Thoughts on Abortion?

its reasonable in a society where if you're under 19 you cant raise a family

Pregnant women cannot drink alcohol so they murder their future son/daughter to keep the party train going.

>Thots on abortion
Bread and Butter

Attached: FB_IMG_1544858907762_eightbit.jpg (1172x1920, 259K)

>against their biology
You're clueless about biology. Half of all embryo/fetuses spontaneously abort.

Nothing but graphics and emotional pleas, no real evidence.

They're pressured into it by shitty men. They learn the hard way that murdering a child has consequences after they do it so they don't do it again. Instead, they trick future boyfriends/husbands into thinking they'll kill another child only to reveal, after they get pregnant, that they won't ever do that again and instead bring the worthless asshole to court. Women win those court battles because all they have to do is prove that the father didn't want the kid born.

So basically it comes down to 2 things:
1) Dumb women kill their kids because they're either ignorant or are manipulated into doing it.
AND
2) Smart women want abortion legal so that they can trick dumb men into getting them pregnant with the false promise that they'll kill the kid. Those dumb men give the women all the evidence they need to win in court.

If you ever know a guy who tries to talk you into trying to get your GF/wife to abort your kid, you can bet your ass that he got reamed in court for trying that, now pays child support for a kid he has no custody over, and wants you to be in the same position as himself. CRP is a good example of this kind of subhuman piece of trash.

Attached: Portrait_of_Niccolò_Machiavelli_by_Santi_di_Tito.jpg (1244x1600, 231K)

That is a self-correction mechnism, where the mother's uterus actually fights with the embroy about the amount of nutrition and the bloodflow that the embryo can obtain through placenta. Those embroys that fail to attach sufficently strongly and embedd themselves to start consuming monther's nutirents are terminated by the body and are flushed out.
It'sa natural pre-selection process that ensures that human babies are not even more underdeveloped than they already are as compared with other animals.

People think that every instance of unprotected sex ends with pregnancy, but in reality, you need on average several instances of intercourse to have a baby due to how hostile the female reproductive system is to all the sperm, not to mention, the small window in which the egg is released and is waiting on impregnation. The only way that people do end up with all the kids that they have is that they just have tons and tons of sex in the end and that balances out all the odds.

Wasn’t my point. I am saying that under a Darwinian framework , they should want to propagate their genes

>In 2007, someone who identified himself as Scott Roeder posted on the website of the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue that, "Tiller is the concentration camp 'Mengele' of our day and needs to be stopped before he and those who protect him bring judgment upon our nation." This was reported by the ADL's Center on Extremism, noting that Roeder called for "the closing of his death camp."

Reminder that Anne Frank would have approved of bombing abortion clinics

Attached: AnneFrank_001-ALT.jpg (687x1117, 531K)

It's murder for convenience. But to your original question - why do women do it? To avoid the consequences of a child. A lifetime of commitment and responsibility.

see
Its often not the women who want the kid killed but rather the father.

"Its often not the women who want the kid killed but rather the father."

I won't argue that at all. At that point, it's going to be tough for the woman. If she does the right thing, she'll stand up to the father. But it might not be a pretty picture. One consequence of the sex could be a life time of single parenthood. Still, it's not the innocent baby's fault. He or she deserves their right to live just as you or I.

Bump