If sexual selection is a major driver of evolution why do black people have such an awful hair texture?

If you could test 100% of people and each time get the result they don’t like nigger hair it would be objective fact.

I didn’t say you could but you went full retard.

this explains it
youtu.be/9HpnMdzEp7s

That may be true, but it's probably due to Western culture's dominance over the world. Before the modern-age they'd probably prefer their own traits.

There was a documentary I watched recently about Portuguese, Jesuit missionaires traveling to Japan. The Japanese considered their "long-noses" and colored hair to be defects.

yes, but now they can't get enough of colored hair, eyes, etc, just look at anime. It may be subjective, but most people want to look white

You sound like a faggot that's trapped in 1968

Attached: fashwave3.jpg (286x176, 17K)

Long silky hair can't survive the hot African sun.

It's still culturally subjective so it doesn't make it objective, genius.

If you put black toddlers on an island, allowed them to form culture organically, and then asked them what type of hair texture they prefer do you think they'd say they prefer white texture hair?

Ok, but how does this make the case that Negro hair is objectively unnattractive?

It doesn't, looks are culturally subjective.

I agreed that beauty is subjective, my point is that it doesn't matter when most people in the developed world prefer white features anyways.

Because the hot sub-saharan climate favours for curly hair. Don’t you know science user?

OP's asking how could African hair be a thing when sexual selection is a major drive for selecting traits. In his eyes it's awful but that's just due to a cultural bias. Your point adds nothing to the conversation.

You have no base to back up your claims. Social constructivism has been proved wrong.

There is a biological algorithm that makes beauty objective, and consequentially some individuals better, fitter and smarter than others for the despair of misfits progressives/liberals/leftists that wish to change the beauty concept.

Attached: wakandaproject.jpg (625x910, 126K)

>I agreed beauty is subjective

>If you could test 100% of people and each time get the result they don’t like nigger hair it would be objective fact.

Choose one

Explain my example of the Japanese reacting to white missionaires. If looks are objective why did the Japanese consider them ugly and defected?

I'm not arguing that there are no races or whatever you think I'm arguing. I'm just stating the fact that words like good or bad are inherently biased.

In an alternate universe Jow Forums there's a nigger asking the same thing only about white hair texture.

because sex doesn't care about who is pretty or ugly. it cares whether the sperm reaches the egg.

in black culture women don't get to choose shit

and those preferences fall short of the fact we live on a big farm that does everything in its power to homogenise us.

>hair texture
is a social construct

You can't prove objectivity exists but you can prove preferences exist, and if you can't understand that then you are actually retarded.

okay retard, lets say "the best ice cream flavor is subjective" but when asked honestly most people say they prefer chocolate ice cream. Saying "well that's subjective" doesn't change that most people like chocolate ice cream the best. So ice cream companies will probably focus on chocolate ice cream the most since it is popular.

Attached: head of an argentine.png (201x206, 59K)

No, it creates an insulated sponge that blocks out heat, kinda like a Styrofoam cooler. The black color also absorbs heat from the body, giving it a cooling effect. It's why desert tribes like the Bedouin tend to wear loose billowy robes and hoods made with dark fabrics.

Explain this
youtu.be/bIOujtxeQzo
1:04

The Western man picks a woman who, by Chinese standards, is ugly. That proves looks influenced by culture.

Beauty isn't subjective, we prize our definition of smart but that doesn't mean being smart is an objectively good thing.

I'm not a SJW or a liberal btw.

Idk but I hate niggers

Attached: Haircut.jpg (750x725, 109K)

>Chinese standards, is ugly

case closed. they aren't human.

Nice point the one of the japaneses.

>In an alternate universe Jow Forums there's a nigger asking the same thing only about white hair texture.

That would be true IF all the other currently white characteristics were transfered to blacks, and vice-versa - making the blacks more witted and adaptable.

But in this universe, having the whites engaged with other races and triumphed (as Hegel said, any white man is the embodiment of civilization), therefore the beauty patern has been revealed and stated. Perhaps you are right.

Attached: west.jpg (744x716, 52K)

And if you don't understand that your point adds nothing to the conversation about why a thousands years old trait is still around you're retarded.
>hurr durr Ice-cream
In Africa's case the hair-texture they preffered obviously wasn't fine hair so it didn't drive their sexual evolution. What's so hard to understand?

100% agreed opinion is still opinion, not fact. You sure are getting mad insisting on stupidity, though.

Except I’m replying to your full retard logic that if 100% percent of people believe something it’s not objective fact which is literally the definition.

The statement everyone prefers white hair would then be a objective fact you sperg

It would only be fact that the 100% OPINION is that they don't like nigger hair, not that nigger hair is objectively unattractive. You aren't smart at all. Please don't reproduce.

SeeWhen I state everyone believes something and then it’s tested 100% accurate and repeatable it’s a objectively factual statement.

Anything else....

Modernity doesn't change the meaning of the words "objective" or "fact".

the hair is lice resistant.

Attached: faggit.gif (392x500, 186K)

Are you retarded the fact it’s a universal statement makes it not a opinion anymore but a objective fact

The statement everyone prefers x becomes an objective fact.

Still opinion. Attraction is a subjective thing. You should go back to school.

Preference m8

If I asked do you prefer breathing air or water 100% of people should say air and objectively breathing air is preferred

Don’t back track now

Raping everything isn't sexual selection. Getting raped also isn't sexual selection.
The more "hot blooded" the people, the less sexual selection means more ugly people with shitty traits and less opportunity for selecting for positive traits creating a downward spiral that appears to end in abbos, spics and somalis.

Nope. Still subjective. The only fact arising from that statement would be that 100% of the people opine that nigger hair is less attractive. Since a precedent already exists in history, the assumption that even a 100% agreed result will remain stable cannot be made. Even if it could, it's still only the consensus of opinion, not fact. No variation of opinion would ever change the chemical composition of water, so that is a fact, not objective. Please try to pay attention.

>fact, not objective.
subjective
typo

No, that would still be subjective, but the 100% agreement would be because people can't breathe water. Only a moron would choose water. Had you said that 100% of the people on earth will die if forced to breathe water, that is fact. No one's backtracking, you're just wrong.

hahhahahahaha!

what kind of lice?

If any choice is to be made based on preference, it's subjective. In your example, people prefer not to drown. It's a terrible analogy that doesn't work.

No m8 your word Salading now

The preference to breath air or water is a opinion your argument is no matter how much you can get a 100% on a opinion it’s subjective yet it’s objectvily a fact people prefer to breath air why

Because of the objective consequences of the latter the same way preferring to like niggger hair comes with objective consequences.

Being able to repeat th experiment on water to understand its chemical composition makes it objective the same way being able to test repeat and prove the statement everyone prefers x will make that statement objective fact

No m8 it’s a opinion some people don’t even prefer to live

Your fucked logically m8

Because sexual selection is not the only kind of natural selection occurring. Niggers with nappier heads can keep their heads cooler more easily allowing them to run longer without tiring. this makes hunting easier and more likely to be successful especially considering the best traditional nigger weapon for hunting anything larger than a rabbit is the spear. Niggers have never invented nor used spear throwers, which are literally just a stick with a hook at one end, and nigger bows are so rudimentary that they cannot be drawn fully and have rather low draw weights in the first place, making them essentially worthless on anything other than birds or small rodents.

Attached: b60.jpg (600x763, 76K)

If it can be changed by raising them differently or something similar to that than it *is not objective.*

Objective facts are non-wavering and impossible to change like 1 + 1 = 2

Raise a man in pre-modern Japan and he thinks Japanese features are more attractive? Then your 'fact' is not objective.

it makes kick ass dreadlocks tho

No it does work because we know people kill themselves everyday

But based on consensus you say living is objectively preferable you got trapped in a corner

Don’t back track

We are talking about a objectively stable opinion faggot a hypothetical

SeeYou suggest that drowning is objectively non preferable yet that’s only based on consensus that living is preferable

Nigger, are you accounting for factors like culture, how they're raised, etc.?

TV, politics, memories, and so many other factors can be changed to produce different preferances. Therefore, it isn't objective.

Better yet: Why do niggers smell like a mixture of feces, urine, and raw onions?

We are taking about opinions that are objectively stable faggot

Again did you not just suggest that drowning is objectively non preferable or not faggot

It is a proven scientific fact that niggers are an inferior race. They are intellectually, physically, and pschologically inferior. Like women, Niggers use emotion rather than logic to resolve problems. In that regard, niggers are more feminine than whites.

>If you put black toddlers on an island, allowed them to form culture organically, and then asked them what type of hair texture they prefer do you think they'd say they prefer white texture hair?

Yes.
Fine textured things are typically preferred over rough textured things.
>Let me slip into my woolen lingerie!
Said no one ever

Attached: 18a.jpg (1721x1492, 458K)

Stop using the word objective if you don't understand what it means.

Preferring nappier hair isn't something that places you in immediate danger like drowning.

And if everyones in agreement about standards of beauty explain ancient Japan or the tribes in Africa that wear lip-plates.

What you call objective is really just a subjective preferance of the time caused by external factors like Hollywood.

Niggers have pubic hair on their heads... So what? Is having a head full of fucking cunt hairs supposed to give one an advantage?

You're fucking retarded. You're projecting your own opinions and cultural ways.

>typically preffered

In other words not objective

For you

No m8 your still clinging to the nigger analogy no one is talking about we are discussing the fact a consensus agreement on anything being preferred makes it objectively fact

You fucked yourself when you showed you understand this logic by suggesting the fear of death or drowning is objectively non preferable twice now the only reason you believe that is based on consensus when people in the world want to die and Prefer not to be alive.

You’re a hipocrtical child with the logic to fit.

The exported beauty myth is blown out as well with your own logic

Music fashion and art and even thoughts about law and education are just as subjective and have been just as pushed for longer than modern times onto none whites yet niggers prefer their own version of these things today but somehow prefer white beauty after decades of being threatened with death over indulging it.

Most black people lose their hair

Attached: IMG_2658.png (750x1334, 952K)

so that you don't mate with them and produce offspring with awful nigger genes, retard.

Objective fact:
1 + 1 = 2

An object added to another object equals two objects. That axiom is unwavering through time, through culture, through time and space, and even in the minds of non-human species.

You can travel lightyears away from our Earth and even aliens would agree with what you're saying if you can decode their language.

Subjective fact:
In the year 2018 people prefer European features, but that is a very unstable fact because just a hundred years ago different races preffered there own features.

You see? You're talking about today's ever-changing preferences and acting like the here and now defines objectivity.

For something to be objective you have to factor in what is agreed upon by all living things throughout history from now and to come. The aliens living in some far-away galaxy? Their thoughts also have to be factored in.

Facts aren't about what is preffered.

Listen man, I can't explain it ot any different way. PLEASE ask someone else who knows, someone you trust hearing it from, like a professor of English. You need to know this. I am absolutely 100% correct. This isn't even debatable. I am 100% empirically correct and you are 100% incorrect without variation. You don't believe me. I get it. I don't care to be the one to prove it to you, but you need to know before you look stupid in real life trying to argue this. PLEASE look this up further for your own sake. You are objectively, empirically incorrect about this. This isn't a pissing contest or mental sparring. This is a black-and-white issue, but you're showing colors.

My black gfs hair is really nice though

Lions are scared of afros.

Still an opinion.

You're throwing around nonsense now to try to trip me up or something, but there is no grey area here. This is a simple, simple matter.

Please, ask someone you trust who will know - a professor of English, perhaps. You don't trust my explanation of this empirical fact, so before you look really stupid in person somewhere, go find out for yourself. You are wrong.

You clearly don't understand these concepts.

It's a wig, my dude

niggers are the ugliest son of bitches of all time.
The fact the media shills them as attractive despite having faces like an exploded asshole and every conceivable unattractive feature known to humankind should alert all intelligent people to the mass deception and brainwashing from the media.

No, it's her natural

>a consensus agreement on anything being preferred makes it objectively fact
objectively, empirically incorrect.

Niggers like the things that Jews tell them to like tbqh. Jews control Hollywood and mass-media.

The most popular African Pornhub search is 'Ebony.'

Attached: .-''.png (764x567, 193K)

you just haven't pulled it hard enough.

They're just trolling now. Anyone north of window-licker would've understood one of our explanations by now. You're just wasting effort.

*most people

Which is arguable because most people still prefer their own race's traits.

at first glance i thought it was ice cream on a cone.

Rape is a bigger factor.

it is objective if its the only preference that can be observed, its the only sort of its kind that exists so it's true. Like how 1+1 has only had one solution therefore it's objectively true, the preference follows likewise if the experiment were done (on the entire population to prevent bias) and it did result in 100% then it makes it objectively true that it is preferred and likewise that non shitskin hair is better because no counter exists

how can you say something can exist without having proof of its existence (that someone prefers that hair texture)?

you can't

There is a give and take with black women. I personally am a fan of the natural hair. OP's pic is very selectively biased because we've all seen pics of natural haired hotties.

Moreover, black women tend to have more desirable skin. Culturally, the use more lotion that white people, and as a consequence, older black women are still fine as hell.

Just sayin

No one finds black womens skin desirable you idiot.

Still opinion. Still subjective. PLEASE go ask someone you trust about this before you look stupid to everyone else you ever say this to. You're just plain wrong. It's not even a gray area. There's no room for argument. This is an on/off scenario.

I do. I like all shades and the pussies they surround.

I pull it, it's real. Never wears wigs or weave

Is living subjectively better or objectively better

Human skin sensitivity is universal faggot.
There's a reason why rough clothing is associated with ascetics, and it's not because of cultural mores. It's because rough shit irritates human skin.

nigger hair literally looks like shit and its disgusting

Attached: nigger.jpg (620x765, 92K)

>Ok, but how does this make the case that Negro hair is objectively unnattractive?
Their hair is like pubic hair.

Subjectively. It's an opinion, regardless of who agrees.
You could say that air is objectively necessary for life.

There is sexual selection for black people who straighten/shave off their hair.