Is Monarchy the best form of government

inb4 anything about how the monarchy can have absolute power and do whatever they want and that democracy is decent and other garbage

Attached: Monarchist.jpg (250x242, 19K)

Monarchy isn’t a type of government it’s a type of leader. There is no difference from a monarch to a president of a one party system.

Feudalism is what you’re trying to get at.

no absolute monarchy.

What do you do if an incompetent dumbass is born into the position? Will the monarch step down if enough people demand it, or can they only be replaced after violent upheaval?

The best form of government is the one where Jesus Christ himself rules.

bad monarch>democracy
>muh bad monarch meme
people who believe this have a dinseyesque view on monarchy, or they are jews

Not really. Monarchy heavily implies transfer of power through inheritance.

Uh, what? History is filled with scores of examples of corrupt, ineffective, or otherwise bad monarchs. Read a book

what I would prefer would be a monarchy where after the current king/crown prince/etc. dies the regency council selects another one from either the past kings house or the nobility based upon merit. That way the nation would have a capable leader that would be trained to do their job unlike any president or dictator.

Well, I hope you are ready for shitloads of violence and corruption because that is what you are going to get. It is easier to bribe/threaten a cadre of 100 than it is a majority of voters in a democracy. And furthermore, that holds that family lineage is somehow important, which is retarded

it's the worst, it's for cucks that want to be reuled by inbreed leaders

elective benevolent dictatorship is the best form.
also you can call yourself whatever you want, dictator president for life emperor caesar

yes, but those are old times not so relevant today. europe was built by monarch albeit good or bad.
you can see with your own eyes ineffective democracies

Europe's monarchies were mostly bad. And the passage of time would not solve the problem that heredity based transfer of power is real fucking dumb.

So then how are you liking sweden's monarchy?
or when king michael surrendered to the allies?

The best form of government is a government full with competent good politicians

>Europe's monarchies were mostly bad
wrong on all accounts

>So then how are you liking sweden's monarchy?
they dont have much power if any at all, l am talking about absolute monarchy

>or when king michael surrendered to the allies?
he had no choice, we were loosing the war, and switched to the soviet team
Romania got united under kings: Alexandru Ioan Cuza (pic related), and Ferdinand I

Attached: Alexandru Ioan Cuza.jpg (587x744, 39K)

what about when carol II let codreanu get killed by jews

Codreanu was getting more and more popular with the people, and because of his pro-german(anti jewish) views scared alot of politicians, who were pro france and england. A lot of politicians were owned by jews at the time and were against his nationalistic movement.

With that said they organized assassinations against iron guard leaders all over the country (Bucuresti, Iasi, Cluj etc). Codreanu was killed on his way to jail, by the police, along with other 13 legionaires.

He said in his book that the only good form of government is monarchy, he believed in the succesion of power generation to generation.

Maybe but a christian fascist theocracy is just as good.
>enforced morality
>labor camps for the belligerent
>no multicultural/multiethnicity

.

>t is easier to bribe/threaten a cadre of 100 than it is a majority of voters in a democracy.
completely fucking wrong and you know it you communist faggot piece of shit

Bump