Why haven’t you read the ultimate redpill yet?

Jesus was a Jew

I have read it that's why I'm not a Christian

> the ultimate red pill
Pic Related IS the ultimate red-pill

Attached: kikesarenothebrewisraelites.jpg (640x925, 397K)

8ch.
net/pol/res/12611216.html

I think you mean blue pill

Christianity is all about rejecting knowledge and embracing blind servitude.

At least the Greek Gods were interesting and multifaceted. The Aberhamic God just seemed like a whiny boring asshole.

Attached: 400.jpg (585x307, 123K)

Yes read teh 1611 KJV !! Do it!!!
make sure it's the 1611 PERFECT version.

The 1611 KJV had a list of Holy Days to be observed throughout the year, including

– The Purification of the Blessed Virgin
– The Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin
– All Saints’ Day
– other Saints’ Days

The 1611 KJV had a calendar for each month of the year, which included:

A list of designated Saint Days!

A list of designated fast days!

A schedule of Scripture readings for morning and evening prayer which included passages from Judith, Wisdom & Ecclesiasticus). You know, those “uninspired,” “unauthoritative,” “unscriptural” books?

Attached: 1611-KJV-Holy Days.jpg (891x1400, 464K)

The REAL 1611 KJV had marginal cross-references to the Deuterocanonical books from the Septuigent:

– Daniel 8:25 – the note in the margin reads, “2 Macc. 6:9,” a cross-reference to a book of 2 Maccabees
– Matthew 6:7 – the note in the margin reads, “Ecclus. 7:16,” a cross-reference to a book of Ecclesiasticus
– Matthew 23:37 – the note in the margin reads, “Wisd. 2:15,16,” a cross-reference to a book of Wisdom
– Matthew 27:43 – the note in the margin reads, “4 Esd. 1:30,” a cross-reference to a book of 4 Esdra
– Luke 14:13 – the note in the margin reads, “Tob. 4:7,” a cross-reference to a book of Tobit
– John 10:22 – the note in the margin reads, “1 Macc. 4:59,” a cross-reference to a book of 1 Maccabees
– Hebrews 11:35 – the note in the margin reads, “2 Macc. 7:7,” a cross-reference to a book of 2 Maccabees

The 1611 KJV contained the Deuterocanonicals. Interesting that King James himself thought it important enough to spend the time and resources to have it translated and printed in a protestant bible.

Attached: KJV1611_Page t33 (Liturgy for the Annunciation of Mary).png (644x871, 1.42M)

Throwing a yiff straight off a cliff. Christ cucks get fucked. Schutzstaffel just awful. Better dead than red.

Attached: 1429772178914.gif (213x199, 336K)

>Aberhamic

Is that the god from Aberhame, Scotland?

At the time of Christ there was no consensus on a canon of scripture. Instead there were competing Jewish communities with different lists of books. Christ, the Apostles and the early Christians used the Septuagint as their primary Old Testament Bible. Of the approximately 300 Old Testament quotes in the New Testament, two-thirds of them are quotes from the Septuagint as opposed to the Hebrew Scriptures

How do we know? Because the wording of the Septuagint is sometimes different from that of the Hebrew Bible. A classic example of this is Isaiah 7:14. In the original Hebrew it states that a young woman (Hebrew: almah) will bear a child and he shall be called Emmanuel.
In the Greek Septuagint it states that a virgin (Greek: parthenos) will bear a child and he shall be called Emmanuel.

Matthew the Apostle, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, chooses the Greek Septuagint version of this verse to quote .They regarded as inspired. No Jewish council had defined a canon of books. The Pharisees revered 39 books, the same 39 found in Protestant Bibles today. Two other groups, the Sadducees and the Samaritans recognized only the first 5 books of Moses known as the Pentateuch (Genesis - Deuteronomy). The Essenes were a Jewish sect that held to a third list. The complete list of their revered books is not known; we only know that the list was different.
It should be noted that the Pharisees, Sadducees, Samaritans and the Essenes were geographically centered in Palestine. This is in stark contrast to our last Jewish group that was not only located in Palestine, but also dispersed throughout the known world. They therefore had a more far-reaching influence in their practices. This group was known as the Hellenists, the Greek speaking Jews dispersed throughout the Roman Empire. The Scriptures revered by this group were in the books contained in the Greek Septuagint.

Attached: KJV 1611 included the Apocrapha.jpg (800x712, 730K)

Here read it from the translators of the 1611 KJV mouths.

Translators’ Preface to the 1611 King James Version: “For as it is a fault of incredulity, to doubt of those things that are evident: so to determine of such things as the Spirit of God hath left (even in the judgment of the judicious) questionable, can be no less than presumption. Therefore as S. Augustine saith, that variety of Translations is profitable for the finding out of the sense of the Scriptures: [S. Aug. 2. de doctr. Christian. cap. 14.] so diversity of signification and sense in the margin, where the text is no so clear, must needs do good, yea, is necessary, as we are persuaded.”

In their preface to the 1611 King James Bible, the translators also praise St. Augustine and St. Jerome, even though Augustine and Jerome were Catholic saints whose views would be condemned as non-Christian by KJV-Onlyists in our day. In fact they defer to Catholic Saints opinions over 100 times on scripture!

Catholics believe in Scripture interpreted through the church's magesterium, based on the biblical promise from Jesus to Peter that his faith would not fail.

Also Paul taught us that the church is the bulwark of the truth.
So we believe in written tradition and verbal tradition.

Plus the Catholic Church has been arguing over the magesterium of translations for more than a 1000 years.

library.osu.edu/innovation-projects/omeka/exhibits/show/the-king-james-bible/sidebars/the-translators-preface-to-the

Attached: 1611-KJV-(Praise for St. Augustine).png (1551x496, 2.14M)

Here is a portion of the translators notes from the 1611 KJV of the Bible telling you that the Septuagint is biblical and "the word of God". The books that modern KJV bibles do not include in their bibles.

Translators’ Preface to the 1611 KJV: “But, when the fulness of time drew near, that the Sun of righteousness, the Son of God should come into the world, whom God ordained to be a reconciliation through faith in his blood, not of the Jew only, but also of the Greek, yea, of all them that were scattered abroad; then lo, it pleased the Lord to stir up the spirit of a Greek Prince (Greek for descent and language) even of Ptolemy Philadelph King of Egypt, to procure the translating of the Book of God out of Hebrew into Greek. This is the translation of the Seventy Interpreters, commonly so called, which prepared the way for our Saviour among the Gentiles by written preaching, as Saint John Baptist did among the Jews by vocal… The translation of the Seventy dissenteth from the Original in many places, neither doth it come near it, for perspicuity, gravity, majesty; yet which of the Apostles did condemn it? Condemn it? Nay, they used it, (as it is apparent, and as Saint Jerome and most learned men do confess) which they would not have done, nor by their example of using it, so grace and commend it to the Church, if it had been unworthy of the appellation and name of the word of God.”
library.osu.edu/innovation-projects/omeka/exhibits/show/the-king-james-bible/sections/item/72

Attached: 1611-KJV-(Septuagint is biblical 1).jpg (1271x534, 612K)

>worshipping a dead kike on a stick

I have more respect for Buddhist

The Textus Receptus is not the Majority text even though KJVonists would have you believe so.

Look up John 3:36 in the KJV and compare it to the Greek.

John 3:36 King James Version (KJV)
36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
biblehub.com/text/john/3-36.htm

and in the Greek
The [one] believing on the son has eternal life, the [one] moreoever not obeying the son will not see life but the wrath of God abides on him.
biblehub.com/interlinear/john/3-36.htm

Why ? Becuase if Jesus want's you to obey him it means you have to follow his Sacraments which is "works". Not by faith alone are you saved.
In order to follow the idea that you are saved by faith alone, they had to take out any referance to obidience in the KJV of the bible.
This is one of 100s of such instances in the KJV of the Bible that lead one down the road of solo fide (by faith alone) and Sola Scriptura (By scripture alone)

Pic related.

Read this page. Especially the part about the Majority text vs the textus Receptus. Watch the video if you are so inclined.

mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/is-the-king-james-bible-infallible/

Go here and read passage 41-46 and then ask your self why it was taken out of Protestant bibles. Praying for the dead... Why ?

bible.oremus.org/?passage=2 Maccabees 12:41–46:41&version=nrsvae

Attached: John 3 36 Greek Text Analysis.png (997x546, 48K)

Here is ONE reason the Apocrypha is so important.
The New Testament quotes the Old Testament which accepts the Catholic books of the Bible. This means that the New Testament writers accepted the Septuagint version, and thus the seven books which the Protestants reject.

... But there’s more. In Hebrews 11:35 of the Protestant and Catholic Bibles, we see a reference to an event which is only recorded in the Second Book of Machabees chapter 7.

Hebrews 11:35- “Women received their dead raised to life again: and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance; that they might obtain a better resurrection...”

This reference is found in only one place in the Bible. It’s found in 2 Machabees 7, which tells the story of the mother and her seven sons. This mother and her seven sons refused deliverance from torture so that they might receive resurrection with the just. So, in Hebrews 11:35, St. Paul is making reference to the Second Book of Machabees. This demonstrates that 2 Machabees, which the Protestant Bible doesn’t have, is part of the true
Old Testament. 2 Machabees chapter 12 clearly teaches prayer for the dead and therefore Purgatory.

2 Machabees 12:46- “It is therefore a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead, that they may be loosed from sins.”
This verse teaches Purgatory.

Attached: Amazin Grace.jpg (500x679, 122K)

- Daniel 8:25 - the note in the margin reads, "2 Macc. 6:9," a cross-reference to a book of 2 Maccabees in the Apocrypha
- Matthew 6:7 - the note in the margin reads, "Ecclus. 7:16," a cross-reference to a book of Ecclesiasticus in the Apocrypha
- Matthew 23:37 - the note in the margin reads, "Wisd. 2:15,16," a cross-reference to a book of Wisdom in the Apocrypha
- Matthew 27:43 - the note in the margin reads, "4 Esd. 1:30," a cross-reference to a book of 4 Esdra in the Apocrypha
- Luke 14:13 - the note in the margin reads, "Tob. 4:7," a cross-reference to a book of Tobit in the Apocrypha
- John 10:22 - the note in the margin reads, "1 Macc. 4:59," a cross-reference to a book of 1 Maccabees in the Apocrypha
- Hebrews 11:35 - the note in the margin reads, "2 Macc. 7:7," a cross-reference to a book of 2 Maccabees in the Apocrypha
*Significance: why have a cross-reference to "uninspired," "unauthoritative," "unscriptural" books?

Attached: 1611-KJV- (Lords Prayer).jpg (960x720, 115K)

>The original form of Christianity is not Christianity

Attached: images.png (226x223, 5K)

I did. It sucks.

>thinks the original form of Christianity involved Gentiles

Orthodox is the first form of Christianity you retard

It nothing, it just is.

youtube.com/watch?v=L14UNjaZJm8

Martin Luther was a shit eater heretic, who believed in the Catholic Church until he bowed down to Satan and let Satan in his asshole

Attached: Martin.jpg (225x225, 10K)

Christianity didn't start in the 4th century

because the bible was edited by satan
lilith and gabriel and if you can't solve
the puzzle before satan gets here, he
will rip you apart.

Attached: Untitled-23.jpg (666x636, 447K)

The Bible is the fucking original blue pill are you kidding me?

Luther (the Catholic Priest) believed in purgatory, indulgneces and that the office of the Pope was instituted by Christ.
He says so right in his 95 Thesis that he nailed to the Wittenburg Church. Even afterwards he said that only the Catholic Church was the way to heaven.
That Luther ?

I wonder if Prodestants have ever actually read Martin Luther's thesis.

The formal title for his 95 Theses is:
"The Disputation of Doctor Martin Luther on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences"
Oct. 31, 1517.

"The Power AND Efficacy of Indulgences"
Indulgences - Indulgences - Indulgences

In addition to acknowledging the Pope, indulgences and their efficacy, numbers 25-29 of the Theses acknowledge Purgatory.

here read this

#71 of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses
, Oct. 31, 1517:

“Let him be anathema and accursed who denies the apostolic character of the indulgences.”

people don't even know their own religon.

Also, check out Thesis 9, which affirms that the Holy Spirit works through the pope.

"9. Therefore the Holy Spirit in the pope is kind to us, because in his decrees he always makes exception of the article of death and of necessity." [emphasis added]

I doubt many today are celebrating Luther's "courageous" statement in Thesis 39 either:

"39. Nevertheless, the remission and participation [in the blessings of the Church] which are granted by the pope are in no way to be despised, for they are, as I have said, the declaration of divine remission." [emphasis added]

Theses 61 also affirms the pope's power:

"61. For it is clear that for the remission of penalties and of reserved cases, the power of the pope is of itself sufficient." [emphasis added]

Luther also affirms that God remits sins by subjecting sinners to his vicar, the priest.

"7. God remits guilt to no one whom He does not, at the same time, humble in all things and bring into subjection to His vicar, the priest."

Attached: St Theresa on Lutherns.jpg (595x384, 26K)

Jesus Christ is the lord!

My ADHD gets the better of me. Also I always have to reread pages after I read it the first time because of brainfog and my shitty reading comprehension... and the type of older Engish it's written in throws me off (In the King James, i think), but I'm told by people that the other versions of the bible in English aren't worth reading.

I just watch religious debates, documentaries and Videos about Catholicism online. I even learn how to say prayers via youtube :/ I feel retarded for admitting this.

Attached: stained_glass.jpg (750x500, 573K)

>entertainment
It's funny, you know to instinctively look for this and for nothing but this.

Wow, lots of heretics in here tonight.

Heres a redpill:

Only the 1611 KJV is the inspired and inerrant word of God. Not the Douay-Rheims nor the NIV, which has removed over 64,000 words!!

Salvation is by faith alone. Not lordship salvation, not Mary, not the pope, not baptism, not sacraments, not works.

>sacred text, been in the hands of humans for ~2000 yrs
>Humans

How can people assume this book is even valid? People really assume his sacred text by which we're suppossed to live by has not been altered over the years to for personal interests? I seriously doubt the "orginal release" is remotely close to the one we know today.
If you objectify an overall theme it is "obey or else" which is pretty convenient for any institution that seeks to control the masses.

Catholicism is cucked. But Orthodoxy is as redpilled as it gets.

Attached: 1492426192107.png (1570x1016, 71K)

Jesus never preached to gentiles, and ordered his apostles not to preach to gentiles. He said many times that he was sent specifically for the jews.

It was only after he was crucified that Paul went to Rome and started preaching to the gentiles, at which point Christianity changed into being a religion for everyone. But only because the jews didn't want any part of it

>Larping that you're a jew

You are an actual brainlet. Christianity immediately began to spread with the Orthodox church, arriving in Assyria, the first nation to adapt Christianity as their religion, and it continued to grow through the early first up to the third century.

Sometimes I just want to copy the best parts from the Bible (the parts without Jewish history, like Proverbs, Pslams, most of the New Testament), put it all together, Europeanize it, and just title it "The Good Book." That way it's easier to deal with. I hated going through Genesis and Deuteronomy and hearing about the lineage and laws that kikes wouldn't even follow. It always made me laugh when God would literally deliver them from certain death and subjugation, and the kike would find some way to betray God or bitch about it. They are some of the most grotesque, backstabbing, whorish people in all of creation. I can't count how many times people like Moses and Samuel and others would be absolutely disgusted by other Jews.

Attached: Christ-Chan 13.png (680x590, 417K)

>it’s only a religion if the state imposes it!

Lol.

Gonna need a little more info there boyo.

Ah yes, the book of the demiurge

That wasn't the point, that was just an extra fact. The point was Christianity began spreading immediately through the Orthodox church right after the death of Christ, and even a nation adapted it way before the 4th century, which that user claims was when Christianity was born LOL

Never forget!
Genesis 6:4

Also, would be wise to note that they abandoned their previous pagan/satanic gods and accepted Christ as a whole peoples right after his death.

youve got it backwards, but you might not like the truth either

Jesus preached only to the ISRAELITES, which are the people we now call the Caucasians
The only jews he interacted with were the race of people who had infiltrated the priesthood, slowly replacing the Levites. These people were called 'Rechabites' and are now known as jews, even though they have no genetic connection to Israelites

These fake jews were exposed by Jesus, he said they were the children of the devil, and did the deeds of the devil

Later, Paul was instructed to preach to the gentiles, which is all the non-white races, which includes the fake jews, the people that call themselves jews. They rarely have anything to do with Christianity, for various reasons

Watch pastor Charles Lawson!

King James financed scribes and translators, he probably didn’t read and definitely didn’t write the damn thing.

He didn’t even want to pay for it, but was endlessly petitioned.

The translators of he KJV didn't use any texts earlier than the 12th century A.D. The texts were in such bad shape that the compilers of the texts and the translators of the KJV used, the Vulgate and the Douay-Rheims Bible, to make corrections. Most passages in the KJV were not even translated, just lifted directly from the Douay-Rheims and Bishops' Bible.

Even Wikipedia will tell you that

>we wuz

He Didn't pay for any of it. Actually all the translators were volunteers. A circular letter was sent to Church of England bishops encouraging them to consider the translators for appointment to, "well-paid livings"

Acts 8:37 is removed from almost all translations except KJV

Attached: saved_or_being_saved.jpg (470x403, 42K)

Pastor anderson is a great source for the word. Its too bad baptists believe you dont need to be baptised to be saved

>christians don't understand the bible because they read and old ass version because they're paranoid their doctrines are being rewritten by satan

>Catholics believe in Scripture interpreted through the church's magesterium, based on the biblical promise from Jesus to Peter that his faith would not fail.

If the gates of hell hath not prevailed, why does the current pope say God loves fags when god says they are an abomination? Why does the pope say god made them that way when God says he gave them over to reprobate mind?

Why does the Catholic Church make tradition of things Christ commanded against, like calling their clergy “father” and engaging in vain repititions?

you misunderstand
we still are

look around you, look at all the nations that fly the red, white, and blue
look at which nations bless the entire world with their nobility, prosperity, culture, and technology
look at how how God has thoroughly blessed this one race, in complete fulfillment of all his promises
no other race fulfills the promises that God made, and God does not break his word

Amen, tindale and henry the 8th

Attached: 12717767_785313538279529_17255425541817759_n.jpg (750x627, 58K)

Paper and ink isn’t free, nor were the source materials cheap themselves, and unless I’m mistaken “well-paid livings” sounds like room and board and something to eat at the least.

>Acts 8:37
The verse is apparently only attested by the Erasmus manuscript of 1527 and a handful of Old Latin texts. The Erasmus text actually reads a little differently:

“Philip said, ‘If you believe with all your heart, you may be saved.’ And he replied, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God.'

The Catholic bibles have the verse in a foot note
usccb.org/bible/acts/8

Stating:"] The oldest and best manuscripts of Acts omit this verse, which is a Western text reading: “And Philip said, ‘If you believe with all your heart, you may.’ And he said in reply, ‘I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.’”"

You know, the Catholics, the guys that gave you your Bible in 340 AD (which included all the deuterocanonical bookss)

Even if there is one person teaching the true Catholic doctrine, then the devil has not prevailed. This same thing happened during the Arian heresy time and we overcame it

Been more interested in 19th century Spiritualism.

Sounds awfully Protestant to me, fampai.

How can souls be real if they can't be detected by CERN?

Reminder all anyone needs is the Orthodox Study Bible

did it occur to you brilliant people that God has no intention of losing any of his souls, if he can possibly prevent it?
if you choose not to study the words he has left for you, the result might be serious humiliation
the Bible says that the entire world will wonder at the Antichrist, and whore themselves to the Beast
I would be more worried about what the Bible says about those things, rather than whether you are 'saved,' which feels like such a rudimentary thing
as if the creator of the universe would be inconvenienced by the details of your personal beliefs

Come join us on /christian/! Info in pic related! God bless and Happy New Year!

Attached: 1525716976147.jpg (573x591, 142K)

The Pope can say whatever he wants. He can sin, he can be petty, he can sin just like all men.
You have to ask yourself. If the gates of hell have prevailed against Jesus's church, which is where Paul is. Then what ? Jesus was wrong ?

Why does the Catholic church make tradition out of calling people father ? I dunno. Ask Paul. he was called father. Was Paul taken by the devil and disobeyed God or maybe... just maybe, YOU don't understand the verse. What's more likely ?

Vain repetition like exactly how Jesus taught us to pray in the bible ? You do relize that jesus was talking about the Jews repetition for hours and hours.

The actual verse says, "And in praying do not heap up empty phrases (“vain repetitions” in KJV) as the Gentiles do; for they think that they will be heard for their many words."

Now why would jesus teach us to pray the Our father ?
Why do angels pray day and night the same verse ?
Revelation 4:8:

And the four living creatures, each of them with six wings, are full of eyes all round and within, and day and night they never cease to sing, “Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord God Almighty, who was and is and is to come!”

These “four living creatures” refer back to four angels, or “Seraphim,” that Isaiah saw as revealed in Is. 6:1-3 about 800 years earlier, and guess what they were praying?

Maybe once again you don't understand the verse, because you self interprete the bible instead of getting your teaching from the bulwark of the truth. the church.

Right the great savior of modern Christianity. King James the homosexual.. I'm sold, which of the 35,000 protesting groups do I sign up at ?

Wait Jesus left us a bible ?
Wow I missed that part in the Bible.
I thought he left us a church and priests to confess our sins to and sacraments to keep the commandment in John 3:36 to obey him.

I’m in the same boat user. What you need to understand, is that the bible isn’t something you read, it’s something you study. Read 5 pages a day, and research those 5 pages after. Look up what the message of those pages. As time goes by, you will start to find things a little easier in terms of old English.

>Then what ? Jesus was wrong ?
No, Catholics were. Couldn’t have been more clear about that.

>You do relize that jesus was talking about the Jews repetition for hours and hours.
oh you mean like saying 40 hail mary’s After allowing a man who is not Christ to act as an intermediary between you and god?

Btw, Jews aren’t gentiles. Oops!

>Now why would jesus teach us to pray the Our father ?
Did you just admit you pray to mortal men? Oops.
Your clergy isn’t god and the angels weren’t praying to your clergy.

I feel like you didnt put much thought into this at all.

Already told you he probably didn’t read it and definitely didn’t write it. He didn’t even want to pay for it

I don't see an issue reading other English translations. I've read the Bible in KJV, while it was great, I also get blessed by reading other English translations.

I would recommend the EXB (Expanded Bible) translation if you're an autist like myself. Also be sure to check us out on /christian/! God bless!

biblegateway.com/versions/Expanded-Bible-EXB/

Attached: 1522262990736.jpg (516x787, 181K)

whats the best 1611 kjv version to purchase? the one in OP pic?

Mostly a problem with bible translators, no one is out there to get you, you're walking money

For liberty
youtu.be/FeNYjYA2lVg

Attached: 2a.webm (1280x720, 1.26M)

Biblehub.com has Strong’s KJV, the KJV with all of the text hyperlinked to the Greek and Hebrew source language with translations, notes, and different appearances in the Bible.

In fact, those translations don't include these words because they weren't in the originals which they are handling, which is the problem with your waifu-translation. Your waifu-translation has verses other ancient texts don't have.

Why do Christians even bother to argue with the retards here? No matter what you say they are convinced the Jews are responsible for every bad thing going on in the world today. They are beyond reason and have the most jaded view of paganism I have ever seen.

FTR I am Deist.

So let me get this straight. For 1500 years Catholics were wrong and everyone goes to hell, until we are all saved by Martin Luther and the KJV 1611 edition.. Yeah don't think so. Jesus left us a church and he promised that it's faith would not fail and it would last until he came back. Now you believe this to just mean Christians right ? Well Christians have to do what the church God left us says to do. that's why he gave it the power to bind on earth as in heaven. Part of that is to be a church that is universal and seen and is a teaching church. It is also a ministry of reconciliation, as the bible says. Reconciliation is confession. It also is to administer a sacrifice as jeus told us to do with the Eucharists. now every christian believed this until the late 1500's. So who's right ?

An Christ tell's us to to confess to the apostles and the apostles tell the men they laid hands on , "made priests" that they have thier power. Or do you think the ability to forgive sin died with the last apostle ?

Do I pray to mortal men. No. Do you ?
We don't pray to clergy,a re you nuts ?

So tell us, what is the right church ? Who has it right ? Go on. Which church exactly.

The one that translate John 3:36 properly.
Which is called the Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition.

Proof by assertion isn’t proof. We can point directly at claims of the pope being in defiance of God; we can look at practices and see where Christ forbid them.

In fact, we already did this! And you really struggled to give a very embarrassing answer and when that was refuted you posted this sad stack of letters.

Newsflash! If the leader of your church disagrees with and mocks God, you aren’t the true church.

are you retarded

So you think we must obey not believe?

>god’s word needs to be revised.
Classic Catholicism.
Also, from your version:
36 He who believes in the Son has eternal life; he who does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God rests upon him.
Uh oh! That sounds like faith and not works to me!
Oops.

Mocks God according to who ? You?
Or 1900 years of unchanging dogma?

But why would Christ contradict himself?
Hmmmm.

Thanks, Buddha.

What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? 15 If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, 16 and one of you says to them, “Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,” but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does it profit? 17 Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.

etc etc

Not like I care about your desert tales

We must do both.
James 2:14-19 Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
Faith without Works Is Dead

14 What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith save him? 15 If a brother or sister is ill-clad and in lack of daily food, 16 and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and filled,” without giving them the things needed for the body, what does it profit? 17 So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.

18 But some one will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I by my works will show you my faith. 19 You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe—and shudder.
24 Do you see that by works a man is justified; and not by faith alone?
26 For even as the body without the spirit is dead; so also faith without works is dead.

Martin Luther told us "No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day."
Martin Luther was incorrect.

I love how boomer fake christian larpers spend so much time on a cambodian mountain climbing forum.

Christ (from your preferred version) says:
> 9 And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.
Your pope says:
>Call me father
The word itself is rooted in the word father

This is mocking god.

Anyone have anything on Manichaeism?