Real Christianity

When I read Christian history I see the likes of Constantine, crusaders, and colonialists, flagrant white supremacists who punched their enemies back. Yet when I read the Bible I see nothing but God supporting jewish supremacy in the OT and pacifism and cuckoldry in the NT. Did Christians get it wrong for 2000 years and a real Christian is a zionist cuck?

Attached: 1542288628820.jpg (646x595, 42K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kike
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Yes, that is right fellow Rabbi. I will now no longer be your Christian enemy but an atheist.

Lmao, if I'm wrong then prove me wrong. Why is the Bible so liberal and cucky?

Jews migrated to Rome, spread christianity and used Christianity to further subvert nations. Vatican has always been corrupt, and their dominance of European countries lead to some of the worst famines and wars in history.

The OT is completely jewish its even part of their faith. Yes Christianity has always been about subverting people, it's a cancer meant to pacify and enslave the goys.

A real Christian is a sheep while a fake christian is the proud person who tries to take everything by force. Humility works in the long run.

So Constantine, crusaders, and colonialists weren't real Christians? They're the ones who successfully spread and preserved Christianity. It looks like being proud and taking everything by force is what works in the long run.

There's only one valid religion for whites and it's nationalism, the rest has pros and cons, cherry pick the best of pagans, christians and atheists maybe even take a thing or two outta islam and that net force along secular idea is the true way.

Christianity is cucked, but behaved many times not like that, simply because they didn't practice what they preached, Pizzaro didn't turn the other cheeks, nor did Richard the Lionheart, they just used it as an excuse for the inherit drive of white men to subjugate lesser races, now thanks to the jews "men" are turning into s.oiboys that would cry like a bitch if someone hit them.

>now thanks to the jews "men" are turning into s.oiboys that would cry like a bitch if someone hit them.
Is this not the Christian way? Jesus said to turn the other cheek, not hit them back.

>He found in the temple them that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting. And when he had made, as it were, a scourge of little cords, he drove them all out of the temple, the sheep also and the oxen, and the money of the changers he poured out, and the tables he overthrew. And to them that sold doves he said: Take these things hence, and make not the house of my Father a house of traffic.
>pacifism and cuckoldry

And Jesus was what, if not a kike from a mother who cucked a beta fag ?

Pic related

Attached: serveimage.png (616x226, 108K)

Crusaders were literally Catholics, the Pope told all the soldiers they would be saved if they took Israel

The infographics show has some short episodes on Hell and Satan, which offer a glimpse of how many layers of interpretation modern religion has been sieved through. Remember Bible is very old and very translated.

So all along real Christianity is being the opposite of Jesus? Sounds crazy, but makes more sense than getting the whole thing wrong for TWO MILLENNIA

Attached: 1507258790967s.jpg (250x220, 6K)

Here OP

Attached: 4chan+on+jesus+httptvtropesorgpmwikipmwikiphpmaingoodisnotnice_58c91c_6080297.jpg (900x1210, 339K)

NPCs will never understand this.

>Yet when I read the Bible I see nothing but God supporting jewish supremacy

That's because you're a faggot and deranged in the brains...
You should learn to read first or something...

Attached: Jews bad News.jpg (726x572, 157K)

God does not want violence being done
by his children, the non whites can do
it all they want because they belong to
satan and lilith.

that's what you get wrong OP. slice
your throat for misleading people
with this bullshit.

The Bible is only liberal and cockish if you have a 2 year old's reading comprehension.
Ever heard of "sell your cloak and buy a sword"? Ever heard of "I came here not to spread peace, but the sword"?
The bits about "turning the other cheek" means choose your battles. If you fight every battle that's thrown in front of you you're a fool.

No. When Gandhi said that it was either during or shortly after WWII (remember he was a pen pal of Hitler's) and the early stages of christcuckery were in motion. This is to what he was referring.

I've been looking for this. It exemplifies that Jesus really was more like the God of the Old Testament than he gets credit for these days.

Good luck getting a christcuck to reference anything like this in defense of necessary violence.

No, I'll continue to mislead people until you finally give me the answers. That's your punishment.

Attached: 001.jpg (1920x1080, 359K)

Jesus told us to be vigilant and carry a sword.
St. Paul told us to eliminate those around us who contaminate our faith...

You're such a brainlet liberal influenced loser that you can't even *have* an opinion on the subject, simply because you seem to lack the capability to understand the very shit you say.

Jesus will come back, first we will all be deceived though

>God supporting Jewish supremacy
Even at Israel's strongest they were never very powerful. God only promised the Jews a homeland that was secure (some other things as well but I digress).
>God supports different things in OT than in NT
Read the Bible you moron. This fucking meme drives me insane. What would be the point of the NT if it was literally just a rehash of the OT? The law was fulfilled, not abolished.
>pacifism and cuckoldry in the NT
There is no pacifism in the Bible. I don't have a great parallel for what Jesus did in driving the market out of the Temple, cause American society has no good parallel. Imagine if someone took a hammer to the Bull Statue on Wall Street, and then started chasing Goldman bankers off the street. In what world is that guy a pacifist?
>Did Christians get it wrong for 2000 years
Everyone gets it wrong eventually. Sometimes whole societies get it wrong. That being said, Constantine was justified, the first couple of crusades were justified, and the colonialists were mostly justified.
>inb4 turn the other cheek
Turn the other cheek when the dumbass across the bar starts cursing you out for no reason. Turn the other cheek when that guy at work who hates you for no reason is being a dick again. You don't turn the other cheek when someone is trying to kill you or destroy your livelihood. You have two cheeks, so you can bear if one is hurt. You only have one life, and cannot bear its loss.

i will turn you my cheek once, and after that i will woop your ass kiddo.

Also Being Christian means being in spiritual warfare for the rest of your life.

Before that Satan does not care about you. He will construct strongholds in your mind that will keep you from believing in Christ.

Good post.

Attached: XP.jpg (1500x2057, 893K)

'But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father in heaven. Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.'

>Give me answers!!!
>To those questions I didn't ask!!!
>Give me!
>Or you're in the wrong!!!

Typical amerimutt behaviour.

>You have two cheeks, so you can bear if one is hurt. You only have one life, and cannot bear its loss.

This.
The turn the other cheek freaks blow it out of proportion, as if Jesus had came to earth to spread those few words or if that was the central mensage of the Lord.

It is not.
Turn the other cheek just means "conserve your energy" and "don't sweat the small stuff".
It's actually pretty sound advice.

I believe Jesus said to turn the other cheek specifically when one slaps you, meaning when one annoys you or wants to get under your skin or humiliate you you should simply "agree and amplify" and be imune to other's peoples provocations and keep a strong frame of your own.

But we see the Jewy ways to destroy us all by appropriating this almost irrelevant and sound advice out of proportion to harm us.

Attached: Kek wills it Crusade.jpg (552x310, 24K)

Okay, explain to me why the three C's Constantine, crusaders, and colonialists are more Christian than a zionist pacifist. There's my question.

Way too wide. Impossible to read.

Paragraphs need to be at least 1/2 that wide to be readable, if not narrower. You should be able to see the beginning of the next line in your peripheral vision while focusing on the end of the current one.

If that makes the image too skinny overall, break it into two columns.

I can tell the people making these caps don't actually read much because they get this so wrong.

I am NOT reading on a phone. I'm on a widescreen monitor in portrait mode (I'm a code monkey). It's annoying that in order to make the text large enough to read, I have to scroll back and forth with each line.

Daily reminder that kike, as a derogatory term, was coined by christians and catholics

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kike

Okay, this is the best way I've ever seen that verse explained.

que livro sem ser a biblia me aconselharias a ler irmão?

And even on a normal monitor, it's irritating since you have to literally pause your stream of thought when you reach the end of a line to find the beginning of the next.

First, the OT is not about "Jewish supremacy". The true Israel is the Church as Paul makes clear in Roman's 9, and so when God is working through Israel in the Old Testament, he is working for the good of those elect saints. Any benefit received by Jews who were not elect in the Old Testament was done as really a secondary result of God's desire to bless his church. And yes, there is an element of supremacy in the sense that God calls his people to be set apart as a royal priesthood, but not because of anything about the Jews (or Christians in the NT) that merits God's gracious favor.

As far as "cuckoldry" goes, you're fundamentally misunderstanding the providence of God. In both the Old and New Testament, God specifically says:
>Vengeance is mine, and recompense, for the time when their foot shall slip; for the day of their calamity is at hand, and their doom comes swiftly.’ (Deut 32:35)

Furthermore, you have to understand the Bible's view of suffering something that is used by God for the refinement of his people.
>For we know all things work together for good for those who are called according to His purpose (Romans 8:28)
>"For this is a gracious thing, when, mindful of God, one endures sorrows while suffering unjustly. For what credit is it if, when you sin and are beaten for it, you endure? But if when you do good and suffer for it you censure, this is a gracious thing in the sight of God." (1 Peter 2:19-20)
>"7It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? 8If you are left without discipline, in which all have participated, then you are illegitimate children and not sons. 9Besides this, we have had earthly fathers who disciplined us and we respected them. Shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits and live? 10For they disciplined us for a short time as it seemed best to them, but he disciplines us for our good, that we may share his holiness.

so christians, is science evil or not? is technology evil or not? is mass manufacturing evil or not?

Your post is the kind of gross ignorant shit that makes me hate your kind of Christianity. Never has God provided vengeance against someone who wronged me. They usually end up becoming popular.

you got it

You are correct

That popularity won't work out for them when they're tossed into the lake of fire for eternal damnation

That’s because you’re a faggot

>Zionist Pacifist

Truth be told that you'd have to define these two words for me in order to get a straight answer.

Neither Zionism nor pacifism have anything to do with Christianity, user.
Christian sort of pacifism is just that it is better to have times of peace than times of war.
Isn't that universal?

Unlike moslems who end up creating wars wherever they pop up, Christianity tends to lead to a peaceful society once it's properly implemented, maybe this is the "christian pacifism" you're thinking about, but that's just a consequence of the effectiveness of the system.

I know, I didn't make it.
It is still a good read.

Glad to hear that, user.

wow, do you see the irony of asking for divine justice against someone who just said bullshit about you? seriously grow a pair

This.

It's not about the the book or stories. It's that whichever religion conquers the most foreign lands and people or converts them is the correct religion to choose. That happens to be Christianity.

Suma Theologica by Thomas Aquinas.

I don't know you user, for what purpose? What power level are you on?
What do you want to get from the reading?

The Pascendi Dominici Gregis encyclical is also a good read for those who don't understand how much red pilled Christianity truly is (or was supposed to be and has historically been). But that needs you to have a very high IQ and a good dose of patience.
I bet most people who read it understand close to nothing (100 to 120 IQ types).

Okay, I understand that, but how were the three C's justified?

Have you tried reading the old testament?

Doesn't matter if I want to follow it. You need more than one good person to make a functioning society. Convincing others to follow it is nearly impossible. Most Christians want to follow Matthew and nothing else so they can smoke weed and fuck each other.

Constantine, what about him?

Crusaders? Sure. The objective of the crusaders was just to protect Christians attacked by moslems.

Colonialism? Do the peoples under it get better or worse of?
In those places where the natives were mostly exterminated (wrong) what was built in their place was better or worse for the world?

Colonialism was mostly justified in the way of spreading Christianity to others so that they can be saved by the lord.
Of course, excesses were always wrong and what not.
It is a very complex topic to talk about in such a general way, in my view.

Attached: Tupis e Mamelucos.jpg (1163x536, 263K)

Because youre a arrogant pig. God does not change according to your shitty belief system

>In those places where the natives were mostly exterminated (wrong)
I don't think it was wrong. In America the indians often struck first. They were also Africa tier savages that didn't deserve to live.

Why not just murder them while youre at it? There is a very good reason why tooth for a tooth brings stagnation, and head for a tooth catastrophe

He shouldve met the pagans

I sort of agree with you except that all human life is sacred and what not...

In America the Indians fought and lost. No big deal, it happens all the time.

Nothing wrong With colonialism. America was a satanic hellhole before the Europeans brought them the gospel

How many times have you wronged others? If you deny any wrongdoing, youve decieved both yourself and others

>America was a satanic hellhole
>was

But yeah, I agree with you.
It was mostly a force for the better, even though shit happened along the way, as it always does.

bump

Obligatory christcuck post

The Chad Judaism vs. the literal virgin christcuckstianity.

Attached: CuckusMaximus.jpg (986x629, 163K)

You read the cuck version, read NAV or KJV

What do you have against Douay-Rheims

The Rheims is missing a lot of subversion common in modern Bibles but it also has some jewy subversion like censoring the antimiscegenation verses in Tobit. The New American Bible is basically an uncensored Rheims and includes the missing books unlike the KJV. That’s why the NAB/NAV/NABRE is the best Bible.