Youtube alternatives

>what's so hard
I'm going to base my reply off the assumption that you're completely ignorant.
Infrastructure is the first hurdle for any competitor. You aren't going to be able to support a billion video requests every day with a desktop server in your basement, so count out any potential for hobbyists to make an impact in this market without any principal.
Second is getting users and content. What made YouTube successful was just the fact that it got its foot in the door before anyone else. Google bought YT rather than develop a competitor service (back in 2006ish?) because of this. Alternative services like Vimeo and DailyMotion fail to grow because they lack in user-generated content. This leads to limited potential for monetizing content, which then means that fewer people will create content and ultimately fewer people will use the service.
Also this is off-topic so no bump for you.

Theoven.me
>Jump in

youtube.com/watch?v=nXvsv_b3160

youtube.com/watch?v=v1VK954hyMg

Bitchute exists.

jamesclear.com/the-1-percent-rule

>Develop your own service, goy.
>Develop your own payment service, goy.
>Develop your own bank, goy.
>Develop your own government, goy.
>Develop yo...

Attached: 1538645608461.jpg (680x513, 27K)

Because you will never sell a single ad
But the profit motive is always good rite

Remind me again how Alex Jones lost InfoWars website?
Sounds more like you are just a nigger wanting violence

Nothing
people would rather whine and be lazy than fix anything
quora.com/What-is-a-way-to-create-a-video-sharing-website-like-YouTube
Here is all that's needed
couple hundred bucks when its all over, between lessons and renting/buying servers parts and line

>paypal banning
Dude they ban people just because its funny, let alone for receiving payments for porn
Not the site to call for a nebulous antiright
You know since Elon Musk owns it

Capitalism.

The state exists to serve the will of the upper class, which by wielding economic power can shape the state to its will (democracy with unequal economic status is a fraud, it is impossible).

The elite, use the state to silence criticism of themselves. Thus the old addage that the ones you cant criticize are your enemy.

Whelp youtube cant be the enemy seeing as not only can you, prager U is suing on the basis of losing their shekels over having to actually build infrastructure as a uni instead of parasiting off Youtube

use bitchute

Chinese live without it. Koreans and Japanese use it 50/50.

It's actually hilarious, I mostly avoided Youtube altogether until 2010 or so, as my local ISP with 100k+ users had its own video platform. Anything I wanted and more was available at hand.

Then appetites grew and I jumped the boat.

Hooktube?

Have you tried reverse image searching any porn lately? It simply doesn't work. If I found a pic of a legit model on a legit porn site, I used to be able to find more of her in half a second. I can't find good stuff anymore, and when I do get some results they are all non-English fly-by-night blogs. Used to get the girls name right away, subscription sites like MetArt with all her photosets, even forums like peachy or vipergirls. Now my searches return nothing so I gave up and pay like 300 bucks a year on porn so I have immediately have it whenever I want.

You need a way for it to make money. So if ads, it has to be from.. google? It can't be, because they are your competitor.

Then you need funds to store the videos in every country for fast performance, instead of just serving them from one country.

Then you need some kind of serious infrastructure to store all the videos (and transfer them between all the countries).

Then... you get banned by the silicon valley mafia and can't compete.

>what's so hard about developing a simple video uploading platform?
If you know how to do it, it's pretty damn easy. Development cost is one highly skilled engineer and about $4k in cloud spend a month. Right there your burn rate is looking around 24k/month and it's gonna take something like 10 months to do the development, testing, integration, mobile app, etc you got that kinda scratch bucko??
Oh and if you want it to go anywhere you gotta hire some other asshole to promote the damn thing and get your users. He needs a budget to make shit happen, all in total this is another 15k/month.
Over the course of a years development of a video sharing alternative you have spent somewhere in the neighborhood of half a million dollars on development costs alone, this further compounded by the spookynigger lawsuits which will follow you around for years afterwards for daring to bring about an 'alternative'
Long story short, user, development is a tiny fraction of what needs to happen, and the creation of a video sharing platform is a large endeavor. Probably, you should work harder towards things you want rather than kvetching about things you don't have.

youtube interface is horrible
>no option to just start playing all the videos a channel has in order
>have to load dozens of new 'pages' of videos to find something in the middle of their catalog

just two examples of absolute idiocy

This, room for improvement but BitChute is viable, I use it over YouTube whenever possible.

JewTube killed it, F

Attached: 1543876449754.png (720x945, 149K)

Google alternative first please

How did JewTube kill it? I just watched Stefan Molyneux on it yesterday (didn’t give him a dollar or a view by not using JewTube)

Youtube has always operated at a huge loss. They can do this because they print money.

Attached: 17dcb258414d5eca351773f3a32b2cec7436454fea20d082a92959ba2bf101bf.jpg (320x320, 19K)

paypal was peter thiel

bandwidth and servers cost a lot

forbes.com/sites/calebmelby/2012/03/12/how-elon-musk-became-a-billionaire-twice-over/#586343cf1c88
>paypal

>dailymotion
>vimeo
>metacafe

no, they simply aren't directly monetized. the data they feed to the alphabet soup is valuable enough to accept this "loss" on it's face.

Bitchute is more viable than youtube, since they don't pay for all the bandwidth used. It also doesn't censor legal content.

Vimeo. Daily motion. Bitchute. There's plenty of competition.

This is entirely impertinent.

Youtube is not the same as many years ago. Now it is full of clickbait, ads and shit.

I only use liveleak now.

this but unironically

>you shouldnt try to fix things, you should just get angry about it

How does netflix even exist when Comcast is out to destroy them?

If YouTube made Google easy bucks, there would be dozens of alternatives.
It actually doesn't.
Video hosting is quite hardware intensive and monetization is not easy. Google can use their existing hardware infrastructure (at low marginal cost) a competitor would have to pay the full price.

this isn't something that can be fixed very easily...google controls ~70% of what the entire world sees since ~70% of the world uses it.

if you're an up and coming competitor google and just shoah you from its search engine and voila...you're invisible to the normies........and normies are how you generate ad revenue to keep your site up

only way an alternative can be set up is through someone influential - like pewdiepie, moving to it...but we all know felix won't take such a risk..........yet.

We need to wait for "my perfect government and politicians" to get in and change how corporations do business. Dumb lolbertarians, only voting for conservative politicians actually gets things done.

jewtube is run at a loss, not profitable, supported by jewgle's other revenue.

BITCHUTE

bitchute.com/video/hPbzVSxjm3jj/

>developing
that's not what's hard

Bitchute exists.

>How come after 13 years, there still isn't a viable censorship-free YT alternative?
You know how hard it is to be approved by the CIA?

YT IS profitable , think of all the user data they otherwise wouldn't get

It's not easy to host a site for videos. This kind of an operation requires massive servers that cost millions to run.
A lot of conveniences that we take for granted cost Youtube millions of dollars an hour. Youtube is a money losing site, they are losing money just to make the site more convenient, so you don't have to wait for the videos to buffer, so that all videos get the same speeds on them, to store hundreds of millions of videos etc.
Youtube shouldn't even exist. It's too expensive to run, and they can't possibly make enough money from running the site. They get their money from investors, propaganda kikes and whoever benefits from youtube being a monopoly.

If you try to take on youtube by running a site that functions just like youtube, you've already lost.
The only reasonable attempt at trying to compete with youtube was Bitch shute, because it deal with the server problem by relying on peer to peer sharing, but not even that could compete because it's not as convenient as youtube.

The only way you could tackle the jewtube problem is by some sort of a government take-over of the internet with state of the art internet servers that smaller companies can access. Make internet a public utility like roads and water. At the end of the day you will get fucked in the ass by a company or will get fucked in the ass by the government, I think I prefer the government.

If bitchute was properly decentralised, it'd be ideal. The ultimate censorproof YT needs to be decentralised.

>but not even that could compete because it's not as convenient as youtube.
The big advantage is that it can run a profit off of nothing and stay up indefinitely.

>At the end of the day you will get fucked in the ass by a company or will get fucked in the ass by the government, I think I prefer the government.
The government keeps shutting down any attempt for towns to provide their own fiber and the solution is to nationalize Comcast? Fuck that.

You realize Comcast made the government forbid competition?
They'll be doing the same to youtube when they have their own video site setup next year

>You realize Comcast made the government forbid competition?
Yes. What does that change? That makes it even more likely that the government will run to them when they decide to nationalize internet services.

Hooktube literally just embeds YT links now, no different from YT.

Hence the other part, all the youtube hate does is make sure comcast is the all hero when they cut off even more freedom

I'll offer infrastructure design and support for free but the moola will be needed for the equipment. The infrastructure team will also need to expand with time as I can't work 24/7 being human with energy restrictions and all that. We need to think about data halls and redundancy too. I mean I have the facility to set up a basic infrastructure for drafting, design and hosting for initial stages of development but the gear I can donate wouldn't be able to host more then 20k users because it'll be old by the time the platform becomes live.

or just find new way to make money through videosharing

good goy

>
>Remind me again how Alex Jones lost InfoWars website?
>Sounds more like you are just a nigger wanting violence

Alex Jones never lost the Infowars website you lying piece of shit. (*pic related)

Attached: 1532656943677.jpg (440x440, 28K)

Yes that's my point
He does just fine in direct counterance to the whiny bitch ass moochers who want to have it all done for them

>>paypal banning
>Dude they ban people just because its funny, let alone for receiving payments for porn
>Not the site to call for a nebulous antiright
>You know since Elon Musk owns it

Again, you lying piece of shit. Elon Musk does NOT own paypal, he helped found it and was bought out.
KYS

Attached: 1524054849869.jpg (700x933, 81K)

>bought out
Right and I am to beleive has no controls or backdoors

YOU FUCKING RETARDS.

CIA=AMAZON AND GOOGLE, GOOGLE=YOUTUBE

CIA=YOUTUBE

That's why no one can compete. It's not feasible nor allowed.

Yeah except all the places doing it
Tell me how dead newsground is

> I mean what's so hard about developing a simple video uploading platform?

Patents.. guess who owns them..

Attached: bitch-betta-have-my-money.jpg (500x422, 156K)

Will never gain normie support because normies literally still think the government is good.

IF YOU WERE TO TELL THEM IT IS RUN BY CIA, HERE COMES A KIKE/BOOMER PROPAGANDA (OR THEIR OWN COGNITIVE DISSONANCE) TELLING THEM "it is run by the CIA, and that's a good thing."

Then you tell them, they say; "Of course it's good, they probably filter out all the Russian and China propaganda and keep us safe! I could never go to another site now that I know our big bad CIA bros are making it safe for us on YouTube!"

>Youtube is a money losing site

Are you retarded ? They take 60 % of advertising revenue from user generated content.
They make millions of dollars a day.

Attached: 1539311346079.png (632x796, 204K)

Same thing will happen with new platform. Revenue from advertising = censorship. Need different business model.

Like charging people money to put the videos up on the site and viewers the same, just like tv?

Checked

It will inevitably be something like this but using a social media blockchain.

Like Steemit and Dtube.

Police state options with worse censorship lol

>Vimeo rebrands
>goes ad free
>netflix payment model
>no censorship other than what's illegal
>buys pewdiepie and a few big names
>the crowds start swinging across

Screenshot this so I can show mum.

Webspace. Videos have a big data capacity and a lot of gigs. You need a big and scalable data center for your service. You need services for data conversation and calculations. You have to be the owner of the hardware and the bandwith. If you would use public cloud services (AWS,...) it is not free anymore. Videostreaming needs a lot of bidirectional bandwith and a lot of cores if you want to serve mutiple users. It is not so easy without big money ... write a little streaming service, measure it, then scale it.

Is YouTube actually censored? Seems you can put up anything but hardcore porn so long as it's not copyrighted.

There won't be a "one stop shop" type of place for )))The Shunned(((.
It'll be a series of clones-type sites that come and go as needed. Things like this "The Oven" are going to be popping up and shutting down from now on. It'll be similar to raves, or how hipsters have pop-up resturants, little one night only events, where they rent / aquire / use some space for a brief period of time.
It'l have to be the digital equilivant of these:
youtube.com/watch?v=C1q5EZ7lgAM
youtube.com/watch?v=3Ie22_esLlM
youtube.com/watch?v=iaVzsTRv8zw
youtube.com/watch?v=tU1sdaTw68o
youtube.com/watch?v=QtPZj9ssKEU
youtube.com/watch?v=o0-GiCcAV94
youtube.com/watch?v=C8VhlXS4tPA

Temp sites that you will expect to get shoah'd DNS banned. You'll have to get used to rebuilding them back fairly quickly and expect the inevitable kevtching / downtime. Distributed paltforms are going to have to be utilized efficiently / effectively. Virtual hosting and private DNS servers will have to be a thing a well.
example:
I utilize some video hosting / youtube clone / private video server.
I then have a private DNS server that is semi-publicly accessable.
I let word get out that If you want to access the site, you need to either switch to private DNS or type in the updated I.P. address (that'll be updated when it changes).
I keep a skeleton of the bare-bones setup as a backup so that when I need to change names / hosting / etc. I can quickly setup again and only change a few details.
I run it until it either crashes, hits hosting limit, or otherwise becomes inaccessable.

any questions?

There has been but it's always because (((Media))) and (((Bankers))) fuck everything up.

Bitchute???

Attached: 7002752018217.jpg (3500x3000, 2.19M)

Bitchute is Peer to Peer.
Trick Jow Forums into making an Android background player app with autoplayback and we are all set.

Attached: 1543243890436.gif (500x375, 618K)

Right wing opinions on youtube are censored

There are a few of them. Bitchute, for example. A better question is why aren't you using them.

You don't like our trending content selection?

Attached: casey-neistat.jpg (1141x700, 311K)

Because a hacked youtube app can play videos in background and autoplay next video? It allows me to listen to youtube while I walk/run with screen turned off. Bitchute doesn't even have an app.

>Bitchute doesn't even have an app.
hmmm, thanks for the idea!

Google runs Youtube at a loss. It's all but impossible to create a competitor that can turn a profit.

What we need is an peer to peer video sharing network, like bittorrent, that also mirrors the videos on youtube and uses youtube as a seeder. LBRY is a bittorrent video service, but it doesn't copy youtube. All the videos are original content, so what's the point? Anyone know if my idea already exists, or am I gonna have to build it myself?

I already made a script that auto downloads every video I click on, because I'm sick and tired of videos being destroyed for wrongthink and other arbitrary violations.

Attached: 2018-12-23.png (1465x367, 262K)

>ancap flag
>doesn't understand basic free market principles
No one wants to advertise on "censorship free" websites.

No shit. I simply don't have time.

Youtube has never made any money. no one has the pockets like google does to run a money losing operation of that scale.

The only way this is fixed is the destruction of state sponsored monopolies like google

Bitchute is kike owned, just like every single other (((alternative))). JEwtube is owned by kikes but so is every single one of your shit replacements for it, that's why no one wants to use any of it. Find one non-jewed replacement for jewtube and we'll all be on board

>They make millions of dollars a day.

And they spend twice that.
everysecond.io/youtube

Americans have money but are too retarded. Jews have money (US taxpayers) are not retarded. Slavs don't have money and are not retarded. Jews it is. You are welcome.

worst part about bitchute is alot of sites will censor the site automatically cause it has the character order "bitch" in it's home site.

bitchute.com

a good example would be steam..

can't link any bitchute without being censored.

Google... the ai is live. Submit

I wish I go through life and be as dumb as you everything would be so tasty like rainbows and candies basically living in Willy Wonka‘s chocolate factory my whole life.

ZOG intelligence orgs recruit stooges right out of the elite universities so any person with talent in the tech field, or any other field for that matter, who might be an innovator gets sucked into the agenda right off the bat and becomes one of the adversary. The intel orgs play the same role as masonry played in that anyone that rises to a position of influence gets recruited and then becomes a puppet.