What should be done about big tech monopolies?

What should be done? Join them. It's a only a problem if you're not in it.

Flash a custom android ROM on your phone, don't use any other Google software. The only really difficult ones to go without are Google pay and Google maps, so you'll just have to deal with it.

Day of the rope.

Attached: Day of the Rope Pepe.jpg (600x597, 34K)

Commucuck.

It's their fucking God given right to infringe on our rights. That's capitalism. The biggest and toughest wins and the weak die.

Are you a Catholic German? Maybe that's why you don't understand the white man's Protestant capitalist system...

Only faggots and Lenin sympathizers think regulations are the right thing to do.

Prosecuted for breaking free speech laws.

apply existing anti monopoly laws, make corruption a capital punishment

No one is calling to end Capitalism you elitist shill. We are going to end up with something far worse because of shills like yourself.

Capitalism without competition due to monopolies and government preferring them through policy is not capitalism and not an example of free markets.

slap some sense into them. If your company operates withing the United states, it is beholden to its laws.

Can't tell if troll or bootlicker.

Attached: Confusing Bait.jpg (300x301, 7K)

He likes his prison.

>What should be done about big tech monopolies?
They should be regulated by the very definition of a monopoly. Or nuke them, they are all cancer anyways

That's unrealistic to expect from the average user.

What would a broken up FB look like? So i have to have one app for my dad and his new wife and another for my mom and all those black fellows shes been hanging out with lately?

Attached: FB_IMG_1542749143035.jpg (720x402, 21K)

>What should be done about big tech monopolies?
Choose:
A) Make them public utilities
B) Break them up.

Break Amazon into Whole Foods, AWS, retail, distribution (warehouses), distribution (shipping), film production, Instant Video, etc. Break Google into Android, cloud services, search, gmail, mapping, Youtube, etc. Just nuke Facebook.

Attached: bigtech.jpg (1040x197, 88K)

PRISON for raping and eating babies

Nothing directly.

Support gab, bitchute, etc. There really isnt much esle you can do to weaken the stranglehold that silicon valley has on the internet as we know it.

YES!

Attached: nuclear.jpg (1173x879, 84K)

Trust bus them

nothing, they are murdering media companies,
people have significantly switched off from media agendas, the people could end up in a fresh mind space soon, ripe for red pilling

A

>Google literally founded from a Pentagon slush fund
>Amazon didn't turn a profit for 15 years and then grew tremendously after they won the contract for CIA cloud computing
>Facebook started as an extension of an NSA profiling program
>capitalism

come on Kek, breaking them up would be more chaotic!

>Why should Google and Facebook be allowed to silence dissent to aid our ruling class’s efforts to turns America into the Third World and destroy the civilization that we inherited? If the NAP says we are not allowed to stop them, then to hell with the NAP. Political systems should serve the interests of real people, not some ideological constructs of philosophers. And if private companies become a threat to the just interests of real people, then it is the duty of responsible men to rally government force to stop them.

Attached: 1538612689362.png (527x353, 214K)

At least we'll still have the constitution.

Turn the lights off.
All of them.

Not possible. You break up google, everyone will just go back to google. Same with Facebook. Whatever component of facebook that Zuckerberg ends up at will just rehire everyone, and users will all go back to that one because nobody wants 100’s of social media accounts.

You can cut them down, but they’ll grow back overnight.

Except there IS a ton of competition. Social networks are FREE, users are not customers. Ad buyers are the realcustomers, and have a plethora of other options of where to buy ads.

To go a bit further with Google:
Youtube
Doubleclick/Adsense/ad shit in general
possibly break off Adsense by itself since it serves multiple ad platforms
AI/self-driving cars/etc
cloud services
hosting services
search engine
gmail
maps
Android OS
hardware(phones and other devices)
metrics services
Chrome

MS can be broken up similarly.
OS
IE
Other paid applications(Office, etc)
Web services(Outlook, etc)
Bing
game dev
DirectX as middleware(switch to platform-agnostic model)

This, you would have to somehow convince everyone to just not use them and do things like actually socialize and go to local businesses instead of doing everything online in order to make any kind of boycott matter

Attached: 1539809500990.jpg (656x555, 66K)

You are all a bunch of fucking socialists.
Except for he knows whats up

Attached: 1499523701475.jpg (3024x4032, 1.27M)

nationalize them

The key is to break them up into the smallest self-contained pieces to destroy their horizontal and vertical integration and their ability to use one profitable piece to subsidize another unprofitable piece.

Nigger do you think I like google or facebook? they could crash and die for all I care about, but regulating the market will only make it harder for smaller companies be born and take over the current tech behemoths

Nuke Silicon Valley.

Exactly, there has never been a truly "free market" because of the existence of the state. If you say you want no state and just a free market, we will have a future owned by corporations, eventually getting so big they provide food house etc for their workers. So pretty much neofeudalism.

Also this and the fact that the (((media))) prefers these sites because it upholds the state and their jobs.

Socialism well implemented is based.
>ancap
>thinks they "know what's up"

read above why ancap will lead to shit.

But this IS the only short term solution

do you really see that happening with today's giants?

network effects
internet services use publicly funded infrastructure
services where the public can communicate will respect freedom of speech BY FORCE
corporate paternalism and social engineering is being used by treasonous parties and will be stopped BY FORCE

>read above why ancap will lead to shit.
>future owned by corporations
I'd much rather that and be able to vote with my wallet than having to rely on democracy tbqh

>eventually getting so big they provide food house etc for their workers
as long as it is volunatry, whats the problem with that?

Microsoft's mobile OS was actually really good. Still pissed it didn't catch on.

Small companies are only created now with the goal of being acquired by big tech. It's not possible to challenge big tech in the current environment. Google lobbyists visited the Obama White House over 400 times in a six year period.

But realistically, the market will see to their downfall. Many have already taken 50% hits this year and we haven't even started the decline yet. There will be several well known companies today that will not survive what's coming.

Netflix managed to take over Blockbuster didnt it? Because they inovated, created a better product and managed to take down one of the biggest companies of the time
Ofc it is possible, wont be fast sure, but it sure as hell isnt impossible

>publicly funded infrastructure
they do? how so?

>services where the public can communicate will respect freedom of speech BY FORCE
yeah, anc creating a company that respects freedom of speech is much easier without (((them))) using a state to crush you

Institute progressive minimum wage.

Smaller businesses have a lower minimum wage due to having less earnings, bigger corporations have higher minimum wage due to having more earnings. This way increasing minimum wages doesn't hurt small businesses, and large money tree corporations pay their fair share to their employees. No reason to complain about how big they get, because that would just mean if you work for that company you're making bank, and if you're not you'd want to. We could essentially have 6 figure warehouse positions at Amazon (well not that high but you get the pic).

Corporations have been shutting this idea down so hard it's not even funny, it's not even mentioned by any major political party platform or news outlets. Because it's such a damn good idea, but it fucks big corporations. But remember, these big corps are the same ones fucking us over and funding leftist campaigns to import more immigrant cheap labor. We need to fuck over companies like jewgle and faceberg using their own rhetoric, the very word "progressive." How could they be against something progressive?

Shill it hard. If they have to pay their immigrant laborers more, they won't want to import immigrants anymore because shitskins are actually shitty workers. They'll start only hiring white people if they have to pay them a living salary, because for that cost they'll actually want work to get done.

Attached: 346.png (275x280, 40K)

>Google lobbyists visited the Obama White House over 400 times in a six year period.
Exactly, thats corporatism at its finest
Which obiviously wouldnt be possible without a state, at least not with today's degrees

>Maybe 1,000,000 people boycott
>one out how ever many hundreds of millions if not billion people
>nothing happens
I’m no commie, but in the words of Tucker Carlson, “There’s no Nicene Creed of capitalism that I have to by into.”

Facebook is pretty much done. I only use Youtube and don't go on Amazon since I found out the prices are based on algorithms and 99% of the stuff can be found online cheaper.

Make them follow the free speech amendment. They can’t delete stuff they don’t agree with. Only posts/videos/users that call for physical violence. It also has to be well documented and taken to local police.

Also start breaking these companies into smaller companies. There’s no reason why Google needs YouTube and Android OS.

>Commucuck.

No, you fucking retard. Breaking up monopolists is the essence of capitalism.

What you are arguing for is an economy where market mechanisms will eventually cease to function because competition is erased.

Boycotting isnt the only solution, creating a better product can also be one, just not as easy, but definitely more effective
Thats how blockbuster got taken down

>Not possible. You break up google, everyone will just go back to google.

You won't have "Google" anymore in that case because it has been broken up.

Regulate until sufficient alternatives both exist and are financially stable. This may never happen as these platforms have monopolized the people, not their product.

Attached: 14.png (760x749, 494K)

I'm not really viewing it like that situation. That happened because of the shift in the way people watched movies at home. Are you expecting a similarly sized technological shift in the next few years that would shift the playing field in a similar way? Granted it wouldn't be easy to guess, but what comes to mind that could do that other than AI?

Microsoft sure slept on Apple a while back. Microsoft is now the highest valued company in the country (not sure if the recent pullback impacted that...).

Companies like Apple or Amazon or Facebook have such giant fucking moats of money surrounding them that they can survive for a lot longer making mistakes like this than blockbuster.

Clearly the answer is not to break them up but to form some sort of Voltron of Tech out of them. Amaboogle!

Youtube should definitely be split from google. Right now it seems to be a subsidiary of google which is a subsidiary of alphabet. There's no reason they should be allowed to stay together.

Now that they've taken away an entire generation's prospect for happy marriage anyway, we refuse to use them and the society of fuckasses who are dependent on social media can all keep spiraling into the lake of fire together after I die in 50 years.

>deosn't see why all of Europe is no longer feudalist
>thinks neofeudalism via massively powerful IT companies will be ok
>you'll get to vote with you wallet
>won't enforce wrong think
>Oh you want to leave, ok now you have nothing because I provided everything
>goes to another corp with their own PC culture

>vote with your wallet

it isn't even google anymore. it is alphabet. they're already planning for this.

It's a valid question, the one about publicly-funded infrastructure. I'm very ignorant on the subject as well, so of you have some info or a link or something, pls share it.

Force them to gib free money to every citizen for 60 years in a row for all eternity

this is what ancraps actually believe

>That happened because of the shift in the way people watched movies at home.
You're right, I guess it would be more accurate to say that Blockbuster didnt adapt to this new market as good as Netflix did, but still, there was innovation and a better product, if netflix was all janky and slow, people would most likely still be using blockbuster

>Are you expecting a similarly sized technological shift in the next few years that would shift the playing field in a similar way? Granted it wouldn't be easy to guess, but what comes to mind that could do that other than AI?
Honestly, I can't say for sure, we have seen a gigantic technological boom in the past 20 years, I mean, I would have never imagined I would have a machine that allows me to communicated with anyone in the world that also fits my pocket. The market is unpredictable, and good ideas will always spread as long as there is freedom, which is something directly threatened by the existance of a State

>that they can survive for a lot longer making mistakes like this than blockbuster.
Its true, they also learned that in the age of information, you have to adapt or you will die faster than ever, thats why they are so willing to lobby for heavy regulations, because once those are in place, such as Article 13, those big companies will be the only ones able to afford that, making smaller ones much less present and much more likely to die out
There's nothing more threatening to a big company than the free market, where good ideas can arise at any time and the current leaders be surpassed overnight

Yes, and the moment it is clear you will not kick people off for being politically incorrect, the (((media))) will gin up SJW rage against your Nazi platform and payment processors and hosts will drop you.

Attached: 1541752373964.png (1000x1000, 102K)

Lol, the tech giants are the ones doing the regulation

>What should be done about big tech monopolies?
Split them into 4 different companies each

he's a google employee/astrotrufer

>break them up
>implying they still wouldn't cooperate under the table

I understand where you're coming from, but there's nowhere on the internet for new alternatives to exist and thrive without getting nuked to hell or bought out by the same people over and over again
It would literally take the internet either crashing or everyone boycotting the internet entirely

Offshore them completely. Indians are already best at technology anyway.

Here’s what Trump did:
>Gave them massive and permanent tax breaks
>Allowed them to continue mass importing foreigners specifically so they don’t have to hire Americans

Good idea actually, you'll end up breaking them and everyone will stop using them completely lol

Why do pajeets come here and immediately begin to whine about racism? You have to choose between being a poor oppressed minority or the master race. You can't be both simultaneously.

Well, that's what he does in his businesses.

That is why I brought up Microsoft. Have you ever seen any of the Steve Ballmer iPhone videos?

youtube.com/watch?v=nXq9NTjEdTo
youtube.com/watch?v=VWkRgNTJZuM

The guy also had a funeral for the iPhone, lol.

None of these companies are as singularly focused like Blockbuster was. Consider Amazon. AWS will be as big of a part of their business as their online store. $BABA or $JD come and shit on them? They're still around because of their other businesses. Same thing with Facebook or Google. Apple to a lesser degree, but again, the money moat. People make cracks at their iPhone sales while the niggers still have $2-$4+ EPS per quarter. They aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

I can definitely see the Disney streaming service putting a big dent in Netflix. I'm barely even considering Netflix in any of this. They seem like the least harmful even though their content is PC dog shit. They also seem like they would be the easiest and first to be replaced. They aren't nearly as branched out as the others.

I'd like nothing more than to be totally incorrect and see them all fail.

Like I said in a couple replies to people other than you, I think that if they do fail or get surpassed, it will be after our next sever market crash. Many of these companies have already taken 50% hits from their peaks. The downturn hasn't even started yet. They've rocketed so high that they will all be hit the hardest. I can see competition from smaller companies being much more realistic at that point.

regulation, no one involved in money transfer can refuse a person's business sue to non-illegal beliefs, expression, or actions

Yes. It's called winning you fucking Bernie bro.

Jeff Bezos is smarter than you or me. He deserves what he has earned. What right do you have to tell someone that they're not entitled to what they have worked for? If you think you can meddle in someone else's life and get you things you don't deserve (in this case freedom from Bezos) go and march with Black Lives Matter. If you don't want to be Bezos' slave, do what an honest Anglo Saxon would do and work hard and innovate so that you're his equal.

Let me put it this way, if your are helplessly beaten and raped by a man who has overpowered you, does nature have some sort of regulatory body to make the rapist to stop? No. So why should capitalism? Capitalism is the natural order. Don't fuck with it. If you don't like it, stop being weak.

Facebook is crashing down and Google might be next.

Amazon is still going strong though.

I said I'm okay with companies voluntarily giving food and housing to their employees if they so desire, no one should be forced to provide it nor accept it

Nah they wouldnt, it would not be smart to not invest in a market without government intervention, its just too dumb, even if its to fit in your agenda, we're still talking about companies after all, and they all want money
But even if that were to happen, as i said before, it wouldnt take long for some creative faggot to come up with a solution to this problem and possibly capitalize on it

They are lobbying for it, they cant enforce anything outside their plataforms, this is called corporatism

>but there's nowhere on the internet for new alternatives to exist and thrive without getting nuked to hell or bought out by the same people over and over again
I disagree, companies still depend only on our individual money, and all big companies today also had to start somewhere too, if you want the situation to change, why not start looking for such smaller companies trying to make a change? or even better, start your own!

are you being ironic?

>Have you ever seen any of the Steve Ballmer iPhone videos?
Nope, but now I have, lmao
Thanks for sharing

And its true, none of these companies would have survived for so long if they didnt start diversifying their products and seeing what works or not, ofc heavy regualtions and lobbying helped too but to a lesser degree
They certainly wont be overthrown anytime soon, but if you truly wanna see them fail, and I'd say many people on this thread want to, you can start by doing your part and avoiding their services as much as possible, speak out against them, expose their flaws, like Google's Dragonfly or Maven, and how Amazon treats their workers, seek out and fund different services, and even start your own if you have a good idea
Imo its way better than trying to convince a majority to vote for a policitian who hopefully will keep its promises and will also hopefully manage to convince others to take instances against those companies, which is also still immoral cause they're interventing in someone else's property, and then still hope the courts wont take some sweet shekels to decide in favor of (((them)))
Voting with your wallet works, and you're not forced to be part of a system if you dont want to, in ancapistan, at least

Wish I could try it, but will probably switch to samsung. Apple has gone off the deep end.

So something like this, I know somewhere in europe implemented it, thought it was germany.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_wage#Relative_earnings_limit

Amazon and Facebook are not monopolies. Anything you can buy from Amazon you can buy elsewhere. There are also real competitors for the web services division. I've never had a facebook account in my life -- not even a fake one. Such a useless service can't be a monopoly.

Attached: facebook_censors_md.jpg (800x569, 110K)

nothing

Attached: 1541798227982.png (1472x2212, 1.04M)

Attached: GOOLAG.png (1300x944, 655K)

god damn you are the reason peoples think every american is god damn stupid beyond repair you align words you don,t understand
you are a walking dumpster

Attached: Google american inventors.png (1876x880, 539K)