Monogamy is not natural

It’s nit monogamy that does that. It’s the modern relationship model that does.

No, it makes Civilization. Not just the best, it cannot exist without socially enforced monogamy - how else do you harness the labor of beta men to further your society, if they know they will never have an heir, a family, a legacy?

>you start to feel like siblings
fuck based if true
>2018.
>not having the superior festish

Attached: 3a229cf5c5cf92ae676332d6f542092e.gif (512x288, 578K)

Old spinsters complain how no men want them, while having no regrets over their own wasted youth. It's apparently easy for women to tell themselves she doesn't need to be chained down by a man while men are throwing themselves at her. They sing a different tune once they're old, dried-up hags.

Why do you feel jealous after your gf get fucked by a nigger? Is that not a natural feeling or are we all supposed to be polyamorous and cool with it?

Fucking retard

This monogamy is our natural state. Evolutionary benefit of jealousy is securing mate to ensure she only sleeps with you

In Hinduism the widow is supposed to throw herself into the same fire that burns her husbands corpse (or atleast it used to be like that)

Marriage and monogamy is for cucks and will turn you into a fat effeminate pussy, and promiscuity is a great way to get rot on your dick eventually.

Celibacy is unironically the superior path. Doesn't even matter if it's impractical for most men, since most men will be unable to resist their biological urges anyway so mankind or the white race or whatever will never die out because of celibacy.

But those who do successfully resist are rewarded with peace, freedom and self-possession.

I wonder why Spain is so fucked in comparison to other western countries

fpbp

Attached: must be at work.jpg (1200x1909, 304K)

>Czech Republic
>60+%
Based atheist meth smoking pornstars.

Based Ireland

Attached: 84BA0A17-7C1B-4C9E-B0C6-BC01108DAD16.jpg (480x640, 41K)

There is nothing wrong with polygamy. There is nothing in the Bible that says I cannot have more than one wife. Women are biologically designed to have one partner while men continue to produce viable sperm for the rest of their lives. Monogamy is a pagan degeneracy that is helping white genocide by keeping birth rates artificially low.

Wrong. Human infants are too weak to survive without both parents in the wild.

Because the government and feminism fucked marriage. Women are rewarded for divorcing.

That’s Sati. It’s an Indo-European tradition adopted by the Aryans when they came to India from Andronovo, so it’s missing from the more “Dravidic” branches of the faith. That Indian poster doesn’t know shit, Hinduism doesn’t exist. It’s like saying Europeanism is a religion with Roman, Greek and Pagan Norse Gods.

The major reason why divorce rate in India is low is because people don’t bother to register their marriages to the government portal, much less their divorce unless they need it for some documentation, which most rarely do. And women do “divorce”, they just go away from their husband’s house to their parents back and it’s really common. It’s a common theme in Indian culture with songs like “Mai maike chali jaungi, Tu dekhte rahiyo” (I will go back to my mother’s house, just watch!). Adding to this, the Vedic vows of marriage make it such that the Husband and Wife are united for 7 reincarnations, making the concept of “divorce” itself non-existent. But bridal separation isn’t unheard of. And widow remarriage was legalised after 2,000 years of continued Gupta law in 1947, so for urban women it’s not even an issue.

It is funny to note that in Europe, the countries who are more religious tend to have the lowest amount of divorce ratio while the atheist/secular ones tend to have the biggest,isn't it funny?
Oh and by religious I mean that people actually live by their religion's values and attend the liturgies.

The Hindu Remarriage Act was passed in 1856 by William Bentinick allowing Hindu widows to marry. It was welcomed by the lower castes since the lower castes did not practice the prohibition of widow remarriage or Sati. The upper castes Arya Samaj (Society of the Aryans) opposed it four times, attempting to pass legislation criminalising it for all castes, but William veto’d it. Shit like this is what made us look bad on an international stage.

The Athiest Jews were The architects of Communism in the early 1900s. A group at the Frankfurt School developed Critical Theory to convert the West to Communism.

Basically, the Frankfurt School plan was to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. They called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life to de-stabilize society and destroy what they saw as the 'oppressive' order.
They hoped their policies would spread like a virus--'continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means' as one of their members noted.
To further the advance of their 'quiet' cultural revolution - but giving us no idea about their plans for the future - the School recommended (among other things):
1 The creation of racism offences.
2 Continual change to create confusion
3 The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4 The undermining of schools' and teachers' authority
5 Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6 The promotion of excessive drinking
7 Emptying of churches
8 An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9 Creating dependency on the state or state benefits
10 Control and dumbing down of media
11 Encouraging the breakdown of the family

Attached: 7D7B961D-924F-4002-8B1C-E49B699B285D.jpg (1200x1800, 493K)

Can you please fuck off with this Hindu shit?
No one cares about your religion,you are nothing more than a British colony, keep your mouth shut.

>You are nothing more than a British colony
Well, the British are our colony now.

Monogamy is natural. It’s millions or years of survival of the fittest proves that it’s the most stable and survivable arrangement. Just because you want to fuck everything with a hole doesn’t mean it’s not natural.

Attached: 85FC1647-0441-42E1-A9D6-9670728659BA.jpg (1324x920, 830K)

I went to Italy once and noticed people talked to me directly in Italian and I had to tell them I was a foreigner. When I told a woman I was from India she went “Ohh I see.. I didn’t get that at first.”.

My Italian brother, we are bound by phenotype.

BVLL

Attached: 20B6A571-06A4-4ED0-832E-75B9F76B4CE7.jpg (1280x720, 232K)

Because the jews are destorying the white family. They want total control of the white race. They want less whites in the world because white people are their main enemy.

fpbp

I would like to add that I mean no offence to any Italians. Italy is a beautiful country with a glorious history, indeed, the Gupta traders are said to have bought marvellous artefacts from Rome during the Indo-Roman trade, and we all know about the legends of Caesar.

Absolutely based. I am also Southern European and we are all originally from India.

I wonder why...
Look at this instead
>en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Romania

Attached: Screenshot_2018-12-27-14-41-00.png (480x854, 88K)

REE, GET OUT

If the gupta traders saw aqueducts so long ago, why do you all still shit on the street?

>There is nothing in the Bible that says I cannot have more than one wife.
There literally is, retard

Gupta Empire got invaded by Huns, and BTFOed for all eternity

Cite it then, where it clearly states a man cannot have more than one wife.

>The British are our colony now
Like the sub-humans that you Indians and other tribes are,you mistake a small period of decay in Europeans as our end,our death...You don't understand that when all boomers die,all liberals get killed/die/disappear the only Europeans left will be hardcore ones,they'll preach what is preached here unironically.
Have fun while it lasts,once the weak Europeans die,you'll see why our ancestors colonised the whole world.

Why do sub-humans use always this strawman?Mediterraneans,which are quite a big part of Italians,as in pic related will never be found in India,you made me laugh,but at the same time I pity you,imagine being born as a lesser being, a non-European.
Don't call me brother,my only brothers and sisters are the people from european tribes

Attached: Mediterraneans.jpg (894x572, 94K)

Roman catholic women were pretty based back then ,sorry no translation but she is bashing politicians after franco death and prasing Franco
>youtube.com/watch?v=SOiMRksAIbU
She says she is catholic in 1:05

She also talks about jews and masonery at the start btw kek

Men should have as many wives as he wants and can equally support but women should only have one husband for their whole lives.

This is the natural way to go and for some reason Christians rejected this, even though Jesus himself endorsed one husband + many wives and even though there isn't a single biblical basis for monogamy, yet untold amount of basis for polygamy, mainly among the best men of God in the whole bible

As you state,women were based back then because men were based too,whores exists since the dawn of times,but they were always seen,treated and uses for what they were:cum dumpsters;on the other hand,women were protected and loved.
Nowadays whores are seen as women,that's the biggest problem,solve that and you solve everything.
The problem will sort itself out,many Europeans will die,the liberal ones,the globalists and such,but only the best will survive.
Just wait,better yourself and be prepared

Jesus himself says so you fucking idiot go get reading

Based and redpilled,unfortunately she is the old guard, those women were the ones who witnessed what aberration Communism is.
How's the political situation right now?I remember the "Podemos",but they look like basedboys and sounded like communist filth,though I might be wrong

Attached: 1545885702239m.jpg (1024x957, 127K)

I don't recall us fighting the Italians. It was mostly the English. In our history textbooks, the Irish were shown as allies against British Imperialism, how they suffered under the potato famine.

>you'll see why our ancestors colonised the world
Simply put, your ancestors occupied the world due to the geopolitical situation at that time. During the 1600s, the EIC several times tried to take control, in fact, the English were literally asked to bow down to Aurangzeb after they lost the Child's War in 1690.

The reason why the English were able to make a comeback was because India underwent a civil war starting from 1715 to 1758, fracturing the Mughal Empire.

I doubt that is the case today, and that any European army would be able to fend off the Indian forces without massive loses, or the annihilation of Europe and India itself. So your colonial fantasies that go to rest, one, you weren't a colonizing power, and two, the colonization was a product of geopolitics at that time which are completely different today.

>Your ancestors occupied the whole world due to geopolitics
And the technology advancements that they had over the non-Europeans.
Even if the colonisation ended you non-europeans are still wired to us,take for example what is happening right now:
You are speaking English,an european language
On an english board
From either a European or East Asian device
Even if you aren't a colony of the British empire,you are still influenced by the western world and you will always be,because it is the best and will always remain so.
The Indian army is nothing more than a giant with feet made of clay,do you really think that you could theoretically win?Do I need to remember the hygienic state of your country?