TEXAS FEDERAL JUDGE STRIKES DOWN ENTIRE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
>A federal judge in Texas said on Friday that the Affordable Care Act's individual coverage mandate is unconstitutional and that the rest of the law must also fall.
REPUBLICANS USED LIBERAL TRICKS AGAINST THEM!!!!
Other urls found in this thread:
chicagotribune.com
finance.yahoo.com
cnn.com
nationalreview.com
foxnews.com
twitter.com
Post a link, you faggot. Stop this sourceless cancer.
It’s cnn it won’t let me post link
I just heard it on the news.
>A federal judge in Texas said on Friday that the Affordable Care Act's individual coverage mandate is unconstitutional
No fucking shit. What took that judge so long?
B&RP'd
I see POTUS just twote about it...
This is good.
As much as I am against the ACA, SCOTUS already ruled it was constitutional. and remember, Roberts twisted the knife last time
The irony being, of course, that SCOTUS upheld it finding the mandate to be a constitutional tax
Roberts changed the meaning to a tax to make it legal.
Yes that’s what I am saying. And fuck Roberts for that.
>Bernard O'Bama
Read before posting or go back to faceberg faggit
Holy Shit guys I just saw the invdividual mandate fly over my house!
I read it ya dumb cunt. The individual mandate was already ruled as constitutional by SCOTUS. Kys faggot
>when you're 40% white and still the most based state
W E W
E
W
Faggot should've done this 5 years ago
The individual mandate no longer exists. Obamacare's constitutionality relied on Congress' ability to tax with the individual mandate. Now that that "tax" no longer exists, Obamacare is unconstitutional.
that was with the individual mandate, without it that could change.
finance.yahoo.com
"Texas and an alliance of 19 states argued to the judge that they've been harmed by an increase in the number of people on state-supported insurance rolls. They claimed that when Congress repealed the tax penalty last year, it eliminated the U.S. Supreme Court's rationale for finding the ACA constitutional in 2012.
The Texas judge agreed. "
Wonder if Roberts will find a new way to cuck. Hope not
Hmm, doesn’t look too bad.
This judge seems like an absolute piece of shit. Some of his past work is an absolute travesty. This guy just struck down a law preventing asshole government agents from abducting Native American kids off of their reservations and forcing them into foster care. This is the same kind of globalist shit that this board fucking despises, unrooting people from their true culture and feeding them some lobotomized cosmopolitan shlop "culture" is unethical as hell.
>Judicial activism is ok when it favors conservatives
eh, it'll be overturned
taking away health care, fucking dope!
red-pilled judge!
not even being ironic, nationalized healthcare is a good thing.
>triggered
Unironically yes. Kill all lefties
The logic seems sound to me desu.
How does this retard not understand republicans played them?
People can be turned into agents of the opposing team, even if by coercion. Think about it as reverse compromise.
Why do you guys so badly want to pay 180$ for salt water?
What the fuck are you talking about?
Faggots like you are the reason we're in such a shit state.
>durrrr, they are forward passing, better not do it too because reasons
Douchebag
>convervatism has been a big fucking failure for the past ~60 years or so
>let's keep doing it!
I don't give a fuck anymore. Play to win or go home.
Oy vey the goy are refusing their shared responsibility to pay for my health care
Its literally another shoa
The do you want to pay for changs surgery so bad?
You liberals liking that activist judging now?
Play stupid games 9th circuit, win stupid prizes. Maybe they'll understand now how judicial oversight on the national level needs to be handled by the SCOTUS?
>People are celebrating this
This will kill people
I do not want to foot the bill for some niggers crack addiction 9r whatever, let them die,
Anyone this kills deserves it
Go to bed drunky
Oh, get fucked. It's shit insurance. This system raised the price of good insurance. Oh, more people who previously had none now have some! Good sentence, but it means nothing when it's poor coverage that you have to pay for. Less for your money and more shittiness for everyone.
Cry some more in your teepee faggot. Here’s your blanket.
This isn't activism, but let's assume it is for a moment. I don't give a flying FUCK. Liberals love to rule from the bench. If you start shit, you don't get to choose the method of combat for the other side. It's going to happen to you, and you're going to like it. Same for all those (R) losers in congress. Based Texans saving this country.
Five years ago the individual mandate still existed.
Exactly. New rules. We play to win.
Lol you sound like Dan. Agree, though.
>tfw ((your))guy Kavanaugh is the swing vote that keeps it legal
>another Jow Forumstard needing to be spoonfed instead of taking a few seconds to look it up.
This board fucking sucks.
Fuck yeah. I can't wait to be denied healthcare for the rest of my life because I have allergies. Free market healthcare is so based.
Of course it's unconstitutional. Everyone knew it. How much money did they fucking steal from us over this stupid shit. I want my fucking money back!
nationalreview.com
This public-versus-private distinction is crucial, because studies of Medicaid do not find the same positive effects on mortality sometimes seen in studies of private insurance. Researchers have found that Medicaid patients with a variety of conditions and medical needs experience worse outcomes than similar uninsured patients. In a randomized trial in Oregon that gave some individuals Medicaid while leaving others uninsured, recipients gained no statistically significant improvement in physical health after two years.
Die in a fire you absolute fucking moron.
DRRRUMMMPPPFFF!!
I just don’t get how one could be mad about the government not forcing you to buy something any longer. What have they done with people. This is that smooth talking niggers fault for sure. He lowered so many peoples’ defenses towards tyranny.
Who has been paying their Obamacare tax?
This is why the right loses. Why are they fighting a battle from 8 years ago? The courts should be ruling that birthright citizenship is unconstitutional.
Texas is the last bastion of real american freemarket capitalism.
I remember having layovers across US and texas is the best. Their airport is the best in my opion
>thinks giving people a semi-affordable healthcare option that is barely subsidized takes more money away from your pocket than muh military muh police muh keep people in prison muh super tacticool border commando force
No, nigger, that's basic etiquette. You post a God damn link so we don't have to do legwork to ascertain whether or not this is another one of the countless slide threads plaguing this place. We had an influx of summer fags who didn't know better and now it's a trend. Show me an article and I'll read the whole damn thing and then do further reading on my own, but don't make a thread with nothing but an image and a bald statement that something happened unless a fucking nuke went off or something like that.
Wow only 8 years too late. Winning..
I'm perfectly fine with paying the police to lock up degenerates like you. You're right that the military wastes a ton of money blowing up sandniggers though.
Yes, it's always the black guys fault, isn't it?
>costs more to put one person in prison than send them through an artificially priced college degree
>making healthcare a 2020 election issue
I guess both parties like to shoot themselves in the dick. Between the Russian shit and the GOP not coming up with a solution for Obamacare while killing it...well good luck.
If the supreme court found it constitutional, how can a lower court change that?
This ruling is based on a recent change in the law, the supreme court will probably uphold it again after this is appealed
It’s not a tax, it’s a fee. It would be a tax if everybody had to pay it. It’s a fine becuase you have to pay it if you didn’t do something. Which is pay one of the fascist companies
Healthcare was one of the biggest issues last election (2018)...and Democrats won big on that issue.
The difference is that the common person actually benefits when you lock away the trash of society. It's a sensible policy. Nobody benefits when the taxpayer is forced to pay for some low IQ moron's gender studies degree.
shiiit this is real. Will John Roberts find his balls this time and uphold this decision?
foxnews.com
>clearly they don't want to insure my because I get the sniffles sometimes
>not because I'm a gigantic fatass who smokes a pack a day
$2100 from me
Well Kavanaugh already supported Obama Care when he was a Federal Judge. Watch him side with lefties again.
Fuck off back to pleddit. Tradition here is to cite and link, faggot.
>What have they done with people.
Leftists are perfectly fine telling everybody what to do and forcing everybody to do what they want. Where have ya been the last couple years especially?
It’s not a tax if you can opt out of it.
based texas
But it’s already been deemed constitutional as a tax
Good fuck that Kenyan nigger piece of shit
>Muh rules for radicals only works for me
Get the fuck out. The left shifted the overton window so far to the side of playing dirty that it's started to bite them in their asses. It's and here's why it's beautiful.
I agree. But I am just saying Kavanaugh is not based and is a lefty in disguise. I hope I am proved wrong but i doubt it.
That went out the window when trump killed the individual mandate.
O into: it’s not a tax soundbite
JUST...
Even though his parents are liberal faggots it still makes me sad.
I think this is the logic:
>in 2012 SCOTUS oks law, says its a tax because of individual mandate
>in 2017 Republican Congress passes a new law providing relief from the mandate
>now the whole ACA is unconstitutional
kek would be funny if Republicans accidentaly repealed Obamacare through their incompetence
>Died of SIDS
Literally died of death.
The democrat in 2020 is going to make Medicare For All their campaign slogan and won't have to run on anything else to beat Trump in a landslide.
The law was changed to remove the tax penalty for not having coverage. The constitutionality of the law hinged on that being in place the first time around.
I think we all know they're putting all their stock in Beto. We need to get a headstart on the memetic warfare campaign.
SCOTUS should have struck it down in 2012
by not doing so they abandoned any pretense at legality
You're ok leaf
Jesus that's fucking sad
Yeah and you think the economy wont matter to people.
Voter in 2020: "Let's see my choices, provide free healthcare for wetback beaners and niggers or keep having an income of money for my own pocket. Hmmm which shall I choose "
