One day I hope all of you will realize the truth and the error of your ways

you mean my numbers.

Check these nigger faggots

That's objectively false and you know it.

How so? Please elaborate.

Made everything
Now lick my balls and check these

WHOA NICE PSYOP BRO

>TURNBACKNOW.MEME

See the numbers? I like when you pull hard on them fag

>whites literally figure out electricity, gravity, astrophysics, space travel, genetics, bioengineering, nuclear energy, microbiology...

Yeah, I'm sure nothing could go wrong with the far-leftist ideal of replacing whites with their "equals" that never even figured out the wheel or the sail.

Attached: leftists and the space program.jpg (1280x1338, 223K)

MY BALLS. NOW!

You realize that below the color of our skin, we are all the same right? The culture in the west was what allowed for the advancements, not any sort of superiority. Btw, China was ahead of Europe for a massive amount of time. Anyways, with the cultural and scientific advancements made recently it no longer matters what color your skin is, just how willing you are to learn and try.

so what? You're arbitrarily limiting all of human history to the last 200 years because that's when "whites" did a bunch of cool science shit. China has had a relatively singular culture and empire for the last 5000 years with philosophers,engineers strong religious tradition etc. The Egyptians and Aztecs were doing advanced math and astrology a thousand years before Christ was born. It takes a very very stupid person to have such a narrow outlook on human history. sad.

>You realize that below the color of our skin, we are all the same right

Objectively false, you're practically a deluded religious fanatic.

Attached: 6d1372b43a92749982e0958c0fc27601122f7c84dd78eb6e1e5d180deda47bb8.jpg (1111x1308, 246K)

I checked 'em but I ain't licking

>Aztecs were doing advanced math and astrology a thousand years before Christ was born.

lol wat, are you fucking retarded? Do you realize that the Aztec civilization is not even that old? When aztecs were still hunter gatherers, Europeans were already figuring out serious astronomy.
>anti-white far-leftists in charge of knowing history

Attached: oxford-university-is-older-than-the-aztec-civilization-oxford-university-4470042.png (500x874, 151K)

whatever you get my point lol

nice kippa

>Deliberately ignores logical argument that all people are capable of learning the same shit
>Thinks skull shape correlates with intelligence
>Enter modern day with tons of non-white geniuses
You're practically searching for shit to draw a conclusion you made prior to any research. I fucking hate using stereotypical liberal buzzwords, but I think you're just racist.
You're right about the timeline thing, but the Mayans were doing advanced math around the same time of the fall of Rome.
This. All of this.

I bestow the coveted "Most Jewish Thread of the Day" award to this thread. Congratulations!

>truth
Truth is subjective.

First, before we discuss the IQ differences between blacks and whites, let’s define heritability. Over the centuries, the average heights of both males and females has changed considerably. Both men and women have become taller. Yet, the heritability of height can still remain the same or similar between men and women. This is because heritability is a measure of what causes the average differences between groups or individuals at a given time, in a set range of environments. It’s like using a measuring tool or a snapshot to determine what is causing the current situation. Depending on the extent to which the environment differs between two groups, the environment may begin to explain more of the difference than genes.

We know from adoption studies that blacks and whites who are raised in similar environments have adult IQs -adulthood is when IQ becomes most heritable - similar to what you would expect if the hereditarian hypothesis was correct; blacks and whites perform only slightly better than their respective peers in the general population and the white-black IQ gap still persists. Moreover, mixed children who grow up in the aforementioned similar environments have intermediate adult IQs between that of blacks and whites. In fact, the more European admixture a black child has, the higher their IQ will tend to be when they reach adulthood. After accounting for european admixture, skin color itself has no effect on life outcomes or IQ. Another noteworthy argument for hereditarianism is that Black children who are born to the richest 20% of households have similar SAT scores - the SAT is essentially the same as an IQ test since a person’s SAT score correlates about as well with their performance on an IQ test as the same person’s IQ test scores correlate with one another - as white children born to the poorest 20% of households in the US.

Fuck off commie scum.

Systemic beliefs are maleable by time, arising from variables such as social environment, and economic. Status and even genetics. It's not a matter of error as error regarding subjective issues is strictly contextual. Some of us may change, just as the left, but as core values are made by the multiple causal variables of upbringing, it is unlikely that an extreme shift will occur. Tldr
>no u

where do people get this race realist shit? Is it all really from ecelebs?

You will die and nobody will miss you.

What's your point? Seems you have none except spewing literal falsehoods.

>Deliberately ignores logical argument that all people are capable of learning the same shit
One thing is learning the same shit, another is coming up with said shit in the first place. Sure, even a dumb negro ape could learn how electricity works but it isn't a big deal since the knowledge is ALREADY THERE.

>Thinks skull shape correlates with intelligence
Never implied that, just that race is not just "muh skin color duuuuuude".

>the Mayans were doing advanced math around the same time of the fall of Rome.
Arguable, Mayans didn't even had a concept of fractions.

>You're practically searching for shit to draw a conclusion you made prior to any research. I fucking hate using stereotypical liberal buzzwords, but I think you're just racist.
Oh you mean like how you already came to the conclusion that "everyone is the same maaaan" despite blatantly obvious biological, genetic, cultural and psychological differences?

Attached: 1528053567694.png (800x480, 15K)

Must explain why every shitskin on the planet is dying to live in our countries.

>biology iz not real becus muh feels
The absolute state of far-left cumshitters.

Attached: leftist neocon puppet brainlet.png (900x729, 210K)

Attached: 1539806940334.jpg (768x960, 138K)

Regression towards the mean helps to explain these results. Despite the vastly different environments, black and white children tend to perform in line with the hereditarian hypothesis. All children, regardless of race, born to intelligent or even dumb parents tend to regress toward their population’s mean. Whites tend to regress toward the mean of 100 while blacks tend to regress toward the mean of 85, even if the black child is born to intelligent, relatively wealthy parents. This, in part, helps to bolster the hereditarian argument since regression toward the mean is in part a result of genetic effects (additive vs non-additive genetics) and blacks with an obvious environmental advantage still underperform whites.

Thus far, I have avoided discussing the impossibility of absolute equality. First of all, we know that many of the alleles that are correlated with higher IQ between people in general are not equally distributed between the races. Furthermore, there are a myriad of phenotypic differences on average between the races, pic related. Similarly, we know there exists average differences in brain size (MRI testing) between the races and that brain size and IQ are correlated at 0.4 when normalizing for gender - the gender difference in average brain size has a special relationship with IQ that I won’t go into here. Some studies suggest that there are also average differences in brain composition between the races. Worldwide, we see the same racial trends in IQ that are present in the US, even in places that did not have slavery or segregation. Knowing all this, why should we assume that all differences in IQ test scores on average between races are attributable to differences in environment?

Attached: 824BACEF-D6D1-408C-A1B2-345455777742.png (1334x750, 1.87M)

antifa are spoiled rich white kids.

When we look at the performance of blacks and whites on specific IQ subtests, we find that the subtests that are more heritable and the subtests that are more g-related (the general intelligence factor) are the subtests that blacks perform worse on. This is quite difficult to explain by just appealing to environmental reasons for the black-white IQ gap. In order to explain this, egalitarians will likely need to come up with something that is ad-hoc, contrived, and possibly untestable. Considering the evidence that has already been presented, it’s preferable to invoke Occam’s Razor and to realize that at least some of the black-white gap is probably caused by genetics.

Umm no sweaty, evolution is a proven fact.

I mean he's spamming whole paragraphs of bullshit about genes and science stuff that look like it belongs in a scientific paper and I'm fairly confident he's not a doctor. So im just wondering where he got these ideas

I built a truly great company worth many billions of dollars. That is a big part of the reason I was elected. As President, I can make far better deals with foreign countries than Congress.
- August 02, 2017
Statement by President Donald J. Trump on Signing the “Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act”

Individual 1 pulls out of Syria, lifts sanctions against Russian oligarch businesses, and his secretary of defense resigns.

Attached: 1545364581448.jpg (333x333, 21K)

You will see flags with fasces walking over you in your last moments.

>typed on an invention by white people

For some reason, this downward pointing symbol seems appropriate. Down's Syndrome? A lowering of human consciousness? Downward to death? To hell?

Right wing art always draws the gaze upward for a reason.

You must be a physically and mentally healthy productive member of society huh op??

Attached: 07E346EE-87EC-4C51-A9D7-AC84BCD3DD5F.jpg (1024x802, 161K)

>we’re all the same underneath

First of all, correlation does not prove causation. Second, SAT scores are not intended to be IQ tests. Last, the very fact that upper class black people have higher SAT scores suggest that the issue is with the sociology-economic circumstances rather than biology.
>Inventions correlate with advancement and race
China and the Middle East for most of history will show just how wrong you are.
>Race
Race is a social construct: don't like it? Argue with modern semantics
>Mayans
Anything to keep other people down, huh?
>Blatantly obvious differences
Psychology is mostly nurture. Culture can be adopted. Genetics are mostly the same. Biology is all the same.
It's unfortunate to be born in suffering countries. That doesn't make it their fault, rather the fault of their leaders. Were you in their situation, you would do the same.
>Insert Chinese/Arabic advancement during dark ages meme here
Einstein's brain was smaller than average. Was he inferior? Btw is doesn't take a mountain of very selective research to show that all races are capable of the same advancements.
Sociology would speak to the falsity of genetic arguments. Blacks see significant disadvantages overall in their home lives and everywhere else. Nurture is stronger than nature
Great argument, flawless

>Last, the very fact that upper class black people have higher SAT scores

Where's your source?

>China and the Middle East for most of history will show just how wrong you are.

Chinks never figured how to make realistic paintings, lol. The myth of chinese civilization being far more advanced than contemporary Europeans is just that, a myth.
Literacy in the Middle East even during the "muslim golden age" was never higher even than that of Europeans during "the dark ages". SO yeah, quit getting your info from the goddamn History channel.

>Anything to keep other people down, huh?
You mean like how you are using your poor knowledge of ancient non-white civilizations to imply that whites were inferior, despite that being a falsehood?

>Genetics are mostly the same. Biology is all the same.
To what extent? Please enlighten me.

>Chinks never figured how to make realistic paintings
the lengths nazi cucks will go to just to pretend they're better than other people lmao

Prove me wrong then, leftist neocon faggot.

He said in his TL;DR post, I just used whatever the fuck he's using
>Chinese paintings are the pinnacle of their technological achievement
They advanced mathematics, invented gunpowder, invented the printing press, and painted just as well as the Europeans. The renaissance was when European art took a more realist approach, late in their history. Muslim golden age far surpassed European inventions. They built palaces in like alhabra within a year whereas Europe took hundreds of years to build notre dame. Also, those flying buttresses on the sides of notre dame and other Gothic-style buildings are because they fucking forgot how to built with supports. Again, any excuse to keep other down.
>Europeans are inferior
They are not. They just aren't superior.
>Genetics
Humans are all the same fucking species, despite physical characteristics sometimes varying anyone can learn the same shit in the same manner as anyone else give the proper circumstances.

prove you wrong about what? You said white people are superior because they invented stuff like electronics and nuclear physics. I pointed out that many cultures throughout history have developed math and science.

What is your standard for which inventions make a race or culture "superior"? It seems like you only want white inventions to count, which is a circular logic. So I guess keep being a hysterical fanatic if you want

>Chinese paintings are the pinnacle of their technological achievement
Never said it was, just an example that even at the arts Europeans excelled beyond the Chinese.
>They advanced mathematics
So did Europeans to a much, much greater extent. Newton INVENTED CALCULUS ffs.

>They are not. They just aren't superior.
I'm sorry, but the advancements brought by WHITES are objectively superior to what you mentioned.

>Humans are all the same fucking species, despite physical characteristics sometimes varying anyone can learn the same shit in the same manner as anyone else give the proper circumstances.
Now you're going in circles, again learning knowledge that is already there is not a big deal. And no, humans are different biologically no matter how much you chant to the magical sky fairy of equality.

Alt-left?

You don’t know what heritability means, retard. Read what I first wrote (first paragraph of first post) and then come back to me. We are talking about what is causing the differences between two cakes, not the degree to which a cake is the result of ingredients or mixing. Also, heritability of IQ within the general US population is 0.75-0.8. You can use that to predict the degree to which the environments must differ to cause their to be a difference in performance of a standard deviation between two populations which are equal in potential (note the difference between observations and potentials). The average black in the US would need to be in an environment two standard deviations worse than the average white, meaning that they would need to be in environment worse than 98-99% of whites’. This is not even close to being the case by any observable metric. Also, alleles found to be related to intelligence are not equally distributed between the races, meaning that there is no reason to assume equality from the onset. Why should phenotypically distinct populations who were geographically separated for extended periods of time, subjected to different environmental selection pressures, and who we can distinguish between upwards of 95% of the time (significantly higher than chance and this is including mixed race people and races who are close to one another in ancestory), and some of whom interbred with non-anatomically correct modern human populations like Neonderthals and Denisovans, be exactly the same in terms of intelligence behind or in front of the decimal? There is no reason to assume equality. This is something you need to evidence. There are three positions available to explain the observed differences in Western populations: agnosticism, 50/50 (point of lead error), 80/20 (general heritability in the US).

There*

Over*

Note the last sentence really meant as the first assumption, not the final conclusion. You need to prove your conclusion. Also, we can distinguish between the races upwards of 95% of the time by sight alone. Pic related lists some other phenotypic differences.

GTFO pleddit

Mathematics don't show how advanced one civilazation is, it is just shows how people perceive reality. Ancient greeks would blow their head off if they see negative numbers, because that is how they used to view the world

>Einstein's brain was smaller than average.

Photographs of the brain show an enlarged Sylvian fissure. In 1999, further analysis by a team at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario revealed that his parietal operculum region in the inferior frontal gyrus in the frontal lobe of the brain was vacant. Also absent was part of a bordering region called the lateral sulcus (Sylvian fissure). Researchers at McMaster University speculated that the vacancy may have enabled neurons in this part of his brain to communicate better. "This unusual brain anatomy...[missing part of the Sylvian fissure]... may explain why Einstein thought the way he did," said Professor Sandra Witelson who led the research published in The Lancet. This study was based on photographs of the whole brain made at autopsy in 1955 by Harvey, and not direct examination of the brain. Einstein himself claimed that he thought visually rather than verbally.

Marian C. Diamond compared the ratio of glial cells in Einstein's brain with that of the preserved brains of 11 other people. Glial cells provide support and nutrition in the brain, form myelin, participate in signal transmission, and are the other integral component of the brain other than the neurons. Einstein's brain had more glial cells relative to neurons in all areas studied, but only in the left inferior parietal area was the difference statistically significant. This area is part of the association cortex, regions of the brain responsible for incorporating and synthesizing information from multiple other brain regions.

>Einstein's brain was smaller than average.
Brain. 2013 Apr; 136(4): 1304–1327: "Diamond et al. (1985) found a higher glia:neuron ratio in the left inferior parietal lobule (cf. Hines, 1998). Anderson and Harvey (1996) found greater neuronal density in the right frontal lobe. Kigar et al. (1997) reported increased glia:neuron ratio in the bilateral temporal neocortices. Witelson et al. (1999b) observed a larger expanse of the bilateral inferior parietal lobules. Colombo (2006) found larger astrocytic processes and more numerous interlaminar terminal masses. Falk’s study (2009) documented unusual gross anatomy ‘in and around the primary somatosensory and motor cortices.’"Also, Einstein had relatively expanded prefrontal cortices, which may have provided underpinnings for some of his extraordinary cognitive abilities, including his productive use of thought experiments.

>You realize that below the color of our skin, we are all the same right?
Wrong.

>last 200 years because that's when "whites" did a bunch of cool science shit.
From first flight to landing on the Moon, in 66 years, and the Egyptians and Aztecs had nothing to do with that.

>So im just wondering where he got these ideas
Try reading a book (not 'Harry Potter') sometime.

just a lil FYI if anyone doesn't know, you can use the minus button at the top left of a thread to hide it.

typing sage in the options field prevents the thread from being bumped. just in case you do want to actually reply to an obvious bait thread like this one.

>Muslim golden age far surpassed European inventions. They built palaces in like alhabra within a year whereas Europe took hundreds of years to build notre dame. Also, those flying buttresses on the sides of notre dame and other Gothic-style buildings are because they fucking forgot how to built with supports
You mean when they took Christian cathedrals and turned them into mosques? That was some amazing engineering. Gothic architecture is vastly more complicated than the Alhambra Palace, and the major cathedrals were not worked on continuously, and were completed as funding and resources allowed. You obviously have little to no knowledge of history, architecture or engineering, but keep going, it's funny.

Nice propaganda cleetus

Attached: 2hk26t4cln121.jpg (640x479, 43K)

>ignoring biology
youtube.com/watch?v=6SJNVb0GnPI
There is a reason our ideology persists despite defeats, and that is the objective truth of man.
That people naturally perform better when surrounded by like individuals, and that attempting to blend seperate groups will invariably lead to conflict.
Every race has a natural home. The imperialism of the west, and the modern neo-imperialism practised through late-stage capitalism and neoliberalism is abhorrent, and the manner with which it exploits the homes of ethnic africans, hispanics and arabs is equally so, but the answer does not lie in extracting their brightest minds so as to leave them in eternal poverty, rather to reject this judeo-materialist filth, ensure free nations for their respective ethnicities and an end to the cycle of exploitation that underpins neoliberalism.
youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
youtube.com/watch?v=PfkRunYJ-ME

>You will not agree with us, if you are content with things as they are
Are you?

Attached: Colour Mosley.jpg (2560x1536, 622K)

Left to right: Australian Aboriginal Man, Han Chinese Man, North German Man

Attached: Racial Skulls.jpg (883x374, 31K)

Wot an absolute unit. In awe of this lad!

What an absolute unit!

Dunno man she seems pretty whole there.

Witnessed

I hope this was made in jest

>So many baseless assertions
>So many equivocations
>So many handwaves
My god, is this the power of, of...
Bait threads?
Don't forget to sage.

Attached: 1513041382029.png (500x501, 80K)

He’s not gonna reply. He actually thinks race is just a social construct... how do you agrue with that?

The middle skull is a Negro.

These are the only arrows i need

Attached: 1200px-Bandera_FE_JONS.svg.png (1200x800, 43K)

Based

Attached: Jose Antonio Primo De Rivera.jpg (800x1070, 106K)

T H I C C

Attached: 1513049748647.png (500x501, 142K)

Same goes for you friend. I hope you're not under the illusion that you hold "THE truth."