this text is a multi step plan to save/ reform western nations and remove the (((ruling elite))) while giving he power back to the able people ( not fucking everyone). It is written to be digestable even for near- normies and can therefore be spread by everyone.
>come, Jow Forums >click this external link Stop trying to draw people's attention to your retarded shit.
Daniel Morris
I'm not clicking that link. QRD?
Anthony Fisher
fair,
copypasta is on the way
Christian Roberts
>PART 1
To whom it may concern, This is a general plan to reform modern democracy and remove systematic deficiencies in modern societies. The proposed system is supposed to be flexible to be able fit different, valid, even contradicting, political standpoints. Still the center problems which are to be solved by this system should be known to everybody and, in my personal experience, have concerned everybody I talked to. The here displayed solutions to current problems are quite frightening taken on their own, but may work in tandem. This may be the reason for the aversion to the proposed measures. So I ask of you to read the text for yourself and see it as a whole instead of only focusing on a few components.
If you agree with the proposed solutions, share them. In my experience there are more like minded people than you are lead to believe. Many people are distraught by the parties on the whole spectrum of politics. And all governments and parties are plagued by basically the same problems. In the whole western world.
These problems would take too long to explain without writing a book.
So here are the proposed solutions as a simple list. The results should speak for themselves:
Dylan Wood
>PART 2
1.) spreading the following political ideas: - Introduce a basic income/ negative income tax combination system (social safety net, creates base to kick-start economic success and not reduce like other welfare systems) (housing money is given separately per household) - Only Net Taxpayer may vote (keeps the basic income from escalating into bankruptcy) (a minimum percentile voting pool may be constitutionally secured to prevent oligarchies) (only the tax status of citizens of working age is utilized)
- Transaction tax: Harder to avoid than income tax. Allows for lower income taxes and legalized crypto currency use. Can fund the basic income. May replace the value added tax. - Stepless taxation system ( to remove income barriers in jobs)
Josiah Gonzalez
>PART 3 2.) Results - Smaller government/ less bureaucracy
- Politics of the free working people
- Fair taxation
- Fair welfare
- A host of other problems solved ----------------------------------------------------------------
3.) Hurdles of implementation
- The state would lose influence, therefore they will fight against the systems implementation
- Large corporations may lose their monopoly and therefore fight against the systems implementation
- Without shrinking of the government, a corporate oligarchy may officially begin
- If only the universal basic income or the voting system is implemented at once, there may be riots.
Samuel Bennett
>PART 4 The proposed changes should be shared from person to person, anonymously (online), to local/small parties (single members) only, by pamphlet/stickers or other similar means because main line politicians/parties/companies would shut it down, trash the idea or defame you to keep their influence. No matter if the party is left, right, center, progressive, traditional, pro social or pro market. Do not let yourself be intimidated or haggled into obedience. Sharing the solutions is half the battle As the proposed system is flexible and compatible with many political standpoints, you can add what you like. My primary concern is only the core message. The rest is healthy discussion. Sincerely, F.
Jack Hill
> PART 5
proposed regulations of the voting system:
- the voting hurdle may be lowered according to the size of your company, because smaller companies make less money than bigger ones regardless of competence - students and trainees are exempt from the need to pay taxes to vote - retirees may pay a low fee for the right to vote - handicapped people/ people in medical treatment have a lower hurdle according to their disability. People medically unable to work can pay the retiree fee for the right to vote - people of working age living of their savings may pay a fee higher then the base hurdle to vote
Elijah Hill
> PART 6
Additional ideas :
(because no political text author can resist injecting his own ideas into a paper)
(personal preference of the author, unrelated to main idea)
(here for further thoughts) (pick and choose if you like and if not then so be it) - Systems of Liquid Democracy and/or meritocracy for the staffing of certain government offices - Direct Presidential voting combined with electoral college - Lower ballot access hurdles - A representative long term office with a partial veto right and non binding influences to some other offices in order to roughly guide politics (because large scale liquid democracy may result in fast changing and therefore partially incapacitated, politics) - Official petition system with anonymity of the authors and the signers before the state - It is the right and responsibility of every citizen to stand against structures of every kind involved with governance that only hold power for the sake of power or to only further that power - Deregulation of businesses and markets - Cut of business subsidization, only single direct financial aid packages may still be administered - The state may sell non mandatory seals of approval to help finance itself - Public referendums for large decisions - Minimum number of participators for state state decisions to be valid - Legal and criminal security of personal deposits in bank insolvency - A secondary currency with a material standard
Wyatt Lewis
>PART 7
- Exposition of state sponsors (transparent lobbyism) - Right to own arms, gun licenses may be acquired at local police, controlled gun shops and/or controlled clubs - Basic state healthcare system based on trust funds - Trust fund based pension to compensate for the decline in population - State funded primary schools - Two recognized biological sexes (plus born intersexual ( for example Klinefelter syndrome) and trans M/F ( if hormones are taken) ) for medical information. (you may dress and behave like you want, as long as you don't harass others and mentally or physically harm children. Due to the limited ability to consent in children a sex change should only be possible after age 16. Forcing children into changing their born sex shall be considered child abuse) - Homosexual marriage and adoption are allowed - Social decriminalization of definite male and female behaviors - Social decriminalization of androgynous behaviors - Equality of all citizens before the law - Fight against "guilty until proven innocent" court structures, no sentence without proof, no sexual or ethnic bias in sentencing - No assumed guilt in legal matters, but statistics may be used to find unknown perpetrators - How you live out your personality is a free and private matter - Drinking age of 18, legalization of marijuana with the same sobriety regulations as alcohol (exception: medical use of marijuana) - Absolute free speech (two exceptions: direct call to violence and protection of minors ) - Absolute free press (Exception: direct call to violence)
Juan Sanchez
> PART 8
- Reformed education system more akin to classic systems. Inclusion of a course for rhetorical, informational, digital and media education. Stronger support of basic mathematical education. No retention of uncomfortable but important information. - Voluntary social work system for poor people. - Encouragement of voluntary self improvement programs - Deregulation of the sciences ( with an exception for: animal cruelty, personal rights) - State secured basic food quality and environmental protection regulations - Environmental plan based on the Nobel Laureates Guide to Smarter Global Targets to 2030 - Removal of bloated extra positive and negative rights - Medical reevaluation of the effects of wireless technology and standard agricultural methods - Opened borders, but with a "bouncer mentality" - Refusal of refugees because of a reaching of national system capacity is legitimate. Systemic bottlenecks should be solved. - If a person in danger of deportation would be endangered in the destined county, but endangers multiple people in the current country, the deportation can be seen as a net reduction of global suffering. - If a non citizen is in the country for provable terroristic reasons, this Person is to be treated as an invader. - Allowed asylum seekers should be able to take basic courses about the language and practices of the state. A residence permit or citizenship may be acquired in the regular fashion. - private corporations may test allowed asylum seekers on their work experience so that they may be adapted as workers. - Clear distinction between the terms asylum seekers, refugees, economic refugee, migrant and new citizens - No assumed incapability of responsibility and accountability in migrants and asylum seekers - No assumed incapability of responsibility and accountability by sex and other factors
Julian Johnson
> Final part
- Refugee admission sites at the affected borders - Commitment to the global Cleaning of the oceans and to sustainable forestry - No ban on nuclear power - Evaluation of the longterm and environmental effects of hormone preparations, light pollution and inaudible frequencies - Foreign aid by communication of expertise instead of only material goods. - Public Information about crisis precautions - Light, medically safe, corporal punishment for repeat offenders - Rehabilitative criminal system ( for example policed public charitable work to give purpose and train for a civil life) - Mandatory work for prisoners unable to be rehabilitated to subsidize their imprisonment - Protection of physical and digital privacy - Modernization of the copyright laws - Definite application of current laws - Rejection of transnational undemocratic structures, cooperation with democratic transnational structures - Everybody is responsible for their own action or inaction
my main concern it is not very consistent. and even some contradiction. I'm sorry but i don't really want to go into this. so consider this a lame answer with a bump because it is interesting none the less
contradiction? i will check if i have contadictions in the text. i tried to make the additions quite nuanced. maybe i mixed something up.
Jackson Roberts
> i found some. they will be fixed in the linked text.
Michael Long
> Homosexual marriage and adoption are allowed >open borders >refugee admissions sites >you cant deport anyone unless you PROVE theyre a terrorist
What kind of fucking low test cuck bullshit is this? Do yourself a favor and never come back to Jow Forums.
Wyatt Long
> read original post:
this stuff is included to make it digestible for normies.
- refugee admission site= concentration camp - open border with " bouncer mentality" = get fucked, we are full. you tresspass , you get shot - prove is a moldable word - homosexual marriage: they can marry each other, so they aren't forced to marry women: they remove themself fro the genepool - homosexual adoption: high standards must be met, also: see child abuse part
Education is the key, spreading awareness of this as an option, you need to attach it to symbolic things, a logo etc... The internet is heating things up in regard to self-awareness, we're becoming increasingly self-aware, the average person today presumably knows more about science and god knows what else than anyone before.
They cannot be tricked into saying 'yes'. They must be leveraged into accepting the validity of what we offer. At first I was thinking about why everyone is so mentally unhealthy in my country. My intuition tells me that the Royal Family are the symbol or anchor of our culture, they are like magicians, every artifact they wear or hold has significance. For example somebody attempted to steal the mace the other day in the house of commons. youtube.com/watch?v=UQiYm9DPnyY This mace grants parliament the magical power to rule, they cannot function without it. They set up the dichotomy between right and elft and let it play out, so long as it nver exceeds the (real) power of the state. But they are not completely in control, they deal with their courtiers in private gatherings like the Saudis or big finance. I can't use the necessary parenthesis in that last sentence. They have massive influence in the media, they have complete access to military intelligence.
TL;DR - You can't just beat people over the head with your ideas, the problem is a kind of knot.
I'm not scared though, I feel like it will all work out eventually, the internet is our greatest savior. Countries that reject the full potential of the internet will not be as successful as those that embrace FOS. We must educate people to the various evils of this power structure and demonstrate how great the alternatives are. Older people may not be as open to these ideas, they've already accepted that they are nothing. Like any organised crime firm, the primary tactic they have is fear. You are right that people don't realise how many people would be willing to listen to these ideas, the prison is running on fumes. The prison is in the mind, and they are maintaining it themselves. Don't beat them over the head with the ideas. Anyway, rant over.
wow communism and free gibs is your plan. time to kill yourself for being retarded.
Charles Lewis
...
Dominic Evans
if only net taxpayers vote, the whole welfare stuff will only reduce the voting pool. therefore these gibs wil be cut by the remaining voters.
the gibs are there to bait peole to implement this. and the remaining ubi is there because ebventualy most people won't need to work because of automatization.
Luke Green
i tried to make the text as digestible as possible.
and most people like a few of the proposed points. even if only one thing will be remembered it was worth it. because this text is not a package deal. it is many small deals.
it is formulated this way to be digestible by normies and the slowly awakening
Chase Hughes
>universal basic income, the unholy grail of commie kike shit >gaydsden flag what the fuck did he mean by this guys Im confused
Hunter Walker
I know, I was talking to him. And now I'm talking to you: if there's nothing shady about your message don't deliver it in a shady way. It looks like you're trying to manipulate me.
Isaiah Anderson
> due to the changed voting rights, the ubi would desintegrate. it is bait.
...and there is no liberal fascist flag on pol...
Jason Thompson
the message would be considered shady in my country and by most people
Kayden Morgan
It has to be. You have to convince them.
Ayden Carter
Yeah, so when you have messages like that, post them here. Not some janky paste site.
Cooper Myers
And by shady I mean a lie. If you're not lying, don't act like a person who lies.
Easton Edwards
caution =/= liying
>aside of that: what country are you from not to have a flag? just curious.
Dylan Baker
It's called a VPN, and this is an anonymous website for shitposters. Why you're even trying to do anything serious here is beyond my ability to understand.
Ryder Jenkins
Probably a leaf. The only way people will take him serious is if he doesnt have a memeflag.
Landon Morris
close, its kraut.
Christopher Robinson
mate your posts are just too gay you re aburger arent you? you can always identify where posts are fromby where they are on the gay/retarded grid, and you have this mix of gay and retarded about you that tells me you re a murican
>The only Person you should truly compare yourself to is yourself from yesterday. go clean your room, bucko.
Adam Smith
have we met before? :'D
Ryder Walker
and like i wrote multiple times: digestible for uninformed normies
Jacob Nguyen
mate do you not realise how shitty voting is? if you can say who can vote and who cannot its like handpicking the winner then you have the reality that you know who people are gonna vote for anyways if you both know and control the outcome of an election why even bother with voting? another question, if you know what s the best choice, for the nation, why the fuck would you let anyone else win?
James Parker
also you avoided my post, show flag you gay merican
yo give back our flag wait what the fuck you fucking pissed on it??
Ryder White
Stop trying to make it look like we stole your flag. You stole ours and replaced the color of male fertility with the color of surrender.
Samuel Evans
because its the same clickbait bullshit the media uses
James Martin
fucking kek
Nicholas Myers
the voting pool constantly changes because of economics. i have some ideas what would be good, but everbody has their own ideas. the voting is still anonymous.
all i know is that intelligence is strongly linked strongly to economic success. and the idiots and welfare leeches shouldn't vote.
no taxation without representation. no representation without taxation.
and please, go on and behead macron ( why are you still online, prepare for tomorow). just make sure you know what to do next beforehands.
> back to gadsen because krauts can not into politics
Aiden Sanchez
First you have to overthrow them, so you can rule, then you can change something. Why aren't yellow vests killing politicians yet? They won't give you victory by being alive. The only thing politicians really really want is for you to peacefully protest, since from nothing comes nothings. Peace means silent agreement.
Oliver Taylor
before the revolution can be started, the word must be spread
Dylan Price
western politics is jew'd anyways an unwinnable game
Nathaniel Jackson
therefore the call to keep it low profile. until you can overtake through your numbers
1) text is written for normies 2) krautflag is worse
Jace Diaz
not in europe. they are the norm there. this text would be viewed as right winged there
Xavier Hill
>be me >look at Europe and who's in power right now >look at the policies they're putting in I mean if leftists are a majority then the governments of the individual countries do not reflect that.
Dylan Bailey
The more complex a system is the less of a chance you have that people will understand the purposes of the system. And therefore more likely to be abused and manipulated.
Unless you're going to restrict voting by IQ, this system is doomed to defeat.
Go back to the drawing board desu.
Xavier Wilson
pro big gouvernment, pro gibs, pro imigration?
Jose Gutierrez
Monarchy unironically.
The aristocracy kept the king in check. The aristocracy used to represent the people.
Austin Williams
If only you really understood how bad things really are. Conservatives LOVE big government and globalism is a conservative viewpoint. As for the gibs, what gibs? Compared to even ten years ago, what gibs? Your brain is mushy.
Logan Reyes
the system in it self is not elaborate.
the list of unrelated political ideas is long however. and the current systems are far more complicated. remember: the additional stuff is a pic and choose list. and less complicated then most party programs.
Jackson Martinez
and voting by net tax payers is a pretty good, easy to test and fluent estimation of IQ. the proposed regulations to the voting system should reduce random factors in the selection of voters.
Camden Green
Obviously, you have a high opinion of the proposed voting populace...
You do understand that Jow Forums folks are the 1% as far as political interest AND IQ go.
Brandon Howard
Perhaps the shortfall could be mitigated by requiring voters to have ongoing education about current events
Jonathan Mitchell
they may be less shitty voters. and mostly men.
Jacob Evans
to counter this there are three additions in the "additional" section:
- meritocratic staffing of intermediate gouvernment offices instead of just whim- based
- a long term office with a partial veto right and non binding general influence / descission capability if the gouvernment is unable to reach consensus.
- other possitions may be staffed by means of liquid democracy ( watch the according burgerkrieg video, it explains it pretty good)