British vs Spanish Colonies

British Colonies:
Canada
America
Australia
New Zealand

>Extremely high living standards and per capita incomes
>Very low crime rates(Except US because Niggers)
>Very little political corruption
>Very stable societies
>Extremely successful libertarian style Capitalism

Spanish Colonies:
Mexico
Guatemala
Chile
Paraguay
Argentina

>Shit living standards and Africa-tier per capita incomes
>Higher crime rates, even in white majority colonies(like Argentina)
>High Political Corruption
>Very unstable societies
>Unsuccessful oiligarch style Capitalism with lots of socialism mixed in

Would countries like Mexico or Paraguay be rich, developed first world Countries like America or Canada if they were British colonies and not Spanish Colonies? It seems to me that the Anglos are very experienced at building a stable, well governed society(the UK holds the record as the oldest continuous government on planet Earth, America(A British colony) is number two). Meanwhile the Spaniards were dirt poor and suddenly "won the lottery"(Discovered the Americas). They had no experience managing money or building a successful government. The Anglos already were rich and had plenty of experience building a successful government before they colonized the Americas.

Attached: 1200px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png (1200x600, 5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexicans_of_European_descent
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

The US thrivesd off of immigrants & cheap labor, including the Irish, who they enslaved into fighting the civil war for them lmao

>the UK holds the record as the oldest continuous government on planet Earth
Some citation required there my friend. I'd wager Denmark has us beat.

Mexico and all the countried u said is better than south africa. Chile has a very high hdi

How does this place figure into your theory?

Attached: california-state-map-1.jpg (2075x2257, 586K)

We are better than british colony india too. Mexican per capita is $20,000 and its even higher than some european countries part of EU. We are not africa tier

>Chile has a high HDI
I've personally been to Chile. It looks like Communist Poland in the 1970s. Small shitty cars, potholes In the road. The most expensive restaurant I could find had a worse quality toilet than an Average McDonald's or Tim Hortons in Canada. On paper they look good. But in reality it's nowhere close to a British Colony like Canada. When I arrived back her I was so grateful for having been born here.

Argentina was a first world country in 1900 too. Spain did good here btw. Chile would be a rich country soon and mexico would be the 5th economy soon, we are khangz

>We are better than India!
When I say colonies, I mean colonies that were mostly empty or depopulated like America or Australia. Where the European power had basically a "clean slate" to build whatever society they wanted. India or Africa had millions of Niggers or Billions of pajeets sitting there and shitting up the country. The European powers had very little power to fashion their own society in those places.

South chile is a german settlement, stop lying

I've been on trips to both Argentina and Chile. I thank God everyday I was born in Canada and not those countries. Shittier in every way possible. Definitely not first world or Western, 2nd world at best. If you have enough money, you can get a shitty knockoff of Canadian living standards that is worse in Quality and higher in price. Heavy corruption Anywhere I went that was very obvious. Potholes in the roads etc.

Dont deny your colonies like india hahahhahhahahhah, you did poorly there like in south africa. Also you forgot puerto rico as a spanish colony, its has a $40,000 per capita, thus spanish genes are good

>German Settlement
Haha! I've been there. It seems the Germans mixed with the locals, since I didn't see any white people. I saw plenty of lightskinned mestizos(look identical to Mexican Mestizo but they had light brown skin instead of dark brown) with blue eyes. But no actual white Germans. All the white people I ran into were fellow Canadian/American, or European tourists. The German area looked just as 2nd world as the rest of Chile.

Puerto Rico is a US territory. US is a British colony(former). And Puerto Rico is the US territory with the worst living standards and highest poverty rate. They also have some of the highest amount of debt of any US territory. Most of their prosperity comes from piggybacking off the rest of the USA

Canada has too much metis mixed people, and its getting chinesed and arabed every second like our countries.

Havent gone to new mexico?

Canada is 70% white, and those white people are all Nordic looking white people(blonde hair, red hair, light brown hair, green eyes, blue eyes etc.). non-Whites only exist in big cities. Drive 10 minutes outside a city and it's 100% Nordic looking whites as far as the eye can see.

Canada was a 100% white country as recently as 1980. Can you say the same hombre? Mexico is 20% white AT BEST and those whites are not 100% European.

Canada was a french colony lost to the British due to other war losses

100%? What about canadian skimals and canadian indians? You never was a full european country. Mexicans of European descent or European Mexicans, are Mexican citizens of complete or predominant European descent.[8] While the Mexican government does conduct ethnic censuses on which a Mexican has the option of identifying as “White”[9] the results obtained from these censuses are not published. What Mexico's government publish instead, is the percentage of “light-skinned Mexicans” there is in the country, with it being 47%[4] in 2010 and 49% in 2017.[10]. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexicans_of_European_descent

Who cares, we spanish discovered and settlered west canada first than you

Mexico, argentina and chile are good countries, we are not africa tier. Thats so unfair. We have a high HDI and more then $20,000 per capita and more than +80 life expectancy

Indians in Canada come from east asia not mexico

Great land, but was only decent until America took it over

No

Attached: unnamed.png (300x152, 29K)

Puerto Rico was Spanish for most of its history.

Suck a dick, bud, yo Conocer te gusta lo.
I'm proud to be Metis!

T. Known Boss

Yeah, fag culture and degeneracy is what you're known for and you've turned mighty California into the foundation of wickedness. You're shilling hard for the kikes, you cockroach.

You are a frenchie goblino hahahhaahhashh in the racial cendud what do you choose?

the problem is in northern countries you have to work a lot harder to survive. In southern countries fruits and vegetables grow very easily and cattle can be maintained easily too. Brits always had to be a lot smarter and economical about everything to maintain food resources etc. So basically british colonies were destined to be more successful because they had to be a lot smarter about survival.

Attached: 1244561.png (245x251, 81K)

this. India is a shithole.

No, puto, estoy un Rey y hijo del Senor.

Attached: photo.jpg (451x450, 84K)

Not true, basques and galicians made us their 8th province and they are celtic and alike british. Thats bullshit

And south africa

But do you look french at least?

Damn man, you are so retarded.

you may include south italy. where the spainards have been in charge, they left behind them nothing else but ashes and desolation. due to their shortsighted greed, they just consumed their provinces like a parasite , without letting them the bare minimum to guarantee their own sustainability.
now the ones left with the burden to fucking feed them are north italians.

Usually protestants tend to be in a better position, though give them enough time comparable to Catholics, they would fail in an exact same way.