Pol approved philosophers?

Kierkegaard
Spengler
Kant

Add some stoics to that list
Epicurious
Seneca
And my nigga Marcus Aurelius

Diego Fusaro, Italian modern day philosopher, REAL National Socialist, blames Soros for the amount of degeneracy in Europe, has written many successful books that are translated in English and the book he recently published (The new erotic order) literally says that trans "people" aren't to be considered mentally stable and that a catholic marriage between a white man and a white woman should be at the very center of society, he still hasn't busted a nut, at least with his gf, because he wants to wait until marriage

Attached: 1537624813_db56c016cfd86da2223b835358381edf.jpg (1225x1737, 282K)

Epicurus wasn't a fucking stoic, he was a degenerate

Oswald Spengler
Carl Schmitt
Ernst Jünger (although he hasnt really seen himself as a philosopher)

Attached: 04021802-4993-4ACA-A6AC-AAF7534EF966.png (546x259, 189K)

>unironically
>that e-celb manchild cunt
Idiot

Why was Epicur a degenerate? And yes, he wasn't a stoic, obviously.
There are modern philosophers worth reading, despite their political views. For example, ''Simulation and Simulacrum'' by Baudrillard, etc

Seconding this post but add Aquinas.

Attached: The_Thomistic_Proof.png (488x2127, 451K)

I'd start with Anselm, I don't want to recommend shit like scholasticism to a beginner

Yeah that's fair.

Reading philosophy is shit. Listen to Mozart.

t. Pooinloo
Adolf hitler

Ive not really studied Epicurus' reasonment but it basically just revolves around the whole "Carpe Diem" idea which is often misinterpreted by modern-day degenerates who translate it into "lets destroy ourselves with drugs, smoke, alcohol, non-stop sex and poor knowledge of pretty much everything"

>Mozart
listen to Liszt, at least he wasn't scatophilic

I hate nazis and their ideology, but I heard that Mein Kampf also has some pretty reasonable philosophical considerations in it. Can someone non-88 redpill me on that?

Rudolf Steiner. Anyone willing to read and meme him would do the culture a service.

Autism is a sign of genius.

But degeneracy isn't

Attached: hegel5.jpg (249x249, 12K)

Meh I'm a degenerate myself so that may be why I've always liked Mozart.

>Nietzsche

Shit

Attached: socrates.jpg (1335x561, 286K)

Attached: YuanEmperorAlbumGenghisPortrait.jpg (1578x1997, 1.2M)

Ancient Western:
Heraclitus
Socrates
Democrirus
Pyrrho of Elis
Diogenes of Sinope
Epicurus

Ancient Eastern:
Laozi
Mahavira
Buddha
Liezi
Chuangzi
Nagarjuna

Medieval:
Musashi
Munenori
Eihei Dogen
Tsunetomo
Machiavelli
Montaigne

Modern:
Schopenhauer
John Stuart Mill
Nietzsche
Heidegger
Camus
Wittgenstein

>one of the few greeks against democracy

you fucking retard, almost all greek philosophers opposed democracy. socrates, plato, aristotle, and the stoics all opposed it.

>john stuart mill

you libtard fag. mill was a degenerate individualist who cucked his friend and defended sodomy

heraclitus, plato, aristotle, nicholas cusanus, aquinas, meister ekhart, rousseau, kant, fichte, schelling, hegel, nietzsche, schmitt, spengler

Unironically this guy

Attached: roger-scruton-2015.jpg (500x625, 67K)

neitzsche, machivelli, plato, sun tzu, aristotle, aurelius, confucius

dude spent all day jerking off in a marketplace

ganz entartet

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus

Attached: marcus aurelius 4.jpg (1229x768, 423K)

You should read everything everyone has mentioned to get a frame of reference. This will take years.

But an honest acertation of what is best for you in terms of applied philosophy will lead you to Aristotle and Ayn Rand.

>Ayn Rand

jesus fucking christ, go put your life savings in bitcoin or something you libertarian faggot

ayn rand was a fucking joke

4 more.

Ancient Western:
Marcus Aurelius
Seneca
Plato
Aristotle

Ancient Eastern
Hilel
Patanjali
Sun Tzu
Confucius

Medieval
Shantideva
La Rochefoucauld
Hakuin
Jayarāśi Bhaṭṭa

Modern:
David Hume
Henry David Thoreau
Frege
Stirner

Alfred the Great
Diogenes
Jesus

>medieval

>la rochefoucauld

jesus fucking christ 1680 is not medieval you retard

Plato
Kant
Bob the Builder
Schopenhauer

Kind of medieval. It depends of the cutline, dear meme flag.

let the simpletons live their lives by over simplified black and white caricatures of reality.

nobody thinks 1680 is medieval. what the actual fuck is wrong with you you fucking moron

can i grasp this without reading hundreds of books?

Attached: 345325325325.png (658x662, 43K)

George Carlin

>jacks off in public
>espouses unpopular opinions on normies who care not
>owns literally nothing
>only freinds are stray dogs that give him a leader of the pack feeling
Literally pol

>hurr durr simpletons
>rand triggers me because I'm too dense to read

As always, non-arguments.

Treat your obsessive–compulsive disorder reading those authors

If you read half, you're alright for life

Overwhelming majority were libtard retards.
Just stick with Nietzsche.

Stop wasting time and read, moron

I do. I'm getting my PhD in philosophy.

I used to be an Objectivist, when I was like 12, and a libertarian/classical liberal until I was 20.

Rand's not taken seriously for two reasons:

1. She's a libertarian (even if she didn't admit it) and the academy are lefties who don't like reading libertarians.

2. (FAR more importantly) she was a bad philosopher - she was not academically trained, didn't know what she was talking about, and argued badly.

Replace him with Peter Abelard. Now breath.

abelard was a fucking eunuch. your favorite philosopher had no balls you brazilian greasemonkey

So what? I read their books. While you're concerned about what happened to them. It's hard to believe someone will write anything worth it with such childish behavior.

you read abelard? what are you - a medieval phil professor? nobody fucking reads abelard, it's a waste of time unless you're working your way through a medieval phil anthology

nigga i just got my second journal submission published

Do you write in one of those retarded white supremacist KKK journals? That's the only platform for you.

'philosophy and public affairs'

I’m about to read stirner. Am I retarded?

1. True, which causes a contradiction in your second point.

2. All of the worst philosophers were academically trained. Literally I'm to point where the extent to which a philosopher is academically trained is the extent to which I expect them to be a terrible human being.

Also
>I was objectivist when I was 12
No, you weren't.

I adore the works of Henry David Thoreau, though I seem to be the minority in that regard.

Stirner is not worth reading unless you are:

a. An edgelord leftie or libertarian (in which case yes, you're retarded)

b. Doing extremely niche scholarship on 19th century German thought after Hegel

I would not recommend Stirner assuming you have more important, more foundational works in philosophy to read first, which, given that you're on Jow Forums, you probably do.

In general I'd recommend starting with classical thought. Get a Presocratic reader - the Patricia Curd one is good-, then read some Platonic dialogues (Euthyphro, Phaedo, Crito, Symposium, Apology, Timaeus, in no particular order, but definitely include the Republic), then Aristotle (Categories, Physics, Metaphysics, De Anima, Nicomachean Ethics, Politics), then get a Hellenistic reader (Inwood and Gerson is best).

Medieval philosophy is cool but nobody cares about it. If you want to spend time here, it's worthwhile, but so niche that hardly anybody cares. Read Augustine, St. Anselm, Aquinas, Ockham, and Nicholas of Cusa. This is optional but fun.

(Early) Modern: Descartes (Meditations), Spinoza (Ethics), Leibniz (get a reader with some of his longer essays, like Monadology). Read Locke (Essay, Second Treatise, Letter on Toleration) and Hume (both of the Enquiries).

Kant and German Idealism: Kant is most important (read: Prolegomena, all three Critiques, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Metaphysics of Morals, Perpetual Peace, What is Enlightenment?, History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View). Fichte (Wissenschaftslehre, Natural Right, Addresses to the German Nation), Schelling (this is hard because he has so many writings - I'd recommend reading selections from the System of Transcendental Idealism, the Naturphilosophie, the Essay on Human Freedom, Positive Philosophy, and the Historical-Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Mythology). Finally Hegel (Phenomenology of Spirit, Science of Logic, Philosophy of History, Philosophy of Right).

1. What's the contradiction.

2. If you think that all of the experts in a field are the worst people at that field, maybe you're just retarded.

3. Yes, I got really into Rand in middle school.

he's the worst of the american transcendentalists. emerson is way better, except for being a lincolnite fag

Attached: 1538778664810.jpg (1185x2048, 200K)

Justin Roiland
Dan Harmon

HEGEL IS A NIGGER

1. If you can't understand the contradiction, then sorry. You're beyond help.

2. Not an argument.

3. Watching a YouTube video does mean you understood a philosophical framework .

Marx's relationship to Hegel is a retarded meme that Marx's have emphasized in order to lend Marxism more intellectual heft. The similarities are for the most part things that are implicit in German idealism (and oftentimes just 19th c. European thought) in general, stuff that Fichte and others already said.

Hegel himself was a political conservative.

lots o' commie memeflags at 7:41am, Atlantic time.

1. I'm asking what the contradiction is you fucking mongoloid.

2. meme

3. you're literally quoting molyneux

Rousseau
Sartre

sartre was a bug-eyed commie

rousseau is actually way cooler than people give him credit for and is actually not really leftie

Imagine being an 80 IQ Ukranian subhuman slav criticizing Plato... Kys

Attached: image.png (1280x1280, 221K)

*naturalist.

Kierkegaard
Charles Maurass

>just do whatever you want bro

Kys Epicurus was ass

um... he was definitely a transcendentalist

Whether he was also a 'naturalist' is open-ended because 'naturalism' refers to a bunch of different philosophical positions. But he was a part of the Transcendentalist movement

It’s a political analysis of the austro Hungarian empire, autobiography, and anti-Marxist polemic that also touches on some party politics and marketing. Philosophically it assumes knowledge of Hegel and on.

We loved poles and considered you german brothers, unlike the R*s which are vikang rapebabies

I'm pretty sure regular doctors did work on teeth back then, and to my knowledge thoreau was neither.

>I'm pretty sure regular doctors did work on teeth back then

A+

Bertrand Russel

>What is work? Work is of two kinds: first, altering the position of matter at or near the earth's surface relatively to other such matter; second, telling other people to do so. The first one is unpleasant and ill paid; the second is pleasant and highly paid.

Moral philosopher David Rachels. who BTFO the idea of moral subjectivism with the very simple proof that this belief implies moral infallibility, which is impossible.

>Bertrand Russel
he was a socialist, naive empiricist, atheist, utilitarian, and a proto-positivist

what a total shite choice for a favorite philosopher

Mostly as a joke but partially unironically, Diogenes.

Attached: 70g6bdpxqjjz.png (2518x1024, 247K)

he's the romantic faggot of the transcendentalists and quite the cuck. i can see why you like him, ladyboy.

Attached: Behold, a man.webm (480x600, 2.91M)

>Top Aryan who won't breed his own wife
Kek. What a role model for wypipo

You probably mean Epictetus, Epicurus was a degenerate hedonist.

Thanks for the recommendation bro. Just read the doctrine of fascism yesterday

Any place in your brain for post-WWII thinkers, or are ye only ruminating and fulminating on dusty books, you lousy excuse for a faggot?

Everyone tells me to start with the greeks, how true is this?