Neoreactionary movment

>Inb4 babby’s first moldbug.
Is this just a peculiar oddity or is there real value in supporting feudalism? I’ve read UR and I feel the premise (that representative democracy is irresponsible and doomed to fail) is valid and that conservatism is a lame duck catchall for anti-progressive resistance.

To paraphrase: One of the key tenets is submission to sovereignty through passivity (as opposed to activism). IE active resistance to progressivism only fuels progressivism and obstaining from counter-activism will only leave progressivism without vital fuel. In such a state, the progressive movement will shrivel up and weaken. In its place, a form of governance should be prepared... This theoretical structure would be powered by an intelligent information system built on empirical truth and with the sentience to propose a governmental architecture that will perform better than any current or past government in its ability to serve its customers (the pessants). The problem of finding a responsible, effective sovereign is boiled down to an engineering problem: creating sentient AI which governs without tribal biases and for profit of the nation (and its shareholders)... by default quality of life for the pessants as a whole is improved.

Attached: 0ECFFE32-8CBA-48B7-9CB8-5B1A6E07D553.jpg (220x207, 18K)

Moldbug's criticism of the Cathedral (really a Synagogue) is mostly legit. His proposed solutions are the LARPings of a Jewish autist avoiding reality

He does make some stout observations regarding monarchy, capitalism and traditionalism, but the rest is nonsense, take the useful info and leave him be

I agree. The idea of the Cathedral being the Neo-Puritan religion makes sense and has merit. The solutions he presents are impossible at least from where we stand today... however the sentient machine idea is intriguing. In fact, if current predictions regarding the emergence of the Singularity hold true, who’s to say that a shift towards a government run by sentient AI won’t happen organically?

I’m with you on that. The observations are good and his proposed solutions seem to be a novel oddity at best. But he does also make a valid observation about conservatism in its current form: that it’s structurally unsound and does not provide real solutions other than appeasement to progressivism. One is left with the question of where to go next.

>sentient machine idea is intriguing. In fact, if current predictions regarding the emergence of the Singularity hold true, who’s to say that a shift towards a government run by sentient AI won’t happen organically?
All of that transhumanist crap is just Jewish attempts at synthesizing their deranged Tower of Babel fantasies and kabbalaistic demon worship with the modern world.
It is a hellish materialistic vision of a world in which Jews can do as they please without constraint. Every author that writes about that as a desirable future is a Jew, White people find it unsettling and dystopian.

Why though? I’m willing to go with this assessment if a compelling argument is made... i also feel that saying “transhumanist” is the same as a far leftist calling everyone slightly to the right “fascist”...

Molbug looks like he is from the 90's. Is he?

Transhumanism is a derivative of the Jewish desire to usurp God and escape all moral constraints. This is the basic idea of all Jewish religion and 'philosophy', transhumanism is just this applied to modern technology.
Moldbug is hitting the same notes when he talks about a society ruled by AI and the new priesthood that manages it.

This is literally nothing but absolute nonsense.
>Do you want your kids to smarter and healthier?
Congrats you're a demon worshiping jew, at least try to make legit arguments like J.F does.

Eugenics is not the same as transhumanism.

>progressives will go away if we ignore them

Yes.

It pretty much share similar tenements, I'm not talking about breeding smarter people, I'm talking about modifying genes for that purpose, we aren't anywhere close today with current technology but the Chinese geneticist already attempted deleting genes associated with increase risk in HIV, smallpox and cholera.

hello christcuck. Technological improvement isn't jewish, thanks.

Ultimately, the entirety of the west's faggotry comes from Christianity, and the resulting ethical memes from it. The atheists follow a stupid mix of Christian ethics involving universalism and utilitarianism.

Because society has been infected with slave morality semetic trash from top to bottom, there is no hope to be saved by endogenous factors, which is why half of the alt-right loveson tech and ai-cults and transhumanism, and the other half wants yellowstone to erupt.
There's nothing within the system that will revolt against the system. But technology can change that, and so can catastrophe and war.

Universal Democracy is obviously trash, because the vast majority of voters are dependents, rather than people who actually work. So you could cut democracy back down to white men only, which I would agree with. But the state as a corporate entity will just lead to some brave new world shit.

And this is what the christcucks don't understand, the brave new world shit will come, and they have nothing stable to fight against it. Their house is built on sand.

Eugenics is actually works in that it seeks out to purge the defective, whilst transhumanism seeks out to repair and revitalize the defective... one is a destructive act, the other is creative.

>utilitarianism
Do you mean “Unitarianism?”

They really don't share anything other than the use of technology. Transhumanism isn't limited to the idea of using CRISPR to edit genes, it is a more twisted idea of escaping the idea of humanity altogether.

>christcucks
Ok, no one said anything about Christianity being good, so I'm not sure what you are butthurt about.

I understand that and I also understand that it isn't limited to using CRISPR which why I stated that modern tools aren't sufficient, what I am saying is that the steps that have already have been taken is just the first in the ultimate revolution in human biology.

My point is that transhumanism, as Moldbug circles around it, isn't about tech or genetics. It is a moral, or really anti-moral, idea, of replacing humanity with a purely materialistic concept.

Brave New World has arrived with or without transhumanism being at the leading edge. You’re also championing “white men only” democracy... we fucking had that up until the early 20th century...white men are the people who invented white guilt and cuckism in the first place in this country and it was the Puritans. Liberal white societies ussered in the lies of “equality” and all other bullshit forms. Rome’s Catholicism started it but tempered it for a thousand years because they valued the old classical structure (for all its faults, it at least had no pretense that Democracy was a virtue)... then faggots like Luther came along and everything went to shit...
>inb4 muh Habsburgs...
We would have came out of that mess just fine if it wasn’t for the delusions of Democratic governance. We live in a society that operates on niggerdom

Attached: B17FA5C4-8976-4BAE-AFDF-290B9C891ABE.png (1024x537, 1.19M)

That’s an extreme assesment. Apes are still alive. We achieved enlightenment and humanity and stopped butchering them like we did before with Neanderthals. Humanity will be humanity for millions of years to come as long as a meteor doesn’t hit us. Just like tractors replaced hand tools or fingers as an extension of our ability to manipulate the world, so can other tech... but humanity won’t die... it will only change as it has changed continuously for many hundreds of thousands of years

Nick Land is based. The human element of capital is soon to be made redundant, may the universe lose its last conscious observers sooner rather than later