Fuck Youtube

At what point do we consider youtube to have gone too far and how do we burn it down? How hard would it be to start independently uploading youtubers onto other platforms so that youtube can't eliminate content, but rather send more viewers directly to their competitors with every time they do with as little effort as possible?

Attached: mumkey.jpg (225x225, 12K)

What are some ways in which we can fuck with youtube?

False flag the videos of the retards they featured in rewind

That's a good idea . A YouTube archive that automatically updates specific YouTubers who could be in danger of being censored . One of you autists should make this happen

Attached: 1544586763893.jpg (768x1024, 53K)

especially someone like mumkey. the guy literally dindu nuffin. the h3 kikes have done more "offensive" content

fuck off denzel.

Attached: 1235566.jpg (1815x1440, 322K)

ye build a house on sand be not astounded when the tide washeth it to sea.

if mumkey jones can get banned, then nobody but the big names and the lefty faggots can.

Why do you hate black people tho .

Attached: 1544435784632.jpg (408x373, 13K)

shit i am a nigger that cannot write for shit

That's the idea, they want to make Youtube PG 13.

reminder that you cannot be a white nationalist and also demand free speech, as fascism does not respect the idea of universal liberal rights

Confucius sayeth let man who goes to bed with itchy bummeth not be astounded when thou awaketh with smelly finger .

Attached: 1544441647663.jpg (635x551, 291K)

Lets get this shit rolling... each of us would be in charge of one YouTube channel.

Where would the videos go, BitChute?

Liberal rights does not respect freedom of speech in practice.

silicon valley

he who walk, arrive.

Attached: jwwwtub3.jpg (1852x290, 167K)

and yet it at least recognizes the concept in theory as legitimate. WN and fascism do not even extend a theoretical approval

He who runs when not in a hurry , arrives quicker needlessly

Attached: 1544409360100.png (500x375, 189K)

Right, one is honest the other is not.

I have two questions about youtube

>1) why are they censoring edgy content when they already have youtube kids?

>2) with the adpocalypse why didn't youtube just put disclaimers near the ads that warn the viewers that the advertiser isn't related to the content?

Am I smarter than the ceo of youtube?

Your idea doesn't include outrage mobs or censorship of "undesirable" content

Attached: 1544432345032.gif (320x180, 661K)

I don't know how people can be so dumb they think it's a good idea to reject universal human rights. It has literally never ended well even a single time in modern history, unless maybe you count communist regimes on the terms of pure economic/industrial improvement.

There is no such thing as universal human rights.
I'm not even sure what you're crying about here, there is no single ideology for white nationalism, and why would it be much scarier than regular nationalism, which already exists?

Bitchute.

They don’t care about ads. They don’t care about creators. Jews only use that excuse to shut things down they don’t like. Youtube never makes money and never will but, next to tiktok it is invaluable in terms of intellectual property. If youtube can decide to destroy a random normie shitposting channel just because they felt like it encroached on their “news” territory, nothing is safe.

>There is no such thing as universal human rights.
what do you have to gain from believing that? I can't understand why anyone would say that for a reason other than just trolling or being edgy. No country would benefit from such a rejection long term

>universal rights
amerimutts really are out of touch with reality

Attached: E3EE17ED-E5B1-4A61-9C35-6617943DF7B9.jpg (480x360, 7K)

Every country benefits from beliving in no universal rights.

It's not trolling, it's literally true.
I might ask you the same thing, are you trolling or retarded?
The three biggest powers regularly don't obey the ''human rights'', your country included.

PROTIP: Universal Human Rights were created in Robespierran France

right-wingers are not inhuman according to leftists

off with your head

human rights are meaningless

Stream.me

* right-wingers are inhuman

>The three biggest powers regularly don't obey the ''human rights'', your country included.
what are the big three powers? To my understanding a system that recognizes rights and the democratic right to representation will always outlast a system where violent revolution is needed for reform.
>right-wingers are inhuman according to leftists
you mean anyone who isn't a sociopath

The USA, Russia and China.
You can count the Eu too since it's illegal to insult people, like in my country.
It's sick to see someone from the USA pretend not to know how useless something like human rights are when your country regularly casts it aside.
What gave you the right to invade Iraq?

I'm not saying that the US actually respects human rights in practice, just that it's a valuable thing for a society to believe in. I think it's still a better place to live than Russia or China, but not better than parts of Europe.

There is no reason to believe in the current conception of 'human rights', like I said it's made up and the people who profess to uphold them break it often.
There are many things wrong with it, probably too much to go real in depth with it but if I were you I'd read some criticism of Liberalism, since there's much to criticize about it, for example the idea of a human is all off, it paints the human as an individual, free in nature and without obligations. They base their ideology around that when in reality a human like that does not exist.