Let's see how intelligence compares to political views

FUCK OFF OP

1. I have
2. Come
3. To n-word

Attached: 250px-Crosslinker's_Coil.png (250x274, 75K)

>100 if I assumed the geometrical object's gender correctly
>conservative for most things
>retarded but whatever floats their boat

70
Communism
dont kill animals

70

Fascist militaristic ethno-nationalist dictatorship

>c2 = a2 + b2
>a = (16-12)/2 = 2, b = 5, c = 8
>82 = 22 + 52
>64 = 29
>???

Must have been a nigger that wrote the question.

Attached: 1514981232513.gif (278x234, 45K)

It's 70. I misgendered one product

oh I see, the geometrical shape is completely non-representative of the actual values.
shit's retarded

The more I look at that diagram the more it hurts to look at.
70.
A blend of nationalist and socialist policies.
Vegans are terrorists.

doesnt work anyway with those numbers

1- 12x5 + 2x5
2 - conservatism
3 - veganism is Cain's syndrome

35. Anarchist, vegan, atheist.

You made some assumptions you should not have made.

this is the sole reason why I teach in private institutions only now

but without those assumptions, you have insufficient materials to solve the problem (ie height, assuming that vertical line is perpendicular to the base)

70
Trad but aknowledger os science and tech: if it works, don't touch it. I despise ideologies that don't succeed
Veganism is stupid and a passing trend

16 x 5 = 80
(12 x 5) + (4 x 5) = 80
80 it is.
Conservative
Faggy.

1 - 50 (units)
2 - libertarian
3 - Feed them to pigs

1: 12*5+2*5
2: anarcho opportunism
3: more tasty meat for me

Attached: ancestry.png (751x599, 61K)

1. f this was actually on a test. I would show how to calculate the are of all three possible object and point out that area A was not specified. This way I would have shown that I know how to solve the problem without the problem being well defined. In my uni days there a few times that information was missing from some questions in exams in order to solve them. Giving an answer where you fill in the blank and point out that information was not provided always resulted in extra marks.
2. I am centrist(the horrors!!!)
3. Veganism is bad for domesticated animals. there are billions of chicken, pigs and cows that have been bread to live in symbiosis with humans. We get something from them and then we tend to them. If the world was to go domesticated animals would die out in one generation or two because there would be no incentive for humans to take care of these animals. Also if the whole world went vegan, millions of people that work with meat production or egg and dairy related jobs would be unemployed. Globally this is one of the lasrgest industries. This would be bad for everyone.
I do believe that animals should be treated as humanly as possible and we should reduce their suffering; but veganism is not the answer. I can also understand people that can't eat meat or use animal products because they actually feel bad if they do. But people that are vegan to one up someone else are using veganism to give their life a purpose that doesn't exist.

14•5 520

1. A=70
2.On what?
3. Not for me.

16-12=4
4/2=2
16-2=14
14*5

Typical ASVAB question.
The militarization of autism has begun
The next war will be fought with the reeee as the victory cry

1) undefined angles
2) libertarian
3) superior in every measurable way.

nigger, you fell for a nonsensical exercise. there is no way that the 8 and the 5 and the part of the 16 form a valid pythagoras. heil hitler! feed vegans to the kitteh!

50+20=70

16x5 would be if it were a full rectangle of width 16

7 * 10
Anarcho-primitivist
My tribe has not invented numbers beyond 10.
Animals are food and clothing

But given that it's common core, let's assume those things (cuz otherwise you can't work it out).
(2 x 5 / 2) + (2 x 5 / 2) + (12 x 5) = 10 + 60 = 70.

So many idiots

FPBP

Attached: 1540846964605s.jpg (166x250, 5K)

The shape described in the image is not possible. It is improperly implied to be a trapezoid, and the 5 and 16 length segments are not adequately indicated to be perpendicular. This is what the shape would have to look like in order for those side lengths to be exact and the 5&16 to meet at right angles.

Attached: 1539638107530.png (613x327, 4K)

Veganism started out as a way to make your butthole smell less shitty for anal sex.
Anyone who has ever stuck their penis in a butthole needs to be sent to the gas chambers.

Attached: chitchat.jpg (657x753, 80K)

Are you mad you can't do simple math?

go ahead, draw us a triangle with sides 5 2 and 8 in length, I'm waiting

It doesn’t make sense because 5 squares plus 2 squares doesn’t equal 8 squares.

I’m right wing and hate leftism.

I’m vegan.

You are a dumb nigger

A. 80
B. Islamo fascist
C. Who cares

*squared.
Phone auto corrected

thank you user. now I know why steve jobs became a fruit-vegan after his trip to india.

1. That question is nigger tier
2. Conservative with light leanings towards ancap economics
3. It’s kind of silly, but it isn’t bad I guess. If you want to be healthy though, and I am no judge on this but, if you want to be healthy removing meats fishes and dairy from your diet entirely is not a good idea. It would be far more sane to just be vegetarian instead, that way you could still have eggs and dairy.

You should take a little extra time to think about the problem.

Looks like your views on veganism is as good as your math ability

You need to think outside of Pythagoras' theorem. Math is bigoted anyway

In geometry, it is not proper to assume a shape is a trapezoid without indication that exactly one pair of sides is parallel. Nor is it proper to assume that any given angle is a right angle without an explicit indicator for this as well.

I know that's not how you solve it but people who purposefully give you wrong information and then go "huhu you shouldn't be relying on what I gave you" should get a bullet to the head

Might be telling you something you already know here but the AIDS document wasn't a fake. He really DID have AIDS and died from associated illnesses. The cover story is he was too much of a hippy to properly treat his cancer....yeah sure I believe that

I see

By the way, here is what the shape would have to look like if it were indeed meant to be a trapezoid. It would be impossible for the interior segment to have a length of 5.

Attached: 1514718758096.png (585x317, 4K)

stfu chink

I honestly don't know who is spamming these 'questions' but hopefully you learn the lesson:
the question itself is flawed, or in this case is both flawed and incomplete, there's no right angles stated or implied, and there's no way that the residual area to the left of the dotted line can be sqrt(39), it just doesn't fit
so long as you let the opponent choose the context, the story, or the question, you are powerless and end up with meaningless or useless information, and spin your wheels accomplishing nothing

The answer is: do not respond, but instead attack, preferably with useful truth

when news about stevo's health problems emerged, i just looked at the photos which were suggesting aids. Later I was surprised to learn that it presumably wasn't. now whom am I supposed to believe? 1.) some random user on Jow Forums 2.) kike media sucking up to celebs. I guess that's a no-brainer again.

tim cook gave him aids because steve was actively chasing to get aids (it's a fetish every gay man has) and in exchange they made a deal: steve would allow the aids to fester and kill him (which was his fetish) and tim cook would become apple ceo.
that's how the silicon valley rolls and this is nothing unusual there

>so long as you let the opponent choose the context, the story, or the question, you are powerless and end up with meaningless or useless information, and spin your wheels accomplishing nothing
the best advice all day

1. A is next to the word object
2. Anything but fuck democracy
3. Plants are creatures too

60 + 5 square roots of 39. assuming parallel sides.
far enough left.

/thread

1) 80
2) Technocrat centrist
3) Literally who cares

this unironically

Attached: 51461561651.jpg (470x356, 28K)

70
Nazi
Veganism is okay. Vegans are cringy narcissists

Attached: 1484789268930.png (640x1136, 765K)

1. >Find the area of the object
It's on the paper lol!
2. communist
3. the best thing evah

Very interesting, I once heard of poor people chasing AIDS for housing benefits but never heard about the gays. Might make sense from an evolutionary perspective though. If the increase in gays is natural response to overpopulation then perhaps those who are gay also have a deathwish in some related psychological development.

not bad for a frog.

this, nip-san

hivemind

Attached: Oppressive trapezoid.png (664x1119, 42K)

a bit corrected for all assumed red colouring

Attached: Oppressive trapezoid.png (664x1119, 43K)

>sqrt(39) = 2
Thanks, common core!

1. No A area you fucking facebook boomer
2. Fascist
3. Dont give a shit

You clearly lack the animal protein and b vitamins to realize the answer is 70.

Attached: 60DC82D5-2B4A-4495-93C6-D27F640F1B31.jpg (442x460, 40K)

Your inbred muzzie genes retard you from realizing the answer is 70.

Attached: BEF20C05-25A1-4219-B6E6-D35F8CD30F8E.jpg (400x400, 30K)

Did you just assume my angle’s gender?

Attached: 5348EEE3-0B2C-46AF-964C-FED0ADC1DF5D.jpg (599x461, 70K)

What if we're watching a 2d representation of the trapezoid that is leaned back and resting on the dotted line which is behind the trapezoid (thus its dotted and shorter). So it would just be the area of the trapezoid which is (square root of 60) x 14 .

no, no, sir, xir,... please don't send me to reeducation camp!

1. 100
2. Centrist leaning toward liberal
3. Stupid pipe dream that will never accomplish anything

Enjoy user

8*sqrt(396)
That's not a trapezoid.

12*5=60
(2*5)*0,5*2 =10
60+10=70

Fuck me, forgot to divide by 2, it's 8 * sqrt(60)

If you consider the trapezoid (12,16,8,8) the area is 14xsqrt60. How did you end up with 8xsqrt60?

can we go back to the stupid fucking gold ball problem for a second?

1st you can actually measure the angle by a triangle ruler
2nd right and left ends have the same lenght of 8 units with a constant hight of 5 units so it must be a 90 degree angle.

1: A is right fucking there goddamn you.. you... DOUBLE NWAH

2: Andrew Ryanism

3: Pictured plant should be 100% of your diet

Attached: rhymes with rage.jpg (1000x1000, 235K)

70
Neocon
Personal choice

In a trapezoid (12,16,8,8) it is impossible to have an interior segment of length 5 stretching from the 16 segment to a (8,12) intersection. Ergo the shape cannot be a trapezoid.

Look at my responseThe trapezoid is leaned back and resting on the dotted line , the dotted line is behind the back-leaning trapezoid, hence its dotted and smaller.

There is nothing in the problem to suggest that the shape is a trapezoid tilted in 3 dimensional space, you are just being absurd.

1. 16x12
2. jews
3. good for some people. Rtarded ideology. Shlomo loves it, for some reason they know meat makes us stronger and more of a threat.

>3. Vegans should be fed to pigs
goebbels prize

Attached: 72398a3a5216b268b83d2e537b470aa6ea79e9273eed7f6dfcc94f611c1370c5.jpg (650x310, 27K)

i bet u r a republitard too. the nums dont represent the actual size its just to show math and cognitive skills you fuckshit. its no wonder us college educated are liberal and retards like u alt righties stay dumb and stay out of college.

fuck i mean 16x5

give it up shlomo
4pol thrives in shit

A trapezoid with dimensions (12,16,8,8) when you lean it back it looks like in the picture. (Ignoring the dotted line)