2 birds 1 stone

Have you not heard Peta?
It's 2 birds 1 scone

I was fascinated as to what could lead someone to this conclusion. This person thinks Moldova is a good example for what the future ecotopia should look like. It's pretty scary they honestly believe this.

Attached: ecomorons.png (538x886, 196K)

kys faggot.
Humans don't control the climate, there used to be more greenhouse gasses in our atmosphere several times in the past, and mass migration is all about slavery, it obviously would not impact the climate other than increasing air pollution in wherever the slaves flock to.

Do they even realize how fucking evil they are?

Attached: 1517754264588.jpg (521x600, 30K)

Make sure to send them to Israel first

Attached: jewish hypocrisy.jpg (1024x634, 115K)

We literally cannot support all third worlders to live like Americans and europeans. Unironically letting immigrants in will cause global warming to get 100x worse.
GW is bullshit though so they just want to replace us

There is no mass CO2 emission if there is no civilization

Every invader will consume over 3 X the resources they would have in their home country.
What marijuana are they snorting? This is peak cognitive dissonance

They're not wrong; with open borders society and countries would collapse, economies would slowly grind to a halt, and fewer emissions would be released. But at least the earth won't be affected as much by humans, right?

In ya go! I warmed it up for you.

Attached: ferro-bronze-open-oven.jpg (810x1080, 122K)

It's because of "global warming" that we need open borders. Let's refresh your memory about global warmings threats and promises:

Here Al Gore say ice caps will be gone within 5 to 7 years in 2009:
youtube.com/watch?v=MsioIw4bvzI

Tpbp

>Force constructive action
I'm sorry, what? Fuck this, and fuck you too.

>As rich nations finally start to feel the heat, so to speak, you can bet they'll act fast
act fast to genocide third worlders, more like it

I do not understand how this would solve the problem.

Attached: 35342.jpg (1280x707, 381K)

OPEN BORDERS FOR CHINA
OPEN BORDERS FOR INDIA

this makes no sense what so ever

But how though? How will moving eight million million people into a tiny Northern Hemisphere space that has to import food and gas already help "combat" climate change? The transport costs alone will negate any potential savings for centuries to come.

Attached: 1535833183988.png (412x299, 98K)

How do you even measure something like social achievement?

>EVERYONE WILL GET A MILLION DOLLARS AND A UNICORN IF YOU LET FOREIGNERS PERVERT YOUR CULTURE AND RAPE YOUR KIDS

It is a pretty sound argument.

Chinese and blacks are the scourge

what makes someone a 'climate' refugee? just because a bunch of idiots ruin their land, or are so dumb they allow industry to do so, or they choose to live in a shitty part of the world and want to just flee to a nice developed place made by whites who they will then try to make war on in their own country, then no fuck them i dont care if they call die there are 4 billion too many people as it is

how does causing chaos in the world by opening borders and letting those in the developed world who have worked for their lives suffer, how does that help anyone? you're just trying to redistribute suffering, fuck you, commie slime

Attached: 1540180037901m.jpg (1024x476, 78K)

The author is a jew.

every fucking time

>left says global warming is cause by western countries, which have a wealthy population that consumes too much thanks to high life standars
>that's why we should decrease births in Europe and the west
>but we also need to send masses of people into those countries so that they can have the same life standard and consume even more
Makes sense

If you cut the world's human population by, say, 50% (I don't know the actual numbers on 1rst world vs 3rd world populations), how much less carbon would that be per annum? (breathing out)
If humans stopped producing co2 via industry and transportation, how would that compare with the ongoing volcanic co2 emissions?

In order for the banks to get their interest payments from countries that have declining populations, they want 3.8 billion migrants in Europe
This is a real
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/195541289/

Attached: 1543905872266.jpg (879x782, 194K)

I've been thinking about this alot... what if the Soviet Union did not lose the Cold War, but instead submerged itself so it could undermine nato countries in the long run. Are we living in the time of the shadow war ?

Eight thousand million user

((Hickel))
That's a wierd name for a jew?

>opening the borders to climate refugees is a matter of basic justice
The declaration of human rights was a mistake

Attached: 1517115203043.png (849x453, 735K)

Oh shit, yeah, sorry, got carried away with my zeroes. Even so, that's a lot of people to cram into a tiny space simply because the infrastructure is already in place for Consumerism.

Attached: XIrz_VSKobz19sH0_P-czP2ws4ojrf7V-xOZRuBoWSg.jpg (960x990, 157K)

Yes. I read a story about people like this. It was mid apocalypse and these people were being rounded up and given an option denounce your beliefs and stop being evil. Or take a bullet to the face.

what a retard
the purpose of mass immigration is to bring in new consumers to replace the old ones so we can keep the cycle of mass consumption exactly the way it is
mass immigration is part of the problem

Hickel, kikel, kike

Yep. We need a holocaust. For real this time

What is really going to happen is that every african will want to drive a car and eat shitloads of factory farm meat. And you'll piss off whites past critical.

Yeah I was wondering what the argument would be and it's this? Once they get even more niggers then they will know to shut down their economy and live off wind power

I read a lot of really stupid shit. this is up there

the question is if you're killing the half that generates the most carbon or not. while emissions are way higher in india and china their heavy industry is geared towards production for the west. without the west, presumably they would adopt western levels of consumption themselves, so removing western demand is moot. the only way to achieve a lower level of consumption is to wipe out areas outside of western control and then strictly limit the consumption levels of western populations. which starts to look not that different from the globalist prison planet, honestly

Because bringing 3rd world people who already have 7 kids each into the 1st world where they'll get even more resources to pop out even more kids is a good way to fight "MAN MADE" climate change? Leftism is a bottomless pit of stupidity.

they're betting that western lifestyles will corrupt them too. if modernity caused europeans birth rates to collapse and europeans to abandon their traditional structures en masse, the liberal theory goes that the same will happen for non-europeans. and that's been borne out for the most part in east asia. it's a risky bet to make re: africa, though

the saddest thing about this particular shill is if he actually genuinely believed in demographic crisis spurring action on environmental sustainability he would be arguing for the carpet bombing of the third world since 3rd worlders are too low iq to have sustainable societies

but since his whole argument is just a stalking horsr for "kill whitey" theres no enlightenment

Attached: 1495824463360.jpg (385x387, 17K)

to them we are eternally guilty for being throwing the world into the industrial revolution. We are blamed for enlightening the world

This

>We need to devise policies to ensure that all have the right to access safe and habitable parts of the planet we share.

AYO WE FUCKED UP OUR COUNTRY, CAN WE COME IN AND FUCK UP YOURS?

It would go the opposite way. Africans are low IQ and won't replace sexual stimulation with anything available in western society. They'll reproduce out of control like dogs and cats do if given vast resources and relative security.

>By tearing down the walls that separate the causes and consequences of climate change we can force constructive action.
This is some next level of serpent speech.

I didn't ask about industrial emissions in 3rd world countries, I asked about human output from being alive.
Or cows and chickens for that matter
Whatever amount of co2 and methane they put out, you'll have to multiply it by 4 billion for humans, 700 million for cows, and 10 billion for chickens.
Existing causes co2 (plus toning down the cow population could, theoretically, lead to reforestation instead of deforestation)

>if the country is piss poor it has no industry hence no polution
Someone, give this man an award or something

Note: those numbers are for 'wiping out half the population. There's something like 1.4 billion cattle and 19 billion chickens in the world... circa 2009

>to stop climate change, we need to flood the western world with billions of niggers and muslims
From a certain point of view, the absolute collapse of human civilization which is the one and only outcome of the Kalergi Plan WILL stop global warming, by dragging us all back down into the nigger stone age from which humanity will likely never re-ascend out of.

All this bullshit about climate change needs to fuck off.
>pic related, 444.hu, Soros' proxy hungarian fake news outlet, (they even partnered up with GAWKER until it got shut down)
>Rebel against our common future
>Taxation is the best way to counter global climate change, it makes the polluters pay
This was an article about the yellow vests.
FUCK NIGGERS, JEWS, SHABBOS GOYIM, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY FUCK JANNIES

Attached: soros faggots.png (827x243, 40K)

Only people that actually do anything about 'Climate Change' are White people
We punish ourselves with Taxes and laws when what little it does accomplish is a mere fraction of what China/India is putting out.

Yet all the calls for Change still boil down to WHITE PEOPLE DO SOMETHING

Top stop climate change white people need to stop having kids

Funny how the solution to climate change is always "implement the left's other agendas"...

>implying that third-world migrants destroy industry and ruin whole nations
Like shooting your own feet when you're already an amputee.

Attached: 1474137377376.jpg (1920x1200, 451K)

if you open the borders draught is inevitable, hence global cooling will ensure.

How to actually stop climate change
1 fuck up the cunts producing most of the pollution
Who is that someone?
China
Nuke china, it's that simple, they are either going to destroy the world through climate change, comunism or war anyways. Better get the leg up on them

Everybody know that if you do the same shit somewhere else, you produce less carbon.

the worst thing about these retards is that they preach the majority of the people to live in poverty while they expect themselves to keep their unsustainable living standard

Access to white people is not a human right.

To stop climate change we need to invade China, leftists are too pussy to understand this.

>1 world, 2 jews (anti-christ and satan)

The only answer to stop overpopulation, global warming and starvation in the world is to NUKE ISRAEL.

Attached: 1533160100578.jpg (1066x1128, 242K)

Actually, its mostly low-middle income countries(if you look at gdp) that actually produce most of the waste that contributes to global warming. As countries grow richer, they start to care more about the environment, so they start using more renewable enrgy because they can aford it(im talking about people in the country overall).

ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions

Main examples include india and china as low-middle, in that order. The UK now has a much cleaner economy, if compared to the ecological nightmare they had during the industrial revolution. America also is a good example, the rich lifestyles of the average american, in recent years, has allowed them to buy organic food, solar panels, electric cars(teslas) and have developed countless cures to diseases from research by pharmaceutical corporations, all driven by a need for inovation and efficiency required in capitalism.
There has never been a better time to be alive in capitalist countries,

google.co.th/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.heritage.org/index/country/venezuela&ved=2ahUKEwjwuf_-yZ_fAhVGMI8KHUNCCLsQFjATegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw3UouUydwrru7xUpKPtStZz

unlike certain socialist and communist ones.

The argument seems to be that importing refugees will force whites to act on global warming to stop more refugees from coming

Just make sure that white people aren't having babies either, because white babies contribute to global warming. And is that (((Forward))) magazine? Thank you for the trustworthy source, very informing.
And if someone asks whether it isn't likely that people with no environmental conscience whatsoever being given the chance to partake in a consumerist(i.e. polluting) system en masse will do the planet harm, YOU'RE A FUCKING BIGOT!

Ahh yes we should all strive to be more like Moldova; so poor there is no industry and too drunk to care.

could kikes stop with the bullshit? I've had enough

Shoo shoo, terrible jew.

What he is really saying is they want a one world marxist government to force global policy changes.

>thinking anything can be done to stop the climate from changing.
remember the dinasaurs?
remember the ice age?
remember how there were no humans around?
yeah.
this is all pointless.

Every single time...

>Vast majority of pollution comes from China and India
>Better open up white regions

>what do you think? should we let them in in order to solve global warming?

that's some bullshit that only brainwashed fools would believe.

These fools don't give a shit about the environment, they only care about destroying white countries.

>convection
That’s fancy

Only a faggot thinks like that.

Increased consumption base means increased climate impacts.

Only morons think you can control and environmental outcome whilst increasing population.

Attached: MADCUNT.jpg (575x795, 123K)

niggers are a consequence if climate change?

Or we can just nuke the third world. There's that option. Lefties are always whining about overpopulation and righties are always whining about thirdworlders.

2 birds 1 stones

Attached: 1544276205592.png (788x788, 301K)

>our addiction to endlessly expanding economic growth and consumption
>also, the immigrants will expand and grow our economy increasing consumption
fucking shit

>Humans evolve through hardship.
>Let them evolve over there
Then they'd be getting selected for the wrong thing, we're either headed for space age or extinction.

Being fat is a result for your ancestry getting selected for "the wrong thing" to thrive in the modern environment.

Attached: 57.jpg (1585x1527, 140K)

Remember lurkers, this is why journalists are so thoroughly despised.

They fucking hate the truth while simultaneously pretending to serve it. People cannot stand the naked hypocrisy.

Attached: Globalization.jpg (1290x251, 71K)

By taking people from the third world into first world countries you bump up their carbon footprint by a stupid amount. This will only make climate change worse.

those billions of cattle/chickens don't just exist on their own, they're there because we're feeding them. just like the billions of people in africa don't exist on their own, they're a byproduct of the worldwide industrial complex

>borders magically redirect the effects of climate change to other places

So basically this faggots argument is
>Let in all refugees
>Once their useless and gibs become a drain and start ruining the host nation's economy they'll be forced to make the shitholes they came from not shitholes
Brilliant just brilliant