Remember when the media was anti war? Now if you try to leave a war you're weak and it must be you're working for putin

I meant Iraq not Iran

Why don't you just poo in it if you care so much.

ISIS is just warmed over Soviet era bullshit.

There is no such thing as finishing the job. Lucky for you your country will never have to worry about such problems.

>Implying American MSM has ever been antiwar
What the fuck are you talking about? It's true they gave some concessions to Obama's antiwar campaign themes, but man, not only FOX but CNN and MSNBC fired reporters who opposed the invasion of Iraq in 2003. And this happened despite the Republican president they otherwise hated.

>this pullout will leave a vacuum
Except for the troops from France, Russia, Iran, Syria, and Turkey.

Because leaving a vacuum like this is what allowed ISIS to emerge in the first place. I don't want international terrorism in my country. Gee, but I guess I should just go back to poo in the loo

>he thinks the war in Syria has anything to do with ISIS
You have to be 18 to post here.

No, arming, funding, and training Al CIAda is what lead to ISIS. All you had to do was leave them alone instead of Hillary Clinton and Barak Hussein Obama and Vallerie Jarret and Samantha Power and their ilk start them back up again under a different name.

When the hell is Victoria Nuland going to appear on TV to answer for her genocidal war crimes? Where's Robert Kagan?

Unfortunately I do have to worry about this problem because these ISIS fighters return home and put on a 'good guy I was just confused' mask and the (((media))) pressures the government into letting them back into society.

Obama and Israel armed ISIS . Only way ISIS reforms is if another commie dem becomes POTUS.

>It's quite obvious this pullout will leave a vacuum
I agree, and god knows they'll need it to clean the place up.

I agree but now you've done the same thing again with these "moderate rebels" against Assad. What do you think they'll do now once the US is no longer there to keep them in check?

Israeli
Special
Intelligigence
Service
How about just sending one of India's nukes and glass all of Israel? The problem will then be solved.

This
I'll hear you out on this, but the US has been in Afghanistan since 2001. The US invaded Iraq in 2003. The puppet masters will always ensure the job is never actually finished

Classic America

>Fuck up stable country
>Drag allied forces into unwinnable conflict
>Leave allies in the shit

Let Russia clean them up, ideally.

Don't forget to purchase our Nike, Coca-Cola, Levi jeans, and iPad.

>>Fuck up stable country
You think Syria was stable? Do you ever read the news? They've had a civil war there since 2011.

wtf I love war now

This. All of the Middle East has never been stable in modern times and it will never be.

Attached: 3984795.png (894x2584, 663K)

Apparently you weren't listening to neocon talk radio, or else you'd know they've been terrist HQ for over a decade longer than that, kike asshole.

it's the timing user

Yeah just like the allies cleaned up Libya and Iraq. It is in Russia's interest to keep ISIS alive as a boogeyman and maintain their presence.

is he getting blackmailed?

Fuck off

>but why american goyims want to mind their business

(((Their))) attempts at trickery are laughable at this point. (((They))) truly are the enemy of the people.

Attached: wqsyeiluogz11.jpg (1200x928, 114K)

That's their business if they want to do that. I think what they really want is to maintain their warm water port and keep a strategic regional ally so that the neocon (Jewish) arc of destabilization stops before it hits Iran.

This shit is expensive for Russia.

>this pullout will leave a vacuum.

No, with the Israeli proxy army called ISIS defeated, it will leave the country to the legitimate government they've had since before you knew anything about Syria.

Miss me yet?

Attached: 1545248533000.jpg (407x509, 22K)

Maybe because it’s pointless and we should let the sandniggers solve their own problems for once

Hmm let me see

>Civil war
Olga booga Islamists killing themselves

Vs
>International war
My blood and taxes spent on Israeli weapons bombing sand

Tough call rabi.

>How about just sending one of India's nukes and glass all of Israel?
nukes are no longer a threat, China, Russia and USA have star wars style protection, we have to allow a launch for it to happen, all 3 of these nations of course have reason to allow a launch against Israel

The media has always been pro-war. You're talking out of your ass.

The New York Times of all outlets promoted that liar Ahmed Chalabi and every WMD lie Bush ever said. NYT reporter Judith Miller went to jail defending the lying Bush admin over their fake Iraq yellow cake uranium claims.

The media cheered when Trump bombed that Syrian air strip in 2017 and was on his side for that brief moment.

>The media has always been pro-war.
except Vietnam

Fucking hate how the American media tells you what to think about any development, stating as if it were fact that this is related to Putin instead of just reporting that Trumo withdrew from Syria.

You know the world is in a very bad position when (((the media))) criticizes a US president for not staying in criminal middle eastern unjustified warfare, either for israel or oil and resources.
I can already see that as ironical as it sounds, leftists will use this as an argument against Donald Trump "LOOK ! He pulls out of a war in which we have nothing to do, and against countries that don't even remotely threaten us ! IMPEACH!"

I need a good narrative about left wing hypocrites re war and intervention. After 9/11 Dem party supported war. when Iraq started getting drawn out they used anti war sentiment to try to defeat Bush (failed) and Romney (succeeded). But if Dems and Republicans are all on the same side playfighting, why use this against the Republicans at a?

Do you really want all this inventory to simply rot in the warehouse

Attached: tmp_30492-images(3)-1158589286.jpg (258x195, 20K)

What? You must be new at life.. The media has never been "anti war"..

That would be a dayum shame compared to blowing people up with it.

You're right, but if they didn't then they wouldn't be a world power.

>poo in loo wants to poo in politics too
Go clean your streets and when you've learnt how not to shit in your streets and make toilets you can come back and talk.

The media is Jews.
The Syrian War was fought for Jews.
Israel wanted America to invade Syria and stay there forever.

All of this is objective fact. Now that Trump wants to leave, the international cabal of Jews makes their moves against him. There would be no "power vacuum" in Syria had the Jews not created this conflict in the first place.

>Remember when the media didn't serve kikes?
I don't

Maybe because it was more obvious that bombing empty jungle was pointless in a gurilla war where the enemy is willing to die and your forces are not.

Liberals love war

The same media will tell you that intervention in Venezuela would be a mistake while praising Obama and Clinton for toppling the government of Libya. They're schizophrenic.

Add a picture of the pentagon next to microsoft, pfizer, bush, clinton, facebook, jpmorgan, and all those other cringey allies of the #resistance.

A long time ago, when the jews weren't swarming everywhere so obviously, the ethics and purpose of journalism was to present information that did not have any opinion coming with them - leaving the decision making up to the people, while only presenting facts, evidence material. Now they do not show any fact and evidence because they make shit up, and tell people what to believe and what opinion is or isn't problematic. The true opposite of what it's supposed to be.
This is why gas chambers need to be real

>Remember when the media was anti war?
No, but I remember when lefties were. Major media has basically always been pro-war. This is because they are thinly veiled fronts for the CIA.

The worst example is the "fact checking" by the media. Not only do they try to fact check opinions, but they also cite themselves when fact checking statements. The NYT and WaPo are especially guilty of this

Your comments make no sense.

no it was just a happy way to get people who would be politically active to feel demoralized and swept away instead of claiming right to their position in the political process

they already got the rubber and the heroin they needed to fuck over the blacks, Betty Ford sold enough helicopters for a quarter mil each

but they needed those vets to die so they wouldn't take over the politics and move the nation further right, so they did that with media psyops and narcotics

>This is because they are thinly veiled fronts for the CIA.
who work for the elite cabal of American industrialists and European aristocracy

When kill CNN be kill? They are abhorrent.

Genuinely scary image.

>(((American))) and (((European)))

Sure they do. Syria being terrist HQ was a sandard neocon talk radio line since at least 9/11, when Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, and the rest of them blew up the 9/11 towers as their "new pearl harbor" to justify a succession of military engagements across the middle east, which angered Zbigniew Brzezinski because it was ham-fisted and set back his plans for American Primacy and the geostrategic imperative of controlling Cental Asia.

Who's controlling Central Asia now? The neocon kikes fucked it up even harder now by pushing Russia and China together over the whole silk road thing.

Except for Assad? What if Russia wanted peace...should we be against that?

Let Russia have it. Let Iran have it.

Assad put up a good fight against our CIA color revolution. He earned his country. GG, no re, I say. No reason to not be a good sport about things.

with jews? never

>isis is not real
So are your twin towers lmao

>if
of course Russia wants peace. They have the GDP of Spain. They're not in a position to project force in any meaningful large conflict.

Should we be against that? We don't want Trump to look like a puppet

kek

Nobody cares what Trump looks like except for the genocidal kikes in the media.

>Don't be daft, Brandon.
>be a warmongering neocon
or you could go, and go fucking start another one in your backyard, or install another puppet regime, and cope with the immigrants yourself, you filthy (You) harvester cocksucker

It has to do with what Turkey has concerning the Kashoggi assasination. They threatened to release info showing info came from the oval office to aid MBS in killing Jamal. Since Blumpf put himself firmly behind MBS Turkey has him by the toes. He's now a complete puppet. Also Kim Jong Un said he's not removing nukes until USA does first BAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: 1567898234.jpg (1069x812, 243K)

Attached: 2k48t0.jpg.cf.jpg (400x485, 14K)

Are they pro war or just anti trump?

I really cant tell

This is different, in Iraq we destroyed the government and left, this is a civil war that we didn't start, but intervened in for no good reason. We shouldn't be there. Nobody but Syrians should.

>They threatened to release info showing info came from the oval office to aid MBS in killing Jamal.
Jamal went to the Saudi consulate in Turkey for paperwork related to his marriage. They told him to come back. When he came back is when they killed him. Clearly, Saudi Arabia doesn't need any help to kill this one guy from the White House or anyone else. You are a terrible liar. You didn't even do basic research.

>leave a vaccuum
Assad is still in control. He won the war using his military full of his soldiers with Russian assistance. This isn't some American proxy war where they install someone with no credibility, use the US military to win the war then are when his regime falls apart when the US military leaves.

>win for russia
Two wins actually. Russia got Crimea and now Russia has Syria.

I always wonder why ISIS doesn't attack the Chinese in Africa but it seems to always find westerners to fuck up.

>Remember when the media was anti war?
No, I don't. I remember Hillary was talking about setting up no-fly zones and being more involved in Syria.

Remember pic related? That was right in the middle of a humanitarian crisis in Aleppo that everyone in the media was buzzing about. There was all sorts of hand wringing about helping in Syria while Yemen was being torn to pieces. American relation sour with Saudi Arabia and suddenly major media cares about Yemen. The bias isn't about war. It's bias about allies.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 85K)

>Implying Israel didn't kill that guy

>((((((ARISTOCRACY))))))

>Clearly, Saudi Arabia doesn't need any help to kill this one guy from the White House or anyone else
yeah but my contacts at slisteen hunny been saying it was Israel from the day it happened

YO HOL UP

*smacks lips*

YOU MEAN TO TELL ME THAT

*tilts head and squints*

UHMMMM

*strokes chin in mimicry of a thinking human being*

DA MEDIA BE LYING N SHIT? DAYUM!

>muh vacuum
hi boomer

Except we didn't do any of that with Syria.

>Remember when the media was anti war?
No. I don't.

>No. I don't.
VIETNAM WAR

If Israel pays for the wall....

We need the money to pay for the wall.