How come North Africans never went down and conquered and replaced all of africa even though the moors attempted to in...

How come North Africans never went down and conquered and replaced all of africa even though the moors attempted to in Spain.

Attached: afr_web_3.png (431x350, 9K)

Why would they want to? What is there to conquer? Malaria and mud huts?

Lazy

Because Spain is closer

Africans were too strong, they were afraid of the BBC. Even Europeans were afraid to fuck with the BBC. until they had weapons of mass destruction. Remember that the Vikings tried to colonize America and they ran away like cowards because the Natives fucked them up too much. Europeans were only able to return to try and colonize the America's again after they had guns. Simply put, in a fair fight, Europeans would get destroyed by Natives/Africans everytime.

Just for more land and resources.

A big desert separate the south from the north.

That would involve crossing the Sahara. It’s easier to cross the Mediterranean

>the moors attempted to in Spain
Firstly we took over Spain, then we took over Egypt, Arabia and the Levant as the Fatimids. We also conquered various African Kangdoms in the Sahel and West Africa.

Last but not least we're currently conquering Western Europe.

>conquered and replaced all of africa
For the same reason that the Romans didn't bother conquering Germania. It was a shithole.

LMAO kys monkey

hard to conquer and control due to the Sahara and the terrain of sub Saharan Africa, also Africa is a shithole

>we
You have done shit sperglord

You took over egypt first before spain, you can't even learn your history correctly retard.

They tried and couldn't do it.

The answer is the Sahara desert. Not worth the hassle for niggers

Just to give you an idea how fucking massive it is.

Attached: chapter-12-early-societies-in-west-africa-3-728.jpg (728x546, 74K)

He's speaking of the berber kutama fatimid conquest of the 10th, wich happend 2 centuries after the conquest of iberia of tariq ibn ziad

North african and middle eastern empires conquered/ruled most of africa for centuries in ancient, medieval and modern empire.

The saadian dynasty, the almoravid empire etc. Western africa was under north african moroccan rule for several centuries. The garamante, senoussi outposts in central africa, the sanhaja empires, fatimid etc.
Why do you think there are so many muslims in western and central africa?
You're really clueless. Even outside of conquest, North african empires like the almohad also had good relation

And for arabs, omani empire, all the random arab slave masters in congo etc.

Also stop with the sahara meme, there was a MASSIVE trans-saharian trade for centuries, with a lot of gold and slaves. Crossing the sahara was never difficult for north african with camels.

Pic related.
If the sahara was hard to cross, there would have not been millions of people crossing it each year back then.

>Not worth the hassle for niggers
Worth for the gold.

Attached: Commerce_transsaharien.jpg (599x355, 69K)

its the same land mass, that doesn't mean all travel is equal:
think about it, if you have only ships and animals- the sea is something to sail on, but who wants to cross a giant burning desert?

that's still not as easy as sailing a ship

The Ethiopians were too powerful

the combination of terrain, climate, disease, and a lack of anything worth conquering (plus the difficulty in adminstrating it)) made sub saharan africa far more trouble than it would be worth

It delights me that the wretched Moors can't get over losing Spain.

Attached: 23424242352.jpg (700x555, 134K)

Because Africa is a barren wasteland where shit will kill you at every move where live does flourish. Who wants to do guerilla warfare with mud people. The British had a damn hard time conquering the place and to this day Africans need outside aid to keep their populations alive. Best remove all aid and let them revert back to sustainable populations (or they'll develop tech to survive, either way win win).

Attached: Africa_satellite.jpg (900x900, 472K)

>lack of anything worth conquering
Just massive amounts of gold and precious gems, ivory, rubber, Iron, salt, and just about every other resource that has ever been valued anywhere

>Crossing the sahara was never difficult for north african with camels.
frenchie crossing the Sahara even today in modern vehicles isnt a walk in the park

>there would have not been millions of people crossing it each year back then.
its almost like a large portion of them were slaves forced to make the march...

SO WHAT IS THE EXCUSE FOR THE PEOPLE LIVING THERE!
say it, all these natural resources and you didnt even mention oil, uranium, cobalt, and the fucking metal they have to stick in every new cell phone.

>SO WHAT IS THE EXCUSE FOR THE PEOPLE LIVING THERE!
They dindu nuffin
>you didnt even mention oil, uranium, cobalt, and the fucking metal they have to stick in every new cell phone.
I tried to keep the list relevant to the time period in question.

>I tried to keep the list relevant to the time period in question.
you forgot their most valued resource, slaves

None of those invasions were like you're saying "for several centuries" or included "most of africa".
Most of thoseactually were temporary and only included small portions of the region. Like in the case of the omani empire where they were only present on the coast or the moroccoan invasion of malia where they just destroyed the kingdom and quickly gave up on governing it since it was more of a hassle to rule a so far away territory.

The billions of bloodthristy savages that breed like rabbits.

With today's technology it wouldn't be difficult to cleanse the continent but with 1800's or earlier nearly impossible.

lol, please kill yourself mohamedian and get out of here parasite.

This do not expect 80 IQ to control and to invade in a long term something. Otherwise you can see with french colonialism, controling africa north to south is worthless when you have 60-80 IQ native here. The only possible optionto gain something from it is to do like american or english did in australia or america genocide.

>burger schooling system