Good thread yesterday on discussing the current leftist cultural infighting regarding Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminism (TERFs). What it takes to convince white western women to embrace more "right wing" ideas whilst retaining social acceptance amongst their peers.
Subvert the Left General - /slg/
Thomas Powell
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.fo
youtu.be
twitter.com
Nathaniel Miller
i don't understand this.
woman thought is irrelevant.
>checks flag
oh...
Brody Morgan
B ump
Ayden Howard
Also good point on the fp
Evan Lopez
non 4plebs link
William Hall
>The Experiments in Fracturing Monocultures
>It’s been over a year since The Theory of Fracturing Monocultures was published and during that year, the theory has been successfully tested.
>The Twitter hashtag #SolidarityIsForWhiteWomen was the first application of the theory. Members of the Jow Forums board Jow Forums created dozens of fake accounts designed to look like women of color. They used the same techniques pixel-based feminists utilize to game social media: _dehumanization of critics, signal boosting the mundane, and tone policing_. This resulted in several days of white feminists desperately pleading on Twitter to be quiet and listen and eventually the monoculture obeyed.
>Soon after that, many of these same accounts were utilized to promote the #endFathersDay hoax. For a week, prominent feminists and feminist blogs actively promoted the idea. Even after the hoax was revealed, the monoculture was not able to quickly disengage from the narrative since the tone of the hashtag was similar to something the monoculture would actually believe.
The results are conclusive: The imperial monoculture of pixel-based feminism -CAN- be fractured, but how was it fractured and why did it fracture?
Logan Cruz
>1.) Self-identification is automatically trusted
>The lure of the monoculture is that as long as you self-identify with an orthodox identity, then you will be able to leverage the entire monoculture for your goals. (Promoting blogs, reviews, and other gamified content) However, once the identity is pledged, every action after that will be under imperial review with strict punishment for the slightest violation. This dual incentive for compliance creates a walled garden that, in turn, creates the illusion of a grand ideological unity. Finally, this illusion is essential to the cherished “safe space“ of the monoculture and to question any component of this complete illusion threatens the safe space.
>Therefore, questioning the self-identity of another erodes the illusion of unity, which might erode the safe space, which means all self-identifications must be automatically trusted. Furthermore, the self-identification cannot be considered false as long as it is speaking in the tone of the monoculture as a whole.
>In the event of #solidarityIsForWhiteWomen, members actively feared being labeled a racist, which means that questioning the self-identity of a woman of color would result in potential excommunication.
>In the event of #endFathersDay, the self-identification was automatically trusted, allowing the narrative to get as loud as it did.
Camden Ross
>2.) The safe space is sacred
>The safe space is only possible through absolute obedience to the monoculture. However, the same obedience shields it from criticism, which in turn, dramatically weakens the monoculture’s ability to adapt over time.
>The safe space is sacred. Anything that is responsible for the safe space is sacred. The initial conditions responsible for that safe space are also sacred, so if there is a fundamental error in the design, then it is the fault of the believer, not the monoculture.
>In the event of #solidarityIsForWhiteWomen, the safe space was totally shattered and had to be forcefully recreated by asking the monoculture to “be quiet and listen.“ Members of the monoculture were quick to blame themselves for not listening to women of color… without overtly self-identifying as racist themselves. (Though, is is theoretically possible members will even self-identify as racist if that means they get to retain membership within the monoculture)
>In the event of #endFathersDay, instead of shattering the safe space, agitators spoke in the appropriate tone to amplify it. The monoculture generated a believable tone that was quickly championed for several days. When it was revealed that the safe space was actually compromised from the start, the monoculture was quick to lay blame and generated a new safe space. There must always be a safe space or the monoculture cannot provide returns. Members were not allowed to conclude that safe space -can- be compromised, because that would invalidate its holiness.
>Therefore, the safe space is entirely open to be manipulated (either to be destroyed or to be amplified) by -any- identity (and thus, invalidate its promise of safety) because the monoculture is not allowed to examine fundamental flaws in its own structure.
Isaac Allen
Jow Forums is constantly targeted by divide and conquer operations while also conducting their own for free
Blake Cooper
>3.) You must find an enemy
>The monoculture rewards the membership that engages in imperial conquest. By denouncing, humiliating, or otherwise dehumanizing a supposed enemy of the monoculture, the conqueror is rewarded in retweets, likes, upvotes, reblogs, and other arbitrary metrics of progress. The more targets that are attacked, the more points they receive. This naturally creates a structure that rewards any attack on anything, regardless of fault, through increasingly under-handed tactics.
>Therefore, the monoculture exists to provide incentives for perpetual acts of dehumanization.
>In the event of #solidarityIsForWhiteWomen, black membership attacked white membership, and when the agitators magnified the vitriol of the attack, white membership dehumanized itself in proportion to the vitriol.
>In the event of #endFathersDay, the success of the trend was based entirely on fulfilling the required mandate of dehumanizing an enemy of the monoculture, in this case, fathers.
>If there isn’t an enemy, one must be found because there is no other way to collect points.
Michael Brown
>Conclusion
>Even in the wake of two successful attempts at covert manipulation, the monoculture has not even attempted to fix its fundamental flaws. With the advent of #NotYourShield, the three aforementioned fracture points were tested and broke yet again.
>Citing the previous two attempts against the monoculture, they believed that #NotYourShield was yet another covert operation. They quickly found an enemy, (chan) and generated a safe space, (“Those aren’t actual minorities, those are sockpuppets”) but this time, the safe space had a *very limited amount of authorized identities. (The gamer identity is now forbidden from the monoculture)
>It turned out that the hashtag was actually comprised of a significant amount of non-white racial identities as well as female identities. The monoculture leveled their sights on active membership, monoculture supporters, and potential monoculture inductees, and unloaded upon them.
Samuel Gonzalez
Chiggidy checked son!
Carter Harris
>This means that the agitators have successfully exploited the immutable weaknesses of the monoculture (two jabs and then… nothing. The monoculture took the lead and attacked its own) and can potentially weaponize the entire structure for their own usage. And because of the monoculture’s impulse to punish all criticism, the membership that sees this exploitation isn’t allowed to fix it, (they’ll be forced to fracture off entirely and build a new monoculture) and the membership that cannot see the exploitation are not allowed to hold such a heretical belief, allowing successful agitators to issue internal purges almost at will.
>The entire monoculture of pixel-feminism has been demonstrably and irreversibly compromised by non-approved identities because of three fracture points: the complete inability to handle identity emulation, the worship of an impossible standard of safety, and easily provoked bloodlust. And if one identity (especially one the monoculture hates so much) can direct the wrath of the monoculture against its own kind, then other identities are free to steer it just as easily.
Michael Russell
GOOD thread. Bumping.
Joshua White
Using leftist newspeak rhetoric against leftists >it's important to realize that the idiotic, self-serving hypocrisy of the TERF is exactly what makes them the perfect useful idiot. As ideologically indoctrinated morons, they can attack the transgender idiocy in ways that no right winger can. It's a hard concept to explain but essentially, left-wingers can attack left-wing ideas in ways that right-wingers cannot. There's no "automatic defense" so to speak, when a TERF says that trans-women shouldn't be in women-only spaces compared to when a sane person says the same thing. TERFs have all the same ideological markers, they fight from points of equality, safety, and inclusivity (Near enough holy words in the modern left) so they pass through the front gate and actually get to spew their ideas in leftist forums.
>Properly utilized, leftist talking points and ideas can be turned on their users because of their inherent contradictions. Attacking from a leftist point of view should really be included more often in Jow Forums's attack patterns. It's far more effective than attacking from a right or traditionalist point of view, which is often dismissed out of hand as bigotry or just being old fashioned.
Cooper Young
I can see it now. They're transforming into Pepes.
Dominic Price
...which I am able to do because I happen to have a snake tongue and mind. Your point? Psyop 101.
Adrian Rogers
Lol I read the thread polack tier response,
Nolan James
blessed thread and bump
Dominic Rogers
Also another angle of attack is to just show clips of cute white babies with both their parents.
Show this video to any young woman who thinks she doesn't want to be a mother.
Don't lead with the conclusion — just tell her to watch this cute video.
Based on the reactions in comments, this video is the most effective pro-natalist propaganda ever to hit the internet.
Apparently, it hits women right in the uterus. Delete your graphs and charts and essays and word- or logic- or fact- based arguments. With women, all you need is more videos like this (and only because they're not seeing it IRL enough).
A minute-long video of a cute baby doing cute things is literally all it takes for thousands of women to cry tears of longing for a husband and a baby of their own.
Consider how easy it would be to get women to want to be wives and mothers again if we had control over the media and women were seeing stuff like this regularly in the media they consumed which showed the good and cute and beautiful and fulfilling side of being a wife and mother.
Remember this: Biologically, women haven't changed. They essentially have the same genetics as their female ancestors from centuries ago.
What has changed is the culture — which is intent on ruining them (and us) — this is a sad fact, but it also means they can easily be saved. All of this damage could be reversed within a generation or two.
We'd just need control of the culture in order to do it — and there's the rub. That's why they commandeered our culture to begin with and won't give it back without a fight.
Daniel James
Some of the time. I've seen specialized indoctrination that causes instant hate on seeing it.
Robert Baker
bump
Isaiah Turner
If they know this, you'd think they'd realise that they're just weak cowards whose only conviction is in conforming to the herd.
Grayson Scott
Except that it's impossible to tell CIA ops from run of the mill shitposting, so we're immune. Mossad/JIDF ops are easy to spot since they're retarded kikes.