If “punching an nazi” or banning their speech is morally justifiable because of what (((they say))) their speech...

It’s simply a talking point to bring up if libshits start saying “by any means necessary” to supposed nazis that the same can be applied to leftists and it’s even more justifiable in that regard, glownigger. And I wanted feedback on it from Jow Forums

'Anti-social redneck views' are what you get when you censor any objection to your fancy, anti-patriarchal, anti-racist utopia and stomp out any public discourse on sensitive issues

>It's simply a talking point
Only because you only want to talk about it, whereas it's actually happening.
>censorship of obvious anti-social hate speech is more detrimental to society than the hate speech
Oh my word.

m8 there is no consistency to any of this, it's all a meme

>I can't stand my ground and argue why 'diversity', mass migration or gender indoctrination are good things
>let's just label it 'hate speech' and ostracize everyone so that we don't have to defend our ludicrous, circle-jerk fantasies

You're correct, even though leftards are too fucking stupid to realize it, and they are physically incapable of comprehending what that leads to.

It's not murder if they're not human

Correct

Attached: image.jpg (1342x528, 440K)

Cry more faggot. Censorship is a thing, it exists, and it's always existed. It's being used against you because your viewpoint is predicated on mass murder. Nobody cares how much you cry. Meanwhile, this is America, a religious conservative majority country where the republican party controls (controlled) the entire governments of 25 US states and all three branches of the federal government and even they think you're a piece of shit. They aren't protecting you because you make idiots shoot up churches. Nobody is trying to hear your complaints. Kill yourself.

Attached: b7ebbf8.jpg (802x960, 79K)

>literally can't argue about sensitive societal issues because he's not sure if he's right in the end
>SHUT UP! RACIST! SEXIST! MISOGYNIST! HITLER! DEPLATFORM IT! DOX IT! BAN IT! SHUT IT DOWN!
That's how you get the violence, sweetheart. Public discourse, a concept deeply alien to modern progressives, it could have prevented a lot of blood, both in the past and in the future.

>That's how you get the violence, sweetheart.
Lol retard there's violence right now. We're not in a situation where -if- the censorship happens -the- the right wing will attack, the right wing is attacking. There's violence right now. So fuck you nazi, what you're warning me of is happening, don't be surprised if I put your warning in the garbage where it goes.

Obligatory

Attached: 1483101804347.png (500x503, 124K)

>hey guys I'm planning on shooting up a synagogue, but I need your approval and blessings beforehand
neck yourself you piece of shit.

Attached: 1535600652734.png (676x502, 196K)

Please kys nu-pol reddit trash

What you see is simply isolated outlets of tension and desperation about the silent demographic replacement and the degenerate indoctrination of kids that people are NOT allowed to dispute. People hate being slaves, so it's quite possible that the most disenfranchised, impressionable ones become rebels.

Bring back public discourse, bring back self-reflection, let people discuss diversity, ethnic replacement, dangers of sexual deviancy without fear of persecution. As they say, public discourse is the basis of democracy, but there's no public discourse in sight.

So no sweat, bring it on. If you're so against participating in an inclusive society that you'd rather rip the country apart than allow diversity to exist unchallenged, get in the street and let's go right now.

>Dʌböl Stændörd

Æ Hazer Wyl Sej Hi Wʌz Bitön

Bʌt Hi/l Nεvör Sej För VVVʌt

>Dejńöl Krεg'z Lyst

Attached: DoubleStandard.jpg (1322x1734, 413K)

'Inclusive society' is a bogus term that lacks self-reflection. Why do white progressives live in homogeneous white neighborhoods? If progressives are better than 'dumb bible rednecks', how come Democrat voters are much more criminal on the average? Are all groups identical, or some are more civilized, community-driven and beneficial than others? If so, why can you criticize one but not another? Those are reflective issues and they take off the thin veil of political correctness.

There's just so much there that doesn't apply to me that I don't know where to start. Meanwhile none of this is in jeopardy because you're not allowed to say nigger. You're not that important. And hate speech: news flash, people just don't want to hear it. And they can make it go away. As long as the government isn't literally restricting you from doing something it's fine. Nobody owes you a platform for racist hate speech or an speech for that matter. You see this happen all the time with minority viewpoints that simply annoy people, do you think white nationalism is such a transcendental ideology that it deserves some kind of special status in the public sphere? Get lost with that shit. Enjoy feeling like a minority. Spoiler alert, we treat minorities like shit.

You are 100% wrong. The problem is that popular right-wing leaders are embracing dehumanizing fascist rhetoric. Most popular left-wing leaders like Hillary or whoever are centrists, they aren't embracing Stalinist totalitarianism or even far-left rhetoric at all. The few politicians who are far-left are amplified to polarize people further. They are usually in minority political groups.

tldr; Trump is the president, he overwhelming represents the right in its shift towards far-right populism. Far-left leaders are not even close to representing the left in any meaningful way. They tend to be way more centrist. Most polls confirm this.

It's funny how you're torn between 'privileged white literally nazi males are enforcing their patriarchy' and 'you are a tiny minority and no one owes you anything' paradigms. So, let's continue our reflective exercise. What exactly makes progressives & liberals the very best of this world that they're so smug and condescending about it? Because last time I checked, people of their leanings are much more criminal and even have a lower IQ. Something doesn't match.

It's weird how in an "inclusive society" explicitly professing your hatred for white people and your desire for their death is not considered hate speech, but expressing a race neutral desire for reduced immigration in order to limit labor supply and increase wages for citizens and permanent residents is considered hate speech and must be excluded from society.
To be more direct, your support for censorship is self serving, short sighted, and retarded, and you are either disingenuous in your arguments or a fucking retard to not see this. While "nigger" can be objectively considered hate speech, it is a highly subjective concept that is susceptible to a slippery slope that it has already rolled down to include any legitimate criticism of globalist policies like mass migration. Meanwhile, objectively hateful speech against whites or conservatives is considered acceptable, proving that "hate speech" and the censorship of it has nothing to do with excluding "annoying" opinions, and everything to do with suppressing all opinions that oppose corporate sponsored globalism. A side note, as an Indian-American I have been treated quite well in this country, and in fact my racial group is now the highest earning ethnic group in the country. If minorities are so badly treated, why is it that only very specific groups seem to be affected, and it's the same groups that have achieved little everywhere they exist on Earth, independent of white influence?

Nice trips shareblue. And cool lie about left wing leaders not embracing far left rhetoric, or do you think youve shifted the overton window such that open borders are mainstream now? Also, explain to me how right wing rhetoric is any more dehumanizing than the portrayal of all men as rapists, all whites as school shooters, etc etc.
>Polls
Good one. You know what's more dehumanizing than any rhetoric? The economic devaluation of humans through overpopulation and globalism. Think about the effect of the lies you are spread for fun or payment. Think about the harm you are causing your fellow man on behalf of the wealthy elite who don't give a shit about you. Globalism helps no one but the very rich, and you are their servant.

What you need to understand is that leftists do not care about truth, objectivity, principles, or logic. Using their own arguments against them is fruitless, they will deflect or call you a liar or otherwise REEEE when confronted with facts and cogent arguments. They only follow one principle: winning. They will say and do anything to advance their causes, and will destroy anyone who opposes them. It's ironic that right wingers are stereotyped as cold because no one is more Machiavellian and deceptive than the leftist. They couldnt care less about following a self consistent ideology. The only ideology that matters to them is that which results in them gaining power and which destroys those who oppose them.

The globalist left have decided to become racially abusive to Whites. They have thrust a collective identity upon them and want to enact punishments against them, some of which have already manifested.

Surely you will have noticed this "dear White people" thing and the "you can't be racist to White people thing" or the insane backlash the left had to the "It's ok to be White" flying campaign (which was a stroke of pure strategic genius).

When you are being collectively targeted by the left for punishment and destruction, not only do you validate racial nationalism but you also necessitate it. If Whites are to be attacked as a collective, why can they not operate defensively as a collective? The left cannot back-peddle to advocating individualism when it is clear that they are supporters of extreme racial identity politics.

White Nationalism is thus a completely politically and ideologically appropriate response to what is collectively happening to White people.

Attached: End.jpg (633x950, 930K)

Based

Are you implying that I can refuse to rent my apartment to anybody for any reason, including being a shitskin?

>Also, explain to me how right wing rhetoric is any more dehumanizing than the portrayal of all men as rapists, all whites as school shooters, etc etc.
This is bullshit. No one except for the most extreme radical feminists follows the former view. The latter, is that even a portrayal?
Mass shootings in the US are overwhelmingly committed by white men: statista.com/statistics/476456/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-shooter-s-race/
There is a need and an emphasis to understanding why white men are committing these acts of terrorism, but there is no dehumanization or fascist rhetoric involved. They aren't calling for white men to be deported back to Europe. Their view is far more nuanced than something so simple than just "Build a wall!!".

No.
WWII was the final judgment on Nazi's being bad.

It's almost like you two need each other. That's not t a healthy relationship.
Lol get rekt, you'd never reveal your heritage around one of these people but you feel safe revealing it to make some kind of point to me, why is that? What's your point? That I won't dismiss you just because you're Indian? Yeah, thanks for the easy out. See, diversity in action.

Wait a second, if you want to have a business in my community and receive the protections that a business owner receives, while the community has to accept your business to operate within it, it's completely valid to require you to obey community standards. You receive benefits, you follow rules to receive them. You're not an anarchist, are you?

>Claims our views are antisocial

>Labels them with a racial slur.

Some day you people are going to push the normal people too far and end up finding out that your bullshit is what turns people into actual Nazis.

Attached: 1535596250889.png (750x890, 1.39M)

>the protections a business owner receives
Care to explain what those protections are?

Wow it's almost like it's not about the words you use, it's about the ideas behind them. I don't make anyone do anything, tough guy. You people make your own choices how you want to present yourselves to toe world.
>gives a very specific situation - landlord
>doesn't understand basic laws protecting landlords specifically
>doesnt know the basics of how businesses have special status
If you dont know the basics, use a different example.

Attached: pol_meetup.jpg (1200x799, 166K)

Any disobedience to the official narrative is hatespeach to the left. You're not protecting anyone. You're trying to legitimize the policy of censoring all descent and opposition.

Remember new fags nothing is more evil than that which the people carrying it out believe that they are doing it for the greater good. Communism is and always will be just one good genocide away from utopia.

Attached: 1539148669310.png (1784x1766, 284K)

You're not owed a platform. You're not entitled to use someone else's. Your tears are tragic, but you'll just have to cope.

>Lol get rekt, you'd never reveal your heritage around one of these people
You must be on weed.

>Most popular left-wing leaders like Hillary or whoever are centrists, they aren't embracing Stalinist totalitarianism

Citation fucking needed.

Attached: 1532498205294.jpg (986x542, 111K)

After reading a few of your post I'm reasonably certain that you are a kike.

Attached: 1534847139456.png (1366x639, 72K)

>You're not owed a platform.

Could you please enlighten me as to what you think the purpose of the first Amendment is. I would actually like to hear you bullshit your way out of this.

Attached: 1535008377838.jpg (888x470, 120K)

>spoiler alert, we treat minorities like shit.
Which causes them to chimp out.
Be careful what you wish for.

Attached: Chimpout.png (500x1013, 296K)

The purpose of the first amendment is to exclude the government from restricting your freedom of speech, press, assembly, religion, etc. What you're talking about is similar to a series of cases that were adjudicated in the late 70s involving political canvassing. It's been upheld that another entity can't restrict you from contacting other citizens in your community because such restrictions would create zones where political speech of a certain type could be excluded or legal processes couldn't be served, etc. Now if you can find a recent example that doesn't include the ability to contact a person at their home, I'll read it, but time and again, specifically companies are allowed to curate specifically comments specifically on the internet and your image is irrelevant.
Oh I'm so scared. Faggot.

You are scared or you wouldn't be here talking about right wing violence.

I'm not afraid to lose a revolution, I just don't want to have one.

>You're not owed a platform
Neither are you.
Keep on your path and you will get one.

Whatever helps you sleep at night bucko

THAT'S MY PEPE!! AND FUCK YOU IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT!!!

Nice cherry picked quotes, my man.
The first one cuts off an important part which completely changes the context. "I'm proud of American record on cultural and economic integration. Of not only Muslim communities, but african communities, asian communities, hispanic communities, and the wave still continues. It is not going to stop, nor should we want it to stop." OMG, integration? He is totally just saying that we should just kill white people LMAO!!!

I notice you didn't address a single one of my arguments and your only retort is "conservatives are racist". You'd be surprised how diverse Jow Forums is, and I actually live in a very white and conservative part of America and I've never been treated any different than anyone else. You know why? Because I'm a contributing upstanding member of society and I look like one. It's amazing how "racists" will treat you with respect when you act respectfully yourself and aren't a social disruption. It's almost like they aren't racist at all, but that they judge people based on their character, and some demographics are correlated with low character on average, and thus suffer "discrimination" based on their inability to function in society and not their skin color.
You ask why I revealed it, and yet I stated exactly why in my post you deceitful scum. Because despite being a minority, I have not suffered for it as you claimed all minorities do. My point wasn't that I was looking for a free pass, which you concluded without actually understanding my post, because you are an actual racist and passed judgement solely because of my ethnicity.

But of course you won't address any of my points because like all leftists you are uninterested in actual debate, because your inconsistent ideas will be shot down. So you resort to deflection and personal attacks in an effort to shape narratives that benefit you. Eat shit brainlet leftist, this is a forum for adults.

Okay shareblue, you roped me in. Actually the portrayal of all men as rapists is very mainstream. If you have attended college in the last 10 years, you will have attended "gender violence" training, where you are explicitly told that men are predisposed to gender violence. The main strategy to combat gender violence is teaching men not to rape. Now, certainly men commit much more rape on average. But let's consider homicide for a moment. Young black men, No one says all white men are school shooters but we need to address the fact that white men are terrorists
Lol. Maybe we should start with Islamic terrorism or black murder, seeing as how that affects far more people dontcha think? And no dehumanizing rhetoric? Have you forgotten so quickly about the NYT editor who faced no consequences for her open racism against whites? Leftist acceptance of anti white racism doesn't qualify as dehumanization?

And how the fuck is "build the wall" more dehumanizing than "you are a terrorist"? "Build the wall" is not remotely dehumanizing, nor is it "fascist". Believing that a country should have control over who enters it has nothing to do with fascism. And finally, pretty hilarious to hear you talk about nuance while boiling all right wing viewpoints down to "build the wall".