definition of a conspiracy.
Jackson Richardson
>Why don’t Republicans use credible sources?
Like what? CNN? MSNBC? New York Times? Washington Post?
It's amazing how Liberal Democrats demand that their enemies do everything they demand of them.
Aaron Ross
>Climate change isn’t disputed
That's a stupid as hell claim. Of course it's disputed. But you just dismiss the disputes out of hand and vilify those disputing it.
Andrew Gonzalez
Why the fuck should we trust the media, the Democrats and those who control big tech/social media?
Ayden Gonzalez
Yes it is you fucking idiot. To all sorts of degrees. Have you never used google before?
Parker Harris
>nowthis
>vice
>vox
>huffpost
>MSNBC
>CNN
>literally every late night TV host
>republicans are the ones that don’t use reliable sources
There’s a difference between a large, well-funded news organization and a reliable news organization.
Cooper Collins
>citation needed
Grayson Brooks
>>citation needed
Who do you claim to care about a citation? It's not like you'd accept the citation should the citation be given.
Nolan Miller
Faggy ShareJoo thread
Caleb Reyes
>shill cries out in pain as he strikes us
*yawn* Do you think we've never seen lefty hypocrisy before?
In all fields.
Nathan Scott
My sides.
Leo Morgan
>democrats less trusting of family
lel
Matthew Cooper
Give me any - ANY - authoritative source that describes anything even CLOSE to the tin foil you wrote out
Hudson Moore
>Give me any - ANY - authoritative source that describes anything even CLOSE to the tin foil you wrote out
We're onto your tactics.
Any evidence posted that you don't personally support you'll just declare as "not an authoritative source" and dismiss out of hand.
And of course you claim only Liberals/Democrat sources are "authoritative".
We all know the Liberals/Commies took over the higher education system decades ago and censor/ruin dissent and free thought.
Then there's the issue of the media being virtually all Liberal due to the Jewish control of it.
You don't care about the truth. You only care about shoving your ideology and agenda down the throats of indoctrinated people.
Camden Powell
>my sources are evidence-based
>your sources are anecdotal
That wasn't so hard, what do I win?
Eli Watson
The very nature of the discussion means that no source that’s given to you will satisfy your need for evidence. Could you imagine for a moment if someone said that Pravda was corrupt and biased, and a detractors response was along the lines of “well Pravda says they aren’t biased, and they’re the best/ only news organization we have!”
The claim is that bias is widespread and prevelant in mainstream news organizations. Clearly, mainstream news organizations are not going to be forthcoming with evidence of said biased.
David Long
said bias*
Sebastian Reyes
Shit I meant to reply to
Hunter Hughes
You know none of that is true.
Adrian Davis
KEK how come the media ignores the fact all those companies got subpeonad by Mueller?
Jaxon Smith
Andrew Reyes
So, you've got nothing, then.
Aaron Torres
People like the OP want us to inherently trust the Mainstream media and academia because they're the mainstream media and academia.
As if them being the mainstream media and academia is justification enough to inherently trust them, despite their clear bias, ideology and agenda.
Christian Morris
>So, you've got nothing, then.
That's not my point. You've completely missed my point.
My point is all the evidence in the world refuting the OP's position won't matter to the OP because he'll dismiss it out of hand due to the fact that it doesn't come from his approved sources.
OP doesn't want to see evidence that will prove him wrong. OP wants to see evidence he can dismiss out of hand to make himself look smart/important/better/correct/etc.
Dominic Bailey
>You know none of that is true.
Who says it's not true? The MSM themselves? Big tech/social media? Liberal academics?
Cameron Torres
THE BIAS IS SO CLEAR GUYS
LET ME SHOW YOU THIS ARTICLE I FOUND ON INFOWARS TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHY
Xavier Moore
>THE BIAS IS SO CLEAR GUYS
Yes, it is.
Are you seriously claiming that the mainstream media and academia aren't biased?
>LET ME SHOW YOU THIS ARTICLE I FOUND ON INFOWARS TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHY
So it's wrong to use a Conservative based, non-mainstream news outlet but it's not wrong to use a Liberal based, mainstream news outlet?
Jack Kelly
Because all sources that people deem "credible" are, in fact, misinformation and social engineering entities. Your "credible" sources are your parent and your parent are telling you the boogeyman is real. Only the boogeyman is a terrorist and Christmas is open borders.
You're a child.