How many races are there?
1. European white.
All other bipedal mammals in the Homo genus are fauna.
3
One the white race. The rest are orcs, vampires and insectoids
5
R1a and R1b are the only ones that matter. And there's subgroups too.
>One the white race.
White isn't a race you dumb mutt. It's a phenotype.
NASCAR, Kentucky Derby, Boston Marathon, Grand Prix. Those are the only ones I know off the top of my head.
white black red and yellow
doesn't matter pic related needs to be deported first and replaced with actual people who care about America
3.
Europoids, Negroids, and Europoids.
The rest are just hybrids of those or religions. Jews are a religion, not a race. Native American is a religion, not a race.
mongloids. damn.
>Native American is a religion, not a race.
Haplogroup Q is the most unmixed race.
>How many races are there?
1. huaman white race
2. animals
Western and Eastern Europeans are predominantly two different races: R1b and R1a respectively
>Being this retarded
Haplogroups are races. If you don't want to read about it, fine, but don't go calling people retarded because of your ignorance.
Why don niggers smell so bad?
Show me the argument that haplogroups are races then
Read a book nigger.
Caucasoids, Negroids, Mongoloids and Australoids. There are also Capoids.
>Europeans (including the middle east, excluding India)
>Asians (including most native tribes in North and South America)
>Africans (excluding the Middle East)
Race exists and is biologically real.
P1) There are differences in patterns of visible physical features which correspond to geographic ancestry
P2) These patterns are exhibited between real groups, existing groups (i.e., individuals who share common ancestry)
P3) These real, existing groups that exhibit these physical patterns by geographic ancestry satisfy the conditions of minimalist race
C) Therefore race exists and is a biological reality
Technically there could be anywhere from two to many hundreds of races. However I would make the argument that Rosenberg's findings of populationist racerosenberglab.stanford.edu
(genetic clustering preprogrammed to sort into 5 groups) are good candidates since that match notions of race dating back a hundred years and predict self identified race with 97 percent accuracy.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Not an argument
Race is subjective
How many races there are depends on how many there are perceived
Some might only see white, black, asian, and native american
Others might divide groups further like white into german, english, russian, italian, irish, etc.
race is purely subjective, so there is no definitive answer
ethnicity on the other hand is more defined because thats based on genetics, not appearance
here is a list of contemporary ethnic groups
en.wikipedia.org
>Race is subjective
Wrong. Race is biological. You can analyze someone's DNA to determine their race. Haplogroups can be used to categorize them.
The # of races is somewhat subjective. However race itself is not subjective. You can't simply decide to be of another race. It's fundamentally genetic.
thats ethnicity not race
race is what you think someone is
ethnicity is what they genetically are
for example, I would be perceived as white, but I am ethnically german
Haplo Q just means a Siberian that has been inbred.
Simply crossing to a new continent does not create a new race. It just means they got bottlenecked and became inbred.
Generally they throw the genetic data into a cluster analysis program, and tell it to draw clusters.
Depending on how fine-tuned the cluster analysis is, you can get 5 big clusters, or hundreds of smaller clusters. These are "races". It really is just a matter of how fine-tuned you want to go.
You can measure the genetic distance between these races, the big groups are very far apart, but within each big group are smaller groups that are not so far apart.
I fail to understand how that's a response my criticism of you characterising race as subjective. It's not. What is subjective is the number of races.
maybe subjective isn't the right word
lets say someone has one parent of some european descent and the other of some african descent
while they are ethnically both european and african, they are more likely to be perceived as black because of the one drop rule
that would make their race black despite sharing both ethnicities
Checked. But i wouldn't say they are both ethnically european and african. They are neither; they are a mutt. Socially speaking they will usually be grouped into black/colored/mulatto because as you say the one drop rule (plus alleles for darker pigmented tend to be dominant)
But the existence of mixed race people proves the existance of race not the other way around and i'm not sure how much of a problem they present when it comes to mapping self identification to genetic reality. I know in western pops the correlation is around 97 percent (between clusters and self identification) but I don't think its that much lower in more mixed pops ex south america. Though I don't know off the top of my head.
There are 3 biological races - Caucasoids, Mongoloids, and Negroids