Why and under what law and sense is pedoporn illegal in USA...If freedom of speech is legal...??

Why and under what law and sense is pedoporn illegal in USA...If freedom of speech is legal...??
Be quick I am in middle of a fucking LGBTQ debate from conservative side.

Attached: 1545226253381-402733035.jpg (3264x1836, 2.45M)

gotta be old enough to vote in order to be able to have rights.

stand up and demand everybody's attention towards you.
beg God for forgiveness and then kys.

you're welcome.

>LGBTQ debate
The fuck is wrong with you

Freedom of speech != abusing children

to expand on this, you have to be 18 in order to be in porn because that's when you're a legal adult because of voting age.
before 18 you're not allowed to fuck off camera either because you have no rights.

It's not only child porn that is illegal in the US but also clothed images of children that are considered to be sexually suggestive. I don't know if consumers of suggestive images have been convicted of possession of child porn based on such images, but I know producers have because I recall researching it once.

Possessing actual pictures of child exploitation and abuse is being complicit with the act itself.
Fictional novels, drawings, paintings, sculpture, and other forms of fine art are free speech, and banning such things is indefensible. That's the sort of shit that touched off the French Revolution.

Quick my turn is just 5 7 minutes away...I need real points of law and logic...
I can't lose to these degenerates..And can't watch youtube at this moment

I hope you spill your spaghetti.

>debating kidfuckers
Pedos get the bullet, user.

>I said to them that it is denegrate because children can't consent.
They don't know right or wrong.

Now they want me to eat shit.

Its context sensitive. Your mom having a picture of you as a baby naked isn't considered cp, but having cutouts of childrens clothing models mixed with other pornography would be considered cp.

Awesome...Now I am white supremacists.
I think we are winning.
I am Indian btw

freedom of speech does not extend to the depiction or encouragement of illegal acts. The sexual exploitation of children is illegal, and so are all products resulting from it.

Fuck! Where is the success of capitalism?!? India is not successful...3 more turns and my chance. Can't defend it there, the place was shit when I came from there in 08.

They are now on socialism and India. They had to be routed after they started calling me white supremacists

>Your mom having a picture of you as a baby naked isn't considered cp
What if she gets aroused when looking at the picture?

Heyy...Please stay on the points..I need it

>abuse of undeveloped minds leads to unproductive damaged adults, if fucking child was sooo fucking awesome then why most nations that are wealthy and high productive where people are free have it illegal. You can imagine that in the last 50.000 years if not 12.000 of civilization we've tried and test everything, and having a certain age where we consider people adults and responsible for their actions this also includes sexual activities. If it would have been a good idea, we would have embraced it along time ago, especially that we know that some cultures today still marry children between families from the ages of 12 and those nations and countries do not produce the most productive and most motivated people that created the modern world where we able to guide our destiny with our hands towards a bright and better tomorrow. Thus providing pedo-porn will only create a demand and an increase over time of abuse of children.
>Freedom of speech, not sure exactly that freedom of speech and having the freedom to voice your opinion has to do with pedo-porn, but throught freedom of speech we the people are not longer bond to the elite to follow blindly, even if we still do, but we do the legal standpoint where we are free to speak, sadly thats not 100%.

Truth be told, this should be a debate about hate speech vs freedom of speech
Why isn't freedom of speech when you call someone a filthy nigger or a a greedy jew... WHEN THEY FUCKING ARE A FILTHLY NIGGER AND A GREEDY JEW

If there is a nice black guy, you call him a nice black guy.
If he is a nice jew, you call him by his name, but when the jew comes to you with a special "loan offer" for you his goy, you call him a greedy fucking jew.

LOL. So basically now they're trying to defend socialism by pointing to a country where people shit in the streets and just toss dead bodies wherever?

If it was different I would have done it easily faggot!
It's tough..help or bump

India is a socialist shithole. Places where capitalism is successful? Easy. Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Chile. Places where socialism is successful? Nowhere, ever, period.

I am stuck..Because India is doing great on paper and GDP..If that's socialist..I lose.
I need good point unfortunately in India's favour.
I have fended off for 10 minutes because I somehow proved india is pro capitalism.
Quick ain't gonna have second chance now, and professor is KEK!

Obscenity is illegal, freedom of speech is for political speech.

seriously.. India is "great" "on paper"? India is the worst shithole there is. It's literally a hole filled with shit and dead bodies. They have an entire class of untouchables, who are probably excluded from their statistics in order to make them look better. They have horrible air pollution because their socialist policies make economic progress impossible so they can't afford pollution laws. They have horrendous poverty and can't even afford basic shit like toilets. You chose the wrong damn side of that argument.

Children cant consent
This every interaction with them is literally literally rape.

all pedos should be mowed down in the street and their bodies hung up on light posts

It's a violation of freedom of speech and goes against the constitution.

There's really no two ways about it.

Attached: 751.png (769x733, 34K)

India is capitalist as fuck

>open factories
>cram them with workers
>manufacture goods at rates lower than competitors
>take market share through economy of scale

The reason India’s GDP is growing is down to global capitalism.

>so are all products resulting from it.
Stained bedsheets are illegal?

Laws were intentionally broken to create the digital content for distribution and sale. This would differe from a security video of a crime where the recording was unrelated to the criminals acting.

Attached: memeflags.jpg (821x1024, 210K)

Scotus justification said it served no "societal value" so they banned it.

Basically its an unconstitutional ruling to appease retards who fall for the muh chillun bullshit.

Attached: ff.jpg (400x600, 26K)

>be 18
>Can vote
>Can't buy smokes
>Can't buy beer & Liquor
>Can't buy pot in states where legal
>Can do porn
>Can join military and kill in distant lands
>Based merchant rules.

There is nothing to debate, or discuss. Any notion that pedolove, as an idea, deserves to even be debated is DOA. All pedos get the bullet.

Attached: Nonononono.gif (250x186, 2.43M)

1. CP is a $3,000,000,000 cake.
2. Jews will bend backwards to pick up a penny.
If we continue to let jews run the world's politics, it's just a matter of time CP gets legalized.
With oversexualization of everything around you the next generation (which consists of now underage cam-whores) will see nothing wrong with it.
It's fucking over dudes. We need those nuke codes ASAP.

Attached: 1541804786475.jpg (228x271, 22K)

Jews are the ones who criminalized it you fucking dunce. It was legal before america was completely overrun by jews. Same with the age of consent being far lower.

Those $3bln is probably underestimation.

Attached: CP-industry-stats.png (1043x1585, 90K)

illegal for goyim, you dumbfuck pedoscum.
The jew don't apply goyim laws to themselves if you haven't noticed yet.

>The absolute state of wikipedia.

3 billion dollars my ass. It's like no one here has ever been on the deep web.

Illegal at the scotus level you backoedalling retard.

Just like age of consent getting raised by women around 1900 when, coincidentally, jews started coming in and shortly after the fed was established.