Why do gun owners pretend they're for "fighting tyranny"? I get that they like shooting for fun but to claim they're for some higher purpose is absolutely laughable. The average American gun owner is no match for the US military.
Gun delusions
What am I looking at here? Another overweight gun owner with unkempt hair?
>implying many of the military are not ordinary americans
They're brainwashed
you need to be 18 to post on this site
Rand Paul went full 1488. This is a slide thread. Keep these threads bumped. The shills are trying to slide this.
 # #
 # (OP) #
Killdozer nearly had the government defeated before that had to go with the nuclear option and that was one guy
>full 1488
>saying merry christmas
Obligatory 
Sliding sliding sliding sliding sliding
Holy shit the population of my town is 14,088. Is my town a nazi sleeper cell? I think a bf109 flew over my house!!!
cool story bro
>The average American gun owner is no match for the US military
Neither were the gooks in vietnam
The average vietnamese farmer could take down the military.
You are implying the military is the tyrannical force my dude. -_-
Your average "gook" was way better at fighting than a bunch of overweight untrained gun owners
Yeah a handful of militants with guns are no match for a modern military
>ponders how weve spent 2 decades failing to defeat a handful of sandniggers with AKs
The average American gun owner is a veteran or sympathetic to them. The military would never turn on those people
Then why ban and grab them?
Eh all they did alright with a bunch of WWII relics. Your average gun owner doesn't collect milsurp.
Has there ever been tyranny in the us? No? Well I guess the second amendment is working.
I'm trained though. Self trained.
Based leaf
Whether we are a match for the military or not is irrelevant. We have the capacity to try, unlike the rest of the world. I can't wait for a politician with some balls to reverse the tyrannical ruling that civilians cannot own fully automatic rifles.
Being anti gun is the most Incel belief you can have
They weren't trained either, fathead
Cringe and bluepilled
Because tyrants want you to be killed when tyroniquius and his faggy bum boys break into your house.
The idea that you can cope and defend yourself without bureaucrat gang upsets them to no end.
yes there was, only it was supported by a (ever shrinking) majority of whites.
I've never met a masculine man who supported gun control. Just saying.
Free men own guns
slaves have no rights to them
are you trying to enslave me..OP? of course you are, you communist kike faggot shill.
I'm sure if you started shooting at the military they would not shoot back. 
nahhhh they wont do that .
But notice they could stop him.
pic related. 
A guy with military hardware (old hardware at that) could not be stopped except by a stroke of luck.
The gooks were way tougher than guntards. 
The gooks got military gear from the Chinese and the Russians. 
It was only a fraction of the US military that was there.
This is an 80s music forum now.
youtube.com
There would not be a US or a US military if civilians did not own cannons. Kill yourself with this faggy argument.
but now there is a military now you dildo.
While you are correct, if shit REALLY was to go down, you'd have all kinds of defectors who'd be able to train civilians and teach them what to look out for against the enemy they once belonged to
Underrated
My question is why haven’t gun owners started killing tyrants. It’s our duty to use 2A when 1A fails.
Yep, no match at all, gotcha.
.
>Tfw Vietnamese 
Feels good man
>shooter in school
>kids are being killed
>cops are too afraid to go in
>we have 48% of the worlds firearms
>wouldn't be an issue for the military that would have a majority of its members side with the citizens who have the guns
>america keeps losing to mongrels who have nothing but old shit weapons
yep
you know there are high powered rifles that can penetrate those, right?
but i'm sure the us would just use nukes on their own soil
could you be more braindead?
Funny how liberals can name so many CURRENT dictators (aka tyrannical governments), but haha its never gonna happen.
it is another dead giveaway like men who don't like cars
Great argument, Romanians were disarmed almost entirely. Yet, the military and police sided with the populace against the Securitate and armed them.
Imagine Afghanistan. Every fucking goat farmer has an ak-47 at least, everyone seems to know how to make bombs, and a good amount of them have an RPG and some rockets tucked under the bed. 
This place is hard as fuck to invade and occupy. This is America with arms. No amount of DUDE DRONES LMAO will automatically win a war.
Imagine Afghanistan but with no weapons. That's then the US can do whatever they want.
and this is Afghanistan compared to the US.
mylifeelsewhere.com
>The average American gun owner is no match for the US military.
Translation
>an individual with a gun is no match for a collective with guns
This is fucking nigger levels of reasoning. 
The idea is that the civilians will band together agains the military if they become tyrannical that has happened in fucktons of countries prior that get steemrolled by the government precisely because they have no guns. 
Inb4 >even a collective of civilians won’t beat the military
Yeah but they can cause enough damage to make the ZOG think twice.
>Thinking every fight is toe to toe and kicking in doors
Determined men vs. pic related. At least the scooter can hold a lot of automatic assault rifle clips. Given that you don't hand in your guns, like the law abiding citizens you are, of course.
How much ammo does the average guy in the military use on a weekly basic at the range? What percent of the military has seen actual combat?
It goes something like this: right now they're for fun. If they're ever needed for serious business, we have them. Make sense? Good.
Reminder to sage slide threads, and kill the treasonous first.
checked and redpilled
No fucking clue. 
The aim isn’t to beat the military,
It’s to disincentives it.
Almost too stupid an argument to even respond to. Forgetting that America has been defeated by guerilla fighters, that Russia has been defeated by insurgents, why do you think the US government spends your tax dollars arming militants in various countries?
Try not to be such a moron.
suck a wetback dick antigun faggot. saged.
This is what the fuck my gun is for. Also bought one for my sister. Both S&W .38 snubs.
youtube.com
I bet you also think the Taliban are no match for the US military. Insurgencies are impossible to defeat unless you exterminate the native population.