The Bible goes into detail on the size and dimensions of this ship, you can't pass it off as some metaphor
Christians actually believe this retarded shit
Ark scaled as listed in Bible
It happened faggot. Just like the sixth trumpet is about to happen
Kys
What if the only animals you've ever seen in your life amount up to like 20 species. The book doesn't have to be a metaphor to not be taken completely literally.
>hur durr 2 of EVERY animal ever
proof it didn't exist?
Ockham's Razor, nigger
Ancient jews had magic powers dumbass. Don't question it.
Yeah, dogs, coyotes, wolves, etc.
Yes, it happened. London and German museums have most of the wood. Also, ararat is in Iran, not the modern ararat of turkey
What’s the problem?
they saved the dna
It's not a metaphor it's an adaption of the story in the epic of Gilgamesh.
The story came from ancient Mesopotamia which was prone to flooding. There is historical evidice that suggest a massive flood did occur a long time ago there and that is the basic for the flood story.
yeah that's retarded
The simplest explanation for mezocene fossils found above 6000+ ft in the Himalayas is that...some hue put them there. Got it, Bruno.
Imposing that atheist-strawman version of Christianity as real deal is among the main reasons people in West are abandoning religion. Christians should just accept that most of it is mythology and focus on moral aspect instead of miracles and supernatural.
!
look here: Yes, Christians do believe this literally happened. How can you take this seriously?
The Babylonians knew about the flood as did many cultures and made their own myth surrounding it. They came after, not before.
Sorry, not sure if you meant this as an argument or a simple ad hom. Waiting for something I can reply to.
What’s the problem?
The universal flood and "ship' is present on various ancient cultures not just the hebrew bible. What is total bullshit is the Exodus, that most likely never happened nor did Moses ever existed
The size of waves and storms on a global ocean would be so incredibly rough and hard-hitting, a ship the size and shape of the biblical ark would be split in two after the first few waves.
I thought the bible discredited dinosaurs?
Welcome to Orthodox
Meant it as an ironic response, newfag.
>Christians should just accept that most of it is mythology and focus on moral aspect instead of miracles and supernatural.
I can do that while sleeping in on Sunday. Failure to focus on miracles and supernatural - the one thing that sets Christianity apart from woo - is the reason people in the West are allegedly abandoning religion.
Any shred of evidence? Because there's scrolls like 4000 years talking about Moses. Waiting
In the journal Science, 22 November 2002, secular scientists reaffirmed something that has been well known and accepted. All dogs from wolves and dingoes down (the word “down” is important as you will see) to poodles are all closely related. From a biblical perspective, this means they are all within the same kind (one of the kinds that God created to reproduce “after their own kind” as we read 10 times in Genesis 1).
The researchers stated:
“The origin of the domestic dog from wolves has been established … we examined the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence variation among 654 domestic dogs representing all major dog populations worldwide … suggesting a common origin from a single gene pool for all dog populations.”1
“Two-kilogram teacup poodles; 90-kg mastiffs; slender greyhounds; squat English bulldogs: For a single species, canines come in a vast array of shapes and sizes. Even more remarkably, they all come from the same stock. … Only subtle differences distinguish dogs from coyotes, jackals, and other canids, making family trees difficult to construct and the timing of the transition from wolf to dog hard to pinpoint.”2 Now how does this fit with a biblical creationist model of origins?
Many articles in this magazine have illustrated the fact that natural selection and speciation are real, observed processes—understood by the science of genetics.
>The
[citations needed]
There are multiple flood myths spanning multiple civilization and societies near and far from one another. The Biblical flood as is told in Noah's Ark never happened, but was an allegory for a disaster that occurred millennia before the Old Testament was even a thought.
Kentucky, right? I want to go
>I thought the bible discredited dinosaurs?
Only complete simpletons do this
> The book doesn't have to be a metaphor to not be taken completely literally.
Spot on
Your point being?
I didn't say they recorded it as it happened. If you'd read the epic of Gilgamesh youd know it's stated that it happened a long time ago before the time of Gilgamesh.
Actually dogs were domestically twice separately, once in Eurasia and once in Eastern Asia
Any archeology evidence? Also jews being slaved on Egypt? Nope not a single one
All the other ones happened but not the Christian one?
How big would those waves be, since you are clearly an expert on...hold on let me consult your post...storm sizes in global iceams.
Have you run mathematical models, or even physical models or do you just, you know...know?
The flood you're referencing was the post ice-age flooding of the Arabian Sea, which used to be above water from Ethiopia to roughly southern Pakistan.
The area was inhabited, and with rising oceans, the land was eventually lost.
The current theory is they just sped up the timeline in the myth(s).
>multiple flood myths
They aren't myths, any time the flood shows up in one of the countless historical texts, its not talked about as some mythical thing
Its pretty obvious that around 12,000 years ago the earth had a pretty substantial flood, what the cause of it was is very much up for debate, but to deny there was a flood at all is completely idiotic
There is a stele that talks about the Hebrews being enslaved, there is also mention of Joseph.
Here we can observe the christian, incapable of defending his bullshit religion, he resorts to insults in a desperate attempt
To claim the authors ignorance means that those books are either inaccurate, or untrue. If they really are gods word and everything in the bible is gods word, one shouldn't say they are actually untrue because the author was ignorant.
>They aren't myths and they are all referring to the same flood
Fixed
It did happen it but not as stated in the Bible as being worldwide it was localized to Mesopotamia.
The reason many cultures have flood stories is because they were often times located on rivers or coast.
>dogs
>wolves
>+4,000 years ago
Think a little harder about this, mate.
It's quite simple really. It's just rogue waves on steroids. Air currents flowing over the ocean, moving water mass, and with no land masses above water to breal those air currents, or at least slow them down, it will just keep gaining mass and momentum.
>apart from woo
what did he mean by this?
Focsuing on the miracles and supernatural allows critics to point out those miracles and supernaturals are fake, leading to christianity losing even more relevance. Religions today can't claim to hold scientific truth or knowledge about any miracles or supernatural, they exist as moral guidepoints and answers to what happens after death, not much more
Show me please? Also Im going to sleep, I will check it out tomorrow
Realistically Noah would have only had to save the land mammals and reptiles that would have been found in the middle east, flying animals would have been fine, and the aquatic animals would have hardly been effected
Birds do need to land eventually, user.
No. The civilization-ending flood from the Bible did happen, but the story of Noah's Ark in relation to it did not happen. Just like all of the other religions and societies that have flood epics. The flood happened, the particular epic tied to it didn't and was an allegory used to describe said flood.
Jesus Christ. Myths, epics, stories, call them whatever the fuck you want. My point was all these stories stem from that one flood some 12,000 years ago.
It definitely has something to do with so many ancient civilizations suddenly disappering...
Read the article, dingus.
Rivets found on Mt Ararat
>what are glacial movements?
Don't be stupid there is a reason why in the story the birds come back to the ark.
Also sea dwelling creatures are often times very sensitive to changed in tempature, salinity, and ph.
it's sad, you are forced to believe these delusions
this is the level Christians are at
What cultures are you referring to?
not saying the words are untrue. Just saying youve misunderstood what is said.
That's not an argument
>aquatic animals unaffected
>a freshwater fish will die in salt water in a minute
Yes we can the size and dimensions of something imagined are meaningless to weather or not that thing exists you need hard proof of the arks existence.
Found the kike.
Sorry, I wasn't aiming at you, just clicking on it to add to the thread. Great article, I saved it.
Because your textbook told you so?
Yes
There are many ancient stories about a great flow all around the world.
REPENT HEATHEN FOR THE JUDGEMENT COMETH SOON
I think this pic is appropriate for this thread. Seas levels some 12,000 years ago.
About flood related references? Sumero, hindu for instance. If not then is whatever I will go sleep now
Unless they had a random evolutionary adaptation
:^)
Q predicted this
I'm always amazed at the arrogance of you children.
>yes we can
>weather
>you need hard proof of the arks existence
lol the mental gymnastics that went into this post were probably so effortless
Do you even know what ockams razer is dipshit? Because declaring ockams razer only works when deciding on a solution to a problem, look it up.
What is this, an ark for ants?
I'd have to search for it. Just duckduckgo it yourself in the morning. Remember, Atheists infiltrated our university system and they've destroyed lots of evidence as well as have been caught in multiple hoaxes in their desperate attempts to prove Darwin right.
An ithcasourus lives underwater right?
this goes to prove, you scratch just beneath the surface of a Christian and you find all sorts of childish fantasies and delusions
this is why intelligent people don't take it seriously
Holy shit, how much time have we been burning fossil fuels??????
they would have been unaffected because the water would have only gotten deeper, water levels change all the time, justs not usually that significant
Still not an argument
i hope to god this picture is a joke, no one can be that ignorant
>Sumer
>Hindu
Both located on rivers, and on coast
>WTF DOOD THEY HAD FLOODS THIS IS TOTALLY PROOF OF A GLOBAL FLOOD
C'mon be reasonable
>Claims to be intelligent
>Does nothing but spew retarded insults at the non-intelligent
>Makes no other attempt to refute them
>inb4 muh no point in conversing with retards
lol
Millennia, apparently.
>all of the animals noah brought on board were babies
>mathematically 2 basic kinds of every animal could fit on the boat if they were all babies
>OP is retarded and literally cant stop sucking cock
That doesn't address the issue of salinity for the freshwater fish. I'll grant you that freshwater "lakes" have been found in incredibly deep parts of the ocean where water and air pressure allow for such anomalies to happen, but it doesn't seem very likely to happen withing 40 days and 40 nights.
It's sad how atheists and agnostics tend tend to believe in delusions like socialism or the almighty power of the state
wait till you find out the great ape species are fake and portrayed by hollywood actors in suits specifically to make you think this way
>I'd have to search for it. Just duckduckgo it yourself in the morning
You are a fucking serpent
why would someone spend all that money and waste all those resources?
> see! we did it in the 21st century! noah's ark confirmed
I no longer listen to modern Christians and their morality. I'm not going to turn the other buttcheek because someone who believes there were dinosaurs on the ark tells me to.
That "Christian libertarian" thing is just American really, European Christians tend to be bluepilled sheeples. If political Christians in Finland had their way, we would have much worse nanny state.
You are completely ignorant to even begin to compare a flood from a river or a coast line to the flood that MANY cultures and civilizations mention
Taking it seriously and it not being a metaphor.
All you satanists and sodomites will burn soon