Why are Conservatives smarter than Liberals?

Is it all the hispanics, blacks, and illegals that identify as Democrats that is holding the party down?

Attached: IMG_2935.png (856x1015, 136K)

>Why are Conservatives smarter than Liberals?

Attached: lib_dam.jpg (625x935, 135K)

Smart people oppose both democrats and republicans

It's basically European vs. non-European IQs. Mestizos and negroids don't score well in intelligence.

Because 5% of them are brilliant while the rest are useful idiots and the other half just want free things.

I originally thought libertarianism was the way to go too until I realized all libertarians do is just stand by and let shit happen. If you're just an observer, you're not helping fix the problem.

As opposed to their general platform of shit like transgenderism, pedophilia, open borders, and islam? It's not that they filled their party with subhuman shitskins as much as that they chased everyone intelligent away.

Attached: pie.jpg (1280x950, 171K)

The problem is both republicans and democrats
the solution is the collapse of America

>The problem is both republicans and democrats
Democrats are anti-European. Republicans are pro-Israel. Make America European Again.

Does 5 IQ points mean any difference whatsoever?

Republicans love America and want to improve it.

Democrats hate America and want to replace it.

Attached: IMG_2950.jpg (920x1776, 210K)

>Republicans love Israel and want to improve it.
>Democrats hate Europeans and want to replace them.
ftfy

Not gonna happen. Are you Chinese?

no, I am not
collapse of America is going to happen no matter what you do
similar to this, you are just a puppet of elite schemes, for yourself, you should always want to destroy your own elite

Being a fencesitter is cringey as fuck bro, especially when you try to give your opinions
>Haha you voted?!

The OP is in regard to verbal intelligence i.e. ones vocabulary and the proper usage of words. This is no surprise since lefties are contantly redefining the meaning and context of langauge as well as coming up with shit that many people refuse to acknowledge.

the only difference between republicans and democrats is time

That's pretty deep bruh

Not being a republican or Democrat doesn’t mean you’re a fence sitter, it means you’re not a mindless sheep.

Now That's What I Call Fencesitting: Volume 23

Because the modern left cares about feelings over economic prosperity
The modern right cares about economic prosperity over feelings.
Feelings are and other E.Q. bullshit hinder intellectual honesty.

>mindless sheep
So why give a fuck about politics at all then? What are you, a mindless sheep?

why fight over nothing?
you are putting your energy into a pointless fight
if you do something, do something useful

>102.7 has a bar more than twice as tall as 97.3
lol do you work for nvidia?

>if you do something, do something useful
It's really funny when fencesitters say this type of epic stuff while they sit here on Jow Forums.org/pol/

>he thinks bar graphs are linear by default
Holy shit, this democrat right here is proving the graph IN REAL TIME!

Attached: foldsbackin.png (707x592, 622K)

If I make a bar graph that goes from 0 to 300, the gap between 85 and 100 won't seem as significant.
If I make a graph from 65 to 120, it'll seem much more significant.
Welcome to information-presentation manipulation tactics 101

Why make a bar graph of a mean that could only realistically range from 80 to 120 start at 0?
>Are we including the average IQ of carrots in our measure?
>No?
>Ok, then start it at 80 and save the space in our paper for actual words and data and shit.

>only realistically range from 80 to 120 start at 0?
For Equatorial Guinea
If 59 is the average, how low does it actually go?